February 28, 2019

"While few would describe any of the blogs as 'freewheeling,' there is a stronger culture of risk-taking in blogs than in more traditional venues for publishing scholarship."

"Several of the faculty members use the blogs as a teaching tool, and students often contribute substantive analytical posts. Students learn from the feedback they get not just from their classmates and professor, but from outside readers as well. While the arguments in blogs may start out less formed than those in a journal article or op-ed, the ensuing discussion can help sharpen salient points, advance conversation and open up alternative points of view."

From "Harvard Law Faculty Use Blogs To Expand Their Influence: 'The Audience And Impact Per Word Are Large Compared To Traditional Academic Work'" — in the Harvard Law Bulletin (Winter 2019). It's funny reading that now, because it sounds like all the talk about blogs we heard 15 years ago. I hope blogs are coming back! And I say that as a lawprof (emerita) whose blog has always been freewheeling.

33 comments:

Paddy O said...

Freewheelin blogs can be very arousing to one's thoughts.

Ignorance is Bliss said...

The Freewheelin Ann Althouse

(Blood on the Comments Section is a better album...)

robother said...

The Freewheelin' Ann Althouse.

Rob said...

It's a fine line between freewheeling and the wheels coming off.

rcocean said...

Yeah, those Free-wheelin' Harvard Law Profs - who knows what those crazy guys will say!

Why some of 'em might say they hate Trump, while others might just dislike Trump.

They're crazy! And Freewheelin' all over the intellectual map!

Darrell said...

I'd like a list of the blogs the Harvard law professors promote.

Darrell said...

Should the World Court repossess the US for war crimes or just jail all all non-Left politicians for war crimes?

Lucid-Ideas said...

People always think that blogs inevitably head to hell in a handbasket. Many do. Especially most freewheeling ones. Not AlthouseBlog though. It just shuffles to purgatory in a attache case.

mccullough said...

I prefer blogs to Twitter.

Amadeus 48 said...

The three blogs I read religiously are Althouse, Instapundit, and Powerline. All are written by lawyers (and two by law professors). None are by Harvard law professors.

I went on law prof blog hiatus after the Kavanaugh hearings, when it became clear that too many law professors had lost sight of the fundamental purpose of many of the attributes of Anglo-Saxon law in favor of rationalizing their vigilante preferences. One fellow over at the Volokh Conspiracy made a complete fool of himself.

Physician, heal thyself.

rhhardin said...

They won't get the right answer except from retired people. They can't be fired. Everybody else can be.

rcocean said...

"They won't get the right answer except from retired people."

Assumes facts not in evidence. Left-wingers will give you the wrong answer no matter who's paying them. And our Left-wing Billionaires are more PC than anyone.

traditionalguy said...

Let's hope the the new Freewheelin Blog title doesn't mean Meade has to practice a duet as your Tenor voiced Joan Baez?

Jim at said...

It's a Phineas, Fat Freddy and Freewheelin' blog.

dhagood said...

a fabulous furry freak brothers reference! well played sir.

stlcdr said...

Blogs are fine and all for casual thinking and all round wrongness.

As an adjunct to a scholarly endeavor it promotes sloppy writing and opinion based thinking - groupthink - based on the current social climate.

Otto said...

Don't forget our lawprof is one who produced the likes of Michael Cohen. Client lawyer privilege saw it's death yesterday. The law profession is becoming cesspool.
Have to agree with Ann, she does let freewheeling at her website up to a point.

tcrosse said...

Have to agree with Ann, she does let freewheeling at her website up to a point.

She freewheels on her electric bike up to Picnic Point.

buwaya said...

The advantage to having that lot posting in public, is that the public can get an accurate picture of the sort of people they are, and the sort of things they are up to.

Assuming of course that what they write is penetrable to non-law professors.

Quaestor said...

Can't say I have much interest in what is said or done at Harvard lately since some of their undergrads have decided the Sixth Amendment is as fungible as the First and the Second.

Quaestor said...

Don't forget our lawprof is one who produced the likes of Michael Cohen. Client-lawyer privilege saw it's death yesterday.

Ethical lawyers are born, not made.

Sydney said...

In theory, it sounds like a great thing - a forum to argue and debate freely. However, in practice, comment sections often get nasty and I wonder how long before the law professors find themselves on the wrong side of a social justice warrior type at their academy?

John henry said...

I taught several online courses for Southern New Hampshire University's MBA program 10-12 years ago.

We used an online system called Blackboard that included a blog module. Each student was required to make 2 substantive posts per week to the blog.

It was a very useful teaching tool.

In a Strategic Management course, each student as a term project had to pick a company and do a strategic evaluation of it. This was structured and each week they had to post a portion of the evaluation in the blog. For example, competitive threats one week. Future opportunities another week and so on.

At the end of the term they had to submit the analysis as if they were acting as a consultant to the company. The idea was that the report was to be done by stitching together the various blog posts.

It was one of the more interesting classes I taught.

I wanted to do something like that in my Packaging Technology course where the term project was to design a packaging line. Unfortunately this school did not use blackboard. Students would turn in a paper assignment each week.

I think blogging can be a very powerful teaching tool.

John Henry

John henry said...

In the blogging, each student had their own blog so they did not get mixed together. However each student could read every other student's posts and could comment on them. Sort of like here.

John Henry

rehajm said...

Who are they kidding? It’s a hoity outlet for their Trump derangement.

Quaestor said...

I wonder how long before the law professors find themselves on the wrong side of a social justice warrior type at their academy?

22.075 milliseconds.

Quaestor said...

It’s a hoity outlet for their Trump derangement.

Formerly hoity. Harvard's been recruiting from the left side of the curve recently. It won't be long before the Crimson beats the Crimson Tide.

Churchy LaFemme: said...

It's a Phineas, Fat Freddy and Freewheelin' blog.

It's a Phineas and Ferb blog, and it's *so* going to get busted.

Mark said...

I hope blogs are coming back!

Blog posts and comments can be a forum to think out loud, to form and solidify thoughts and principles, to make a positive contribution to the marketplace of ideas.

Or a few shit-throwing people can ruin it. Particularly when they hijack things and go on and on and on and on and on.

Birkel said...

This will mean fewer Harvard educated lawyers nominated as federal judges in 15-20 years.

I see little downside.

Danno said...

A free-wheeling blog populated by free-range commenters.

Bay Area Guy said...

Free-wheeling, stuffy Harvard bloggers!

I love it. I hear Larry Tribe is a laugh riot.

Browndog said...

Blogs, government, any institution, is only as good as the people they occupy. The Founders made the point that the Constitution, this system of government only works if the preponderance of people are moral and good.

Look around. Everything seems broken. 'We the People' broke it.