August 30, 2019

"In the weeks I spent listening to Malcolm Gladwell’s podcast, I learned that lobsters have serotonin, that Elvis Presley suffered from parapraxis and that Mr. Gladwell adheres to a firm life rule that he drink only five liquids: water, tea, red wine, espresso and milk."

That's a fine first sentence. The article is "With ‘Talking to Strangers,’ Malcolm Gladwell Goes Dark/Read by millions — but savaged by critics — the author has a new book on police violence, campus rape and other bleak terrain" by Amy Chozick (in the NYT).

Excerpt:
At 55, in clear-framed spectacles and a head of curls, Mr. Gladwell still has the spindly, featherweight look of someone who can break a five-minute mile on a casual weekend run. He lives in a two-story townhouse apartment in the West Village, brimming with books, vintage furniture and a set of eclectic paintings of the Ethiopian Army. We sat at a heavy wooden table as 90-degree August soup poured through the open windows....

Books take years to complete, but thanks to [podcasting], Mr. Gladwell’s typical reader — whom he has described as “a 45-year-old guy with three kids who’s an engineer at some company outside of Atlanta” — can partake in a virtuous cycle of Gladwell programming. The podcast teases interest in a souped-up “Talking to Strangers” audiobook, which builds an audience for more speeches, which stokes advertisers for the podcasts....
August souped-up?

It was a simple writing error to re-use the word "soup" there, and it amuses me, especially since neither use is about actual soup. "Soup" is conventionally used to refer to air that seems thick, mostly for fog, where the traditional expression is "pea soup fog." The OED traces that metaphor back to 1849, to an entry in a journal by Herman Melville: "Upon sallying out this morning encountered the oldfashioned pea soup London fog." That makes it sound as though people had been saying "pea soup fog" for a long time.

And what about the soup in "souped up"? The OED doesn't go into any detail here, but I think it's just an analogy to feeding human beings with the hearty, humble food provided to hungry poor people. The oldest uses are not about adding fuel, but tinkering with the mechanical works, readjusting the engines — of airplanes and cars... and jitneys:
Here come a flat-top, he was moving up with me
Then come waving goodbye in a little old souped-up jitney
I put my foot in my tank and I began to roll
Moaning siren, 'twas a state patrol
So I let out my wings and then I blew my horn
Bye-bye New Jersey, I've become airborne
No, that one wasn't in the OED. That's just what plays in my head. Chuck Berry. Wonder if he had parapraxis... or if I do... What is parapraxis?!
Parapraxis, the clinical terminology for “Freudian slips,” as the episode explains, means abnormal acts in speech, memory, or physicality....

Gladwell focuses on the parapraxis that seemed to occur during performances in the late 60s and early 70s of Elvis’s song “Are You Lonesome Tonight?,” which contains a minute-long spoken-word section aimed at a long-lost lover. Though Elvis performed the song many times, he consistently tripped over the interlude. His final sweat-soaked performance of the song is iconic for all the wrong reasons: the words are almost all gone . . . replaced instead by maniacal, uncontrollable laughter.

The spectacle is hard to explain....
Or easy to explain:



And so, as you sally out this morning, souped up on espresso or tea or milk, have some laughs, have some lobsters, and good luck with your parapraxis.

85 comments:

rhhardin said...

soup opera

Ralph L said...

Jordan Peterson is the Lobster Man.
Is Gladwell for or against campus rape?

rehajm said...

Be careful out there, it's a real pea souper.

Ralph L said...

When going outside in Summer, half the time I think, "Once more into the soup, my friends, once more," but it should be unto and dear, not into and my.

Sharc 65 said...

My worn-out Classic Bloopers record had someone saying "the fog was thick as sea poop." Good times.

Laslo Spatula said...

This made me think of a previous Gladwell piece that seems related: when a ballplayer can no longer throw a ball accurately -- something they have previously done all of their life.

I didn't immediately find the Gladwell article, but found this instead (which references Gladwell's piece, with a title of an Althouse-bait word The Yips.

