"... and Consciousness III, an unshackling from the stifling moral constraints of the 1950s, focusing on spiritual fulfillment. 'The extraordinary thing about this new consciousness,' he wrote, 'is that it has emerged from the machine-made environment of the corporate state, like flowers pushing up through a concrete pavement.... For those who thought the world was irretrievably encased in metal and plastic and sterile stone, it seems a veritable greening of America.'... 'The Greening of America'... might not have appeared in print if Mr. Reich’s mother, who ran the Horace Mann School for Nursery Years in New York, had not mentioned to a parent at the school that her son’s manuscript was languishing at a publisher. The parent was Lillian Ross, a writer for The New Yorker and paramour of the magazine’s editor, William Shawn. The book became a best seller in 1970 despite mixed notices. Reviewing it in The Times, Christopher Lehmann-Haupt proclaimed that in Mr. Reich 'youth culture has gotten its very own Norman Vincent Peale,' referring to the author of 'The Power of Positive Thinking.' In Mr. Reich’s utopia, he wrote, 'we’ll just stop consuming what we don’t need, stop doing meaningless work, stop playing war and ego games.'"
From "Charles Reich, Who Saw ‘The Greening of America,’ Dies at 91" (NYT).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
33 comments:
A very naive work.
A tin ear for the past at the very least.
If Consciousness III "emerged from the machine-made environment of the corporate state, like flowers pushing up through a concrete pavement," Consciousness IV is corporations censoring all thought that offends their owners' fake-woke friends.
Ah, an entry in the fantasy genre.
I did a college paper in 1985 looking at what happened to the Youth Movement of the 60's. I oft quoted The Greening Of America along with a host of other Dawning Of The Age Of Aquarius type books.
What was fascinating that despite the promise of a revolution in 1968, just 12 short years later those baby boomers radicals were casting their votes for Ronald Reagan. It was an interesting contrast.
IIRC, I got a A- on the paper.
"Levels of consciousness"? Hmmm.Would that be the zeitgeist? He was alert to the spiritual awakening that erupted in the USA in the late 1960s. He did his part.
What is up with this subsistence mentality?
And the perfection of the Soviet Man?
What was fascinating that despite the promise of a revolution in 1968, just 12 short years later those baby boomers radicals were casting their votes for Ronald Reagan. It was an interesting contrast.
Reality sux.
I fell for it hard.
Typically, at the the time of its publication, read in tandem with Roszak's "The Making of a Counterculture."
While CO2 doomsayers keep ignoring it, increased CO2 and other factors keep making the Earth, America included, greener.
"...the stifling moral constraints of the 1950s"
It didn't feel stifling at the time. I'm thankful to have grown up in an era with reasonable moral constraints. It made puberty a lot easier. Personal responsibility was still in vogue.
If you've only been alive for a few years, the extrapolation of all future events on the basis of what happened yesterday seems plausible. I didn't read the book, but I heard of Consciousness III, and it didn't sound like a crock at the time.....Marx made some predictions about capitalism that didn't pan out, but it never hurt his reputation. People believe what they want to believe. If you couch the horseshit in scientific terms with German words, it sounds more credible. The climate change people should start using terms like thermal zeitgeist to describe the crisis that is upon us.
My first impression is good riddance,
That didn't age well: #MeToo, #TimesUp.
Wow. Just think what Tony Robbins would have forced this guy to drink.
And with the emergence of Beto, AOC, and Bernie, we enter the era of Unconsciousness I, where thinking itself is an unnecessary burden. We live in the age of feels, bigly feels, which is a few hundred feet above Wrigley field floating on an ephemeral mist populated by a murmuration of cream filled raspberry unicorns.
Green as in naive. Naive as in reaching conclusions based on assumptions/assertions that may or may not, and, in other instances, have not or cannot be confirmed. A post-normal science suitable for our secular age.
In the end a lost sole.
Any relation to the third reich?
Personal responsibility was still in vogue.
Self-moderation and personal responsibility are imperatives of a liberated, sustainable society.
One less barnacle on The Ship of Science.
RIP. Good riddance.
His book did its part in persuading me that a lot of the counterculture was fucking stupid.
Ironic, "Reich" as a surname is far more often found among Jews than non-Jews.
Narr
Honorary Anungarunga
What's one more Lefty who is wrong about nearly everything?
May as well spit into the ocean.
I thought maybe it was that 4 foot 6 inch Labor Sec of Clinton's
i thought of Robert Rikikiki too!
'scuse me, at first glance I was thinking Wilhelm Reich.
I only read excerpts, but remember he said the greening of America was for the educated, upper middle class only. The working class would have to miss out because 1) they’re naturally too stupid (think Archie Bunker) and 2) someone was needed to do all the necessary work while elites spent all day writing poetry and strumming guitars. He didn’t see this as a problem.
I was in Junior High School at the time and this unfairness was not lost on white, working-class kids. They were the “greasers” who beat up the “hippies” every chance they could get.
"Charles A. Reich outside his office at Yale Law School in 1970." Cutline from photo at NYT article.
Distressing and disturbing such a person be permitted within 100 meters of a School of Law.
Charles Reich wasn't the only adult who got the '60s wrong. I recall a conversation in Berserkeley around that time between two adults, where one adult said that in the future, the Bay Area of the 1960s would be compared to Renaissance Italy. I was just a still-wet-behind the ears teen, but even then I knew that comparing Berserkeley to Renaissance Italy was BS.
Many years after The Greening of America came out, I tried to read it and couldn't get very far. So much hate.
Which was even more disappointing since I had read his autobiography The Sorcerer of Bolinas Reef and he comes across as a sympathetic character, a guy on the fast track who refused to admit he was gay and suffered for it. After he became famous, he did and lived a much better life. But in The Greening of America, all that suffering seems to be directed at modern American society, with the surety and hateur of a Yale Law School professor.
Obit mentions GoA published same year as future shock. I read both when came out in paperback. Looking back I think both influenced me not to want to follow my father into big business and ironically CAR influenced ne into wanting to go to law school.
If I'm being generous, I'd call it optimistic. If I'm being honest, the book is sophmoric verging on silly. Its not even dangerous anymore just silly.
Post a Comment