January 28, 2018

Whatever happened to blogging?

Yes, I'm still here, and — importantly — you're still here. But generally, I'm told, what was once blogging has migrated to Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook. The mommy bloggers, specifically, moved on to Instagram, so it says here in "How the Mom Internet became a spotless, sponsored void/Gritty blogs have given way to staged Instagram photos" (WaPo).

If you read that, you'll see that mommy blogging had already gotten screwed up by the effort to monetize. There are various ways to monetize your blog, but the most lucrative approach — especially available to bloggers with subject matter that connects to specific commercial products — is to write posts that incorporate the product.

So, instead of writing about your child and showing him eating a cookie, you get the kid to eat the sponsor's cookie and your post is a photo of the kid looking cute with the cookie and you saying something bloggy but phony about the cookie. Ptui.

But it's not just the monetization. It's also the insipid trend toward prettification and the commodification of one's own life. On Instagram and Facebook, many people — notably women with little kids at their disposal — present themselves and their lives as beautiful. There is a craving and genuine appreciation for beauty in human life, but a constant barrage of shallow, self-directed, predictable beauty cannot really satisfy the craving.

It may be that nothing on line can or should give us what we really want. Take a quick look at that fantasy of a wholesome woman with a cute baby in a well-kept kitchen, and know that it's the equivalent of eating a cupcake, looking at a few minutes of porn, or reading the new spiritual uplift from your faith adviser Burns Strider, and get on with your real life.

I like this from the comments at WaPo:
I see a distinct correlation between these curated social postings of moms today and the TV advertisements in the 1960s where women were shown in nice clothing attire and styled hair as they talked about the product they were using to make their homes spotless. The floors, walls, counters, kitchens, bathrooms were all shown in shining cleanliness.
Those old commercials became a joke, even back then, and advertisers had to find other ways, such as this one:



There's a danger now that any return to "grittiness" will be just as commercial and maybe even less sincere than the over-prettification that infects us today.

And by the way, maybe Barack Obama was too glossily beautiful and that's how we developed a taste for Trump.

So, yeah... whatever happened to blogging? It's just a place to write. You can write whatever you want, not necessarily about yourself. You might get some readers and give them a place to talk, not necessarily about themselves. And you can put up pictures. Most people will get sucked into pictures, and you as a writer might get overwhelmed by your pictures and never find your way back to writing about anything but your life in pictures. But if you're lucky enough to live in the real world, one day that baby is old enough to say "quit taking my picture."

81 comments:

Ron Snyder said...

This was a pleasant post to read, thanks Ann. I will stick with blogs- good ones like yours have content that is often both educational and entertaining.

traditionalguy said...

The Althouse Blog has a secret advantage. It alone combines authenticity, cuteness, top notch writing skills and acess to the culture horde retained in the Mind of LaAlthouse with good male balance provided by her biggest fan, LeMeade.

But then, I love Trump too.

Lloyd W. Robertson said...

It still seems rare to see a man doing the cleaning, or even worried about it, in a TV commercial. More commonly he's a slob who is part of the problem, or who has to rush to clean up because a female is about to show up. (Is it true that men have a high threshold for actual dirt, whereas women might tolerate untidiness, but not actual dirt? I don't know, a stereotype from my youth). I now see there's an inter-racial couple who are packing for a trip, and their two teenagers both sleep in and leave their laundry almost too late. Dad does the last-minute laundry. That commercial seems very "progressive." There's also one where dad narrates how daughter is constantly getting dirty--and she insists on wearing her favourite dress just about all the time, so it's not easy even to find a time to throw it in the laundry. Small steps.

exhelodrvr1 said...

Obama was glossily beautiful because the media kept photoshopping his life.

Bart Hall (Kansas, USA) said...

It is a readily understandable 'cri-de-coeur'. The descent into shallowness in the last decade is quite shocking. Not just shallowness, but tribalist name-calling and little more.

I was considered a "long-time reader" on 'Winds of Change' before you even began your project, and as with you it was for the quality of thought and resultant discussion which brought me there daily until JK got married and went to California.