"Rick Ankiel, the pitcher in the St. Louis Cardinals Organization, was a phenom on the mound his rookie year, pitching a fall season in the big leagues by the age of 20. This all came to an abrupt end in the 2000 postseason. Ankiel not only couldn’t throw a strike — he couldn’t even throw the ball close to the catcher. He threw 5 wild pitches before being taken out by manager Tony La Russa. The next game was even worse. He threw 20 wild pitches in the first inning. Since that post-season appearance, Ankiel has never been able to regain his pitching ability and he had to transition to outfield to remain in baseball..."

I am Laslo.

Mr. Forward said...

“So does this mean we've been wrong about expresso all this time? Yes and no. Espresso remains the original borrowed word for the beverage, but expresso shows enough use in English to be entered in the dictionary and is not disqualified by the lack of an x in its Italian etymon. Just think of expresso as a quirky, jittery variant.”. Merrimack-Webster

tcrosse said...

Let us not forget Soupy Sales.

Ann Althouse said...

"Though Elvis performed the song many times, he consistently tripped over the interlude."

I watched that clip. To my eye (and ear), the laughing is phony, and he just can't be bothered doing the spoken-word interlude. He had a joke lyric in the sung part before the interlude — "Do you gaze at your bald head and wish you had hair?" — and laughs at his own joke — not that he's genuinely cracked up — and then extends the laughing to avoid the trouble of doing the spoken-word part. I don't think it's "maniacal" or "uncontrollable." I think it's sad and lazy, by a great artist who knows he's ruining himself and who would soon be dead.

He gets out a little of the spoken word: "You know someone said that the world's a stage/And each of us must play a part." And there he is standing on a stage, before a huge audience that is eating up whatever bad soup he's serving up. And the words say he "must play a part," but he's resisting. I imagine his inner voice is questioning why he must and who are those laughing faces out there?

The podcast stresses that Elvis is laughing, but what about the laughing of the audience? How did Elvis feel? How alienating was this scene for him? How drugged up was he? How bad were his physical ailments? How lonesome was Elvis that night?

If you read the official lyrics for the spoken-word section of "Are You Lonesome Tonight," you get to: "Now the stage is bare and I'm standing there/With emptiness all around/And if you won't come back to me/Then they can bring the curtain down." The reason to laugh is that it wasn't funny at all, and Elvis was lost and dying.

Mr. Forward said...

Can’t trust spellcheck with a dictionary.

J. Farmer said...

Are You Lonesome Tonight is one of my favorite Elvis ballads, but I’ve always loathed the spoken interlude portion of the song.

Temujin said...

In Florida, in summer...walking through the humidity is like walking through a soup. A thick texture of soupy, hot, wet air. I am sure he was referring to a thick, humid air in Gladwell's townhome. No air conditioning? (maybe he's saving the planet, one bowl of soup at a time).

I'm going to walk around today in parapraxis, unable to think of what I was walking out to do in the soup because I have the sounds of a demented Elvis laughing in my head.

David Begley said...

Souped-up car. Accessories added. Fast.

No beer? No air conditioning?

Eddie Jetson said...

Doesn’t “suped up” come from “super?”

rehajm said...

Everyone thinks I wrote ‘Freakonomics,’

I find that incredibly funny for some reason.

Laslo Spatula said...

The problem Elvis had was that he was perfunctorily trying to get through the spoken monologue he had done hundreds of times before, but was distracted by the inner monologue already going on in his head.

Perhaps that spoken monologue was his own version of the movie "Groundhog's Day": each show, the same one over and over, different audiences that are no different than the previous audience ,the only variations coming from where he is in his own mind.

He is trapped in that loop, and -- outside his head -- people are experiencing it as new, but wanting the experience to be just the same as the previous one.

There was not Skinny Elvis and Fat Elvis: there was Fresh Elvis and Meta Elvis, the latter as he recreated the Elvis Experience so often that he didn't even have to 'be there' to do it.

The flashier the jumpsuit, the bigger the sunglasses, the bushier the sideburns: Elvis as The First Elvis Impersonator.

