The court has been inundated with applications arising from President Trump’s blitz of executive orders, many of them seeking to pause or limit trial court rulings blocking the administration’s aggressive agenda, notably in immigration.... The Temporary Protected Status program, enacted by Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush, allows migrants from nations that have experienced national disasters, armed conflicts or other extraordinary instabilities to live and work legally in the United States. Mr. Trump has tried to end protections under the program as he seeks to make good on his campaign promise to deport millions of immigrants. His efforts aimed to terminate the protections for nearly 350,000 people in early April, and for hundreds of thousands more later this year.
May 19, 2025
"Supreme Court Lets Trump Lift Deportation Protections for Venezuelans/A federal judge had blocked the administration’s plan to remove the temporary protected status of more than 300,000 immigrants."
The NYT reports.
Posts
32 comments:
Progress.
Trump is pursuing emigration reform in order to mitigate forward-looking collateral damage.
The order on Friday seemed out of place. And this action today is puzzling. What's going on with Roberts?
Win some, lose some. There doesn't seem to be a clear pattern here.
What did they do for people in the US who experienced armed craziness and extraordinary instability in blue states during Covid mania? I want to be sent to Switzerland or the Bahamas, please. Maybe send me to both alternating with the seasons. Ski and sand.
I demand equity for sane people.
I'm sure they will all be welcome in Canada.
Mr. Trump has tried to end protections under the program as he seeks to make good on his campaign promise to deport millions of immigrants.
Doing what he said he would do? Unheard of.
“ …to make good on his campaign promise to deport millions of immigrants.”
Dante’s inferno is not bad enough for these people misrepresenting Trump at every turn.
"Supreme Court LetsTrump..."
Every time I think I hate the NYT too much, they prove me wrong.
"allows migrants from nations that have experienced national disasters, armed conflicts or other extraordinary instabilities to live and work legally" Doubly corrupt: falsely applied to Venezuela, and not "temporary."
Skeptical Voter : "Win some, lose some. There doesn't seem to be a clear pattern here. "
That's the pattern. The Chief Justice thinks that awarding 5 yard penalties against each team, roughly evenly, will persuade the fans not to boo the ref. This theory has been tested to destruction, without success, but Johnny is all in on it.
Agree with boatbuilder. Supreme Court seemed to recognize that Venezuelans don't meet any of the criteria for Temporary Protected Status. Venezuela isn't having a civil war (maybe 17 years ago when Chavez came to power, but now). There isn't a natural disaster (although certainly a political disaster for the last 17 years). And as for extraordinary or temporary conditions, as Sebastian notes, 17 years isn't temporary.
Otherwise, the Supreme Court already gave one hell of a due process of requiring a certain (although uncertain, because how long hasn't been decided) amount of time for deportees to be notified before deportation. That's a big loophole for the activist judges to put up national injunctions on what is notification and what is sufficient time, for nearly every one of the deportees that claim it isn't enough.
"Let's Trump lift"! Oh did the Roberts' court let him? Or did they decide it was well within his duties as POTUS to do so? There is a big difference NYT. Big, big one. Watch out! You're veering dangerously close to the conservative interpretation that the Constitution is there to constrain Government from violating our rights. I'm with you if you want to go there.
But do you?
Why in the f*ck would the Biden junta wish to give special protection to illegal immigrants from Venezuela, whose current leadership are our professed enemies?
May I suggest an immigrant tax of $50,000 or so per year for any asylum seeker not yet adjudicated as properly a legal refugee, and $100,000 per year for anyone who did not enter through a legal port of entry, and does not have a green card? Sure, we won't deport them any faster, but have you ever seen a tax the Dems didn't love? The exploding heads from the "want tax but want migrants" dissonance would be a nice sound this Fourth of July.
I don’t know the numbers, but according to Law360, the court made clear that the administration could not revoke protected status already granted with the end date in October 2026.
- Krumhorn
According to Politico, 350,000 can be deported. It leaves the question of 250,000 others up in the air. For reference, the population of Toledo, OH is 265,000. The population of Cincinnati is 311,000. Biden fucked us but good.
- Krumhorn
Catastrophic Anthropogenic Immigration Reform. Obama, Biden, Clinton et al in ethnic Springs, etc. The third world war, but, it was mostly black and brown lives, and white lives, don't matter. Hopefully, Trump et al will successfully pursue emigration reform.
Krumhorn: The Law360 article refers to last Friday's emergency docket decision about Trump's use of the Alien Enemy Act. Today's decision is about revoking Biden's clearly illegal blank temporary parole status.
