June 28, 2020

"The remote Siberian town of Verkhoyans... six miles north of the Arctic Circle, has long held the record... for the coldest inhabited place in the world."

"The record was set in 1892, when the temperature dropped to ninety below zero Fahrenheit, although these days winter temperatures are noticeably milder, hovering around fifty below. Last Saturday, Verkhoyansk claimed a new record: the hottest temperature ever recorded in the Arctic, with an observation of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit—the same temperature was recorded that day in Las Vegas.... On May 29th, outside Norilsk, the northernmost city in the world, the thawing ground buckled, causing an oil-storage tank to collapse and spew more than a hundred and fifty thousand barrels, or twenty-one thousand tons, of diesel fuel into the Ambarnaya River.... The permafrost found in the area surrounding Verkhoyansk is some of the deepest and oldest in the world, descending as much as five thousand feet. Closer to the surface, a type of ice-rich permafrost known as yedoma is particularly vulnerable to rapid thaws. The result is thermokarst, the strange and sometimes shocking topography that forms as the land slides, sags, and sinks. Mysterious sinkholes suddenly appear, drunken forests fall, and hillocks destroy farmland. One of Russia’s most extreme examples of thermokarst, known as the Batagay megaslump, is a two-hundred-and-eighty-foot-deep, half-mile-wide depression, situated just outside Verkhoyansk. It first began forming as a small gully in the nineteen-sixties, because of deforestation, but has grown significantly in recent years, exposing the remains of ancient creatures, including musk ox, a cave lion, a Pleistocene wolf, a woolly mammoth, and an almost perfectly preserved, forty-thousand-year-old foal."

From "A Disastrous Summer in the Arctic" (The New Yorker).

55 comments:

Mark O said...

DOOM™®

Dave Begley said...

We must act now. Crisis! Global warming threatens our very survival.

The Biden-Harris Administration must put China and India on notice. Either get rid of half of your coal-fired power plants in two years or we will bomb them to bits.

We MUST do this for the children of the world. Especially for Joe’s newest grandchild in Arkansas.

Do the right thing!

Mary Beth said...

Disastrous, unless you're a paleontologist, who probably still has to act upset about it.

Narayanan said...

if we are learning about paleo conditions and discovering fossils - should be considered bonus not disaster. since there are no deaths being mentioned.

or is it ALL RIVERS MATTER?

[different from
All the Rivers Run is an Australian historical novel by Nancy Cato, first published in 1958. It was adapted as a 1983 Australian television miniseries starring Sigrid Thornton and John Waters. The mini-series is marketed with the tagline A sweeping saga of one woman's struggle for survival. A sequel, All the Rivers Run II, was produced in 1989.]

Paul Zrimsek said...

That 100.4 eclipses Verkohyansk's old record by... (drum roll, please)... 1.3 degrees.

Achilles said...

Cool stuff.

Evil people are going to use this to demand we give unelected bureaucracies control of our economy.

Retards are going to claim it has something to do with CO2.

n.n said...

In recorded history, inferred with prejudice from proxies with assumed independence and uniform processes.

Achilles said...

Paul Zrimsek said...
That 100.4 eclipses Verkohyansk's old record by... (drum roll, please)... 1.3 degrees.

Guaranteed to have something to do with new buildings/machines in the area reflecting more heat to the thermometer.

There is a reason the climate priests never mention satellite data that is generally much more consistent.

traditionalguy said...

The Air conditioner market should benefit from this. But these warm spikes are temporary due to jet stream southerly dips blocking east west air flow actually caused by Global Cooling.

Dust Bunny Queen said...

Retards are going to claim it has something to do with CO2.

If CO2 is so horrible, why are we being forced to wear masks that increase the level of CO2 that we are breathing (in some cases to dangerous levels for those who have to wear them all the effing day) and decrease the oxygen levels in our bodies? Hmmmmmm?

Don't we care about people's CO2 anymore?

Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

Verkhoyansk was hotter than that during the Hadean Eon, and by a substantial margin.