I am Laslo.

rehajm said...

The reasoning in ‘Outliers,’ which consists of cherry-picked anecdotes, post-hoc sophistry and false dichotomies, had me gnawing on my Kindle,” a Harvard professor wrote in 2009. In 2013, a Times columnist ended his review bluntly: “It’s time for Malcolm Gladwell to find a new shtick.”

I have a hard time understanding Gladwell criticism. Is his style too academic for his content? Too light for people expecting self help? Is it because he's just a little off, like from a parallel universe? Too Canadian?

More likely academic quacks feel their shtick is threatened...

Laslo Spatula said...

I see Althouse's 6:23 comment was perhaps mining the same minerals as mine.

I am Laslo.

stlcdr said...

“Souped up” is a phrase used in Britain. Super, as Eddie J notes above is likely where it came from. Typically, it means ‘made it better, but better depends on who you ask’. You could also say, jazzed up. Adding bells and whistles. Souping it up doesn’t necessarily make it better, but may appear to.

When I was a kid, it generally was used in relation to cars; “did you see Jeff’s Vauxhall Viva?! It’s now all souped up!”

Ralph L said...

Super has been replaced by brilliant, so maybe Brillo scouring pads can make a comeback.

Laslo Spatula said...

"More likely academic quacks feel their shtick is threatened..."

I think a lot of 'academics' don't want the average person to understand their lofty thoughts: if the average person can grasp it, then they, the academics, are no longer the Wizard behind the curtain.

Gladwell is accessible, which brought him mass popularity. Then he committed the sin of not being disdainful of the people who made him popular.

If Kurt Cobain had emotionally accepted his popularity, and not worried about being considered a 'sell-out', he wouldn't have killed himself.

(Ha! That's a joke: everyone knows Courtney killed Kurt).

I am Laslo.

Sofa King said...

I also thought it came from "super", via "supercharged". Engine superchargers have been around for a long time, and was a way to give a car a large horsepower boost without replacing the entire engine. "Supercharged up" became shortened to "sup'd up" but since that reads with ambiguous pronunciation, it got written phonetically as "souped up".

Bob said...

The story I once heard about that Elvis clip is that when he mischievously changed the line to "Do you stare at your bald head and wish you had hair?" a man in in the audience stood up and took off a toupee that he was wearing, which is what Elvis saw and caused him to crack up.

whitney said...

"can partake in a virtuous cycle of Gladwell programming."

Wow. Honesty

rehajm said...

a man in in the audience stood up and took off a toupee that he was wearing, which is what Elvis saw and caused him to crack up.

Ha! Plot thickens...

Darrell said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Darrell said...

People used to add things to a giant pot of soup over time. Or add bits and bobs--like leftover sausage or bread-- to their own bowl of soup. Everyone knew that soup was a dish where no one stuck to a recipe.

Nothing to do with "super."

Known Unknown said...

"The reason to laugh is that it wasn't funny at all, and Elvis was lost and dying."

Do Prince next!

J. Farmer said...

@rehajm:

I have a hard time understanding Gladwell criticism.

Gladwell is a favorite among the globalist set. That alone is enough to raise suspicion. His work has always struck me as one long TED talk. Andrew Orloski wrong a long critique in The Register titled The dumb, dumb world of Malcolm Gladwell more than 10 years ago. Forewarning, it uses that old stupid tactic of dividing a story among three different pages. Steve Sailer also has a long history of criticizing Gladwell, including Malcolm Gladwell Blinks At Racial Realities, Malcolm Gladwell Blinks Again, and Malcolm in a Muddle.

Birches said...

Why do all profiles contain descriptions of where the interview takes place, what the person is wearing, etc. So cliche. I don't want to read further when I get to"that" paragraph because I feel like the profiler is a crappy writer.

J. Farmer said...

"Souped up" originally referred to horses, not cars.

Scott Patton said...

"Here come a flat-top, he was moving up with me"
Read that at first as if it was The Beatles "Come Together". Got pretty far... after realizing the mistake and forcing it a little.

traditionalguy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
traditionalguy said...