Mike (MJB Wolf) said...
The order on Friday seemed out of place. And this action today is puzzling. What's going on with Roberts?
Roberts is in an untenable situation. Foreign invaders are 100% under the purview of the article to powers of the president. There is no place in the constitution that gives the courts any power to interfere with the presidents ability to protect our borders and deal with foreign invaders.
But Roberts serves globalist Masters and his purpose is to slow down and stop President Trump from doing what he was elected to do by majority of the US population.
The wheel of the majority of the electorate will be implemented. These four invaders will be removed from the country. The only question is how much integrity are the courts going to burn trying to stop Trump from doing with the majority of Americans want him to do.
Just view Roberts as an enemy of the constitution and an enemy of the country, trying to do everything that he can to serve his globalist masters and his actions become much more understandable.
Make Tren de Aragua In Aragua Again
Krumhorn: The Law360 article refers to last Friday's emergency docket decision about Trump's use of the Alien Enemy Act. Today's decision is about revoking Biden's clearly illegal blank temporary parole status.
No, that Law360 article was about today's 8-1 decision. Sort of a breaking news release without a lot of details.
- Krumhorn
Use of the term "immigrants" in the title is a bit of sly base-stealing by the publishers. "Immigrants" assumes a lot of things about their intentions in entering the US and implies even more about how they ought to be viewed. Sort of like how the term "illegal immigrant" implicitly gives illegal aliens the status of "immigrant," implying they have more moral right to remain in the country than normal, law-abiding foreigners present in the US on non-immigrant visas.
its the Carlos Slims Times, mind you Mexico was less willing to let access from their southern border as recently as 2014,
then the Darien access point, figured into the matter,
"Use of the term "immigrants" in the title is a bit of sly base-stealing by the publishers."
Anytime I read/hear "immigrant" in anything from the MSM, I assume they're talking about "illegal aliens".
Isn't the key question here who has the legal power to decide who gets temporary protected status and for how long? Why doesn't the article put that front and center?
Gerda Sprinchorn said...
Isn't the key question here who has the legal power to decide who gets temporary protected status and for how long? Why doesn't the article put that front and center?
Because that is clearly not the Judicial Branch.
They cannot be honest about what they want or what their goals are. They cannot be honest about the constitutional issues.
Foreign invaders are clearly as a subject under the control and disposition of Article 2 and the executive.
The Legislative branch can create legal paths for people to get Visas, apply for Asylum, and get temporary work permits as long as the president signs them.
People who do not take any of the legislated paths are nothing but foreign invaders at it is 100% up to The Executive capitalized as defined by article 2 how to defend our borders from foreign invasion.
The Supreme Court and all of these District Court "Judges" have absolutely Zero constitutional authority in this situation. And Judge that tries to usurp Article 2 constitutional authority should be impeached.
Good. Fewer raped and impregnated children and murdered young cops in my zip code. Gainesville, GA. Burt Jones, Governor VP, is scum.
Send them all back to Venezuela, stat. OR any country that lets the charter flight land. Book entire fleet of charter planes available for next year - but get it done before midterms.
The recently-arrived migrants in Chicago are far tougher bunch than our rapper-adjacent street gangs. These military-age migrant gangbangers' murders tend to be grisly rather than simple bang-bangs of traditional Chicago south and west-side gangs. All garnered by reading CWB blog and Secondcitycop blog. Unfortunately these two blogs have more comprehensive and accurate news than Trib, SlumTimes, and NPR affiliate WBEZ combined.
The court has been inundated with applications arising from President Trump’s blitz of executive orders, many of them seeking to pause or limit trial court rulings blocking the administration’s aggressive agenda, notably in immigration
You can always trust the NYT to get everything wrong
1: The Trump Admin has been "inundated" with illegitimate lawsuits blocking its legitimate actions
2: It is the Democrat run "trial courts" that have the "aggressive agenda" of blocking the elected President from enforcing the law
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
24A1059 NOEM, SEC., DHS, ET AL. V. NAT. TPS ALLIANCE, ET AL.
The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted. The March 31, 2025 order entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, case No. 3:25-cv-1766, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
This order is without prejudice to any challenge to Secretary Noem's February 3, 2025 vacatur notice insofar as it purports to invalidate EADs, Forms I-797, Notices of Action, and Forms I-94 issued with October 2, 2026 expiration dates. See 8 U. S. C. §1254a(d)(3).
Justice Jackson would deny the application.
Not clear what that second paragraph is about. But the first paragraph is pretty clear
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.