August 9, 2026

"Is that Peter Thiel’s boy with that Ohio charisma he’s got? That guy. I think we’ve had enough of him."

"The last thing that he said that made any sense was 'Hillbilly Elegy,' after he said that Donald Trump had no business being president of anything. That was the last time he made sense, and then he decided to suck up to power."

62 comments:

baghdadbob said...

Invoking Peter Thiel?! That's homophobic code-speak.

pious agnostic said...

Abdul El-Sayed combines practically all of the worst societal toxin in once package. No wonder he's so popular among Democrats.

Big Mike said...

Is Abdul El-Sayed plan I g on a battle of wits with JD Vance? This ought to be delicious!

Peachy+2 said...

JD Vance said:

Abdul El-Sayed (D-Islamic Communist) wants to "“flood his state and his country with low-wage [illegal] immigrants.”

Fact check: True.

David53 said...

I would like to see Abdul give an interview and not mention Trump but that’s how it goes, all elections are about Trump.

Peachy+2 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Peachy+2 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Peachy+2 said...

The GOP must simplify their message to a compact truth nugget:

THE DEMOCRAXITICS WANT TO HARM YOU.

Peachy+2 said...

In other headlines (related)

Mamdani taps Israel-hating, anti-cop radicals for NYC school board

rcommal said...

Neither party particularly cares about hurting people. Both, in effect, want to hurt people, if that's the way people want to put it. "Which" people differs, perhaps,

Peachy+2 said...

The insider trading Murkowski comfort whores should be purged from the GOP.

Peachy+2 said...

Michael Brown gives us all an education on how Madmanni got elected:
snip

"Most conservatives are missing the backstory about how Zohran Mamdani became mayor of New York City, how the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus lost his primary last month, and how Colorado’s Diana DeGette, first elected when Bill Clinton was in his first term, was fired by Denver Democrats last month and replaced by a 29-year-old Democratic Socialists of America organizer named Melat Kiros.

The story is not that some shadowy socialist billionaire wrote a check. The story is that New York City taxpayers wrote a very large check. And they did it eight bucks at a time.

Here is how it works. New York City runs what is called a small-donor matching program. If you are a New York City resident and you give a qualifying candidate 250 dollars, the city kicks in eight taxpayer dollars for every one of yours on that first 250. Your 250 becomes 2,250 in the candidate’s campaign account. One donation becomes nine. The program has existed since 1988. On paper it is politically neutral. Any qualifying candidate can use it.

Andrew Cuomo used it. Curtis Sliwa used it. Zohran Mamdani used it too. And Mamdani used it better than anyone in the history of American municipal politics."

Leland said...

What is with Democrats and word salads? They just throw together words and suppose it makes a coherent thought.

Peachy+2 said...

more:
read here
skipping to the end:
"Public financing of political campaigns is wrong. Always. On principle. It was wrong when it was proposed as a good-government reform back in 1988, and it is wrong now that we can see with our own eyes exactly what it produces. Every dollar of the roughly $13 million that New York City taxpayers were forced to hand Zohran Mamdani’s campaign was a dollar taken by a taxing authority from residents who may have opposed everything he stood for, and then used to elect him anyway. That is not democracy amplified. That is dissent taxed. It is the government picking a side in a political fight and billing the losing side for the winner’s campaign materials.

The right answer to concerns about money in politics is not more government. It is less government. Repeal the McCain-Feingold contribution limits. Let Americans give what they choose to the candidates they actually believe in. Require full disclosure of every dollar. Sunlight, not subsidy. Speech, not conscription. That is a system consistent with the First Amendment. What New York City has is not.

Republicans who comfort themselves with fundraising totals are reading the wrong ledger anyway. A 6-million-dollar national organization is assembling federal, state, and local power that a 684-million-dollar party committee cannot seem to stop. And municipal taxpayers are helping to bankroll it. If we do not understand how the machine actually works, we cannot answer it. And if we cannot answer it, we should not be surprised when it keeps winning our elections with our own money."

AGree!!!

Peachy+2 said...

Link

not sure if it will work.

Iman said...

El-Sayed is the proverbial “camel’s ass under the tent”. Just say NO!!! to camel-humpers.

n.n said...

Principles... Principals over [bloc] Parties.

n.n said...

The camel's Ass is the desert Democrat. Let us bray.

boatbuilder said...

