... so many that he lost count. I'll copy them all, and don't think I skipped one (he jumped from "Third" to "Fifth" [ADDED: and from "Tenth" to "Twelfth"]):
As a lawyer, former federal prosecutor, and current member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I have a few questions about the FBI’s raid of Mar a Lago. First, did Attorney General Garland personally sign off on this action?
Second, why break into the safe rather than seize it, take it into custody, and then seek a warrant to open it?
Third, why obtain and execute a search warrant rather than first seeking the items in question either through an informal process or with a subpoena?
Fifth, perhaps there’s something here we don’t know—something that, once known, will clarify the reasons for the raid. If there is, FBI needs to bring forward the justification for this unprecedented action—as soon as possible. But if there isn’t, we’ve got problems at the FBI.
Sixth, classification authority belongs to the president of the United States — and NOT to bureaucrats at the National Archives.
Seventh, if this turns out to be the product of the growing political weaponization of federal law enforcement agencies, shouldn’t this incident cause all Americans to be even more outraged by the Democrats’ plan to hire an additional 87,000 agents?
Eighth, how is this aggressive action defensible in light of the FBI/DOJ treatment of Hillary Clinton, who was never subjected to a raid like this, even though she (1) mishandled classified material, and (2) destroyed evidence?
Ninth, what should we make of the fact that this is occurring while FBI and DOJ have taken no discernible action regarding (for example) flagrant violations of the law by (a) Hunter Biden, or (b) pro-abortion extremists threatening Supreme Court justices at their homes?
Tenth, why should we assume that the FBI is above targeting Republicans when it creates documents like this one, which encourages agents to be suspicious of people who display the Betsy Ross Flag or the “don’t tread on me” Gadsden Flag?
Twelfth, shouldn’t all Americans be suspicious of the FBI based on its use of warrantless “backdoor searches” under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (about which Christopher Wray expressed very little concern when I questioned him at last week’s hearing)?
These questions should all have been thought of and considered in advance. What are the answers?
Posts
59 comments:
If Trump goes to jail, does his secret service detail go with him?
Only a politicized and weaponized DOJ knows for sure.
So many questions, but just one answer:
To harass, vilify, and intimidate a former US President, and those who voted for him, using federal muscle and the state apparatus.
This is everything the country was founded to avoid. Happening now. War.
Come Mr. Tallyman, tally me bananas.
Daylight come and me wanna go home.
Like a show trial, this is a show raid.
The base likes it.
Remember when Lois Lerner took the fifth when asked if she had used the almost unlimited snooping powers of the IRS against Republicans?
You started this by voting for Obamat
The "why" is easy. This is a desperate effort to cover up the election fraud in 2020. Trump won, and they installed senile, corrupt, puppet Biden. That makes Trump and his millions of supporters threats to the establishment and deep state that controls our country.
I'm sure the average citizen in Madison, WI is rejoicing at news of the raid. They would raid every home in Waukesha County if they could. No logical nor legal explanations are necessary. Half the country is willing to follow deep state totalitarianism down the rabbit hole. So here we go.
It's over people. Due process is dead. Drink more beer.
On June 7, 2017, at ~10:15 a.m. the FBI met James Comey at his home for an interview and to collect classified documents he removed illegally from his office. There was no warrant or raid. It was a meeting set up by the FBI.’
Just sayin’…
These questions should all have been thought of and considered in advance.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I seriously doubt that more than maybe a couple of these questions entered any of their minds. Who's minds? Let's start at Joe Biden and quickly move onto who is running this show.
They know that their Media partners will not pressure them for the answers to these questions, let alone with any sense of urgency.
Yep. We know President Obama emailed Clinton on her private server. Why don't the National Archives raid his house.
I think the media elite and DC are living in a bubble. Why else would Dick Cheney do a campaign ad for his daughter, wearing a cowboy hat!? Why else would they pass such a terrible bill? Why else would the Biden administration think this raid would be welcomed?
They have no idea what it's like in the regular world. It's going to hurt us all terribly because I'm not sure what will break the bubble.
It is imperative the entire federal justice apparatus be dismantled. Not kidding. Kill it with megaton level nuclear fire so impressive its historical importance cannot be ignored by the citizenry of the entire world.