Althouse is being hard on the King. Elvis came along before The Professor's teen years. And by then he had been displaced by the Beatles, so Elvis could do nothing right. And then Bob Dylan started writing songs and there was no going back.

rehajm said...

J. Farmer said...
@rehajm:

I have a hard time understanding Gladwell criticism.

Gladwell is a favorite among the globalist set. That alone is enough to raise suspicion. His work has always struck me as one long TED talk.


'@J. Farmer':

Gladwell is a favorite among the globalist set. That alone is enough to raise suspicion.

You generally can't complete a sentence without using a vague -ist or -ism so I'm not going to try to wade in to that one but...

His work has always struck me as one long TED talk

...this one is interesting and more to my point. You say that like TED's a bad thing. TED is quick takes on a topic, usually straight from the horse's mouth. Why would that format be a bad thing? I can appreciate criticism of some of the content, but the format?

tim maguire said...

Laslo Spatula said...
This made me think of a previous Gladwell piece that seems related: when a ballplayer can no longer throw a ball accurately -- something they have previously done all of their life.


This makes me think of Chuck Knoblauch, the Yankees shortstop who suddenly and without injury or explanation, lost his ability to throw to first.

Dust Bunny Queen said...

Laslo said: The problem Elvis had was that he was perfunctorily trying to get through the spoken monologue he had done hundreds of times before, but was distracted by the inner monologue already going on in his head

This is very astute and quite true. I used to sing professionally for a while in my ancient younger days. Played the guitar and sang in a group of 3 people.

When you play and sing the same song over and over and over and over, night after night.... It becomes and automatic process like driving a car. Your mind will wander while your body is doing the work. You look at the crowd. Watch what they are doing. Think about something else and eventually you lose your place in the song. Repeat a lyric. Forget where you are in the music or even forget the words.

It is like walking into a room and wondering....Why am I here?

Just think how many times Elvis had to sing and perform these same songs. Also...eventually you get so sick of singing that same stuff you hate the song, hate the lyrics, want to destroy it.

tim maguire said...

Laslo Spatula said...If Kurt Cobain had emotionally accepted his popularity, and not worried about being considered a 'sell-out', he wouldn't have killed himself.

(Ha! That's a joke: everyone knows Courtney killed Kurt).


Yet another Laslo post that triggers memories. In my life, I have known 2 people with a Courtney connection. They both think she did it.

Birkel said...

For me it's black coffee, unsweetened tea, water, milk, and bourbon.

Maybe I'll add a glass of red wine every so often. Reading good things about red wine. And I like the taste.

J. Farmer said...

Yet another Laslo post that triggers memories. In my life, I have known 2 people with a Courtney connection. They both think she did it.

Did you ever see Nick Broomfield's documentary Kurt & Courtney?

Mark said...

Have heard the name. Never read or heard a single thing he has ever said or done though. Always thought that he was some ancient geezer. If not long dead.

J. Farmer said...

@rehajm:

...this one is interesting and more to my point. You say that like TED's a bad thing. TED is quick takes on a topic, usually straight from the horse's mouth. Why would that format be a bad thing? I can appreciate criticism of some of the content, but the format?

If the format is the manner in which information gets conveyed, why shouldn't it be fair game for crticism? Michael Moore's documentaries are typically well crafted and structured but are not so good at conveying real information.

Howard said...

I hate that when it happens

Fernandinande said...

I missed Presley's joke at first and thought he was laughing at the background singers because they made me want to laugh.

Howard said...

What do i need to know about Gladwell besides 10,000-hour experts?

Seeing Red said...

It’s Friday. I started reading the post and couldn’t figure out why Mr. Blackwell was talking about police violence and campus rape.

Lolololol

J Scott said...

I listen to his podcast. He tells interesting stories in an interesting way. Alot of it is airy bs, but he does do good interviews and he does occasionally brings out some interesting observations. I listen to him at 1.3x speed so maybe that helps a bit.