Wince said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pillage Idiot said...

The record was last Saturday (June 20th), what else happened that day? Oh yes, it was the summer solstice - the day of maximum sunlight in the Arctic!

I know what caused the heat gain on the fuel tank. (But then again I have degrees in fields other than journalism.)

The Russians do have good engineers. The problem (as usual) is politicizing the science. A government official declared they needed a huge fuel storage tank built on permafrost, the first engineer said it couldn't be done with acceptable risk or cost. The government officals kept going down the list until they found an engineer who placed political approval above readily determined design factors.

Paul Zrimsek said...

Saying the new record is guaranteed to be due to siting problems is a bit overconfident in the absence of specific information. I don't have any particular reason to doubt that the record is legitimate; it's just not as epoch-making as they set us up to believe.

Wince said...

Points out that the first order response to potential temperature fluctuations is mitigation of potential effects.

Hardening infrastructure in order of cost-benefit doesn't rely on assumptions about causation for it to work the way "abatement" strategies do.

rhhardin said...

It doesn't surprise me. The sun is up all day.

Bob Boyd said...

Достаточно тепло для тебя?

hstad said...

Since I don't trust anything written by the NY Times, I actually liked this article about Verkohyansk attributes better. Firstly, there is a thermal spring near the village, that's the historical attraction. But notice the last time they recorded record cold - their thermometer broke. Interesting no mention of global warming B.S. and the population of 50 not exactly indicative of anything. But I like the reporter's comments "...my saliva would freeze into needles that would prick my lips..." Now I don't know about the rest of you, but man that's cold!

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/16/thermometer-worlds-coldest-village-breaks-temperatures-plunge/

Skeptical Voter said...

I'm certain that bikini sales will be going up in the Soviet Artic.

Yancey Ward said...

"A government official declared they needed a huge fuel storage tank built on permafrost, the first engineer said it couldn't be done with acceptable risk or cost. The government officals kept going down the list until they found an engineer who placed political approval above readily determined design factors."

Listen, lad. I built this kingdom up from nothing. When I started here, all there was was permafrost. Other kings said I was daft to build a fuel tank on permafrost, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the permafrost. So, I built a second one. That sank into the permafrost. So, I built a third one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the permafrost, but the fourth one... stayed up! And that's what you're gonna get, lad: the strongest fuel tank in the Arctic.

Achilles said...

Paul Zrimsek said...
Saying the new record is guaranteed to be due to siting problems is a bit overconfident in the absence of specific information. I don't have any particular reason to doubt that the record is legitimate; it's just not as epoch-making as they set us up to believe.

Fine.

Pedant.

It was the case in every preceding case and 99.9% likely in this case.

Sebastian said...

"45% of the hydrocarbon extraction fields in the Russian Arctic"

So, the Russian Arctic was once lushly forested?

OK, so warming now requires adaptation and can be costly in the short run, but why is it inherently better for the Russian Arctic to remain super cold?

Yancey Ward said...

I am loathe to point out, once again, that we humans don't have much in the way of an understanding of the vastness of time. The best one can say about this record is it the highest temperature recorded by a human being in the location, and that window of recording is probably under 100 years, and maybe less than 75. The land itself has been in roughly that exact spot for over 20 million years.

Original Mike said...

Blogger Wince said...
"Points out that the first order response to potential temperature fluctuations is mitigation of potential effects.

Hardening infrastructure in order of cost-benefit doesn't rely on assumptions about causation for it to work the way "abatement" strategies do."


Can we take the 'A Reasonable Man' tag away from that other guy and give it to Wince?

steve uhr said...

Her Majesty Dusty Rabbit —. What is the authority for your assertion that masks are dangerous because they force you to breath in more CO2. Or is that just your “expert” opinion?

narciso said...

Its hot in the summer, who da thunk it.

Michael K said...

Building on permafrost was the challenge building the Alaska Highway in WWII.