All of the FBIs counterintelligence files and their blackmail-dossier filled safes must be made public immediately, and the entire hooverarian leviathan blown up forever and for all time.
The fear of God must be put into the deep state...yes, you will be defended and dismantled. Not a debate. This must happen now. More important than any other single policy pursuit of the next republican administration.
Kill. Them.
This is so dangerous the fucking constitution of the United States provides specific guidance.
There’s no many things in that document. Searches and seizures is there!
God help us!
It's always whataboutism with you people. Trump had four years to go after Hillary like he promised. He had ample time to get Hunter.
Call a hearing, Senator. Grill the FBI. Do your job instead of whinging to the press.
As a lawyer, former federal prosecutor, and current member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I have a few questions about the FBI’s raid of Mar a Lago. First, did Attorney General Garland personally sign off on this action?
I'M SURE HE DID
Second, why break into the safe rather than seize it, take it into custody, and then seek a warrant to open it?
PROB BECAUSE THE WARRANT GAVE THEM THAT AUTHORITY
Third, why obtain and execute a search warrant rather than first seeking the items in question either through an informal process or with a subpoena?
Fifth, perhaps there’s something here we don’t know—something that, once known, will clarify the reasons for the raid. If there is, FBI needs to bring forward the justification for this unprecedented action—as soon as possible. But if there isn’t, we’ve got problems at the FBI.
WHY ASSUME THERE WERE NO SUCH DISCUSSIONS? IF THERE WERE NOT, THE JUDGE PROB CONCLUDED THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT RISK THE RECORDS WOULD BE DESTROYED.
Sixth, classification authority belongs to the president of the United States — and NOT to bureaucrats at the National Archives.
SO AN EX-PRESIDENT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO TAKE WITH HIM ANY DOCUMENTS HE WANTS? AND THE AUTORITY TO RECALLISFY DOCUMENTS AFTER HE LEAVES OFFICE? DON"T THINK THAT IS THE LAW.
Seventh, if this turns out to be the product of the growing political weaponization of federal law enforcement agencies, shouldn’t this incident cause all Americans to be even more outraged by the Democrats’ plan to hire an additional 87,000 agents?
A PRETTY BIG "IF"
Eighth, how is this aggressive action defensible in light of the FBI/DOJ treatment of Hillary Clinton, who was never subjected to a raid like this, even though she (1) mishandled classified material, and (2) destroyed evidence?
TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT. HOW OLD ARE YOU MR. LEE? ALSO, WHY DIDN'T THE TRUMP DOJ PROSECUTE THEM? ISN"T THERE AN ACTIVE INVESTIGATION RE HUNTER?
Ninth, what should we make of the fact that this is occurring while FBI and DOJ have taken no discernible action regarding (for example) flagrant violations of the law by (a) Hunter Biden, or (b) pro-abortion extremists threatening Supreme Court justices at their homes?
SEE ANSER TO NINE.
Tenth, why should we assume that the FBI is above targeting Republicans when it creates documents like this one, which encourages agents to be suspicious of people who display the Betsy Ross Flag or the “don’t tread on me” Gadsden Flag?
I ASSUME THE FBI HAS FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ASSERTIONS IN THE MEMO. ANY EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY, SENATOR?
Twelfth, shouldn’t all Americans be suspicious of the FBI based on its use of warrantless “backdoor searches” under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (about which Christopher Wray expressed very little concern when I questioned him at last week’s hearing)?
PERHAPS THEY SHOULD BE. RELEVANCE? SHOUD WE SHUT DOWN THE AGENCY? TELL THEM THEY CAN NOT DO SERCHES WHERE THE TARGET IS A POLITICIAN _ LIKE YOU ARE SENATOR? NICE GIG IF YOU CAN GET IT.
The Russian Dossier was used by the FBI to conduct a multi-year investigation into a sitting President. No question they will have faked evidence of wrong doing by Trump to support this raid. The question is will it be more plausible than the Steele Dossier? I don’t think so, because they haven’t shown proficiency in doing so.
The opportunity to avoid where we are today, was after the fraudulent election in 2020. The Supreme Court cowered and refused to hear the Texas vs. Pennsylvania case.
Althouse openly blogged that she hoped they would refuse to hear the case, even though it was a completely valid lawsuit and argument. "Moving on" from corruption only allows it to grow bigger and stronger. That is what has happened.
