August 6, 2022

"In any case, many of us feel suspicious of the color-and-shape manipulations of these images. They're nudging us too much..."

"... insisting that we feel awe. It's a little like the January 6th Committee's over-produced show that insists that we feel anger and outrage. And some people don't think hardcore pornography is sexy. What X thinks is so sexy is exactly what makes it not sexy at all to Y. Maybe something subtler, something more real. Something human."

I blogged on July 14, as I resisted the hoopla, and noticed a column in WaPo by Alexandra Petri titled "James Webb Space Telescope images ranked by how good they look to eat."


The scientist, Etienne Klein, put up his silly post on July 31st, 17 days after Petri's jovial scribblings.
Klein — who has more than 91,000 followers on Twitter — acknowledged that many users had not understood his joke which he said was simply aimed at encouraging us "to be wary of arguments from people in positions of authority as well as the spontaneous eloquence of certain images."

Yes. Exactly. That was my point too. 

However, at a time when battling fake news is of paramount importance for the scientific community, many Twitter users indicated they were unamused by Klein, director of research at France's Atomic Energy Commission and a radio show producer.

This gets my "Era of That's Not Funny" tag. Good lord. People will never learn skepticism. To want to be protected from  humor is to choose to be vulnerable to the truly nefarious liars of this world. 

On Wednesday, he said sorry to those who were misled. "I come to present my apologies to those who may have been shocked by my prank, which had nothing original about it," he said, describing the post as a "scientist's joke."

Oh! He apologized! At least, he nonapologized. Sorry if you're such an idiot that you looked at a slice of chorizo with awe and later suffered the horrible pain of embarrassment. And it wasn't even an original joke. 

It was, by the way, a joke in my favorite category of joke — "big and small." It's a photograph of something small that is perceived as something very large. There's "nothing original" there. 

Just something delicious:

24 comments:

n.n said...

With universal assumptions, assertions, inferential logic fills in the missing links.

Joe Smith said...

'It was, by the way, a joke in my favorite category of joke — "big and small."'

Chorizo in spacecraft mirror is larger than it appears.

gilbar said...

IF the webb telescope COULD actually show us what these stars looked like..
We'd see that they are holes in the celestial sphere and the light from the heavens beyond the sphere shines through those holes. This would be disturbing to Many people
And by disturbing, i mean; it would be disturbing to their research grants

Buckwheathikes said...

NASA is the world's most ridiculously expensive Instagram page.

We pay $22.6 billion a year as taxpayers in a massive deficit environment for these people to take slightly better photos each year.

I'm all for the government funding science ... WHEN WE CAN AFFORD TO. I don't eat out at fancy steak restaurants right now. Why? Because it's too expensive right now. We need our government to be put on this same footing.

If you want to spend money on taking photos in space, then FIRST we have to eliminate all unpaid for expenses in the federal government. THEN if there's money left over, we do Instagram.

Our country is being driven like a stake ... right into the ground. I'm old enough that I'm not going to end up paying for these sins. Your grandchildren and theirs are though. And they should salt our graves for leaving them these ridiculous debts.

mikee said...

I have a footnote in my Chemistry Master's thesis, footnote #42, referencing The Hitchiker's Guide To The Galaxy as to why a towel was used in my research. Nobody noticed, or if they did, nobody brought it up in my oral exams.

We nerds are often only funny to ourselves.

n.n said...

Signals, nothing but signals, of unknown, unknowable fidelity and origin, from far beyond the limited frame of reference of scientific philosophy and practice.

YoungHegelian said...

Wait! So, Proxima Chorizo isn't a red giant after all?

PM said...

Mmmm chorizo.

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

My apologies for misnaming the blueberry nebula as the blue cherry nebula. I'm sorry if I caused anybody anguish and pain.

link to Althouse pic

I better start practicing the Russian National Anthem 😅

Lewis Wetzel said...

So it's actually what the chorizo looked like 4.3 years ago?

Original Mike said...

"I'm all for the government funding science ... WHEN WE CAN AFFORD TO."

Yeah, but we'll never "afford to".

This is a drop in the bucket. The comparison with Instagram is absurd. It's not about pretty pictures, it's about the science. NASA plays up the pretty pictures because it thinks people are too stupid to appreciate the science. Personally, I wouldn't take that tack, but they may be right.

Richard Dolan said...

Don't believe everything you read -- as an approach to life, it never grows old. Works for photos, too. Sometimes what you read or see is just a joke, and if you don't get it, the joke's on you. Even worse when you try to blame the jokester for your own dimness in not getting it -- humor may not be the best medicine, but it's not bad for what ails people like that. They should try some. But that requires a bit of honesty, starting with being honest with oneself. The instinct to blame someone else makes achieving that kind of honesty very hard indeed.

Leland said...

NASA is the world's most ridiculously expensive Instagram page.

We pay $22.6 billion a year as taxpayers in a massive deficit environment for these people to take slightly better photos each year.


Wait until you learn how much the Democrats want to pay the IRS each year.

Joe Smith said...

'Our country is being driven like a stake ... right into the ground. I'm old enough that I'm not going to end up paying for these sins. Your grandchildren and theirs are though. And they should salt our graves for leaving them these ridiculous debts.'

But they're hiring a lot of Bipocs these days and keeping the Asians out, so doing God's work.

Sure, we can't send rockets to the moon anymore, but it's worth it just for all the diversity alone...

Paddy O said...

"You! A scientist!"

Steve from Wyo said...

Now THAT was funny! Dry humor is great because the clueless won't realize their leg is being pulled (unless someone tells them and then they get all huffy.)

Narr said...

What did his shirt look like?

Heartless Aztec said...

It was a joke only half baked. I want to see the rest of the chorizo cosmos. Where's the pizza constellation?

Rt41Rebel said...

I was immediately reminded of this:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/millions-of-prayers-go-out-to-dog-afflicted-with-ham-on-face_n_5684177ce4b06fa68881b2e8

Yancey Ward said...

At least it was the only sausage he posted online.

effinayright said...

Original Mike said...
"I'm all for the government funding science ... WHEN WE CAN AFFORD TO."

Yeah, but we'll never "afford to".

This is a drop in the bucket. The comparison with Instagram is absurd. It's not about pretty pictures, it's about the science. NASA plays up the pretty pictures because it thinks people are too stupid to appreciate the science. Personally, I wouldn't take that tack, but they may be right.
**************
Exactly. Anyone who really thinks all those earth-based and orbiting telescopes are doing is taking purty pictures is breath-takingly ignorant--- and has probably never taken a physical science course in his life.

In my experience, the old idea of the divide between "The Two Cultures" ---the Scientific versus the Humanities---is almost always most strongly displayed by people who know BUPKIS about science, technology and math.

(which helps explain how easily people are manipulated by ridiculous "climate change" hysteria.)

But I agree: NASA pushes those colorized images to "sell" their projects.

Yes, astronomical images are colorized for valid scientific purposes---to sort out visually the ionized elements and compounds that generate photons of different wavelengths, for example,---but in reality virtually all the unprocessed images taken of objects outside our solar system are at best subtly colored, white, or shades of gray.

But who's gonna ooh and ahh over seeing a grey-scale galaxy?

farmgirl said...

I could care less about the cosmos.
I prefer the sunrise series a la Althouse.

lonejustice said...

Reminds me of the recent how to photograph a potato video.

Narr said...

"I could care less about the cosmos."

The cosmos says, "Back atcha."