Some 100 miles (160 km) of route between Burwash Landing and Koidern, Yukon, became nearly impassable in May and June 1943, as the permafrost thawed, no longer protected by a layer of delicate vegetation. A corduroy road was built to restore the route, and corduroy still underlays old sections of highway in the area. Modern construction methods do not allow the permafrost to thaw, either by building a gravel berm on top or replacing the vegetation and soil immediately with gravel. The Burwash-Koidern section, however, is still a problem as the new highway built there in the late 1990s continues to experience frost heave.

Hey Skipper said...

... the hottest temperature ever recorded in the Arctic ...

Why is it impossible for these reports to use the actual time span. Instead, they use weasel phrases like "ever recorded" or "in recorded history".

Before satellite observations, actual temperature data is practically non-existent.

Apparently, "... the hottest temperature since 1975 in the Arctic ..." isn't panicky enough.

JPS said...

Very few articles on this Arctic heat wave mention Fort Yukon, Alaska, where the temperature hit 100 degrees F on June 27, 1915. I wonder what caused that one?

Under "annals of a warming planet," I'm not so impressed by a one-off temperature spike that just barely, maybe, edges out a record from 100 years ago. Like Vincent Vega said, It's freaky but it happens.

The prolonged way-above-average temperatures in that part of the Arctic, months on end, are more impressive, and more worrisome if you're convinced current trends will continue, and accelerate.

stephen cooper said...

I always thought Mary Tyler Moore's sitcom apartment held the record.

Dust Bunny Queen said...

steve uhr said... Her Majesty Dusty Rabbit —. What is the authority for your assertion that masks are dangerous because they force you to breath in more CO2. Or is that just your “expert” opinion?

Dr. Blaylock

....There is a difference between the N95 respirator mask and the surgical mask (cloth or paper mask) in terms of side effects. The N95 mask, which filters out 95% of particles with a median diameter >0.3 µm2 , because it impairs respiratory exchange (breathing) to a greater degree than a soft mask, and is more often associated with headaches. In one such study, researchers surveyed 212 healthcare workers (47 males and 165 females) asking about presence of headaches with N95 mask use, duration of the headaches, type of headaches and if the person had preexisting headaches.2

They found that about a third of the workers developed headaches with use of the mask, most had preexisting headaches that were worsened by the mask wearing, and 60% required pain medications for relief. As to the cause of the headaches, while straps and pressure from the mask could be causative, the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia). It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness..............
So YES a mask can cause CO2 levels to be higher.

If you are using a mask (mostly from China) that allows the exhalation of CO2 to escape and allows fresh air to come readily flowing in then you are basically doing a useless action. Those paper masks are not effective. Unless there is a tight seal, and a way for the exhalations to EXIT, then you are wasting your time and money. The home made and cloth masks trap bacteria and restrict air flow more than the cloth ones. Plus the micron filtering of those masks is not enough to actually protect you.

I thought we were supposed to accept the "experts" or can we pick and chose who we like based on our own preferences? Which is it? Blind acceptance, or...judicious choice. I know which one I make...judicious choice.

People who have to work all day in masks and especially those who are doing active working...not just sitting on their butts....are going to inhale more CO2.

When I go the the doctor and they use that Oxygenation measuring dealie that the put on your finger..the difference between wearing a mask and not wearing a mask during the procedure is that my blood oxygen is lower by several points when wearing a mask. And I AM just sitting on my butt at that time....not working, moving, lifting, or breathing harder.

Wear a mask if it makes you feel good about yourself. I wear one when I am shopping because I want to shop. Or at the Doctor because they make me. Otherwise. Nope.

Earnest Prole said...

It’s the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Sooner or later, everything turns to shit. It just so happens “sooner” turned out to be 2020, and “everything” turned out to be “everything.”

William said...

This will be the new Ibiza. Book early before the drunken Brit tourists ruin the purity of the experience. Many dermatologists believe that a sun tan acquired under an Artic sun requires less blockers and gives your skin a more delicate and pallid tan. Tennis played on permafrost presents some challenges, but jogging there is less traumatic for the knees and actually strengthens them.