Please keep at it in your "retirement" -- Althouse is a bright spot in my intellectual day.

mockturtle said...

Blogs like this one are rare because they demand thoughtful, intelligent writing on a variety of subjects and stimulate interest in a disparate group of readers. Congratulations, Althouse, on a splendid success!

Amadeus 48 said...

Althouse--You call the tune with something that takes your fancy, and the commenters here riff away. Very entertaining.

Jersey Fled said...

I never heard of a Mommy blog. I assume it's something that only women read? That being the case, what about the motives of their readers? To look at pictures of cute kids eating cookies? (Yuck)

OTOH I come here almost every day to engage in (mostly) intelligent conversation on culture and the issues of the day.

Bay Area Guy said...

I know a lot of Moms, but not a lotta Mommy-bloggers. Most Moms I know are too busy and tired raising kids to blog about raising kids. And, then, if you add work to the mix, you get Working Moms, who have even less time to blog.

It's all good.

Oso Negro said...

It has crossed my mind that the commentariat here at Althouse is of a particular demographic and it isn't particularly young. It will be sad when this blog eventually stops, but our words and thoughts will be preserved for posterity, if any are interested to know about us. I can only imagine some future blog archaeologist trying to understand Titus or Inga.

Richard Dolan said...

So mommy blogs have gone from gritty to photoshopped, have they? The things you learn reading this blog never cease to surprise. I suppose that's what those who read (view) such stuff want. Sounds pretty dull to me. As it turns out, one size does not fit all. So good luck to those who enjoy (crave) that stuff. Not for me, though.

PJ said...

Possible silver lining: by giving mommies (and other non-media-professionals) a platform for beauty-signalling and the production of motivated fake news, social media have inadvertently educated and sensitized big-media consumers to signalling behaviors and fake news production by media professionals.

Anonymous said...

I always found "mommyblogs" unbearable, even when my children were younger, even aside from my being repulsed by the use of children as props and the animus I have toward the use of the word "mommy" self-referentially by grown women. I do enjoy some ladyblogs devoted to the domestic arts, dressing well, and the enjoyment of beautiful things, though. They all skew older, and if any selling is being done it's straightforward and the blogger's own product.

And by the way, maybe Barack Obama was too glossily beautiful and that's how we developed a taste for Trump.

That mysterious "we" again. Are there really a lot of people who find Trump refreshing, who found Obama "glossily beautiful"? Never understood the adulation, myself. Phoney-baloney tool, and there's an end on't. Never understood all the fol-de-rol about Trump's vulgarity, either. Vulgar, compared to what? Maybe I just have a broader (or, I admit, maybe just snobbier) notion of what constitutes "vulgarity" (and concomitantly, what constitutes dignity and gravitas).

Anonymous said...

And btw, I do really enjoy your beautiful photography, but in no way do I get "sucked into" your pics to the extent of scanting the writing.

Ken B said...

Not too glossily beautiful, too meretriciously beautiful.

mockturtle said...

The photos are sometimes a nice addition. Sometimes they are the subject. But they do make it harder on those of us with less than speedy internet access.

Birkel said...

Obama was beautiful to anybody who didn't look carefully and didn't listen closely.

For those who did, we saw policies that hamstrung America.

For our efforts, at point to policy, wour motives were questioned as all sorts of -ists.

Ann Althouse said...

"It has crossed my mind that the commentariat here at Althouse is of a particular demographic and it isn't particularly young."

I can give you the demographics, via Google Analytics:

65+ 19% (This is the oldest group and the group that I myself belong to.)
55-64 36%
45-54 23%
35-44 11%
25-34 8%
18-24 3%

The oddest thing is that the group is overwhelmingly male: 82%.

There are no affinity groups that are represented here. Only 5% of us are news and politics junkies (per Google), and there is no group that has more than 5% of us. There's one other group that has 5%: banking/finance/investors. Only 3% are travel buffs. Only 3.65 of us are into media/entertainment/books! Only 3.2% are sports/fitness buffs. Only 3.9% are into food! Notice that statistics like that mean that I couldn't attract "sponsored posts" advertisers if I wanted too. Law? 2.4%. Who are you people?!

