June 4, 2018

Put a name on something that you're seeing for the first time. The next day you will see it again.

Saturday, I came up with the term "hipster homophobia." Sunday, the thing to which the term applied popped up again. I didn't search for anything. It simply came up in the ordinary course of reading and blogging.

This reminds me of something I used to experience as eerie when I was in my 20s. I'd notice a new word and then within a day or so, I'd encounter the same word, and often I'd see it again and again. How could I have gone all my life without noticing the word and then it would come up repeatedly? The best answer — dispelling the eeriness — is that the word had been coming up all along, and it was the noticing of it for the first time that gave future appearances of the previously unnoticed word a specialness that made me notice it every time.

Here's the lesson I learned back in my 20s and followed successfully ever since. When you notice a new word, look it up in the dictionary. Don't just let it go, because it will come up again, and you'll have to think, if I'd learned that word the first time, I'd understand it now. There will be a next time, and soon, so take the trouble to learn it now. I did that back in the days when you had to get up and walk over to a book called the dictionary and flip through pages while thinking about the details of alphabetical order.

It may seem inefficient to stop the flow of whatever you're reading or listening to, and it's inconsistent with the way you learn words as a child — when you roll with so many unknowns — but it's efficient in the long run and suitable for a nonchild going forward using a language where you do know most of the words.

But words are specific. You know when you're hearing that same word again. An idea is different. Having an idea once doesn't necessarily set you up to think — when it glimmers to mind on another occasion — there's that same idea again. You need to give that idea a name, so it becomes like the new word that heightens awareness and causes you to see the recurrence.

Ideas are unlike words, though, in that you don't have to name words. Words are already words. And there are far too many ideas to name them all. You choose what to give a name. Name something that you want to know when you see it again. And you will.

38 comments:

rehajm said...

Baader-Meinhof phenomenon

Meade said...

HomoPHObic?!!

traditionalguy said...

When the Collective Subconscious meets a diligent etymologist, it's amore.

David Begley said...

Ann’s dictionary habit would have pleased Fr. Hindlang, Latin teacher at Creighton Prep.

richlb said...

Would this be the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon?

richlb said...

Rehajm beat me to it.

Ann Althouse said...

@rehajm — Thanks!

@David Begley — Thanks for the particularity. It stands in for the feeling that a million teachers are applauding me.

I forgot to say that if you do look up the word when you notice if the first time, when it comes up again, you have that great feeling that the time spent looking it up paid off and that you knew it would and got your prediction confirmed. If you go the other way and don't bother, because you probably don't need to know, then when it comes up next, you have to go through the process all over again: Should I bother? Now, I've missed the first opportunity, and I didn't understand something yesterday, so that's lost, and this one's about to be lost, but if the word comes up again, I'm going to kick myself for not looking it up this time. That way lies entropy! Look it up the first time and save yourself from that fate.

I told law students they should look up words they don't know, and then I would put them on the spot in class. For example, here's a line from a conlaw case (Pike v. Bruce Church):

"Although the criteria for determining the validity of state statutes affecting interstate commerce have been variously stated, the general rule that emerges can be phrased as follows: where the statute regulates evenhandedly to effectuate a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits."

That's a very important statement of conlaw doctrine, and if you read that in preparation for class, you'd better know what "putative" means! I'd say "What does 'putative' mean?" and they'd better know!

rhhardin said...

Don't look up cunt.

Danno said...

The secrets to extraordinary wordsmithing revealed!

Heartless Aztec said...

One of my pride and joys is a huge antique and elderly dictionary on a stand in my art/study office room. There's hardly a day that passes that I'm not carefully flipping the pages.

M Jordan said...

I can look the new word up till I’m blue in the face and it’s meaning still won’t stick. For me, I just need those seven or eight word encounters before somehow I get it. Then there’s that magic moment when I dare to try it out myself for the first time. It comes out of my mouth a bit heavy and awkward like paying for gum with a hundred dollar bill. But if no one laughs at me, I’m now the proud owner of a New Word which, you can be sure, I’ll find reason to use twenty times in the next month.

daskol said...

one of my favorite books was a dictionary, an old copy of the OED, condensed, that came with its own magnifying glass in a special drawer built in to the case. you really couldn't read it without the glass. wonder if they still make those? going to check in a moment, but first, maybe a little help?

organizational theory can be really useful when applied to organisms too. what do you call that idea?

and shame seems to work really well when cognitive approaches fail, which organizational theory seems to explain as: you can't expect single-loop learners to respond to a cognitive approach, since that presumes a double loop process. most people, vast majority, operate as single loop learners, as most organizations are structured.

in fact, it looks as though shame may substitute well enough for bygone traditions and conventions my parents' generation got a little overenthusiastic about tearing down. with a little help from facebook, et al. not sure what to call that idea either. but it's fun to think about.

daskol said...

oh wow, it was the two volume set and there are multiple vintage copies available on amazon, including in collectible condition. thanks! my daughter will love it.

daskol said...

neat, I just bought Gore Vidal's copy, stamped "from the library of Gore Vidal." The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (2 Volume Set). Have at the remaining ones.

Ann Althouse said...

"neat, I just bought Gore Vidal's copy, stamped "from the library of Gore Vidal." The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (2 Volume Set). Have at the remaining ones."

