I don't understand. The lesbians I watch on the Internet are divide-by-zero more sexy than the lesbians I encounter in the off-leach dog park across the street.
Art lovers don't seem as fat as the average sampling of Americans. Also, there always seems to be a few hot girls in any group of art lovers.....I have no real appreciation of art, but art lovers aren't so bad to look at. Artists try very hard but few of them can produce anything so beautiful as a pretty girl looking pretty against a backdrop of great paintings.
In 2017 my wife and I were in NYC in February and went to the Met Museum on a Friday night. I assumed it would be packed, but no . . several times I found myself looking at a Hopper or a Rothko and I was the only one in the room (except maybe a guard). My best museum experience. The worst (by far) was the Art Institute in Chicago, every room jam-packed with noisy/smelly kids and tourists. At first I thought that peaceful Friday was a fluke, but it may be that way tickets are priced/sold, Friday night seems from vantage of the huddled masses to be the least attractive time to go. So that's my travel tip for anyone going to NYC; just don't tell anyone else.
He has gone full Laslo. Here's a direct quote, criticizing Kavanaugh's role with Ken Starr in the Independent Counsel case against Bill Clinton:
"In a memo to Starr, he proposed that Clinton be asked the following questions, among others, before the grand jury: “If Monica Lewinsky says that you ejaculated into her mouth on two occasions in the Oval Office area, would she be lying? . . . If Monica Lewinsky says that on several occasions you had her give [you] oral sex, made her stop, and then ejaculated into the sink in the bathroom off the Oval Office, would she be lying?”
Currently in Day 3 of a major bathroom remodel. I used the Althouse Amazon Portal to buy some of the materials. I would use the portal a lot more, but my wife and girls tend to order stuff behind my back.
By the way, I'm not actually doing the remodel (not this time). Having it done by professionals. It's my wife's dream bathroom and I didn't want to screw it up.
I'm fearful that Trump may now be in violation of the newly discovered "Too Much Money Will Not Be Used For The Purchase Of Baseball Tickets" clause of the Constitution.
This is sure to be silver bullet to impeachment that the lefties and their LLR Chuck-like allies have been looking for.
I recall a photography exhibit where the subject was the beauty of museum patrons examining an exhibit in one of those museum galleries with the tall ceiling and the dramatic filtered light. The groupings, lighting, the poses. So compelling...
If Monica Lewinsky says that you ejaculated into her mouth on two occasions in the Oval Office area, would she be lying?
"Would you say yes if I asked you if this was the way to the village?" is how you rind the way to the village regardless whether the guy is a consistent truth teller or a consistent liar.
"Did you know they're giving away free beer in the village?" is how you find out even if the guy is an inconsistent liar. Ignore what he answers and follow him.
I'm trying to figure out the damage on the sole of the cute blonde using her cellphone. Normal wear would have worn away the horizontal thread portion as well. The damage seems to come from the inside of her shoe. I'll need her shoes and clothing for a proper investigation.
I'm trying to figure out the damage on the sole of the cute blonde using her cellphone. I'm assuming Gum, or more possibly tape; some sort of foreign object
I'm certainly GLAD to see that Sundress and Straw Hat girl is back! Or, is it a new, and different Sundress and Straw hat girl? That would be Awesome!
Same Sundress and Straw hat girl ( i went back and checked; since there (currently) is no Sundress and Straw hat girl tag)
Darrell; IF you click on the flickr pic, it goes into its own screen; then you can Zoom in, and see: Clearly Gum (or other FOD). It's worn off on the treads
So in a comments on a post of some days ago (about the real accuracy of Trump transcripts), there was an accusation that Trump-haters don't listen to or watch Trump live, and their perceptions are then badly skewed by a transcript-only version of Trump. I said at the time that I very often watch Trump live before criticizing him. Today I couldn't see it, but I listened to it live on my NPR station.
(Funny; at the top-of-hour NPR newsbreak, the reporter indicated in no uncertain terms that Trump again made the claim that the U.S. pays for 90% of NATO, and reported that that is a false claim.)
at the top-of-hour NPR newsbreak, the reporter indicated in no uncertain terms that Trump again made the claim that the U.S. pays for 90% of NATO, and reported that that is a false claim
The fucking Europeans add roads and such to their share totals. As I said yesterday, statistics are like bikinis: What they show is important, but what they conceal is vital.
rehajm said... The Trump direct quote was seventy to ninety percent, depending on how you calculate it
In no uncertain terms, not what Chuck claims.
Trump does a lot of that. "People say..." "By some accounts..." Today he blurted the 90% number without qualification. Yes, he's said "seventy to ninety" at various times. Which is it? 70%? Or 90%? What's the proof of even "70%" U.S. support? And when has Trump ever explained what he is talking about?
