"He" is Bob Dylan, the subject of the documentary film "Don't Look Back," by the great documentary filmmaker D.A. Pennebaker, who has died at the age of 94.
Here's the scene from "Don't Look Back" with Dylan and Donovan:
From Pennebaker's Wikipedia page:
In 1959, Pennebaker joined the equipment-sharing Filmakers' [sic] Co-op and co-founded Drew Associates with Richard Leacock and former LIFE magazine editor and correspondent Robert Drew. A crucial moment in the development of Direct Cinema, the collective produced documentary films for clients like ABC News... and Time-Life Broadcast.... Their first major film, Primary (1960), documented John F. Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey's respective campaigns in the 1960 Wisconsin Democratic Primary election. Drew, Leacock and Pennebaker, as well as photographers Albert Maysles, Terrence McCartney Filgate and Bill Knoll, all filmed the campaigning from dawn to midnight over the course of five days. Widely considered to be the first candid and comprehensive look at the day-by-day events of a Presidential race, it was the first film in which the sync sound camera could move freely with characters throughout a breaking story, a major technical achievement that laid the groundwork for modern-day documentary filmmaking....ADDED: Pennebaker's YouTube page is fantastic. I'll just give you this — Janis Joplin (from the film "Monterey Pop"):
In 1992, during the start of the Democratic primaries, Pennebaker and Hegedus approached campaign officials for Arkansas governor Bill Clinton about filming his presidential run. They were granted limited access to the candidate but allowed to focus on lead strategist James Carville and communications director George Stephanopoulos. The resulting work, The War Room, became one of their most celebrated films....
Pennebaker's films, usually shot with a hand-held camera, often eschew voice-over narration and interviews in favor of a "simple" portrayal of events typical of the direct cinema style Pennebaker helped popularize in the U.S. Of such an approach, Pennebaker told interviewer G. Roy Levin published in 1971 that "it's possible to go to a situation and simply film what you see there, what happens there, what goes on, and let everybody decide whether it tells them about any of these things. But you don't have to label them, you don't have to have the narration to instruct you so you can be sure and understand that it's good for you to learn." In that same interview with Levin, Pennebaker goes so far as to claim that Dont Look Back is "not a documentary at all by my standards". He instead repeatedly asserts that he does not make documentaries, but "records of moments", "half soap operas", and "semimusical reality things".
AND: The trailer for "Jimi Plays Monterey" (released in 1986, showing a performance in 1967):
ALSO: A "Monterey Pop" outtake (that's on the Criterion Collection edition of the movie) — The Mamas and the Papas and lots of shots of people in the audience, looking very 1967:
36 comments:
You may call me Terry
You may call me Timmy
You may call me Bobby
Or you may call me Zimmy
You may call me RJ
You may call me Ray
You may call me anything
No matter what you say
You're still gonna have to serve somebody
Yes, you're gonna have to serve somebody
Well it may be the Devil
And it may be the Lord
But you're gonna have to serve somebody
Ohh Yeah
Serve Somebody
Monterrey Pop was probably (presumptuously) one of the first times Janis felt the love. You can see her in the opening seconds of the clip looking back at her band and friends offstage and smiling at the audience response and applause. I'm thinking she had a life without many smiles up to that point.
While not really my kind of music, Redding put on a great show there. I used to have that album (vinyl). High energy.
Bad link fixed. Thanks for the heads-up.
I prefer "Don't Look Now", the creepiest movies I've seen. I've never liked Dylan's singing voice, but it isn't very creepy.
Totally forgot about that movie - never had the chance to see it, other than some excerpts on YouTube. Thanks to the wonders of the internet, I just purchased a digital version for viewing at my convenience at a later time.
Thanks for the post - this is why I read Althouse all the time.
Janis in that clip seems to be in the role of a fan of the group. The attention is on the glossy haired guy. Talk about white male privilege! Jeez. It's like she's lucky to be on stage with him and singing backup and looking thrilled.
What a magnificent creature Janis Joplin was for her short life.
Interesting guy — not sure how I never heard much about him since he chronicled music that I love!
I watched the Soul Man video by Sam Moore at the YouTube channel - big Sam and Dave fan right here - that guy sure can bring the vocals! What a great start to my Sunday.
Re; Joplin clip
- they don’t play guitar like that anymore (and who was that guy?)
- did you notice how all the guys’ hair under the lights had a reddish brown hue but Joplin’s had a lighter hue, vaguely glowing?