Ann Althouse said...

"That mysterious "we" again. Are there really a lot of people who find Trump refreshing, who found Obama "glossily beautiful"?"

At least one!

Tommy Duncan said...

A good blog is like most corner taverns of my youth in small town Wisconsin. You stopped by for a beer, but also for a chat. There were regulars who showed up every day. There were others who'd stop by a couple times a week to "catch up". There were also strangers.

The clientele varied tavern to tavern.

Some patrons were perfectly predictable in their views. Others surprised you. Some started arguments, others rose above the arguments, others just listened.

There were people from whom you learned interesting facts and tidbits. Others dragged your IQ down. Some were clever, but lacked depth. Some were there to quietly chat in a soothing way, others wanted listen and understand. Still others sought to impress.

Henry said...

Meanwhile the cooking blogs get wordier and wordier. I don't get that. You google a recipe and you have to skip the New York Times excellent offerings because they've paywalled it, and Epicurious is kind of relentlessly average, so you link through to a cooking blog and the blogger has written a thousand words of breathless adventuring about potato pancakes. Just give me the recipe, people. If I want prose about food I'll reread M.F.K. Fisher.

Mr. Majestyk said...

I, for one, am a Russian bot.

Ignorance is Bliss said...

Only 5% of us are news and politics junkies (per Google)...

In other words, only 5% of us get our news through google-approved sources.

Amadeus 48 said...

I don't think Google is very good at analyzing me or any other classical liberal/conservative libertarian person. We are too individualistic. That's reflected in your analytics above.

Birkel said...

Althouse:

Those statistics mean we don't click boxes and provide excess information to Alphabet, Inc. (Google)

We are largely conservative with a small 'c' and don't trade away our valuable assets for free.

Perhaps women are more likely to give away the milk for free.

mockturtle said...

Whatever the demographics, the commenters here are amusing and informed and a pleasure to read.

Amadeus 48 said...

By the way, your analytics cause me to believe that I may have achieved my goal of being invisible to the thought police at Google.

Amadeus 48 said...

By the way, the front page news feeds at Yahoo and AOL are shocking in their obvious bias and mindless leftism. They never saw a snark about Trump that they didn't feature, and they never saw a stain on their paladin Obama. I view them with contempt.

Law 2.4%? That's Chuck, me, David Begley, Balfegor, and a few others.

John Borell said...

As Adam Smith commented, people want to be loved and lovely.

BridgeGuy said...

Who am I?

Just a lawyer's kid from the Northwoods of Sconnie who made it to Western NY.

The legal discussions remind me of growing up without having to spend my weekends updating reference books in Dad's library.

MD Greene said...

There are more people who want to write than people who can write well and who have something to say. That Knausgaard fellow in Norway seems to make it work for him, but he's a rare outlier.

Our culture for the last couple generations has fostered an unusual level of personal introspection. Maybe it's all the counseling for people who are generally okay or our post-Christian disdain for the idea that there actually are bigger issues than the search for personal meaning inside your own head -- not that there's anything wrong with that!

Mommy blogs are typically written by women at home raising children, a fine and noble enterprise. The problem is that families that can afford such luxury settle in really really safe communities where Nothing Bad Can Happen, and everything not-children is as boring as spit. Unfortunately for the mom-blog genre, Tolstoy had it right -- happy families are all the same.

Worse are the ardent first-person blogs by millennials who take themselves too seriously. They have not learned yet that the way to understand yourself is to meet other people, listen to them and learn how their lives/challenges/pursuits are different from your own. Some of these blogs are just cringe-inducing.

Before the internet, you had to convince a publisher that your scribblings were interesting enough to attract an audience before said scribblings could be put out broadly. Now you just hit "send." Very unfortunate.

Sebastian said...

Spotless voids are also a form of self-protection in the era of prog vilification and witch hunts.

MadisonMan said...

It seems to me that when monetization invades Social Media, kids leave it. Instagram is still there, but the more that it's used by people to show beautiful pictures and get money from it, the less it's used by people that advertisers are looking for. (Apparently vsco is better, according to my 20somethings).

btw -- I'm 57. In case google analytics hasn't pegged my age correctly. I also identify as male, which might be different than actually being male. I don't know.