And now Macron is saying that the French haven't changed anything or pledged anything new about defense spending w/r/t NATO.
If Monica Lewinsky says that on several occasions you had her give [you] oral sex, made her stop, and then ejaculated into the sink in the bathroom off the Oval Office, would she be lying?”
That's how you knew, if you needed proof, that Bill Clinton was a sick pathetic loser. Who would do that? You're the President, man! She'll swallow!
And now Macron is saying that the French haven't changed anything or pledged anything new about defense spending w/r/t NATO.
Me. President, just bring the boys home. It's over. Sell the Poles a hundred short-range nuclear missiles, like the Pershing III or TLAM, and call it a day. Nobody will invade nobody.
Chuck is just upset that his girl Stormy got arrested yesterday, further destroying her potential as a witness. Next he'll demand an investigation to link that to Trump.
Darrell said... Chuck is just upset that his girl Stormy got arrested yesterday, further destroying her potential as a witness. Next he'll demand an investigation to link that to Trump.
I have the feeling that Stormy Daniels may not even be needed as any sort of witness after the Michael Cohen document dump. What's the need for her testimony? To prove she had sex with Trump? To prove that Trump -- through Cohen -- arranged to pay her? That's admitted now, right?
Shera Bechard; now she might be a more interesting witness. Because, as Trump often claims, "Some people are saying..."
Nice to see people in a museum not scrambling to take photos of pictures. Last year we were at the Uffizi in Florence and most we taking photos and not appreciating the art.
@cvpayne Follow Follow @cvpayne More Heading to @FoxNews Is NATO ready? Germany's Military Readiness 95/244 Leopard battle tanks operational 0/6 Submarines operational 9/15Frigates in service 0/14 transport aircraft airworthy 21,000 Junior officer/NCO positions unfilled 6/30 Logistical battalions fully equipped 7:31 AM - 10 Jul 2018
The fact that such an unprofessional hack like Strzok could rise to the top at a high level law enforcement agency is enough to destroy the credibility of that agency and extends to the Federal government at large.
I wouldn't trust Strzok to walk my dog. He should be fired and his pension stripped at best.
Is it really the case that Mr Rosenstein's use of prosecutors from each of the 93 US Attorney's offices in the country to vet Judge Kavanaugh is simply due to the judge's unprecedentedly voluminous papers or is something else going on? If I were Mr Trump, I think I'd want an answer to that question.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
65 comments:
"Antman & The Wasp" -- yet another funny, satisfying action movie. The Marvel folks make it look easy, and yet somehow others can't do it..
The people match the paintings.
I don't understand. The lesbians I watch on the Internet are divide-by-zero more sexy than the lesbians I encounter in the off-leach dog park across the street.
Discuss!
Based on this picture, my impression is that art is entertainment and that the entertainees are comfortable with that.
It was leached out of them?
Diversity... one, two, three boys and girls. ha, ha, ha, ha. ten, eleven, twelve...
Art lovers don't seem as fat as the average sampling of Americans. Also, there always seems to be a few hot girls in any group of art lovers.....I have no real appreciation of art, but art lovers aren't so bad to look at. Artists try very hard but few of them can produce anything so beautiful as a pretty girl looking pretty against a backdrop of great paintings.
I have that Seurat in the upstairs hall.
In 2017 my wife and I were in NYC in February and went to the Met Museum on a Friday night. I assumed it would be packed, but no . . several times I found myself looking at a Hopper or a Rothko and I was the only one in the room (except maybe a guard).
My best museum experience. The worst (by far) was the Art Institute in Chicago, every room jam-packed with noisy/smelly kids and tourists.
At first I thought that peaceful Friday was a fluke, but it may be that way tickets are priced/sold, Friday night seems from vantage of the huddled masses to be the least attractive time to go. So that's my travel tip for anyone going to NYC; just don't tell anyone else.
Have you read Jeffrey Toobin's screed in the New Yorker about Kavanaugh?
He has gone full Laslo. Here's a direct quote, criticizing Kavanaugh's role with Ken Starr in the Independent Counsel case against Bill Clinton:
"In a memo to Starr, he proposed that Clinton be asked the following questions, among others, before the grand jury: “If Monica Lewinsky says that you ejaculated into her mouth on two occasions in the Oval Office area, would she be lying? . . . If Monica Lewinsky says that on several occasions you had her give [you] oral sex, made her stop, and then ejaculated into the sink in the bathroom off the Oval Office, would she be lying?”
This a Stormy Daniels caliber-type grilling!
I think I like him even better now.
Toobin is highly distraught over this!
Currently in Day 3 of a major bathroom remodel. I used the Althouse Amazon Portal to buy some of the materials. I would use the portal a lot more, but my wife and girls tend to order stuff behind my back.
