"This is pleasant to imagine, and I suppose it’s true up to a point, but who doesn’t know a lot of big readers who are jackasses from head to toe? One thing’s certain: The writers who insist on the morally improving nature of fiction, and who robe themselves in the folds of wisdom or beneficence, tend to be the ones to avoid. 'If there is any test that can be applied to movies,' Pauline Kael wrote — her test applies to books, too — 'it’s that the good ones never make you feel virtuous.' Saunders’s new novel, 'Vigil,' is slim, about the size of Mitch Albom’s memoir 'Tuesdays with Morrie' or Richard Bach’s novella 'Jonathan Livingston Seagull.' It’s not as soft and shallow and saccharine and strenuously earnest as those books, but it’s not impossibly far off. It’s a hot-water bottle in print form. It’s going to be an enormous best seller for depressing reasons.... [I]t’s about an angel named Jill who presides at the deathbed of an oil tycoon and determined planet despoiler named K.J. Boone...."
Writes Dwight Garner, in "George Saunders Serves a Heavy Helping of Virtue in a New Novel/In 'Vigil,' an oil tycoon on his deathbed receives a visit from an angel" (NYT).

41 comments:
‘A swim in a pond in the rain’ is, in my opinion, the finest introduction to Russian short story writers. Magic.
The audiobook version of ‘A swim in the pond in the rain’ is narrated by Saunders, and gives even more of a feel for the person.
Thank God for oil tycoons.
They created a glorious world of wealth, freedom to travel, pharmaceuticals… well, just about everything.
Oil tycoons and Shouting Thomas are both moral parasites. It’s clear what the tycoons get out of it.
I read a lot. A couple books a week for 60-70 years now. (Currently pigging out on Alan Furst, Book 5 in the Night soldiers series)
I am glad to find out that this will make me expansive and generous at some time in the future.
John Henry
One thing is certainly true, if you are reading stuff that makes you feel virtuous, you know, the only true upright citizen, the one who knows to a certainty that ever action you don't like is "unconstitutional" and "lawless" on account of you don't like it, well, you are being manipulated, certainly to separate you from your money, but probably also to make you enthralled to the will of people whose motives you likely never would approve.
Propagandists are like the perfumers of ancient Paris, one of the stinkiest cites in the world, well my father's memories of Cairo from WWII, may call that into question, but you know what? The Egyptians were famous for their perfumes too! OK, I am on a tangent from that great movie "Perfumer: The story of a murderer" that's on Criterion, but propagandists are the perfumers of evil, and they do it by making you feel virtuous.
I don't think I know any oil TYCOONS, but I do know a decent number of oil executives from small- to mid-cap companies, and they're just normal people.
That said, we had lunch this weekend with a friend who had more occasion to know the execs of bigger companies, and he was describing one of them to us, a CFO. This guy is a South African national and - from our friend's account - absolutely obsessed with sex. On his third marriage, each wife younger and more... enhanced... than the previous one; each wife resigned to being in an "open marriage" in which her husband keeps a bang-pad for his prostitute habit and tries to entice other men in his circle to join him there. He brings strippers and prostitutes - multiple, not one at a time - to work events that he travels to. He talks, in mixed company including his wife of the moment, about wanting to teabag other attendees or be pegged. When introduced to a woman, he doesn't hesitate to say, "Didn't I bang you? No? Well, I'm sure we made out."
Sounds like a prince, huh? I've never been happier only to be in the 1% instead of the 0.1%.
I'm with Thomas. Triangle man not so much. He sounds a bit tetched.
I don't care much about oil and oil men. I do love what oil and oil men have brought us in the way of modern civilisation.
And let's never forget Matthew Boulton and his partner James Watt. We should be praising them every moment of our waking days for bringing us portable power.
John Henry
John Henry
Triangle Man does not understand the underpinnings of modern society, clearly.
It just now occurred to me, for the very first time, that Watt was the beard and Boulton the suit. Like Wozniak and Jobs.
Unlike Wozniak and Jobs, it is the beard that is remembered and the suit who is forgotten.
John Henry
Don't forget that oil men caused the arctic ice cap to completely melt in the year 2000.
It got better, though.
John Henry
Yeesh. That sounds horrible. I gave up on his stories after about five of them. There was a science fiction story that didn't seem to understand how science fiction works and multiple stories about how evil those people who live in nice houses in the suburbs are. I'd had enough. But then one of my book groups read Lincoln in the Bardo and I thought it was brilliant, one of the very few great books of this century. Sorry to hear he's descended to Jonathan Livingstone Seagull levels (ouch) again.
Movie pitch: Snob appeal meets virtue signaling.
There are strange people out there who would rather we live in mud huts if it prevented John D. Rockefeller from becoming insanely wealthy.
They wouldnt just the proles
Countinghouses were necessary how did Dickens get paid by barter chris holm a virtuous hedger funds extinction rebellion also see neville singham
Triangle Man said...
“Oil tycoons and Shouting Thomas are both moral parasites. It’s clear what the tycoons get out of it.”
Not sure why you think they are parasites. But if someone’s gonna be a parasite, it’s good that they are moral ones.
Pay no attention to Triangle Man, poor man, he's still grieving over the inversion of the Food Pyramid.
I like angels. It's all in how author handles it.
A wonderful angel comes to visit "The Bishop's Wife," and he even looks like Cary Grant.
As the last generation to be shaped fully by modernity during their youth, Boomers tend toward binary thinking.
All one or all the other. Oil men bad or oil men heroes.