I've yet to see a Mom Blog out there that is interesting or that has a unique point of view. Maybe I'm stumbling on the wrong race of them. Young(ish) white Moms have little to say to me about parenting that I've not observed or experienced already.

The death knell of a blog is repetition.

John Borell said...

Oh, and I’m team Law.

Oso Negro said...

Althouse said "The oddest thing is that the group is overwhelmingly male: 82%. Who are you people?! "

I run a boutique global chemical engineering consulting firm and spend so much time on the road that I have almost no friends in the town where I own a house. Well, in fairness, I had two, but one just died. I am not sure it reflects favorably on me as a human being, but this blog is my substitute for a human community outside of work and scattered family. Nonetheless, as I learned this morning, I can still feel superior to Instagram users.

And really, Althouse, is it so odd that men like you and your thoughts?

buwaya said...

For a while there the better blogs were a substitute for the columnists I used to follow, as they had passed on, and were never replaced by anyone as good.

I'm thinking of people like Seligman of Fortune, Florence King of NR, etc.

buwaya said...

Winston Churchill would have had a terrific blog.

Young guys blogging did fantastic work, if they were blogging of something external. There were (and are) excellent journalists/bloggers, Michael Totten for instance. There were a lot more great ones in the early 2000's.

Bob Boyd said...

Althouse
Official blog of The Patriarchy?

one of the bobs said...

This post reminded of an article I read last year: https://staltz.com/the-web-began-dying-in-2014-heres-how.html

Darrell said...

I come here because--unlike other blogs--my comments disappear and I am totally taken out of the conversation. It could be for minutes. It could be for 12 hours. Only the very latecomers know I was here.

Ann Althouse said...

I think the number of people who read every day is about 50,000. The number of regular commenters is perhaps 100. There's probably little reason to think the commenters are typical readers, since the vast majority of readers are people who don't comment. So keep that in mind as you try to figure out what's happening here.

Also, most readers do not click through to the comments page (otherwise my "visits" and "page views" numbers would be radically different, and they are not).

Ann Althouse said...

"I run a boutique global chemical engineering consulting firm and spend so much time on the road that I have almost no friends in the town where I own a house. Well, in fairness, I had two, but one just died."

You realize how important a friend is when you only have 2 and one dies. And when you only have one friend, that's infinitely more than none.

2 is a number that's more like the number of children you might have. Or the number of parents. The investment in each is so high, it's almost frightening. If one dies or becomes estranged, then you only have one. It's like marriage: You only have one. The idea of losing that one... if you seriously think about it for 3 seconds, you could make yourself cry.

By the way, my father was a chemical engineer. I never properly understood what he did or managed to express my appreciation for him during his lifetime.

"I am not sure it reflects favorably on me as a human being, but this blog is my substitute for a human community outside of work and scattered family..."

People encountered through reading and writing are real (and often quite a bit better than in real life (personally, I tend to keep my distance)).

"And really, Althouse, is it so odd that men like you and your thoughts?"

But why aren't women equally interested? I don't feel that I'm catering to men.

Susan said...

I guess I am one of the rare women here. I read this blog and virtually every comment because it is different and informative. I am not a lawyer, not friends with any and no lawyer relatives and when I started coming here there was lots more lawyer's-view commentary on news of the day which I found valuable. But I love words and writing too so I also stay for that. I never know what the topic of the day or post will be. Love that.

I work in IT around predominantly males so I don't know that women were more taken in by Obama than men. Left-wing people seemed to like him and his ideas. Birds of a feather I guess. I always thought he seemed like one of those smooth talking guys who lied constantly about every single thing but for some reason people still believed him and his ideas because they wanted to believe.

The only time I see any sort of mommy blogging is if I'm looking for a recipe or a pattern. Never read the content or the comments. No there, there.

Bob Boyd said...

"But why aren't women equally interested? I don't feel that I'm catering to men."

Sex appeal.

Chris N said...