That's great, but why did Gore Vidal have the compact edition. I have that -- got it as a bonus for subscribing to the NYRB — but it's hard to use. Comes with its own magnifying glass. You'd think Gore Vidal would get the full size version!

Laslo Spatula said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
David Begley said...

Laslo:

But how may internet writer gets cited by Rush Limbaugh, 30 million putative listeners

Laslo Spatula said...

(repost -- made a correction)

rehajm said...
"Baader-Meinhof phenomenon"

I was aware of this name of the effect, but -- from the link, thank you -- was this piece that was new to me:

"The St. Paul Minnesota Pioneer Press online commenting board was the unlikely source of the name. In 1994, a commenter dubbed the frequency illusion "the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon" after randomly hearing two references to Baader-Meinhof within 24 hours."

So it was a commenter that came up with this.

Which shows the populism of context that the internet can provide.

You see it in this example, you see it in memes, you see it in terms like the Steisand effect:

"Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the term in 2005...He coined the term "Streisand effect" on the Techdirt blog in January 2005" (yes, he is "the CEO and founder of Techdirt, a weblog that focuses on technology news and tech-related issues", but this is still a term originated by a blog, not big media or a university).

I liken it to naming a star: the people who could find and name one were generally those with the telescope necessary to do so; the internet is our new telescope, and everyone has one.

By the way: a Google of 'hipster homophobia' comes up with a 2016 Slate article: other than that, the terms 'hipster' and 'homophobia' occur in multiple articles, but not joined in synergy. So, as far as that star, Althouse was beaten to the punch by one.

However, Google shows 'era of that's not funny' has not been claimed on their horizon. Lot's of 'that's not funny' and the 'era of Trump' and 'era of fake news', but not the aforementioned synergy. But in quotation marks and capitalized -- "Era of That's Not Funny" -- Althouse is the first seven hits; the next is referencing a post of hers, and the one after that is on a Fark comments thread from March 5 of this year, but Althouse's first usage is 11/15/17 (and followed by many posts thereafter).

To paraphrase Warhol: every internet writer will be famous for fifteen minutes. But accreditation may be tricky.

tomtom2know said...

Professor Althouse, I have just this morning been looking for a dictionary app for a new phone - what do you use? I've been using "panopticon" as my test word; the best I've found so far is the (free) website (not app) of M-W. Thanks!

Laslo Spatula said...

"But how may internet writer gets cited by Rush Limbaugh, 30 million putative listeners"

Talk radio is a precursor of the internet, and functions in much the same manner. In some ways Limbaugh is a blogger by voice, and the callers are the commentators.

Everyone's telescope has gotten better.

daskol said...

I don't know why Gore Vidal had it. I liked it because the magnifying glass was awesome, and the fact that you could only read it with the magnifying glass was like revealing secret code. Pretty sure that's why my daughter will love it too. Gore Vidal lived in NYC. I know he had a lot of money, eventually, but space is tight. Maybe he got it as a younger man, finished it and saw no reason to upgrade when he could afford it later.

William said...

I think the reason that I can never remember the meaning of hermeneutics is because: 1) it's a seldom used word and 2) when used, it's used improperly.......Hipster homophobia is a slippery term. When used, some people might think it refers to having an irrational fear of hip gays

daskol said...

My copy was a gift from my grandfather to my mother when she moved to the states. I can't believe they just gave those things away with magazine subscriptions.

daskol said...

No, that's not it. It must have been his portable copy, for weekends away, or maybe the one he kept in a smaller library in a vacation home. That makes more sense.

William said...

I would have an adverse reaction to someone wearing a $100 t-shirt that publicized Jean Genet's masturbatory practices. It would be so easy to fall into the mistake of describing this adverse reaction as hipster homophobia.

Fernandinande said...

Baader-Meinhof

A subset of reasoning by anecdotes.

McBragg said...

Both links go to the same place. Is that intentional?

Ann Althouse said...

@McBragg

No. Thanks. I've fixed it now, thanks to your heads-up. Much appreciated!

Darrell said...

Hipster Haiku.

Now you can have the second use.

Unknown said...

so what is the meaning of 'is"?

Sebastian said...

"How could I have gone all my life without noticing . . . Here's the lesson I learned back in my 20s and followed successfully ever since" . . . when you think something you experience is eerie and peculiar, look up the psych or social science literature and discover that actually, no, just same-old, same-old. But then, research does tend to dispel the fun of how-could-I speculating, just as looking up words limits the creativity of the reader. Sequel to Bayard: how to read and use words one hasn't looked up.

frak22 said...

"Use a word 3 times in a day and it is yours forever." (granddad)

dreams said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
dreams said...

I did that when I was young and I had to look up a lot of words.

Henry said...

upstream, I was trying to come up with a way to describe Glenn Reynolds' relentless category reduction. I thought of simplism. Looked it up. It's a word.

walter said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
walter said...

"I remember a colleague of mind scoffing at the question"
You might have created a new label with that typo.

Karen said...

This fits nicely with one of Jordan Peterson’s discussions about having an aim. Because we have an aim or a focus, the tools and resources necessary to reach that aim become apparent to us in our surroundings in a way that we would not have even noticed if we had not had the aim.