I think the best approach to him is to not accept everything at face value, do some of your own research, and that even Malcolm doesn't drink his own cool aid.

I would consider him an entrepôt to more interesting ideas.

J. Farmer said...

@J Scott:

I would consider him an entrepôt to more interesting ideas.

I think that's a very apt description.

Laslo Spatula said...

"I would consider him an entrepôt to more interesting ideas."

Yep. I second Farmer on that.

I am Laslo.

tim maguire said...

J. Farmer said...Did you ever see Nick Broomfield's documentary Kurt & Courtney?

I have not. Is it good?

tim maguire said...

Howard said...What do i need to know about Gladwell besides 10,000-hour experts?

If you want your son to play in the NHL, make sure he's conceived late spring/early summer.

J. Farmer said...

@tim maguire:

I have not. Is it good?

I enjoy Broomfield's documentaries, which are often just as much about making the documentary as they are the purported subject. My best friend, a documentary junkie, is not a fan. I didn't like Kurt & Courtney as much as Broomfield's earlier film Heidi Fleiss: Hollywood Madam, but it is quite good, and it does a deep dive on the theory that Love had Cobain murdered. You can watch the trailer here.

Birches said...

So do you guys believe Courtney pulled the trigger? Or just told him to get back in the car and get it over with? Com(Comparison to a previous Althouse subject).

traditionalguy said...

Gladwell has been replaced by AOC. What does that say about our new Hate America First Educational system. At least Gladwell had an optimistic point of view.

Roughcoat said...

I just always assumed that Elvis was stoned when he gave that performance. Seems obvious.

J. Farmer said...

@Birches:

So do you guys believe Courtney pulled the trigger? Or just told him to get back in the car and get it over with? Com(Comparison to a previous Althouse subject).

For what it's worth, I believe Cobain killed himself. The fact that he was in a relationship with a borderline personality disordered junkie probably didn't help matters.

Ann Althouse said...

""Souped up" originally referred to horses, not cars."

Not quite.

The oldest appearance of "souped up" is (OED): "1931 Automotive Industries 30 May 826/1 Ray Keech's run at Daytona Beach in the White Triplex powered with three ‘souped-up’ Liberty engines."

For "soup up" (the verb), the OED definition is: " "[compare quot. 1909 at soup n. 2c; perhaps influenced by super- prefix] Originally and chiefly with up. To modify (an engine, aircraft, motor vehicle, etc.) to increase its power and efficiency. Also transferred and figurative. colloquial (orig. U.S.)." And the earliest uses are about motors.

But if you go to the entry for "soup" from 1909, under definition 2c. which is just "In miscellaneous uses: (see quots.)": "1909 Webster's New Internat. Dict. Eng. Lang. Soup,..any material injected into a horse with a view to changing its speed or temperament. Racing Cant.

So they weren't' saying the horse was "souped up," but just that what was used on the horse was "soup."

traditionalguy said...

Soup for race horses must have been a mixture of stimulants. IIR Pharmacist Pemberton put coca leaf extract into his soda fountain drink with a soup of other secret ingredients.

Souped up must mean dosed with caffeine.

Ralph L said...

So soup was the opposite of nobble. The up part is probably similar to the English play up.

Ralph L said...

Now we juice.

Fernandinande said...

soup (v.)
"increase the horsepower of an engine," 1921, probably from soup (n.) in slang sense of "narcotic injected into horses to make them run faster" (1911), influenced by supercharge (v.).

+

The first functional supercharger for internal combustion engines came out in 1878.

Ken B said...

Farmer
“That alone is enough to raise suspicion “
How quickly one forgets. Ebert.

Fernandinande said...

Here's "supercharged" used in in 1827

Fernandinande said...

souped-up
Etymology
"Origin uncertain; the fact that the earlier senses seem to be the horse racing cant and United States Navy slang ones suggests a derivation from soup (“liquid food item”), connoting a horse or a person being filled with a liquid."

Earnest Prole said...