By the way, I'm not actually doing the remodel (not this time). Having it done by professionals. It's my wife's dream bathroom and I didn't want to screw it up.
Toobin is showing how smart he is by surfacing more Billy shit.
Hil drinks to that..
I'm fearful that Trump may now be in violation of the newly discovered "No "Brett's" allowed on the Supreme Court" clause of the Constitution.
This is sure to be silver bullet to impeachment that the lefties and their LLR Chuck-like allies have been looking for.
Brett just doesn't have the gravitas of "Hitler!"
Apropos of nothing
https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/262327/puerto-rico-ajc
I'm fearful that Trump may now be in violation of the newly discovered "Too Much Money Will Not Be Used For The Purchase Of Baseball Tickets" clause of the Constitution.
This is sure to be silver bullet to impeachment that the lefties and their LLR Chuck-like allies have been looking for.
https://xkcd.com/2018/
Stormy Daniels will sue for improper groping of her Emoluments.
Drago said...
I'm fearful that Trump may now be in violation of the newly discovered "No "Brett's" allowed on the Supreme Court" clause of the Constitution.
This is sure to be silver bullet to impeachment that the lefties and their LLR Chuck-like allies have been looking for.
They can't use article 12 or 13 or 69 anymore either.
According to MSNBC the Constitution is out of date since it is no longer 1776...
Their efforts to turn out complete idiots with college degrees in communications are working better than their efforts to impeach Trump.
If you don't understand what is wrong with what the retards at the link you are saying you are probably a democrat.
Just saying.
Katie Tur is certainly adept at removing all doubt.
The people match the paintings.
I recall a photography exhibit where the subject was the beauty of museum patrons examining an exhibit in one of those museum galleries with the tall ceiling and the dramatic filtered light. The groupings, lighting, the poses. So compelling...
That's quite a shirt. Pollack got nuttin on him. Where does one get clothes like that?
If Monica Lewinsky says that you ejaculated into her mouth on two occasions in the Oval Office area, would she be lying?
"Would you say yes if I asked you if this was the way to the village?" is how you rind the way to the village regardless whether the guy is a consistent truth teller or a consistent liar.
"Did you know they're giving away free beer in the village?" is how you find out even if the guy is an inconsistent liar. Ignore what he answers and follow him.
Senate Hearing = cool chance to impeachment of nominee as it was intended to be!!
The guy on the right is wearing 'Lularoe' the line of clothing sold 'at parties' for plus size ladies.
I'm trying to figure out the damage on the sole of the cute blonde using her cellphone. Normal wear would have worn away the horizontal thread portion as well. The damage seems to come from the inside of her shoe. I'll need her shoes and clothing for a proper investigation.
I'm trying to figure out the damage on the sole of the cute blonde using her cellphone.
I'm assuming Gum, or more possibly tape; some sort of foreign object
I'm certainly GLAD to see that Sundress and Straw Hat girl is back! Or, is it a new, and different Sundress and Straw hat girl? That would be Awesome!
Same Sundress and Straw hat girl ( i went back and checked; since there (currently) is no Sundress and Straw hat girl tag)
Darrell; IF you click on the flickr pic, it goes into its own screen; then you can Zoom in, and see: Clearly Gum (or other FOD). It's worn off on the treads
Trump is a stable genius.
Shorts! Shorts for days! The Horror...the HORROR.
And not a single girl worthy of some Daisy Dukes, mores the pity.
So in a comments on a post of some days ago (about the real accuracy of Trump transcripts), there was an accusation that Trump-haters don't listen to or watch Trump live, and their perceptions are then badly skewed by a transcript-only version of Trump. I said at the time that I very often watch Trump live before criticizing him. Today I couldn't see it, but I listened to it live on my NPR station.
(Funny; at the top-of-hour NPR newsbreak, the reporter indicated in no uncertain terms that Trump again made the claim that the U.S. pays for 90% of NATO, and reported that that is a false claim.)
Next time I go to a museum I'll watch out for the paparazzi.
Today I couldn't see it, but I listened to it live on my NPR station.
LLR's favorite news source.
What kind of jackass listens to NPR?
at the top-of-hour NPR newsbreak, the reporter indicated in no uncertain terms that Trump again made the claim that the U.S. pays for 90% of NATO, and reported that that is a false claim
Oh well...
I'm shocked that no one so far has mentioned that Lisa Page is a LAYER.
Scott Adams's periscope on this is hysterical.
Best President ever.
Most interesting thing I've read in the past 24 hours: The Fear of White Power.
The Trump direct quote was seventy to ninety percent, depending on how you calculate it
In no uncertain terms, not what Chuck claims.