You don't have a fair, clean, voting system when most states follow sane, traceable, auditable election laws...and the purple ones to rogue in blue metropolitan areas. Now we live with the consequences of those that hid from the obvious 2020 fraud.
If you think the Supreme Court did damage overturning Roe, that's a nothing burger. Refusal to address voter fraud in a time of crisis more than likely has ended our Constitutional Republic.
It's probably too late. Half of American has been successfully programmed to believe 2020 was the "cleanest election ever". And even liberals who don't believe it support voter fraud and the elimination of due process for their enemies. Take the population of Madison, WI and Dane County for example.
So how long should Trump be able to stonewall and keep documents that belong to the American people before somebody says, "fuck it, we'll just get a warrant to get them back"?
Trump has been out of office for a year and a half now. We have known that he removed documents to Mar A Lago almost as soon as he vacated the White House. How long do you give him to return the documents?
The judge who signed the warrant was part of the Epstein cover up. It gets better and better. Do you think that the FBI agents stopped over to Royal Palm Beach to pick up a couple of delectable young things for Joe to sniff and grope, you know, since the judge has the connections?
https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1556987145604272140
Remember when that young girl whose nipple Biden pinched on camera claimed as an adult that that is exactly what happened? Oh, NPR didn't report that?
Two factors are in play:
1. The utter incompetence of virtually everyone in the Biden administration. Y'all familiar with the analogy about emptying a piss-filled boot?
2. The utter vindictiveness of the modern American left.
It's a nasty combination.
Can't plant evidence if you wait and do it properly, can you?? They plan to take him down one way or the other. DeSantis is next. They aren't playing anymore.
There is no rule of law in this country. Just rule of whatever political junta gets elected.The usual suspects are applauding this when they should be afraid. But this is what they voted for. This is the America they want.
WHO was the corrupt Soros Judge who authorized this?? We should know his or her name. They should be questioned as to why they allowed this travesty to ever happen.
You missed #11.
This third world action will certainly drive voting in November.
The choices are stark: a sometimes feckless Republican Party or an increasingly Soviet Democrat party.
You cannot vote for the Democrats unless you are either brain dead or a Soviet yourself.
"These questions should all have been thought of and considered in advance. What are the answers?"
Now that's funny.
Could we also add:
By all appearances, the FBI has been conducting an investigation and surveillance of Donald Trump since before he was elected, while he was President-Elect, and throughout his presidency under conditions that have since been determined to be fraudulent including:
- False filings with FISA
- Using unverified claims by the opposition to justify an investigation
- Altered written remembrances of interviews with major national security figures 5+ weeks after the interview, while refusing to record the interview.
And despite this, the FBI has never brought charges against Trump related to criminal actions. By contrast, multi-year long investigations have explicitly cleared him of wrongdoing on several occasions.
What has the FBI or the DOJ done to restore trust? Why is now an armed raid required and what new action by Trump required such?
I'm growing increasingly concerned that the DOJ is not held accountable by the executive over multiple administrations.
"You missed #11."
I missed his missing it. I added to my parenthetical at the top: he also jumped from "Tenth" to "Twelfth."
The fourth and eleventh points were missing. 4 and 11. 4/11. On April 11 1814 Napoleon abdicated and was exiled. Trying to do the same to Trump. All part of a larger conspiracy. 4/11. It’s all out in the open. Wake up!
It is not merely the raid on Mar-a-largo. It is also the kid gloves handling of the investigations of Hillary, Anthony Weiner, Hunter Biden, and others. The impunity with which Colbert staffers wander the halls of the Capitol discomforting even Democrat staffers. The lack of prosecution of repeated Antifa attacks on the Portland Federal Courthouse. Democrat office holders and candidates marching with and expressing support for rioters.
The judge who signed it also arranged immunity for many of those implicated in the Epstein scandal. Traficking in minors for sexual purposes is one thing... records disputes with the National Archives! That's where the hammer comes down!
Twitter is all over Trump, frog marching him to jail in their dreams already, but you will be banned if you say "groomer" which is what this judge protected.
An ethical Department of Justice and FBI concerned with the well being of the American people and protecting the constitution, would have put this type of effort into investigating the 2020 voter fraud.