My father was a law professor with a memory somewhat like Althouse’s, I’m guessing, in that he was able process and store case information visually. It gave him a serious advantage.

My mother is a photographer, and her father was a painter.

I think that’s why I connected with this site, and Althouse’s writing.

I feel like I know a lot about many, many commenters, and still often find the comments informative and interesting. I get a small rush when I do it myself.

Free speech, a window on con law issues, good photographs and a lot of sharp people and some crazies from all walks of life. A generous hostess and her husband and not too much bullshit. Skepticism and wry observations about politics, but not really (P)olitics.

n.n said...

I, for one, am a Russian bot.

Temptation. Must resist and persist, persist and resist... #MeToo

n.n said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
n.n said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
n.n said...

Sex appeal

Professor Althouse?

Although, there is that schoolyard fantasy, in the adolescent boy's mind. To read, perchance to comment, to pull her ponytail and chase her around the blog.

William said...

It's quite possible, maybe even advisable, to live a long, good life without ever listening to a rap song or reading a mommy blog. I just now discovered that mommy blogs exist........I enjoy reading this blog. It's a way of hanging out with an attractive, witty woman and not having to do absolutely anything to reciprocate....,Once a year, I buy a pair of running shoes through Amazon. I try to remember to use the Althouse portal when I do so. I'm not sure, though, if I would follow any of your recommenationw when it comes to running shoes........Maybe writing an interesting blog is like being able to whistle Mozart. It's an admirable skill that's difficult to monetize.

Kathryn51 said...

"There are no affinity groups that are represented here. Only 5% of us are news and politics junkies (per Google), and there is no group that has more than 5% of us. There's one other group that has 5%: banking/finance/investors. Only 3% are travel buffs. Only 3.65 of us are into media/entertainment/books! Only 3.2% are sports/fitness buffs. Only 3.9% are into food! Notice that statistics like that mean that I couldn't attract "sponsored posts" advertisers if I wanted too. Law? 2.4%. Who are you people?!"

If this statistic is for the 100 folks that commonly comment, I question it - bigly.

3.2% are sports/fitness buffs but only 2.4% are lawyers? That would mean that only 2-3 commenters are lawyers? I'm glad Google analytics is so shoddy.

On the other hand, if it is analyzing each "comment" - then there's quite a bit of garbage once Toothless and Chuck shanghai a post.

BTW, I miss some of the more personal posts/photos (red shoes with yellow socks! or was it yellow shoes with red socks?). Maybe that was just a phase when Althouse was in New York.

PJ said...

The oddest thing is that the group is overwhelmingly male: 82%.

Following the Althouse rule, I think we must infer from this that the vast majority of women are too busy accomplishing Important Things to while away time reading a blog.

Oso Negro said...

Althouse said "Why aren't women equally interested?"

You offer logical, considered, and, importantly, original thoughts about what you perceive in the world. This is more compelling to men than to women. Imagine an "Althouse the Smart Girlfriend" tag. Who would use such a tag?

Yancey Ward said...

I think you guys need to believe the analytics because there are three types of visitors to any blog- those who come, read the blog post, then leave- there are those read the blog posts and the comments, then leave- and then there are those who write comments even as infrequently as once a week. I would imagine the latter group is about 1% of the total readership.

Ms. Althouse- can you see the demographics of commenters alone from Google Analytics?

Yancey Ward said...

I visited this blog regularly for years before I began writing comments here- actually started visiting not long (about a year) after Ms. Althouse started it.

JAORE said...

"Barack Obama was too glossily beautiful..."

Handsome is as handsome does.

YoungHegelian said...

Althouse said "Why aren't women equally interested?"

I think because this blog tends to be somewhat combative in its discussion of ideas. In my experience, guys like to mix it up & get feisty with each other over all sorts of shit, & then they all walk away & forget about about it. It's part of male-bonding, just like have having doofy & kinda-insulting nick-names for each other is something male friends do.

Women generally shy (in every sense of that word) away from such jousts. Women who enjoy such verbal jousting over ideas often engage in it with their male & not their female friends, since there is much lesser chance of hurt feelings. I suspect that for some of the female commenters here, we are that group of male friends where they can lower the boom.