Pillage Idiot said...

Yancey,

Will it all be OK if my son marries a woman with "huge tracts of land"?

P.S. He is studying aerospace engineering and not prone to suddenly breaking into song!

Michael K said...

If you are using a mask (mostly from China) that allows the exhalation of CO2 to escape and allows fresh air to come readily flowing in then you are basically doing a useless action. Those paper masks are not effective. Unless there is a tight seal, and a way for the exhalations to EXIT, then you are wasting your time and money.

Of course. Steve is a lawyer or some sort of bureaucrat. The mask is a leftist sign of solidarity. "Drive Trump from office even if it kills the country!"

rehajm said...

Easier to get a tee time I'd reckon. Lets play 108!

bagoh20 said...

I wonder why how all those animals could have lived there before anthropogenic global warming.

Tomcc said...

DBQ- thanks for the link; interesting article.
Also interesting that after a few minutes MS Edge shows "unsafe content" next to the URL!

Achilles said...

steve uhr said...
Her Majesty Dusty Rabbit —. What is the authority for your assertion that masks are dangerous because they force you to breath in more CO2. Or is that just your “expert” opinion?

steve uhr doesn't get a joke...

u r dum.

narciso said...

a disciple of mullah mckibben, there's another piece by entous, repeating the ukraine narrative,

Clyde said...

Nothing is permanent, not even permafrost. We have had much warmer temperatures in the Earth's history, and much colder ones. The current interglacial period has been very benign compared to the much wider temperature swings of the past, none of them caused by human activity, but to expect it to achieve a permanent period of stasis where the climate never changes is unrealistic. The Earth will do what it wants to do, as will the Sun. All humans can do is adapt, which we've been doing for hundreds of thousands of years.

Tomcc said...

Permafrost is to permanent as dormant is to volcano.

Gospace said...

So, musk ox, a cave lion, a Pleistocene wolf, a woolly mammoth, and aN almost perfectly preserved, forty-thousand-year-old goal were found there. Almost like at one time the Earth was much much warmer than it is today, and yet, despite the warnings of radical environmentalists and fear mongering climate “scientists “, animal and therefore plant life thrived.

Almond it was warmer naturally without human interference. Almost as if there was this huge variable heat source at the center of our galaxy that has this strange effect on Earth’s temperature and determines ice age or warm period. Gee, I hope someone can figure it out.

Seems like these warm periods are healthier for life than ice ages.

Robert Cook said...

"Nothing is permanent, not even permafrost. We have had much warmer temperatures in the Earth's history, and much colder ones. The current interglacial period has been very benign compared to the much wider temperature swings of the past, none of them caused by human activity, but to expect it to achieve a permanent period of stasis where the climate never changes is unrealistic. The Earth will do what it wants to do, as will the Sun. All humans can do is adapt, which we've been doing for hundreds of thousands of years."

Of course. You state what is common knowledge. But your mild comment "all humans can do is adapt" leaves unsaid that "adapting" can involve wrenching and even violent changes to how we live, bringing potential social turmoil, global homelessness, starvation, wars, pandemics, destruction of insfrastructure, financial and societal collapses, mass deaths, etc. The encouragement that we take steps to reduce our production of CO2 gasses, made by those who do not believe it is already too late, are made in the hope that we can retard the ongoing process so as to mitigate the severity of "adaptation" we will be forced to endure.

The Godfather said...

This was covered on WattsUpWithThat five days ago.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/06/23/climate-change-temperature-hits-100-degrees-above-arctic-circle-just-like-100-years-ago/

It's nothing new and no big deal.

Nichevo said...

Tundra is shit. There is nothing you can't do to tundra that won't improve it. The Russians have the world's largest supply of permafrost and they would like nothing, nothing better than to turn it into arable land.

And frankly why not? You're worried about natural history? Ask the demonstrators in the blue cities what they care for history. Beauty? Ha ha. Hahaha. A-HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, go look at some tundra and get back to us.

DEEBEE said...