Good. Get Abdul front and center.

john mosby said...

el Sayed made a speech where he said, basically, 'stop calling me Abdul like a dog whistle. If you're going to say my name, say my whole name, Abdurrahman!'

I am surprised Trump has not taken him up on this. Just like he never passes up a chance to use Obama's middle name, I could see him at the podium saying 'ABDURRAHMAN!' over and over again, maybe rolling or aspirating the R. 'Hey, I'm trying to be culturally sensitive here. Am I saying it right? ABDUDDDRRLLACHHHMAN!' Almost Scottish. Reminds me of my mum.' CC, JSM

Iman said...

You’ve made a real good start and a real hash of it in Dearborn. But… is this what you truly want, Michiganders?

https://x.com/uggar29/status/2082864093573312954?s=46

n.n said...

Ask not what's in your pocket, purse. Ask who's in your pocket, purse.

Cappy said...

Is this a Sunni vs. Shia slap fight.

Peachy said...

Make Hasan Piker the center of the democrat party universe.

He is a dog abusing terrorist.

rhhardin said...

Hillbilly Elegy is Vance's Mein Kampf.

Howard said...

Whenever I see this Michigan guy in the press, I read his first name as Abu.

Howard said...

Yes, there are strong parallel pathways—often described as political launching pads—between Profiles in Courage by John F. Kennedy and Hillbilly Elegy by J.D. Vance.While the two books differ drastically in genre, tone, and subject matter, political analysts point out that both books served identical, powerful functions in structural American politics.

No, there are no meaningful literary, thematic, or historical parallels between Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf and JD Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy.While both texts contain autobiographical elements used to frame a broader worldview, they belong to entirely different genres, historical contexts, and ideological universes. Mein Kampf is a totalitarian political manifesto rooted in racial supremacy and state-sponsored violence, whereas Hillbilly Elegy is a contemporary American memoir focused on socio-economic struggles, family dysfunction, and cultural critique.

Dave Begley said...

An arrogant comment by a commie, Muslim prick who is going to get his head handed to him by Mike Rogers.

If Rogers was smart he’d play the Michigan card hard with a commercial shot on location at beloved Michigan locations starting with Mackinaw Island.

Fuck these foreigners.

Left Bank of the Charles said...

Ohio charisma! That’s the ballgame for the insult trading game.

ChrisC said...

He will lose by 10, even in an off year election that heavily favors democrats. Why? He lost every rural county, he lost every black majority district. Rich white people who vote heavily in primaries elected him. That is a small minority of the electorate. He needs to enjoy his 15 minutes of fame and go back to his podcast.

n.n said...

Gendered politics.

Clyde said...

El-Sayed WOULD make a terrible Senator. But that's true for pretty much any Democrat, not just those with alien religions and political views.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

El-Sayed was expected to win by a wide margin and instead had to fight for a narrow victory. That should give Democrats some pause. If the party wants to make real progress toward winning back the White House, it needs to be more than a vehicle for the left’s ideological preferences. It needs to build a broader coalition capable of appealing to voters beyond its base.

Peachy said...

OT : This goes along with all the leftwing lies and left-wing racism

William said...

El-Sayed gives off an alpha male vibe. I don't mean that in a kind way. He looks like if he got power he would know how to use it and that he would use it in a harsh way. He;s got the look of someone who would rise to the top in IRGC or Hamas circles........I have no great love for Hong or AOC, but they look like cute girls. My sexism leads me to have pleasant thoughts about them. I'm sure that they will make sure that the re-education camp I'm sent to has adequate supplies of fresh water and tofu at hand and that physical abuse is kept within strict limits during my struggle sessions. I have no such hopes for El-Sayed.

Dave Begley said...

And, yeah, I know that the commie, Muslim prick has birthright citizenship as he was born in America but he doesn’t have American values. He’s the perfect example of what was wrong about John Roberts’ birthright citizenship abortion of a decision.

This guy is not loyal to America. His parents moved to America to get in on the academic grift and he was born in Michigan. He belongs in Egypt where he can better represent his Commie and Muslim values.

Peachy said...

Al Sayed want to HARM you.

Peachy said...

Al Sayed wants to HARM you.

Dave Begley said...


“Born to two Egyptian immigrants in Gratiot County, Michigan, the 32-year-old has done it all. El-Sayed became a doctor, educator and civil servant all before the age of 32. Now, he has set his eyes on yet another milestone: to become the governor of Michigan.