Instead, we know they are part of the fraud. Trump and the Americans who sent this outsider to Washington now must be stamped out and punished. We will see if the independent self-governance spirit of Americans still exists. I don't think it does.
In 2022 America, self-preservation is a more valuable virtue than self-sacrifice. The way we behave today shows zero concern for the freedom and future of our children. This is most evident in the education establishment, and at Universities ripping kids off to support bloated administration.
My guess is many America First/MAGA supporters will disappear off social media and go into "hiding". They have now approved 87,000 new IRS agents to go after these people, further weaponizing the IRS. Likely, this will all be a successful voter suppression effort.
I'll go vote in the WI primary today, but I know even inside me there is a part that just wants to say "fuck it". Let them have what they want. "I just want to get my kicks before the whole shithouse goes up in flames".
It's going to get a lot worse.
What to do? I suggest all Americans reread the 1776 Declaration of Independence, in particular:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it."
No doubt the DOJ and FBI are gonna piss off voters... and maybe assure the Senate flips.
They called the Jan. 6th protest a 'insurrection' and have tried to crucify Trump since then. Just looking for any 'insurrection'.
So what is next, outlaw voting cause it is 'insurrection'? Or just stuff the ballot boxes more and call it a fair election?
Ok, well after seeing that the Epstein lawyer signed the search warrant, I'm now an Alex Jones believer.
Thanks TiV.
My first thought was that the FBI hates and fears Trump so much that they've gone rogue, but on reflection, it's clear that somebody higher up must have approved this. I suppose Biden did "approve" the raid in the sense that when he was told it was going to be done he didn't object, but it does make one wonder just who is actually calling the shots in the White House.
Why didn't DOJ prosecute Hillary Clinton? Because they didn't want it to be thought that we were a third world country where those who win elections prosecute the losers. Not prosecuting wasn't necessarily a bad choice for the government to make. People who offer the "two wrongs don't make a right" line now to defend the raid, would have been loudly screaming that prosecution of Clinton meant that Trump was becoming a dictator. You know it, I know it, and they know it themselves.
Don't forget planting evidence.
They've done that lately as well...
THIS is the tyrannical Government we have been warned about. Time to take it back.
As “Unknown” points out up-thread here (in a comment which has apparently disappeared?), Sen. Mike Lee did include all 12 points in his Twitter thread — which Althouse apparently, accidentally, omitted 2 of — then blamed Mike for the lack! Here's a followable link to Mike Lee's thread.
Lee's 2 points which got omitted are as follows: [quoting…]
Fourth, if this really is about presidential records, why would the former president — who was himself in charge of declassifying documents at the time he obtained and had unfettered access to them — be subject to prosecution to hanging onto classified documents? […]
Eleventh, did FBI Director Christopher Wray intentionally wait to carry out the raid until after his oversight hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee last week?
[/unQuote]
I'm not sure of the source from which our hostess cribbed Sen. Lee's questions, but here are the two missing items from her list:
"Fourth, if this really is about presidential records, why would the former president — who was himself in charge of declassifying documents at the time he obtained and had unfettered access to them — be subject to prosecution to hanging onto classified documents?"
"Eleventh, did FBI Director Christopher Wray intentionally wait to carry out the raid until after his oversight hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee last week?"
Well, Jim5301, apparently history started last night for you... (For example - isn't there now an investigation into H. Biden's possible influence peddling? Why yes there is - but didn't we have the very evidence used to open that investigation literal years ago? And is that investigation not being narrowly focused on only Hunter's potential wrongdoing rather than including the actions of the President, who after all would have to play along in order for the scheme to work?)
Many of Lee's questions were predicated on what has happened already, but your answers, such as they were, demand that we all give the Federal apparatus a level of benefit of the doubt that we might have before they showed themselves to be partisan clowns.
Or we might not have, because there is no requirement that citizens show any sort of respect for or deference to the federal bureaucracy or the party currently in the executive branch. But, for instance, when you hear that the IRS is given license to "investigate" (or, as pretty much all Americans see IRS investigations, "harass") people flying a Gadsden flag, your response is, "they probably deserve it"?
Do you hear yourself? Do the usual exercise: if the parties were reversed, would you feel the same way? Because I myself have little sympathy for your side, but I'd damn well see these actions as dangerous to the Republic if they were leveled at them - if, for instance, the IRS received guidance that they should pay special attention to people sporting pussy hats. If, for instance, the FBI under Trump had conducted a raid on Obama's civvy home on no better evidence and with no better justification than what we've seen here.