- Joplin looked good there, happy and smartly dressed
- Mama Cass approved! (and neither would see the ‘80s)
Slightly off topic but my discovery of Sam and Dave is kind of funny - I was watching The Blues Brothers (in the theatre, when it was released) and the scene where they were driving and he pops in the Best of Sam and Dave and the music starts playing and in my head I’m thinking “whoa this is great who are these guys?!”
Bought album next day and played it many hundreds of times in my life since. One of my all time favorites. All due to that movie.
Pennebaker's films, usually shot with a hand-held camera, often eschew voice-over narration and interviews in favor of a "simple" portrayal of events... "it's possible to go to a situation and simply film what you see there, what happens there, what goes on, and let everybody decide whether it tells them about any of these things. But you don't have to label them, you don't have to have the narration to instruct you so you can be sure and understand that it's good for you to learn."
Pennebaker is being generous there. Too often the documentary form is indoctrination, not learning. You only need a narrator to tell you which way the narrative is blow'n.
And there is so much rich detail to those scenes he filmed at the time. There's so much going on, even if it's just Joplin looking back at her band, or Mama Cass applauding, or Donovan handing over his guitar a bit begrudging to Dylan after receiving a compliment for performing in Dylan's style. Was Dylan lauding himself?
So much detail to absorb without the constant distraction of a narrator!
I'm not sure that those types of "scenes" are even allowed to take place anymore. Everything is so much more controlled. People are so much more handled. In music and life. Celebrity cocoons artists and performers, and so much earlier. Limited access, rights and releases.
As if the "narrators" have not only taken control of the narrative post-production, but the narrators have moved in to take control of the reality itself as it happens.
One detail: was Joplin using a plastic comb to play her Guiro? Nice touch!
Janis caught in the act of cultural appropriation.
The clip from "Jimi Plays Monterey" is pretty awesome, I must confess.
The Hippies were clueless and atrocious about many things, but the music was spectacular.
>>Blogger Ann Althouse said...
"Janis in that clip seems to be in the role of a fan of the group. The attention is on the glossy haired guy. Talk about white male privilege! Jeez. It's like she's lucky to be on stage with him and singing backup and looking thrilled."<<
Yeah, because who has ever seen a band member look admiringly at another band member as he solos. That is so out there! And never mind that on that song he *is* the lead singer and she is in a decidedly back-up role. But no, it's got to be some sort of male privilege thing or the other. And he's white, to boot!
Everyone, including Janis, including the band members, knew in very short order that *she* was the act and the band was incidental. But at the outset, the guys were an established, groundbreaking SF psychedelic band and she was a good singer that they recruited. It was a while before they gelled and sorted out who was who and what was what - a while after Monterey. She stayed with Big Brother as long as she did because she loved them and loved being in the band. It must have been terrible for her to feel so underprivileged during that time.
If you were handicapping the race back then, you might have given odds on Donovan being the Dylan of his generation. Donovan had a more musical voice and was certainly better looking. He wrote some pretty good songs too, although nothing on the level or in the quantity of Dylan. Well, anyway, he was a contender.....In some weird way, the inelegance of Dylan's voice and looks intensifies the poetry of his songs.
I was looking at the audience in The Mamas and the Papas video. All the people shown were couples or in a group of people except for the one black woman. (No conclusion, just an observation.)
Credit needs to be given to the people doing the sound for these documentaries. Doing that well seems like it would be as hard, or harder, than getting good video.
Bob's lyrics, Jimmy's guitar, Janis's voice, Michelle's face
I cannot recommend Monterey Pop highly enough for the audience shots alone.
'The barbarians were clueless and atrocious about many things, but the music was spectacular.'
That might suggest that one re-evaluate what one means by 'spectacular'.
I never got videos about Music.
Don't watch it - listen to it.
Videos about music are fun in their own right (at least they used to be). The music is complementary, and vice versa.
I never got videos about Music.
Don't watch it - listen to it.
You have to watch Janis Joplin to understand her and appreciate her. To see that she is a wild musical instrument--not a phony rehearsed act.
"Don't Look Back" wasn't a puff piece. Not all of the scenes flatte Dylan. It strikes me as being a fairly honest fly on the wall film.
Dylan has a competitive streak. And I think he enjoyed topping Donovan's Dylanesque attempt.
Amexpat said...
" "Don't Look Back" wasn't a puff piece. Not all of the scenes flatte Dylan. It strikes me as being a fairly honest fly on the wall film. "
That's probably why the film about the 1992 campaign got Carville instead of the Clintons.
