July 7, 2022

"[John Andrew] Rice and his fellow dissidents believed that a college should be owned and run by its faculty and students."

"There would be no board of trustees, no dean, no president and limited administration beyond a secretary, treasurer and the lead role of 'rector,' all of whom taught classes, as well. There was also a Board of Fellows, which was composed of several professors and a student representative — this group would primarily make business decisions on the college’s behalf — as well as a 'disemboweled' advisory council... that had no real power. As for the curriculum, there wasn’t one, really: neither required courses nor formal grades."

"Professors taught what they wished, and students graduated when (or if) they wanted — only about 55 of the 1,200 or so students who attended Black Mountain in its 24-year existence attained a formal degree — as long as they passed two sets of exams, one roughly at the halfway point and the other before the end of their tenure, whenever they decided that was. The hierarchy, too, was minimal, with students and most faculty living in the same building and taking their meals together. There were none of the 'usual distinctions... between curricular and extracurricular activities, between work done in a classroom and work done outside it.' Students often performed chores as part of the 'work program'; afternoons were left free for activities outdoors, which might have included chopping wood, clearing pasture and planting, tending or harvesting crops.... By all accounts, the manual labor was not only fun but gave students a meaningful sense of contributing to the day-to-day maintenance of the college. It was also a great leveler. 'You might be John Cage or Merce Cunningham... But you’re still going to have a job to do on campus.' 

"Among Black Mountain’s most visionary notions was to put the arts 'at the very center of things.' Rice believed that the study of art taught students that the real struggle was, in his words, with one’s 'own ignorance and clumsiness.' The idea was not to produce artists per se... but thinking citizens who, honed by the discipline inherent to the arts, were capable of making complex choices — about their own work and, ultimately, in the larger world."

20 comments:

RideSpaceMountain said...

"There would be no board of trustees, no dean, no president and limited administration beyond a secretary, treasurer and the lead role of 'rector,' all of whom taught classes, as well."

Get rid of the building and you're on a roll. Seriously, maybe tearing down the edifice of higher education requires actually tearing down the edifice.

Michael K said...

What's stopping them? All they need is money and that, of course, is the problem.

tim maguire said...

I wouldn't go quite so far, but I admire the focus. Education should be about education. A well-run institution of learning should have as its personnel goal a 10:1 faculty to administration ratio. Just enough back-room people to make sure the teachers have what they need. Today's universities, where administrators outnumber teachers and budget cuts consistently fall most heavily on any but administrators, have lost the thread and need drastic reorganization. They are why we are in the midst of a student loan crisis.

Owen said...

To whom are the educators accountable?

That’s the question.

And KISS.

That’s my test.

I am Ivy BA, Oxford MA, Ivy JD. But I have zero love for the institutions. Less than zero: they are badly, possibly terminally, damaged.

gilbar said...

The idea was not to produce artists per se...

sounds like they were on to something??
however...
in 1957.. The college suspended classes by court order due to debts; the school was unable to sustain itself financially given the greatly decreased number of students.

it's surprising* that students weren't RUSHING to go to a place that Did NOT produce artists; but instead, let people laze about pretending to do farm work.

it's surprising* No, No it is NOT

Quayle said...

When you meet a University administrator or read some policy written and enforced by a University Administrator, or look at one of the many fancy new buildings that are now dotting our campuses, just remember that it is all on the backs of former students holding non-dischargeable student loan debt.

We can thank the Boomers for that.

What started as "free love" is now ending in massive debt overhang, a lot of which is unavoidable or non-dischargeable. The Boomers' "love" of their children and grandchildren is certainly not free.

gilbar said...

i suppose it Could be Worse. People could waste their time at the University of Iowa City,
thinking that they're "learning how to be writers"

Wa St Blogger said...

This would be a great experience for some people. Great for the idle rich or trust fund babies. Not so good for people who have to find a way to make a living. Just a different sort of guru camp or commune experience. Find yourself! Most schools can't operate like that because there is also value in discipline and rigor, of meeting deadlines and passing assessments. I care less how my bridges look, I care more how they will manage the stresses placed upon them. Same with high-rises.

As for the socialist ideal of "workers owning the means of production" method applied to academics, that probably won't work out. The students don't have the judgement and the faculty might go askew due to the law of perverse incentives. That does not mean the current system is best, just that the suggested alternative would be worse. Now, if your goal is not academic rigor but instead experiential find yourself kind of life, then this method would work fine. Just don't hire anyone from this school where white supremacy skills are needed (you know, like urgency, timeliness, discipline, the things that might be important in healthcare, plane building, police and fire, etc.)

mccullough said...

So the professors didn’t do any chores. The students did.

Always a hierarchy.

Smilin' Jack said...

“In 1933, a handful of renegade teachers opened a school in rural North Carolina that would go on to shape American art and art education for decades to come"

Considering the shape of American art and art education today, is that supposed to be a good thing?

AZDave said...

Let them buy it and pay all expense, including business taxes, salaries and their own retirements and medical plans. See how that works for them!

PM said...

The photo of the Merce Cunningham must have inspired Bernard Kliban's depiction of Ga Fa, the ancient Italian fighting art.

Joe Smith said...

I'm guessing there were no mandatory classes in identifying pronouns?

TheOne Who Is Not Obeyed said...

Sounds rather like the way Tuskegee Institute was founded, but the recently-freed blacks who built Tuskegee actually made the Institute a success.

I'm sure there's a lesson in there somewhere.

Narr said...

I suspect the students got what they paid for, and could not have been surprised at the organization, or lack of it.

Not really seeing anything to critique--artsy-fartsy doofuses paying their own way in the Carolina woods couldn't be any worse than all the Ivys with their Thurston Winthrop Lodge IV's swanning about while waiting to join Dad's firm.

realestateacct said...

Check out Deep Springs College which has been operating since 1917 and has a distinguished alumni list. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Springs_College

Paul said...

As long as taxpayers don't pay for it... they an own it... does not mean there will be a lot of students though.

Go woke, go broke.

Marc in Eugene said...

A comically ridiculous undertaking, destined for failure from the beginning, although evidently a fruitful experience for many of those who participated in it. But what made the Fortini article worth my reading were the sentences attributed to Helen Frankenthaler: "The food was terrible. Most of the people were dingy. The barracks were unspeakable. Most of the personal situations were nightmares. And there were snakes."

"Most of the personal situations were nightmares." And there were snakes.

rhhardin said...

The problem is that alumni vote for trustees, and recent alumni dominate. So the university winds up run by children.

Lurker21 said...

Black Mountain was a hotbed or hothouse for painting, design, poetry, and sexual liberation. It was something like an American Bauhaus. Josef and Anni Albers taught there. It was virtually unique in America, back when colleges and even art schools were stricter and when Bennington and Sarah Lawrence were famously experimental but not coeducational. Black Mountain College wasn't that popular in rural North Carolina. That the college racially integrated didn't help either.

As much as administrators are a plague, a college like Black Mountain would be a lawsuit factory today. So would a lot of old fashioned colleges. Too many horny professors and easy damaged students. Too many gripes about this and that. But did the griping cause the rise of administrators, or did the many administrators encourage the rise of griping?