“I'm sure the average citizen in Madison, WI is rejoicing at news of the raid. They would raid every home in Waukesha County if they could. No logical nor legal explanations are necessary.
It's over people. Due process is dead. Drink more beer.”
Haha Gusty, I live in Waukesha county and I’d welcome in the Feds, we’d have a beer!
Someone should explain to Jim5301 in a sympathetic tone that Merrick isn't going to date him.
PERHAPS THEY SHOULD BE. RELEVANCE? SHOUD WE SHUT DOWN THE AGENCY? TELL THEM THEY CAN NOT DO SERCHES WHERE THE TARGET IS A POLITICIAN _ LIKE YOU ARE SENATOR? NICE GIG IF YOU CAN GET IT.
jim 1234 loves this. How dare this non-politician run for president and, even worse, win over our darling Hillary. We'll teach him to mess around with our Democratic Republic of Amerika. If this raid doesn't uncover enough evidence, we'll make some up, sort of like the "dossier." Wray was conveniently away from DC so Garfinkle got another stooge to run the "operation."
Assassination just took a step closer.
Ya' know.....they're acting AWFULLY guilty. Could there be something bigger than voter fraud?? I can't imagine.
ALL CAPS DOESN'T MAKE YOUR LAME TALKING POINTS ANY MORE COHERENT.
We're to believe that a government that would do something like this, wouldn't steal and election?
Christopher, I wasn't trying to emphasis anything, just make it easier for the reader to distinguish between my comments and Lee's comments.
Haha Gusty, I live in Waukesha county and I’d welcome in the Feds, we’d have a beer!
Of course you would. Morons like you love this stuff. As long as you never deviate from the Party Line, you're happy and loved by Big Brother. Just don't be the first to stop applauding.
Comey took classified data home when he left office. Agents simply went and got them back. H. Clinton had tons of classified on her personal phone and server and nothing happened at all. I bet Obama took some with him. They want nevertheless to indict a former pres on this basis so he cannot run again and jail him if they can. This is very serious. The law was never meant to lead to the arrest of a former pres. Trump really makes them crazy.
To be fair, Jim5301 may be an asshole, but his use of all caps was in the interest of clarity. That should have been obvious.
"To be fair, Jim5301 may be an asshole, but his use of all caps was in the interest of clarity"
Or, you know, he could use html tags for formatting the text for emphasis rather than using all caps like he uses when emailing his fellow anti-American Dems to gloat how THEY FINALLY GOT DRUMPF AND THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN!!!!!!!!! But that would require learning something new, a task for which jimmie in his ignorance is completely unsuited.
Has everyone forgotten how Sandy Berger put classified documents in his socks and underwear, snuck them out of the National Archives, and destroyed them to save the Clinton Administration?
These questions should all have been thought of and considered in advance. What are the answers?
The answers are "Fuck you, prole, now bend over"
If you dont' like that answer, you need to vote for the Republican for every single office in November, and in any remaining Primary you need to vote for the most pro-Trump Republican who has a chance of winning.
Who do I want as the GOP 2024 Presidential nominee? DeSantis
Why? Because Trump absolutely sucked at personnel as President
But right now "pro-Trump candidate" translates to "most likely to oppose Democrat corruption"
So if this bothers you, vote accordingly
Howard said...
It's always whataboutism with you people. Trump had four years to go after Hillary like he promised. He had ample time to get Hunter.
Yep
He screwed up. He didn't fire enough people, and he didn't use the power of the Presidency to go after ever single law-breaking Democrat
But down't worry, Howard. We're not going to make either of those mistakes in 2025.
An amusing thought I had today:
We need to get rid of the Civil Service laws, and fire every single Democrat getting a Federal gov't paycheck
This is not a "moderate" thing to do
However, we know that pretty much all the "squishes" are corrupt.
So a law ending civil service, with a promise to every single Republican in the House and Senate that there will be a certain number of now open gov't positions that they get to fill with friends and family members, should get more than enough onboard to get the laws passed anyway
As Alex the Chick says: Play stupid Will to Power games, get stupid Will to Power prizes
They never would have pulled this bullshit with Idi Amin!
jim5301 said...