For those unfamiliar with Gladwell's podcast Revisionist History, I would recommend the following episodes as an introduction:

1.8 “Blame Game”: The Toyota acceleration hysteria and “the dishonesty and naiveté of many in the media.”

2.6 “The King of Tears”: “Why country music makes you cry, and rock and roll doesn’t: A musical interpretation of divided America.” If you're a Deplorable, trust me.

2.9 “McDonald’s Broke My Heart” “Why for the past generation we’ve been eating french fries that taste like cardboard.” Gladwell savages the system that forced McDonalds to stop frying their potatoes in beef tallow.

2.10 “The Basement Tapes”: Exposing the government’s food pyramid debacle. “A cardiologist in Minnesota searches through the basement of his childhood home for a missing box of data from a long-ago experiment. What he discovers changes our understanding of the modern American diet — but also teaches us something profound about what really matters when we honor our parents’ legacy.”

3.1 “Divide and Conquer”: The plot to break up Texas into four states, three of them blue.

3.8 “The Imaginary Crimes of Margit Hamosh” and 3.9 “Strong Verbs, Short Sentences”: “One long, hot afternoon on Capitol Hill, in the summer of 1991, the most powerful man in Congress [Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich.] took on the most powerful person in American science. Science won. What does it take to end a reign of terror? The science fraud panic of the 1990s.”

4.7 “Descend into the Particular”: The lies surrounding the police shooting of an unarmed man in Ferguson, Missouri. “How does the Jesuitical idea of ‘disordered attachments’ help us make sense of what happened?”

4.8 “In a Metal Mood”: Two thumbs up for cultural appropriation.

J. Farmer said...

@Ken B:

“That alone is enough to raise suspicion “
How quickly one forgets. Ebert.


Only raises it, doesn't confirm it ;)

Nichevo said...

Laslo Spatula said...
I see Althouse's 6:23 comment was perhaps mining the same minerals as mine.

That is, the same minerals as your mine?

Bill Peschel said...

Gladwell leaves me cold with his glib explanations. The 10K theory is pretty well busted. I listened to his revisionistic history podcast, and the one about "The Basement Tapes" -- well, I was taking notes for an essay on why you shouldn't trust Gladwell based on it. He leaps to conclusions unsupported by evidence.

I wish I could quote chapter and verse (which is why I didn't finish the essay), but those are my impressions of his reportage.

rehajm said...

I would consider him an entrepôt to more interesting ideas.

perfect.

rehajm said...

If the format is the manner in which information gets conveyed, why shouldn't it be fair game for criticism (sic)?

...because with respect to TED the format is: People. Talking.

dreams said...

Elvis has been dead now for as long as he lived.

Fernandinande said...

“Why for the past generation we’ve been eating french fries that taste like cardboard.”

You can fix to some extent by using pink Himalayan sea salt on the fries; it's 2% lower in harmful sodium chloride and 100% higher in pleasing pinkness than normal salt.

Earnest Prole said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Earnest Prole said...

Gladwell is a journalist willing to write an article in the New Yorker saying gun control won’t help, and record a podcast documenting how the Black Lives Matter narrative of the Ferguson shooting was an outright lie. He’s worth your time even (or, I would argue, especially)if you disagree with some of his other conclusions.

Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

The laughter sounded genuine to me, but the editing made it bizarre. He told a throw away joke, and then couldn't continue the song because of the ridiculousness of it.

Anyway, he probably didn't know he was dying, and likely wasn't actually dying at the time, though in hindsight, The King was destined to reign on his Throne of Death.

Elvis wasn't a great artist who knew he was ruining himself and would soon be dead. He was just a spastic yodeler with a gimmick that worked. He was a handsome country boy and geetar strummer who could croon, a hick who managed to combine his hillbilly sound with blues and a dash of Hollywood glamor at a time when audiences were clamoring for rock n roll (sp.?).

Earnest Prole said...

Elvis wasn't a great artist who knew he was ruining himself and would soon be dead. He was just a spastic yodeler with a gimmick that worked.