The fucking Europeans add roads and such to their share totals. As I said yesterday, statistics are like bikinis: What they show is important, but what they conceal is vital.
If you don't listen to NPR you are ill-informed.
If you do listen to NPR, you are misinformed.
Rehajm: "The Trump direct quote was seventy to ninety percent, depending on how you calculate it
In no uncertain terms, not what Chuck
claims."
LLR and #DurbinCuckholster Chuck has openly stated that his purpose here is to smear Trump.
Hardly surprising then that Chuck would be happily pushing more lefty lies from his democrat allies.
rehajm said...
The Trump direct quote was seventy to ninety percent, depending on how you calculate it
In no uncertain terms, not what Chuck claims.
Trump does a lot of that. "People say..." "By some accounts..." Today he blurted the 90% number without qualification. Yes, he's said "seventy to ninety" at various times. Which is it? 70%? Or 90%? What's the proof of even "70%" U.S. support? And when has Trump ever explained what he is talking about?
And now Macron is saying that the French haven't changed anything or pledged anything new about defense spending w/r/t NATO.
If Monica Lewinsky says that on several occasions you had her give [you] oral sex, made her stop, and then ejaculated into the sink in the bathroom off the Oval Office, would she be lying?”
That's how you knew, if you needed proof, that Bill Clinton was a sick pathetic loser. Who would do that? You're the President, man! She'll swallow!
And now Macron is saying that the French haven't changed anything or pledged anything new about defense spending w/r/t NATO.
Me. President, just bring the boys home. It's over. Sell the Poles a hundred short-range nuclear missiles, like the Pershing III or TLAM, and call it a day. Nobody will invade nobody.
Mr. Stupid, stupid Android.
Chuck is just upset that his girl Stormy got arrested yesterday, further destroying her potential as a witness. Next he'll demand an investigation to link that to Trump.
Darrell said...
Chuck is just upset that his girl Stormy got arrested yesterday, further destroying her potential as a witness. Next he'll demand an investigation to link that to Trump.
I have the feeling that Stormy Daniels may not even be needed as any sort of witness after the Michael Cohen document dump. What's the need for her testimony? To prove she had sex with Trump? To prove that Trump -- through Cohen -- arranged to pay her? That's admitted now, right?
Shera Bechard; now she might be a more interesting witness. Because, as Trump often claims, "Some people are saying..."
That was the Washington examiner gal, must be a nationals fan.
Nice to see people in a museum not scrambling to take photos of pictures. Last year we were at the Uffizi in Florence and most we taking photos and not appreciating the art.
Well France has to keep 100,000 troops on staff to handler their immigration enabled problem
Charles V Payne
Verified account
@cvpayne
Follow Follow @cvpayne
More
Heading to @FoxNews
Is NATO ready?
Germany's Military Readiness
95/244 Leopard battle tanks operational
0/6 Submarines operational
9/15Frigates in service
0/14 transport aircraft airworthy
21,000 Junior officer/NCO positions unfilled
6/30 Logistical battalions fully equipped
7:31 AM - 10 Jul 2018
Chuck,
Keep fucking those chickens.
Since Europe is already committing suicide by their immigration policies, are we just throwing money down the loo by supporting NATO?
Poor chuck. Still sniffing those panties of the hookers.
Poor LLR Chuck.
No matter what he tries he is unable to extricate his lunatic lefty allies from the Pit Of Despair they have dug for themselves.
It is amusing to watch however..
WOW....this public Strzok hearing is a circus..
WOW....this public Strzok hearing is a circus..
The lefties interrupting Gowdy's questioning are like a giant neon arrow pointing to the corruption.
Did you see the theater when Cummings was talking...the posters of the guilty pleas?
What a clustereff
I love watching Strzok squirm under Gowdy's questioning. And that smirking demeanor isn't helping Strzok's credibility.
And having an adulterous affair with a co-worker, alone, should be grounds for termination from the FBI.
Sickening how many of the leftie committee members are willing to fall on the Strzok grenade. I suppose its a sign of how little they have left.
The fact that such an unprofessional hack like Strzok could rise to the top at a high level law enforcement agency is enough to destroy the credibility of that agency and extends to the Federal government at large.
I wouldn't trust Strzok to walk my dog. He should be fired and his pension stripped at best.
Is it really the case that Mr Rosenstein's use of prosecutors from each of the 93 US Attorney's offices in the country to vet Judge Kavanaugh is simply due to the judge's unprecedentedly voluminous papers or is something else going on? If I were Mr Trump, I think I'd want an answer to that question.
The biggest story of the day and there's no place to talk about Smirky Strzok!
What a smug, smirky bastard he is!
Funny that Strzok said he didn't remember the text but a minute later said it was done 'late at night'...
Post a Comment