Fantastic example of the importance of vocabulary. I always tell my students that if we don't understand the words, we won't know what we're talking about. I love that such a complex surgery could be summarized into such a compact paragraph and yet still be declared "crystal clear."
This is one of the most amazing stories I have seen in a while. Thank you for posting it. I plan to send it to some physician friends who have done various volunteer work overseas.
I also second Joan's comment on the importance of technical vocabulary. There is of course a huge amount unsaid in these simple instructions, but the sender, Dr. Merion, knew that the recipient could fill in the blanks.
Having dissected human cadavers for a living for a short period of five months, I have a great appreciation for surgeons. Dismembering and cutting is easy. Keeping someone alive while doing it? Not really.
Being a medical transcriptionist, I understood what the instructions were even without going to the link.
What I don't understand is why the copied/retyped text that Ann has and that is shown at the bottom of the link, they have misspelled what the doctor originally spelled correctly. The word is "serratus," not "serrates." He also used "cont" suture for continuous, not count. Did they think he was wrong?
Picky, yeah, and it's really cool that this was done using txt abbrevs, again, correctly, but those things tend to stand out to me--can't help it.
"The quality of life in DR Congo is so poor, and he was so alone, that I wondered if it would not be better off for him to die. But the local staff gleaned from him that he wanted to live – which is unusual in the region. The Congolese do not mind dying."
Is anyone else kind of scared by the thought of having anyone - but especially any Congolese person - helpless in the hands of a doctor who thinks like this? (And who not only thinks like this, but is unashamed enough of his "their lives are worthless" attitude to publish it in a major newspaper?)
He seems to have done well and professionally by this patient, but still.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
12 comments:
What?
No smiley face?
:)
Fantastic example of the importance of vocabulary. I always tell my students that if we don't understand the words, we won't know what we're talking about. I love that such a complex surgery could be summarized into such a compact paragraph and yet still be declared "crystal clear."
LOL
Lop Off Limb
That's just mind-blowing. Seriously - holy freaking cow. That surgeon is the stud of all studs.
Fascinating. It's amazing what heights people can rise to.
This is one of the most amazing stories I have seen in a while. Thank you for posting it. I plan to send it to some physician friends who have done various volunteer work overseas.
I also second Joan's comment on the importance of technical vocabulary. There is of course a huge amount unsaid in these simple instructions, but the sender, Dr. Merion, knew that the recipient could fill in the blanks.
Having dissected human cadavers for a living for a short period of five months, I have a great appreciation for surgeons. Dismembering and cutting is easy. Keeping someone alive while doing it? Not really.
Being a medical transcriptionist, I understood what the instructions were even without going to the link.
What I don't understand is why the copied/retyped text that Ann has and that is shown at the bottom of the link, they have misspelled what the doctor originally spelled correctly. The word is "serratus," not "serrates." He also used "cont" suture for continuous, not count. Did they think he was wrong?
Picky, yeah, and it's really cool that this was done using txt abbrevs, again, correctly, but those things tend to stand out to me--can't help it.
"Did they think he was wrong?"
Nope, but Microsoft did.
"The quality of life in DR Congo is so poor, and he was so alone, that I wondered if it would not be better off for him to die. But the local staff gleaned from him that he wanted to live – which is unusual in the region. The Congolese do not mind dying."
Is anyone else kind of scared by the thought of having anyone - but especially any Congolese person - helpless in the hands of a doctor who thinks like this? (And who not only thinks like this, but is unashamed enough of his "their lives are worthless" attitude to publish it in a major newspaper?)
He seems to have done well and professionally by this patient, but still.
Wow...stud is right!
And jaed, I didn't take it that way at all, and I consider myself pretty sensitive. I read deep compassion and understanding in those words.
Post a Comment