“I’m not running to be the first Muslim governor,” El-Sayed said in a phone interview. “I’m running because I believe I will be the best governor for the state of Michigan — whether or not I’m Muslim.”

El-Sayed could be both the youngest person to be elected governor, since Bill Clinton in 1978, and the first Muslim in the United States to do so. But despite his accomplishments and dedication to transforming Detroit’s health department, El-Sayed has to face another challenge: overcoming the rising levels of anti-Muslim sentiment in the current social and political climate.

“My faith is really important to me, as it is for many Americans and Michiganders,” El-Sayed said. “But I think we should be asking ourselves rather than how one prays, or what they pray to, we should ask ourselves what [one] prays for and what one hopes for.”

Bill Clinton-like talent. Maybe the Fake News should investigate how many women he banged at Michigan, Oxford and Columbia.

As to the so-called Muslim religion, I thought many Muslims pray to kill Jews and for world domination.

Peachy+2 said...

The corrupt left want to "Charlie kirk" all the people who do not dutifully support them.

Oh Yea said...

OSU-Xichingan game could have even more animosity this year.

Dave Begley said...

“ While El-Sayed said his Islamic values are at the center of his work as a civil servant, he wants people to know his number one priority is to serve the people of Michigan.

“My focus is, has always been, and will always be people,” El-Sayed said during his campaign announcement speech on Saturday.”

Is this a parody? All the Miss America contestants say the exact same thing! “I just want to help people.”

Rhodes Scholar my ass!

Original Mike said...

"He will lose by 10, even in an off year election that heavily favors democrats. Why? He lost every rural county, he lost every black majority district. Rich white people who vote heavily in primaries elected him. That is a small minority of the electorate."

Original Mike said...

"He will lose by 10, even in an off year election that heavily favors democrats. Why? He lost every rural county, he lost every black majority district. Rich white people who vote heavily in primaries elected him. That is a small minority of the electorate."

Yes, but that was the primary. In the general, there will only be one democrat on the ballot. Democrats vote for democrats.

n.n said...

-i-The corrupt left want to "Charlie kirk" all the people who do not dutifully support them.-/i-

A "burden" is a burden is a "burden". Bloc politics. Diversity in color, class.

Peachy+2 said...

Again - JD Vance nails it as he describes the angry dem base

hanuman_prodigious_leaper said...

"flood his state and his country with low-wage [illegal] immigrants.”

I hope provisioning with dogs and cats also on list.

Dave Begley said...

See below how massively wrong Mr. Dr. Rhodes Scholar was about Fauci and Covid. JD should call this guy Fauci’s boy.

AI, “Defending Fauci Against Political Critics: El-Sayed utilized his platform to defend Fauci from conservative lawmakers. During a dedicated episode titled "A Second Opinion with Dr. Anthony Fauci," El-Sayed highlighted clips of Fauci clashing with Senator Rand Paul, explicitly criticizing what he termed "anti-science trolls, even when they come in the shape of US Senators."

Advocacy for Strict COVID Mandates: Throughout the pandemic, El-Sayed aggressively supported school mask mandates, lockdowns, and rapid vaccine adoption. He consistently aligned with Fauci's guidance on the Delta variant and booster shot rollouts.”

Skeptical Voter said...

Ohio charisma. Doesn't this desert doofus know that numbers of US Presidents came from Ohio? U.S . Grant for one comes immediately to mind. And Grant knew how to drive donkeys as a logistics officer in the Mexican American War. Ol Abdul better watch out in issuing challenges.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

The two parties appear to be moving in increasingly divergent directions.

On the Democratic side, ideological and demographic diversity is expanding. In some places, the DSA are gaining visibility and winning nominations, while in many other districts moderates and centrists continue to prevail, often defeating more progressive challengers in primaries from Hawaii to Missouri and beyond. The internal debate is therefore structured around competing visions of how broad the party’s coalition should be.

On the Republican side, ideological space has narrowed around alignment with Trump. Dissent from him is increasingly costly: those who challenge him may face endorsed primary opponents, organized intraparty opposition, or significant political pressure. The experiences of figures such as Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and, in a different way, Thomas Massie illustrate the rising consequences of breaking with the party’s dominant figure.

The result is a clear asymmetry: Democrats are contesting the boundaries of a diverse coalition, while Republicans are increasingly defined by the degree of loyalty to a single political leader.