Second, why break into the safe rather than seize it, take it into custody, and then seek a warrant to open it?
PROB BECAUSE THE WARRANT GAVE THEM THAT AUTHORITY
If it gave them that authority, they could have asked for the combo, with the threat of cracking the safe if it wasn't given.
Third, why obtain and execute a search warrant rather than first seeking the items in question either through an informal process or with a subpoena?
Fifth, perhaps there’s something here we don’t know—something that, once known, will clarify the reasons for the raid. If there is, FBI needs to bring forward the justification for this unprecedented action—as soon as possible. But if there isn’t, we’ve got problems at the FBI.
WHY ASSUME THERE WERE NO SUCH DISCUSSIONS? IF THERE WERE NOT, THE JUDGE PROB CONCLUDED THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT RISK THE RECORDS WOULD BE DESTROYED.
Destroying the records would be a far more serious crime than what Trump's accused of.
So if you honestly want Trump in jail, giving him the chance to hang himself by doing so is far and away your best bet.
The only reason to do it this way is because you know there's no real crime, so you want to create the appearance of one.
Sixth, classification authority belongs to the president of the United States — and NOT to bureaucrats at the National Archives.
SO AN EX-PRESIDENT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO TAKE WITH HIM ANY DOCUMENTS HE WANTS? AND THE AUTORITY TO RECALLISFY DOCUMENTS AFTER HE LEAVES OFFICE? DON"T THINK THAT IS THE LAW.
Um, no, he can't re-classify them after he's no longer President.
But that's a meaningless red herring. Because if he declassified them while he was President, then he has every legal right to have them
Seventh, if this turns out to be the product of the growing political weaponization of federal law enforcement agencies, shouldn’t this incident cause all Americans to be even more outraged by the Democrats’ plan to hire an additional 87,000 agents?
A PRETTY BIG "IF"
Only if you have a brain the size of a pea
Eighth, how is this aggressive action defensible in light of the FBI/DOJ treatment of Hillary Clinton, who was never subjected to a raid like this, even though she (1) mishandled classified material, and (2) destroyed evidence?
TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT. HOW OLD ARE YOU MR. LEE? ALSO, WHY DIDN'T THE TRUMP DOJ PROSECUTE THEM? ISN"T THERE AN ACTIVE INVESTIGATION RE HUNTER?
Actually, Jim, there's this thing called "precedent." You might have heard of it.
What it means is that once you've established that this is the proper rule (by, for example, letting Hillary get away with her classified document sharing server), you need to keep on following that rule, even when it helps people you dont' like
That's the difference between "rule of law" and "tyranny".
And, in case you missed it, the Hunter Biden "active investigation" hasn't led to any raids on hunter for other criminal documents that he might be destroying
Which is what would be needed to follow this precedent
Ninth, what should we make of the fact that this is occurring while FBI and DOJ have taken no discernible action regarding (for example) flagrant violations of the law by (a) Hunter Biden, or (b) pro-abortion extremists threatening Supreme Court justices at their homes?
SEE ANSER TO NINE.
So your answer is "because we dont' care about the law, just our owner!!11!"
Thank you for clearing that up
Tenth, why should we assume that the FBI is above targeting Republicans when it creates documents like this one, which encourages agents to be suspicious of people who display the Betsy Ross Flag or the “don’t tread on me” Gadsden Flag?
I ASSUME THE FBI HAS FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ASSERTIONS IN THE MEMO. ANY EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY, SENATOR?
Well, it's very nice of you to admit that your'e a total ass.
Twelfth, shouldn’t all Americans be suspicious of the FBI based on its use of warrantless “backdoor searches” under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (about which Christopher Wray expressed very little concern when I questioned him at last week’s hearing)?
PERHAPS THEY SHOULD BE. RELEVANCE? SHOUD WE SHUT DOWN THE AGENCY? TELL THEM THEY CAN NOT DO SERCHES WHERE THE TARGET IS A POLITICIAN _ LIKE YOU ARE SENATOR? NICE GIG IF YOU CAN GET IT.
We should completely shut down the FBI, and the entire DoJ, and not re-fund them until there's a Republican President
Because it's obvious that Democrats just can't be trusted with power
Post a Comment