"Later volumes included 'We Are All Multiculturalists Now' in 1997 and 'From a Cause to a Style: Modernist Architecture’s Encounter with the American City' in 2007.... A child of Jewish immigrants from Warsaw, Nathan Glazer was born on Feb. 25, 1923, in New York City and spent his early years in East Harlem. His father, Louis, was a garment worker, and his mother, Tilly, was a homemaker. Nathan was the youngest of seven children, and when he was 10, the family, which was crammed into a four-room apartment, moved to the wider spaces of the East Bronx. Mr. Glazer’s interest in urban affairs stemmed directly from personal experience, and his upbringing had an impact on his later ideas. His East Harlem tenement block, dominated by the iron structures of elevated trains, had no trees or green strips. It was, Mr. Glazer once said, a 'bad place to live.' Only a few blocks away was Central Park, where a boy could lose himself in the meadows and woodlands, enjoying a respite from the city’s noise and grime. For Mr. Glazer, the park was a 'wonder' of childhood, and in years to come, when some urban planners challenged Frederick Law Olmsted’s vision of a pastoral retreat within a crowded city, he spoke out in Olmsted’s defense.... Mr. Glazer’s turn to neoconservatism followed an almost paradigmatic path. Throughout the 1950s, and even after he went to work for the Kennedy administration’s Housing and Home Finance Agency in 1962-63, he continued to consider himself a radical. But if, as his longtime friend Irving Kristol put it, a neoconservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality, then Mr. Glazer got hit over the head...."
From "Nathan Glazer, Urban Sociologist and Outspoken Intellectual, Dies at 95" (NYT).
January 20, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
According to Wikipedia, "Meliorism is an idea in metaphysical thinking holding that progress is a real concept leading to an improvement of the world. It holds that humans can, through their interference with processes that would otherwise be natural, produce an outcome which is an improvement over the aforementioned natural one."
Aren't we all Meliorists?
...spent his early years in East Harlem... was the youngest of seven children, and when he was 10, the family, which was crammed into a four-room apartment, moved to the wider spaces of the East Bronx. Mr. Glazer’s interest in urban affairs stemmed directly from personal experience, and his upbringing had an impact on his later ideas. His East Harlem tenement block, dominated by the iron structures of elevated trains, had no trees or green strips. It was, Mr. Glazer once said, a 'bad place to live.' Only a few blocks away was Central Park, where a boy could lose himself in the meadows and woodlands, enjoying a respite from the city’s noise and grime.
Huh? Bronx or Harlem?
“As a social scientist, Mr. Glazer valued hard facts over good intentions. At the same time, he was modest about what the facts could show. A reader of his work was always coming upon phrases like “I am not sure” and “We do not have the knowledge” and “I do not know.””
What a refreshing concept!
Three of the most powerful words in the English language:
“I don’t know.”
Those who would improve the world would do well to adopt the medical dictum, "First do no harm."
Not to mention the Althouse principle, "Better than nothing is a high standard."
after he went to work for the Kennedy administration’s Housing and Home Finance Agency in 1962-63, he continued to consider himself a radical.
That's quite a self-consideration.
Doing what he did took some guts. In that sense he was one of the good guys. I may be wrong, but to my knowledge he never drew the obvious conclusion, that to resist the progressive devastation of the polity and the culture he'd have to join the resistance. I guess that was a step too far for a Haavad Jewish intellectual. Politically, his good sense amounted to no more than the gnashing of teeth.
Meliorism is an idea in metaphysical thinking holding that progress is a real concept
Progress is monotonic change, which is qualified in divergent ways. Most physical processes (e.g. human life) are chaotic, which may or may not be progressive, at least in a limited frame of reference.
"East Harlem or East Bronx." Central Park is located near East Harlem.
Back in 20-40s, there where 3 elevated train structures and one subway line within the span of 4 city blocks - Second Ave to Park ave.Two were iron structures (2nd & 3rd Ave Els) and the third on Park Ave ( metro north) is a combination of a massive stone and iron structure. The Subway is beneath Lexington Ave.
Social scientist... he was modest about what the facts could show. A reader of his work was always coming upon phrases like “I am not sure”
This is a remarkable legacy. It seems that with social progress, there are less people who will acknowledge limits in the "hard" sciences and certainly the social sciences, and will voluntarily restrict their beliefs to the near-domain, or at minimum acknowledge a separation of logical domains.
"The Lonely Crowd" was one of those books I always wanted to get around to reading. It had an intriguing title and the reviews didn't make it sound too intimidating. Now its moment has passed and, what with Netflix and all, there's zero possibility that I will ever read it. Sic transit........If his parents were Jews from Eastern Europe, he perhaps had occasion to reflect that living in a tenement in east Harlem was not the worst thing in the world. When I was going to college and, for a few years after, I lived in a tenement in East Harlem. You saved quite a bit on rent. I got burglarized at regular intervals, but all the burglars got was a bottle of whiskey and my radio so I came out ahead on the deal.
Affirmative Discrimination: “Should government try to remedy persistent racial and ethnic inequalities by establishing and enforcing quotas and other statistical goals? Here is one of the most incisive books ever written on this difficult issue. Nathan Glazer surveys the civil rights tradition in the United States; evaluates public policies in the areas of employment, education, and housing; and questions the judgment and wisdom of their underlying premises—their focus on group rights, rather than individual rights. Such policies, he argues, are ineffective, unnecessary, and politically destructive of harmonious relations among the races.”
A useless life, seen in context.
He pushed back at the prevailing academic-bureaucratic-liberal political consensus, but with absolutely no effect. I doubt he changed any minds set upon implementing a liberal program. He did nothing to prevent or reverse any negative policy. No more than what Pat Moynihan or James Coleman managed to, which was nothing as well, and those people had a good degree of institutional authority. This is yet another example of the uselessness of reason and argument.
This is the original sin of Bill Buckley. You cannot work inside "Harvard" to turn its course, as its course is set by its interests. This is the fundamental idiocy of the intellectual "Never Trump", their blindness to their own inutility. Someone should probably explain this to Jonah Goldberg.
The only substantial and effective obstacles to a much fuller implementation of the liberal programs of the day were the much less high-toned conservative populists. The "Moral Majority" and the pro-life movement, the angry anti-busing parents, Rudy Giuliani (in his day), the NRA, Rush Limbaugh, and all the taxpayers and business interests that followed their own interests. And, indeed, all the nastier people, like the racists, antisemites and ethnic chauvinists, that served as grit in the system.
The only thing that matters is if you can mobilize power.
David Riesman was the original author of The Lonely Crowd.
David Riesman was the original author of The Lonely Crowd.
The authors were David Riesman, Nathan Glazer, and Reuel Denney.
My favorite book is "Beyond the Melting Pot" a fascinating look at NYC circa 1960.
Post a Comment