Most of the Dems do. Since they pay no tax in the bottom 1/2, they vote for who will give them the most. Not meant to be derogatory, I would do the same. Just an unintended consequence of a country where your contribution to the society's infrastructure is much more equal for some than others. For the Repubs, it is merely who won't raise my taxes. We got teh Clintons because Bush 41 ignored his "Read My Lips " pledge. Policy about energy, foreign affairs, etc is not immediate enough for our "now" society.
Economists have generally done a better job as President than folks from other occupations, at least in my lifetime, though the one lawyer smart enough to realize he was out of his depth on the subject and farm economic policy out to someone who knew what they were doing did pretty well too. I don't think any of the lawyers currently running are that smart, unfortunately.
>J said: Economists have generally > done a better job as President > than folks from other > occupations,
So far as I know, no economist has ever been President of the United States. George Shultz is an economist and he was Sec State. That is the closest any economist has come -- except for Martin Sheen on the West Wing.
Generally, Presidents don't know squat about economics. They don't really need to; that's why they have advisors.
Click here to enter Amazon through the Althouse Portal.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
7 comments:
Most of the Dems do. Since they pay no tax in the bottom 1/2, they vote for who will give them the most. Not meant to be derogatory, I would do the same. Just an unintended consequence of a country where your contribution to the society's infrastructure is much more equal for some than others. For the Repubs, it is merely who won't raise my taxes. We got teh Clintons because Bush 41 ignored his "Read My Lips " pledge. Policy about energy, foreign affairs, etc is not immediate enough for our "now" society.
Not proposing economic impossibilities is a good indicator.
They're not hard to teach or learn, but the media prefer the soap opera versions of economics.
So not voting on economics might be good advice, since nobody knows any.
Economists have generally done a better job as President than folks from other occupations, at least in my lifetime, though the one lawyer smart enough to realize he was out of his depth on the subject and farm economic policy out to someone who knew what they were doing did pretty well too. I don't think any of the lawyers currently running are that smart, unfortunately.
ye gods....an economic robot. elliott......phone hommmmmmmeeee
what is this "most of the dems do...since they pay no tax in the bottom 1/2...yada yada yada..."
no more mush lowbrow for you. radio dittohead in suspension pending truth audit.
"Business men create jobs that presidents take credit for."
I don't remember who said it. But someone did.
>J said: Economists have generally
> done a better job as President
> than folks from other
> occupations,
So far as I know, no economist has ever been President of the United States. George Shultz is an economist and he was Sec State. That is the closest any economist has come -- except for Martin Sheen on the West Wing.
Generally, Presidents don't know squat about economics. They don't really need to; that's why they have advisors.
Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr both had degrees in economics. Perhaps I should have said "Presidents whose formal education was in economics".
Post a Comment