February 21, 2025

"The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients?"/"It's sitting on my desk right now...."

28 comments:

Temujin said...

Time to play.

tcrosse said...

I swear I thought she was 18.

Leland said...

I'm curious how much Epstein's guest list matches Diddy's.

Wince said...

Well, isn’t that why they went to Epstein Island in the first place?

“Release.”

The Middle Coast said...

Let’s go ahead and say that Pam Bondi did not kill herself.

Readering said...

There is no list. There are no no doubt many Epstein documents in the hands of the government that could be released. Good luck making heats or tails of them.

Dave Begley said...

Tom Hanks
Bill Clinton
Bill Gates
Chuck Schumer
Adam Schiff
AOC
Jeff Bezos
Harvey Weinstein
Bill Cosby

Jaq said...

"Good luck making heats or tails of them."

Kind of like the funds transfers between the 20 shell corporations controlled by Joe and Jill Biden.

Hassayamper said...

As much as I want to see some of these scumbags brought low, we should at least stop to think about the precedent here. Is releasing raw FBI investigatory material outside a courtroom prosecution setting not rather worrisome? Some of it is bound to be mistaken, hearsay, or outright malicious lies.

We've come through a decade when the Deep State scum did stuff like this all the time to Trump and their other Trump-adjacent enemies, so I am not at all sorry that the shoe is on the other foot now, but could this come back in future to do harm to our side? (By which I mean the side of unfettered liberty and adherence to the Constitution, certainly not the Republican party.)

Jaq said...

Game theory says that if you don't dish out some tat, you will lose. It's like the hitter who has trouble with a curve ball, until he proves he can hit it, he's not going to see anything else, and if he never does, he gets cut loose.

This is how Russia ended up with its back to the wall and why it finally had to fight, because it just kept taking it no matter what NATO did, then when Russia finally drew a line, we said that they didn't mean it because the fact that they didn't stand up to us before proved that they were weak.

You can't negotiate with people from weakness, especially when the stakes are this high.

wildswan said...

The way I understand it Epstein's island was billed as fun but, as anyone would find who went there once, it was only fun if you were drunk and high on drugs and wanted servile, underage girls, not stormy, mature women.

Krumhorn said...

Is releasing raw FBI investigatory material outside a courtroom prosecution setting not rather worrisome? Some of it is bound to be mistaken, hearsay, or outright malicious lies.

Sort of like the release of the election interference investigation documents.

- Krumhorn

n.n said...

Democratic law does not allow discrimination of queer sexual orientations. #NoJudgment #NoLabels

I wonder if a progressive party will demand, and a liberal judge will issue, a restraining order to ensure forward-looking sanctuaries, equity, and inclusion.

Freder Frederson said...

Dave Begley, I hope you are ready for a defamation suit if any of those names don't show up on the list. Because you are just pulling names out of your ass of people you don't like.

And didn't you get the memo, Bezos is now a good guy.

Larry J said...

"As much as I want to see some of these scumbags brought low, we should at least stop to think about the precedent here. Is releasing raw FBI investigatory material outside a courtroom prosecution setting not rather worrisome? "

Epstein allegedly killed himself in 2019. If there is an active FBI investigation, why is it taking so long? Is this like some of the investigations into Hunter Biden that took so long, the statute of limitations expired?

Jamie said...

Epstein allegedly killed himself in 2019. If there is an active FBI investigation, why is it taking so long?

I started a (typically) long comment, in response to Hassayamper's very valid questions, along these same lines. The essence of it (let's see if I can even do this) was, it seems after so much time has passed that there ought to be a way to release the verified information from the investigation, provenance and chain of custody documented and presented along with the information itself.

Mr. T. said...

" Good luck making heats or tails of them."

Oh there is plenty of head and lot's of tail to be learned about-and why the democrats and left always say they are "for the children."


Because they just loooovvve the children...

The underage children...

Iman said...

Watching Kash Patel speak after his swearing in… his statement affirming the greatness of our country brought a tear to my eye… his entire statement was refreshing. The people in the cabinet are genuine, they are real. And they inspire confidence.

Leland said...

Freder, are you associating a list of names by Dave Begley made without context to being on Epstein's list? That's a bold statement by you.

Hannio said...

"Freder, are you associating a list of names by Dave Begley made without context to being on Epstein's list? That's a bold statement by you."

Curses! Foiled again!

Leland said...

I hear you, Hassayamper. What you note is what Mark Felt famously did during Watergate. But how many times do Democrats get to do what Mark Felt did, James Comey did in releasing the Steele Dossier, Vindman did in releasing Trump's conversation with Zelensky, and Christopher Wray did in releasing photos from the Mar-a-lago raid before we say maybe they'll use the tactic against their political foes regardless of what anyone else does?

rehajm said...

There are ‘important’ people who know they’re on the list who are on a panic with the threats of the list being released. Do I call my PR people to get the ball rolling? Can I afford the PR team now that Trump is pulling the punch bowl away? Is it too late to suck up to Stacey Abrams? Did she spend all her grift yet?

Lazarus said...

There is such a fog about this. I asked AI how many people on Epstein's list were at the SNL 50 Years Gala and it said none. A list of "Epstein associates" was released a year ago and didn't yield much of interest. So, were Tom Hanks and Bill Clinton on the island? Do we even know?

At this point isn't everyone half wishing Tom Hanks was on the island for something illegal and maybe guilty of crimes against humanity as well?

William50 said...

To Hassayamper ,

Sorry but cutesy time is over.

Mason G said...

"Is it too late to suck up to Stacey Abrams?"

Get close enough and gravitation will take over.

Big Mike said...

Pam Bondi is going to wake up tomorrow morning to find the severed head of a horse next to her in bed, nothing on top of her desk, and all of the security cameras in her office disabled.

Aggie said...

..."Is releasing raw FBI investigatory material outside a courtroom prosecution setting not rather worrisome? "

Yes, to be fair it is worrisome - but since passenger manifests are not necessarily private information - then maybe all of the passenger lists for flights to-and-from Epsteins island should be published, in full detail. Then we'll let the frequent fliers speak for themselves, if they choose to, if anybody should choose to ask. No reason to publish FBI investigation materials, but I wouldn't object to them being leaked for purely destructive reasons - since this seems to be an accepted practice now. I understand there were lots of cameras, and a ton of video CDs recovered.

FredSays said...

Very simply, the hype will exceed the results.

Post a Comment

Comments older than 2 days are always moderated. Newer comments may be unmoderated, but are still subject to a spam filter and may take a few hours to get released. Thanks for your contributions and your patience.