Life is trickier as is morality. JK Rowling got this, making very moral books but without idealizing or demonizing. Was Snape good? Was Dumbledore perfect?
Oil barons were often immoral sociopaths who did some good. Of course we tend to see onlyvfrom our benefits, but I know folks in Appalachia and other places who saw justice very distorted amd family land and community life devastated from massive corruption, Minneapolois sized.
Good Lit reflects that complication. Meanwhile it seems very weird to say instucting morality isnt part of Lit. So Dickens or Dostoevsky or Twain or Tolkien are not good literature?
The good ones make you feel lucky. Gratitude is one of the few things that is never in over-abundance.
I’m going to tell you a strange story. Just about everybody believes that labor unions fought a pitched battle for better conditions and wages. This is simply false. Henry Ford instituted the 5 day week, $5 a day wage, with weekends on his own initiative. He even built housing for his factory workers. The great, glorious fight against the wicked industrialists is a rearview mutilation of what actually happened in the past. The modern, oil based, car based society was created out of enlightened self-interest. Yeah, Ford made a fortune. That’s capitalism working. My first degree was in literature, but I’ve really begun in light of this story to question all the heroic tales of battles against The Man.
"The Man" plays the traditional Satan character in modern religious scripture.
Ford was also equal opportunity he hired men, women, black, whit, Christian, jew and promoted them based on ability.
"I don't care whether a man graduated from Harvard or Sing Sing provided they can work"
Shouting Thomas : "I’m going to tell you a strange story. Just about everybody believes that labor unions fought a pitched battle for better conditions and wages. This is simply false."
ST needs to read about the "battle of the overpass" just outside Ford's Rouge Plant in Dearborn MI. Unions weren't formed for no reason...
Reading makes you expansive and generous is like travel is widening.
Too much self-praise.
Travel and reading might make you a finer, bigger person, but these are also things you do in pursuit of pleasure. It might intersect with virtue, but the idea that it just does and you're better because you read/travel is ridiculous... and probably elitist, and elitism isn't a virtue.
Everybody knows literature can't make you virtuous. That's the job of chamber music.
Jaq writes "...propagandists are the perfumers of evil, and they do it by making you feel virtuous."
Brilliant! No one has said this better or more succinctly. My admiration is unbounded.
https://www.clemmergroup.com/blog/2023/02/01/weve-never-had-it-so-good-a-review-of-superabundance/
I heard the authors of this book on Jordan Peterson's podcast a few years ago. Fascinating. (I haven't read the book). One of the primary points they stressed is that the single most important factor in lifting people out of real poverty (as in real income of less than $1 a day) is the availability of cheap energy--primarily oil.
George Saunders must walk everywhere, if he's hopes to replace my contempt with neutrality.
If only it was so easy. You have to compare it to what you would do if you were not reading. Maybe he just doesn't have any better way to use his time. A lot of human time was spent reading Mein Kampf, and The Communist Manifesto, so....
Speaking of the incredibly wealthy. I was first trained in liberal arts (music, literature, graphic arts). In my mid 30s, I switched almost entirely to tech (programming, instructional design, UI design). But I still looked at the world almost entirely from the standpoint of the liberal arts. Under the influence of Elon Musk, I’ve begun to try to re-orient my mind to understand this world thru First Principles, an engineering method. This is really a fascinating change that I recommend to everybody who’s stuck entirely in the liberal arts mentality (and that includes law).
Rockefeller's kerosene lit a lot of lamps in China--back in the day.
boatbuilder said...
single most important factor in lifting people out of real poverty (as in real income of less than $1 a day) is the availability of cheap energy--primarily oil.
Not wrong but not quite right, either. If the energy can't be used, it has no value. I would put the invention of portable power, Boulton & Watt's steam engine that could be placed anywhere and run anything as #1.
Then I would put energy #2 but for most of history up to today that has been primarily coal. Oil and its cousin NG are #1 now but coal is still a close 2nd.
John Henry
Somehow, the Ford security team, who stood their ground on Ford property resisting efforts of strikers to invade the plant using violence, tend to be portrayed as the bad guys in the Battle of the Overpass.
RC Belaire, were the Ford Security team wrong to resist the effort to invade the plant?
Was the union wrong to attempt to invade the plant? Were they wrong to use force to attempt the invasion?
Yes, Harry Bennett was a pretty nasty spud. We can agree on that.
And who did the jobs belong to, anyway? Henry Ford, the man that made it his life's work to create the jobs? (And his team, of course) or the employees who did nothing to create the jobs?
Seems to me that they were Ford's jobs to give or withhold.
I'll admit a personal bias. Ford developed the Toyota Production System starting in about 1910. I've made a pretty good living off of TPS for the past 35 years.
But we are veering way off topic and I'll shut up now.
John Henry
Not only China, SV, all around the world. I knew families in the 1950s in upstate NY (near Ticonderoga) who still lit their houses and cooled their food with kerosene, no electric.
Also, Rockefeller owned some of the major coal mining and distribution companies.
They had michael ironside (stock heavy) play bennett in the tv movie
Now the Ford Foundation is a den of scum and villainy
Have Billy Bob Thornton play the oil tycoon in the movie, and he'll give as much as he gets.
I thought it must be confusing for George Saunders to have the same name as the actor. Only now do I find out that the actor was George Sanders.
Writer Saunders seems to be getting into a Dickens or Capra jag: characters floating between life and death and beset by spirits. Writer Saunders in bad decline?
Don draper was the tycoon in season one of landman, much as john dutton was for five seasons on yellowstone,
who was the falcon in the series of films
Triangle Man hates Person Man.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.