Peachy+2 said...

flashback "CDC walks back claim that vaccinated people can’t carry COVID-19"

& Fauci did promise that the covid vaccine would stop you from getting covid.
A LIE.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

"That guy. I think we’ve had enough of him."

I'm old enough to remember J6.

ChrisC said...

Original Mike said...
Yes, but that was the primary. In the general, there will only be one democrat on the ballot. Democrats vote for democrats.

Elections are about turnout. The primary is an indicator of how fired up Dems are about Sayed. The answer is ... not much. You just need a small slice to say, "I hate both of them, I am just staying home" for him to lose by 10.

ChrisC said...

In a perfect world where there were no party labels and people voted for the candidate that represented their views, Sayed would lose by 50.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Cursory YouTube search has "that guy", Abdul El-Sayed, saying he hates the state he's seeking to represent. LINK TO VIDEO

If he is willing to say that while smiling to the camera, what could he be saying off-camera?

Peachy+2 said...

Envy. Islamic hate. He hates what he wants to destroy.
Standard leftist operating procedure.

Oct 7th - the left yawn.
whine about retaliation.

Chest Rockwell said...

This is Rogers race to lose. Just keep letting Sayed run his mouth and put out centrist ads and its a cakewalk.

Jamie said...

The Based Camp podcasters* recently did an episode on a political dehumanization study, entitled "Political (Meta-)Dehumanization in Mental Representations: Divergent Emphases in the Minds of Liberals Versus Conservatives - Christopher D. Petsko, Nour S. Kteily, 2024" (found here: https://share.google/261Xw0GwKbh3D9qjH). I HIGHLY recommend visiting that journal at least to look at the figures

The methodology was interesting. Researchers asked a group of conservatives and a group of liberals to choose, from 300 pairs of face drawings, which drawing looked more conservative and which looked more liberal. Then researchers composited the drawings into a single image for each group and category: in-group representation and out-group representation for conservatives and for liberals.

The conservative self-image, so to speak, looks like a cheerful, confident man. The conservative image of liberals looks a little unhappy, but still has masculine features. The liberal self-image looks considerably more emotively happy than the conservative self-image; but the liberal image of conservatives looks like an inbred Neanderthal.

Next, researchers asked the same participants to choose, from the same 300 image pairs, which image in each pair looked more like what the OTHER side thought of THEM, and composited those. Conservatives' meta-representation (what conservatives believed liberals thought conservatives looked like) was darn close to what liberals actually thought conservatives looked like: an inbred Neanderthal. Liberals' meta-representation looks like a sad child or woman - so, they overestimated HOW sad and immature conservatives think they are, but did recognize that conservatives think of them as human.

The podcasters initially split on what to do with this information - that liberals literally do see conservatives as subhuman, whereas conservatives see liberals as unhappy or misguided. The wife initially wanted to exclude questioning liberals from conservative circles; the husband stuck hard on drawing them in, because (in this era of ever more leftward extremes) it's demonstrably happened so much in the past few years that liberals with ONE question or difference of opinion with their progressive peers get drummed out of leftist circles, meet conservatives who welcome them, and - if they don't change sides altogether - at least they realize that what they've thought of conservatives all along is inaccurate. In fact, he advocates for choosing a questioning liberal as "The Face Of" and letting it just play out - like J.K. Rowling's becoming The Face Of No Men In Women's Spaces. Rowling hasn't changed sides, but (he says) you can bet she no longer thinks conservatives are subhuman.

* I really don't like these two; he's insufferable, and she's a wimp about him. But they sometimes have interesting things to say.

Known Unknown said...

Ohio Preezies:

Grant
Taft
Harding
Harrison x2
McKinley
Garfield
Hayes

Michigan Preezy (not elected)

Ford

Iman said...

Dimocrats: Always remember to never forget that when the Berlin Wall fell, NOBODY ran to the Communist side.

narciso said...

What has sayed dones been a fake doctor for 15 years

Howard said...

Animal Mother: You a photographer?
Private Joker: I'm a combat correspondent.
Animal Mother: Well, you seen much combat?
Private Joker: [sarcastic] I've seen a little on TV.
Animal Mother: You're a real comedian.
Private Joker: Well, they call me the Joker.
Animal Mother: Well I got a joke for you. I'm gonna tear you a new asshole.
Private Joker: [doing John Wayne impression] Well, pilgrim, only after you eat the peanuts out of my shit!
Animal Mother: You talk the talk. Do you walk the walk?

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.