Someone once asked Bill Maher why there are so few women on his show, & he said that the producers try desperately to get women to come on the show, but very few women actually wanted to come on.

traditionalguy said...

Althouse is cute. And she can't help
that, but it irritates most other women. They see it as unfair competition.

Amadeus 48 said...

Hmm... a blog written by a former art student who became a brilliant law student and a professor at a Big 10 university with a long-standing reputation as a party school (see those Playboy surveys from the '60s and '70s). She is open-minded, willing to argue points without becoming abusive, and has an unconventional but totally admirable husband who she met through the blog. She is extremely attractive as seen on Bloggingheads and in other photos and videos. She has a quirky appreciation for all sorts topics.

Who wouldn't want to hang out with her? I can only speak as a man, but it seems like fun.

Oso Negro said...

Blogger Amadeus 48 said...
Hmm... a blog written by a former art student who became a brilliant law student and a professor at a Big 10 university with a long-standing reputation as a party school (see those Playboy surveys from the '60s and '70s). She is open-minded, willing to argue points without becoming abusive, and has an unconventional but totally admirable husband who she met through the blog. She is extremely attractive as seen on Bloggingheads and in other photos and videos. She has a quirky appreciation for all sorts topics.

Who wouldn't want to hang out with her? I can only speak as a man, but it seems like fun.

1/28/18, 12:24 PM


#Althousethesmartgirlfriend

Amadeus 48 said...

Oso Negro--Exactly.

Henry said...

"Who are you people?!"

Old farts. It's right there in the analytics.

Yancey Ward said...

The age demographics aren't surprising to me- one of the things I noticed a long time ago and still today is that many of the commentators here are older than me, which is surprising because I am 51 and thus no longer young.

YoungHegelian said...

@Amadeus,

Who wouldn't want to hang out with her? I can only speak as a man, but it seems like fun.

What you claim is very true. I just don't understand why the description you gave doesn't seem like "fun" for women, too? Don't women appreciate the things you mentioned?

It ain't like Althouse is gonna jump outta the computer screen & steal their husbands, after all!

Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

tl;dr

rhhardin said...

I put my housekeeping on display in every dog picture

https://www.flickr.com/photos/rhhardin/39884726382/sizes/o

ALP said...

I have been spending more time on Instagram lately, where I follow many artists working in various mediums. This is a perfect use for Instagram which leans towards the visual rather than text (I tend to ignore the words anyway). Used properly with an ad blocker - it's a inspiring eye-candy break. Artists sell their work directly to followers, that's one commercial aspect of Instagram I do like. If they start posting controversial, political shit (or even sappy inspirational messages) - unfollow. There are lots of artists out there using it just for art. Thus, Instagram blows my mind but in a good way by allowing me access to amazing creativity.

And despite a bio that says I don't provide content, don't follow me - I have several followers. Go figure.

ALP said...

And if you are not following the Cincinnati Zoo and Fiona the hippo via Instagram....well, then...I guess that's YOUR choice to live without the good cheer only a prematurely born hippo can provide.

gilbar said...

-The oddest thing is that the group is overwhelmingly male: 82%.

So, an incredibly hot redhead, who by the way is relatively mature; finds it Oddest that her followers are overwhelmingly male (and grownup)?

I'm thinking that you're teasing us Prof. But go ahead, we like it

Ipso Fatso said...

For what it is worth my dad was a chemical engineer as well. Traveled all over the world. Me, not as smart.

Jim Grey said...

In about a week and a half my blog will hit its 11th anniversary. It's a photography/personal blog in which I write six days a week. Keeping at it has brought me to the place where I get about 1,000 visits a day. I figure I have about 200 regular readers. I'm actually fairly well known in film-photography circles online.

But well known doesn't mean jack when it comes to monetization. Two small ads at the bottom of each post net me, drum roll please, about $30 a month. It's enough to pay for the hosting and buy me some film and processing for my old cameras.

