Of course, after the nice opening sentence we have to read this:
As a result, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission must now decide when affiliates of Canadian utilities -- utilities not subject to FERC jurisdiction -- may sell power at market-based rates in the United States.
Jeez, D.C. Circuit Court cases are dull -- all that federal regulatory dreariness. Everyone keeps jabbering It's the second highest court in the land after the U.S. Supreme Court. What they fail to say is that it's the first most boring court in the land. What good fortune to be nominated to the Supreme Court, but what double good fortune to escape from the D.C. Circuit. All you Fifth Circuit judges who didn't get picked: at least you have an interesting case load where you are.
(The quoted case is boringly called Consumers Energy Company v. Federal Energy Commission, 367 F.3d 915 (2004).)
Posts
8 comments:
Roberts is unquestionably a good and witty writer from what I've read of his stuff--it's crisp, well-reasoned, and not purely ideologically driven, which is a positive sign.
The other "plus" of appointing a D.C. Circuit Judge (even one of longer standing like Ruth Bader Ginsberg), is that while the court is highly "prestigious," there are a bunch of hot-button issues it doesn't touch on a regular basis (or at all) by virtue of its situs--abortion, death penalty, voting rights/redistricting cases, rarely (if ever) wind up before the D.C. Circuit nothaving a paper trail there could certainly be seen as a plus.
Beldar: Yes. No one ever thinks about it. Unless they are well paid for it.
Kevin, John: I once read a student evaluation that criticized me for using the word "thing" in classroom lectures. Too slangy, apparently! I never forgot that.
AA:
Clearly that evaluation did not change your "crisp" use of the language in your Blog. Nor your appreciation of such use in the written work of others!!!
Ditto for the Federal Circuit. It does have jurisdiction over some things besides patents, but that I where I have to deal with it. Of course, if you are a patent attorney geek, then maybe it is exciting... But for the rest of you, it is probably more boring than the D.C. Circuit.
Love is a many splendored phenomenon.
Miklos: I think a good writer hears the written word. Bad editors don't and don't understand why you have the sequence of words the way you do. Somross is trying to be rational about word usage. I wouldn't want him editing me.
(But, purely rationally, Somross, the first phrase in that compound sentence is definitely in the passive voice.)
Somross: Sorry about the sex confusion. Must have been the "Ross." But apparently I know you from high school...
Seems to me the "was" makes it passive, but if there's some additional detail to the analysis, I don't know what it is. Lawrev editors tend to get after you for any use of the verb "to be," and starting off with "It" only seems to make it worse.
I stand by my view that "It was a close thing" is much better than "It was close."
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.