I would invite you to read Daniel Wolff's Threepenny Review article "Elvis in the Dark" (if you have a JSTOR account here; otherwise here), exploring the nature of Elvis' talent through the lens of "Are You Lonesome Tonight?"

CapitalistRoader said...

Looks like a young Boris Johnson enjoying the concert @ 1:40.

Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of New York said...

"Gladwell savages the system that forced McDonalds to stop frying their potatoes in beef tallow.”

There is, or was, a museum in Birmingham, the UK, that served fish and chips fried in beef tallow. It was like fish and chips ice cream.

Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of New York said...

Black Country Museum

PluralThumb said...

I think this is a more careful approach to a duality at the least of understanding oneself and an "legend icon". Fear, I believe is necessary to warn any individual.
Fearless can have a multitude of reasonable explanation.
Pain to me has a specific/certain so called cut off point.
I got this this lesson from an orthodontist that cleaned my gums with what seemed to my imagination a jack hammer for construction.
I should be embarrassed but I'm careless in that respect.
That thought of a jackhammer kept my mind giggling inside through pain until I was surprised that the pain left completely and my mouth was like pudding.
Although the pain surely enough returned as the procedure was halted for some time. I'd apply similar to fear. Maybe a point of 'without fear' is a possibility, but ultimately returns if not disciplined regularly. The two aspects of biological life are a part an within for life, as warnings.

A for Elvis hysterically laughing at loneliness to write vaguely.
I strongly believe he was laughing at himself, his pain, his fear his lifetime, his role in life, his courage that we're misconstrued as rebellion against politics and not motivation to live on past history an certain truths. Also his hysterical laughter is easy to misunderstand as a personal attack of a ' how dare you laugh at my loneliness ' Although the message was not understood. I'll say it this way for what this way is worth. Everyone is lonely, any one being is not alone in that respect.
We are very far in history to have any solutions for feeling lonely,
We have not grazed water to herstory. If I hysterically laugh at my most previous statement, I am bound to cross and hurt feelings. I don't even know if herstory vs or in parallel/comjuction to history, is a subject, a genre, or at all accepted in Institutions of different kinds.
Brave man for the Podcast, more than I'd prefer to expose myself in any way.

PluralThumb said...

P.S. I've used a word "comjuction".
Instead of 'conjuction'.

From Google.com:


com-
WORD ORIGIN.
a prefix meaning
“with,” “together,” “in association,” and (with intensive force) “completely,” occurring in loanwords from Latin (commit): used in the formation of compound words before b, p, m: combine; compare; commingle.

VS.

con
/kän/
INFORMAL

verb
persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception.
"I conned her into giving me your home number"

synonyms: swindle, defraud, cheat, trick, fleece, dupe, deceive, rook, exploit, squeeze, milk, bleed; More

noun
an instance of deceiving or tricking someone.
"a con artist"

synonyms: swindle, deception, trick, racket, bit of sharp practice, fraud; More

( Also from Google.com )

J. Farmer said...

@rehajm:

...because with respect to TED the format is: People. Talking.

I think you may have misconstrued my original comment. The most pointed criticisms of Gladwell are not about his format or his methods, but his tendency to draw overly broad conclusions and to cherry pick data that fit foregone conclusions. I linked to four such pieces of criticism. Also, my comparison to TED talks was not a criticism of format but content. Obviously people talking is not a criticism. You basically only have a few ways to convey ideas to others: say them, write them, illustrate them, or demonstrate them.

Ken B said...

Prole
Very interesting article about Elvis. Thanks for the link. I still kinda go with Guralnick though I think. Early period better and more creative

Maillard Reactionary said...

AA quoted: "Here come a flat-top, he was moving up with me"

At first, I thought this was John Lennon, but when it didn't become "Come together" after "Moaning siren, 'twas a state patrol" I realized my mistake.

Could there have been a Chuck Berry to John Lennon influence here? Consciously or otherwise?

Discuss. (This will be 20% of your grade, or 33%, if you're not White.)

Unknown said...

Thank you Earnest Prole. D Wolff