I'm Director of Engineering at a software company in central Indiana. I can't imagine how I'd monetize my blog in such a way that it would replace the kind of money I make leading software developers. I expect it would involve working 100 hours a week and never taking a photograph of something that interested me personally ever again. No thanks. My blog is and will remain just a place for me to work out my thoughts and share my photos for the people who find that kind of thing interesting.

I tell people that if they haven't already started a blog, don't start one now; do a podcast or a vlog instead. That's where all the cool kids are going. If you want a ghost of a chance at making any real money or building a real following on the Internet, you have to be way ahead of the curve. Blogging is, sadly, past its curve. If you don't already have a successful blog, you are extremely unlikely to ever have one.

choirmom said...

I really enjoy reading your blog because it is just that - blogging your ideas which I find very interesting, though I'm not always in agreement. The mom blogs that use advertising, I think, are mainly Pioneer Woman wanna be's. (She started out as a blogger and has now her own TV cooking show and has a product line in Wal-Mart.) My only somewhat small wish for you is that you could tell us what you need funding for--it seems the requests to shop using the Amazon portal are increasingly frequent. Are there costs associated with running your blog?

Jersey Fled said...

"The oddest thing is that the group is overwhelmingly male"

Maybe because the ladies are over at the mommy blogs.

gpm said...

Law 2.4%? That's Chuck, me, David Begley, Balfegor, and a few others.

If Google can figure it out, which I hope against hope they can't (and damn, I'm about to give it away!), so am I. But I comment half a dozen times a year on inconsequential things.

--gpm

Gahrie said...

And really, Althouse, is it so odd that men like you and your thoughts?

For me I come here because Althouse provides interesting topics and allows free wheeling debate. She rarely deletes comments left in good faith and often engages in conversations with us.

Gahrie said...

But why aren't women equally interested? I don't feel that I'm catering to men.

Because in order to participate effectively in the debates you must be able to think and not just feel. Far too many women merely feel rather than think and have no idea how to defend their positions.

Freeman Hunt said...

This place is mostly full of men? Men and women might, taken as populations, have different interests? No, that must be wrong. The smarties at Google know it to be so wrong that they fire people for saying it.

Freeman Hunt said...

Most of the women I know use the internet to figure out how to do things, not to debate people. One is currently building a chicken coop, so she looks up things about that. Another now has a small farm, so there is no end to the research she has to do. Others are really into decorating and recipe ideas online.

They're not emoting, they're doing. Or wishing they were doing.

Here we tap keys and argue. Love it but don't think it's everybody's bag.

Anonymous said...

I think I read Althouse daily because I see Anne as a kindred spirit ; she is my age and has been a lot of the places I have been.

I had a friend back in the day who was a well-to-do pretty blonde and an avid Bob Dylan fan. One day, she lent me her entire collection of Dylan records (all of his LP's as of 1969) when she set off for a summer in Europe. I listened to them closely and was enthralled, as I was already being drawn to pop musicians who strived to be part of the greater (serious) artistic realm: Beatles, Byrds, Zappa. I still have a taste for the good stuff and still seek it out. Of course. most of what I currently find is out of the realm of pop-rock, but that is where I started.

Freeman Hunt said...

The project of a friend was once marketed, in tiny part, by lifestyle and mom blogs. The posts were hilarious. Perfectly placed kernels of popcorn made to look as though jauntily spilled out of designer disposable popcorn containers. Women with perfect hair, makeup, and wardrobe supposedly enjoying the thing at home. We were highly entertained.

There's no way that human beings read that life as product stuff.

It's like the MLM posts on Facebook. All the MLM people comment on each other's MLM posts, but no one else cares.

SEO Gal said...

Yes! Perfectly said! It’s really hard being a mom; especially a working mom. But, many of us mothers still yearn for opportunites to connect, relate, and share with each other. The Internet and it’s many pathways offer a new version of support and camaraderie many of us need or crave. Community (and content) can come in many forms. If a woman is able to monetize her voice/brand and earn some money to help support her family or expand her financial worth, more power to her. We’re all doing things to get ahead...in one way or another. Perhaps we should all step back, stop the judgement, and just support one another. Thank you.