Althouse: "Australia has imposed a sweeping ban on social media for children under 16.... But many details were still unclear..."

November 28, 2024

"Australia has imposed a sweeping ban on social media for children under 16.... But many details were still unclear..."

"... such as how it will be enforced and what platforms will be covered.... The law... uts the onus on social media platforms to take 'reasonable steps' to prevent anyone under 16 from having an account. Corporations could be fined... for 'systemic' failures to implement age requirements. Neither underage users nor their parents will face punishment for violations. And whether children find ways to get past the restrictions is beside the point, [Prime Minister Anthony Albanese] said. 'We know some kids will find workarounds, but we’re sending a message to social media companies to clean up their act,' he said...."

From "Australia Has Barred Everyone Under 16 From Social Media. Will It Work? The law sets a minimum age for users of platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X. How the restriction will be enforced online remains an open question" (NYT).

22 comments:

Assistant Village Idiot said...: Lots of rumors that social media is bad for children, but no actual evidence.
Like violent or sexy video games.
Like Dungeons and Dragons.
Like pornography.
Like TV.
Like dime novels.
Yes you got trouble, right here in River City.; 11/28/24, 10:09 AM
Leland said...: Teaching the young that speech is no longer a freedom.; 11/28/24, 10:09 AM
RCOCEAN II said...: UK and Austrailia Governments are in a race to see who can be the most totalitarian. No freedom of speech, thank you very much!; 11/28/24, 10:12 AM
RCOCEAN II said...: IRC, Candance Owens was barred from entry to Austrailia because she's been labeled "a bigot". LOL.; 11/28/24, 10:13 AM
RCOCEAN II said...: If you don't want your kid doing social media, handle it yourself. I think this is something a parent can easily do. Of course, with girls you run into the problem that they MUST have an Iphone and whatever to talk to their friends. Heaven forbid they should go five minutes without talking or texting their girl friends.; 11/28/24, 10:17 AM
rehajm said...: Ripe for abuse…; 11/28/24, 10:22 AM
EdwdLny said...: So, fascist tyrants being fascist tyrants. Who'd a thunk. These people have definitely lost the plot.; 11/28/24, 10:30 AM
Mary Beth said...: With COPPA here, a person must be 13-years-old or older to sign up for any online service. Kids lie. The only check is asking for a birth date.

I can't think of a way to have verified proof that doesn't take away anonymity. but perhaps that's the real goal.; 11/28/24, 10:31 AM
Eric the Fruit Bat said...: It's going to greatly complicate the job of those detectives who go online pretending to be underage looking for sex.; 11/28/24, 10:40 AM
Zavier Onasses said...: A law or regulation with no penalty? Cannot but lower general respect for the rule of law. Is that genuinely intent of Govt - to create chaos?; 11/28/24, 10:42 AM
tim maguire said...: We’ve seen it in our own child, who is always happier during social media breaks and studies show a correlation between social media use and depression in adolescents.; 11/28/24, 10:48 AM
tim maguire said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; 11/28/24, 10:48 AM
tim maguire said...: People keep saying this, but I can only think that’s people who don’t have kids. Teenagers’ social lives revolve around social media. Any solution has to be group-based because if you simply do it for your own child, you are condemning them to social ostracization.; 11/28/24, 10:50 AM
rhhardin said...: Minorities who are 16 may not be able to pass the CAPTCHA test of being 16 so there will have to be grading on a curve in those neighborhoods.; 11/28/24, 10:57 AM
n.n said...: Government steps in where females who identify as the feminine gender with reproductive carbon runts need to be kept reusable, affordable, available, and taxable (RAAT) in liberal Democrazis.; 11/28/24, 11:03 AM
Yancey Ward said...: Bet there will be exceptions for government approved social media directed to minors.; 11/28/24, 11:07 AM
David53 said...: "The law specifies that users will not be forced to provide government identification as part of the verification process, a measure that the conservative opposition said was included after they raised concerns about privacy rights."

I can't see how this will work. What kind of verification, other than government identification, would suffice?; 11/28/24, 11:13 AM
Leland said...: I’d like a ban on politicians sending text messages. Better yet, I want to impose a tariff on political text messages if the receiver demands it. Yuge tariff.; 11/28/24, 11:25 AM
john mosby said...: How does the statute define social media? What about the comments section on YouTube educational videos? Or various get-homework-help sites? Or newspaper websites? If the statute is too broad, it keeps kids away from genuine developmental opportunities. If it's too narrow, then kids will find easy workarounds.

Although "my so-called friends on the Special Relativity message board all ghosted me!" would be an improvement, I guess.

JSM; 11/28/24, 11:34 AM
Mike (MJB Wolf) said...: Social media companies are incapable of meeting that requirement without a gross intrusion of personal identifying information. To do that effectively violates EU privacy laws, meaning companies would if pushed simply not operate in Australia.; 11/28/24, 11:42 AM
Jupiter said...: Weird. My daughter has a phone, but I don't think it really plays a very large role in her emotional life. My son borrows my flip-phone when he needs one, which is mostly for Boy Scouts. I think the real problem is school. School is where kids learn to be deeply concerned about the opinions of some random collection of assholes. My kids were never subjected to that.; 11/28/24, 11:46 AM
rehajm said...: The OzzyMan commentary on the issue about sums it up. Unenforceable. Not that that will stop them…; 11/28/24, 12:06 PM