"Yeah, because who has ever seen a band member look admiringly at another band member as he solos. That is so out there! And never mind that on that song he *is* the lead singer and she is in a decidedly back-up role. But no, it's got to be some sort of male privilege thing or the other. And he's white, to boot!"
That's my point: He's the lead singer. Why is he the lead singer? Why didn't they already know she was phenomenal and they were mundane? They were presuming her secondariness, though it's mindbogglingly wrong from the point of view of anyone watching the film.
Monterey Pop is an amazing documentary- probably the best one on music I have ever seen. I watched for a second time only a couple of months ago- I had first seen it in college.
"If you were handicapping the race back then, you might have given odds on Donovan being the Dylan of his generation. Donovan had a more musical voice and was certainly better looking. He wrote some pretty good songs too, although nothing on the level or in the quantity of Dylan. Well, anyway, he was a contender.....In some weird way, the inelegance of Dylan's voice and looks intensifies the poetry of his songs."
They're the same generation.
Donovan is great. It's wrong to see him in a competition with Dylan. They both are continuing in a line of folk singers and each did a very distinctive and original thing with it. Listen to the album "Hurdy Gurdy Man." That's not trying to be like Dylan. The backup band is what would one year later be Led Zeppelin.
Ann Althouse said...
Why is he the lead singer? Why didn't they already know she was phenomenal and they were mundane? They were presuming her secondariness, though it's mindbogglingly wrong from the point of view of anyone watching the film.
Janis Joplin is not secondary there--she is the musical instrument, the soloist. The male provides the repeating chorus.
Althouse>>"That's my point: He's the lead singer. Why is he the lead singer? Why didn't they already know she was phenomenal and they were mundane? They were presuming her secondariness, though it's mindbogglingly wrong from the point of view of anyone watching the film."<<
You seem to not know much about the group. He's the lead singer *on that particular song*. But at that point she was lead on most of their songs. They hired her specifically to be the lead singer - because they knew they needed one and they knew she was phenomenal. But to you of course, from this little snapshot video, she was being marginalized by those bad privileged white males in the band.
And, as a matter of fact, she didn't do much on "Combination of The Two" except sing "who whoop whoop" repeatedly. She was secondary on that song and there is nothing mindboggingly wrong with it. She showed her stuff much more on most of their other songs.
By the way, I worship the woman.
I enjoy watching these documentaries. I was too young to attend concerts in 1968 and, although I liked the music of the 70's, I never went to concerts. When I had the money, I didn't have the time, and when I had the time, I didn't have the money. Anyway, these clips give me a glimpse into events that I never experienced as a youth.
From Wikipedia "Big Brother and the Holding Company" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brother_and_the_Holding_Company
"Joplin sang for the first time with Big Brother in 1966. Years later, Andrew described the band's first impressions of her:
"'We were the established rock and roll band. We were heavy. We were like: all right, out of three or four bands in this city, we are one of them. We're in the newspapers all the time. We're working out. We are doing this woman a favor to even let her come and sing with us. She came in and she was dressed like a little Texan. She didn't look like a hippie, she looked like my mother, who is also from Texas. She sang real well but it wasn't like, "Oh we're bowled over." It was probably more like, our sound was really loud. It was probably bowling her over. I am sure we didn't turn down enough for her. She wrote letters home about how exotic all of us were. The names of the bands. That kind of thing. In other words, we weren't flattened by her and she wasn't flattened by us. It was probably a pretty equal meeting. She was a real intelligent, Janis was, and she always rose to the occasion. She sang the songs. It wasn't like this moment of revelation like you would like it to be. Like in a movie or something. It wasn't like, "Oh my God, now we have gone to heaven. We have got Janis Joplin." I mean she was good but she had to learn how to do that. It took her about a year to really learn how to sing with an electric band.'
"It took a while for some of the band's followers to accept the new singer and her current boyfriend, keyboardist Stephen Ryder. Her music was completely different from that which Big Brother was playing at that time. Big Brother had a very experimental and unconventional sound, but with Joplin, they became more disciplined musicians, their songs adopted a more traditional structure, and the band started to increase its popularity in the San Francisco psychedelic scene."
Yes, I already read that. You realize, don't you, that normal intra-band rivalry, which is rife in rock groups, does not establish the male privilege baloney you ascribed to the group from that one video. But I'll just say you won anyway and move on.
I bet that kiss from the guy holding the lit cigarette tasted...real good.
Blech.
Great stuff
I saw Donovan a few years back. Meh. He was really missing those Mickey Mist production values that made his hits pop and still sound au currant when they show up on radios.
Post a Comment