Ahh! The hunt for Red (hot) October, No ember etc. continues apace. All in the pursuit of Glow-bal warming.

Amadeus 48 said...

How long has this place been occupied? The Little Ice Age ended about 1860. It’s getting warmer you say?

boatbuilder said...

About a decade ago we took a family trip to the Canadian Rockies-Banff, Lake Louise, Jasper-in August. (I highly recommend it, BTW).
We visited a glacier, which was of course melting, in August-but the melting was from a point beyond the highest melting point of any previous year, which is bad.

The very nice kid leading the tour showed us where the glacier had extended to in 1834 (or sometime in that general timeframe), when it had begun retreating, and the annual (or decadal) retreats (each one higher than previous years) leading up to the catastrophically bad current situation, in which it was apparent that the very massive glacier still existing (which we traveled across by gigantic bus-type vehicle for several miles and got to walk on) was melting very fast and shedding a lot --a very lot--of water.

My question--which drew no answer from our guide, and some very negative reviews from the wife and kids--was: what happened in 1834?

alanc709 said...

Earth will reach its natural static temperature when the sun dies.

Bruce Hayden said...

“ The encouragement that we take steps to reduce our production of CO2 gasses, made by those who do not believe it is already too late, are made in the hope that we can retard the ongoing process so as to mitigate the severity of "adaptation" we will be forced to endure.”

You presuppose, with a lot of faked evidence, that there is a credible danger. But even if you believe that humans are heating the Earth through CO2 emissions, even the worst barely credible projections of, say, sea level increases (which turn out not to probably be happening at all), work out to be a fraction of what can be naturally accommodated through building obsolescence. In other words, buildings naturally fall apart and are replaced faster than any marginally credible sea level increase will flood them.

And the Russians and the Canadians can just dream about the millions of acres of farmland that would be released from the permafrost to farming, if Global Warming were actually happening on any sort of meaningful level. And it should be remembered that if it really were happening, it wouldn't involve, except minimally, the tropics getting warmer, but rather the Artic getting warmer (thus freeing up all that permafrost for farming). But, realistically, another Ice Age is more probable.

mandrewa said...

As others have already pointed out, it's hard to know what's normal. To my mind we have only had good global temperature data since 1979. That's the year that satellites made it possible to measure temperatures all over the world and not just some small percentage of the planet.

And during those 60 years, the UAH LT temperature set (LT stands for lower troposphere) shows an average increase of about 0.13 degrees Celsius per decade. For this May we are 0.59 degrees Celsius hotter than what it was in 1980.

But that's just an average, for the Arctic it was 1.15 degrees Celsius warmer than it was in 1980. But that's just an average and although I don't know the number I'll bet that in the specific part of Siberia that we are focusing on it is warmer than that.

For my particular part of the world, it feels like summer is starting late. The same thing happened last year. For the lower 48 states, the UAH LT data shows a 0.17 degree Celsius increase over 1980.

If we go beyond the temperature data and use proxies like ice cores, it is still not clear whether what is happening today is abnormal or not. It may be unusual but then there are also times in the past where it has also been unusual and in a similar way.

And some things don't seem to be changing at all. For example the rise in sea level. Oceanic sea levels seem to be rising at exactly the same rate today as they have been for the last several thousand years.

Robert Cook said...

"Earth will reach its natural static temperature when the sun dies."

Well before the sun is good and dead, it will have expanded outward to encompass the orbits of the inner planets, and will have swallowed up the Earth, made a burnt cinder in the process.

Nichevo said...

Can we take the 'A Reasonable Man' tag away from that other guy and give it to Wince?


Why not, the other guy ain't using it.

Nichevo said...

Robert Cook said...
"Earth will reach its natural static temperature when the sun dies."

Well before the sun is good and dead, it will have expanded outward to encompass the orbits of the inner planets, and will have swallowed up the Earth, made a burnt cinder in the process.



Shows what you know. Who's to say that by then, we won't have either moved the Earth or fixed/moved/replaced the Sun?

More likely than your politics ever working.