That's the WaPo headline as displayed at Memeorandum. The headline is no longer written like that. Now, it is "'Defund The Police' painted on D.C. street as tensions among protesters flare."
Now, my question is: How bad did it get for WaPo to write "tensions... flare"?
More than 10,000 people poured into the nation’s capital on the ninth day of protests over police brutality.... The cause even led to flares of tension among Washington’s protesters, with some embracing a party atmosphere while others furiously spray-painted “Defund The Police” in giant yellow letters a block from the city’s “Black Lives Matter” display....So there was some graffiti. What else? Turns out it was just a few protesters who were irked that others weren't acting angry:
Kenny Sway, a D.C. musician who had calmed thousands a few days before with his rendition of “Lean On Me,” pushed through the crowd, yelling at everyone he could see to stop dancing and start marching.It sounds like the tension was about the lack of sufficient tension!
“This is not a festival!” he shouted into a microphone. “This is not a f---ing festival!”
The dancing demonstrators mostly ignored him, except for one woman who rolled her eyes and complained to a friend.
“Who made him God?” she asked. “You can’t police a protest.”
She took a puff of what appeared to be marijuana and again swung her hips to the music.
One street over, at the corner of H and Vermont streets, Zamzam Elzain stood on her tiptoes, lofted a sign reading “Silence is betrayal” and yelled desperately at the people meandering by with strollers and cigarettes and, it seemed, little conviction....
“If this is a protest, we get an F!” she yelled at passersby. “This is not supposed to be a block party!”
A man looked up, briefly, then returned to the bag of chips in his hand.
Other confrontations unfolded as night fell.So... other than the confrontation about the crowd not being confrontational enough... okay...
There's really only one more "tension" vignette: A white protester guy tells a black Secret Service agent that he ought to quit his job. The agent retorted: "What does your white privilege taste like?"
UPDATE: WaPo changed the headline again. Now, it's "Protesters throng D.C., vowing to be heard after George Floyd’s death." It still hasn't captured what's in the article! There are fascinating vignettes in the article, which I've tried to highlight. I'd like to compliment whoever wrote them. I see the article was written by "Samantha Schmidt, Jessica Contrera, Rebecca Tan, Hannah Natanson and John Woodrow Cox." But I'm going to assume that what I'm enjoying there was written by John Woodrow Cox — not because he's the only man on that vast committee — "vast" is satire — but because when I mouse over the names, his is the one that gets "Enterprise reporter with a focus on narrative journalism." I don't know what "Enterprise reporter" means, but I think what I'm enjoying is "narrative journalism."
ADDED: Wikipedia says: "Enterprise journalism is reporting that is not generated by news or a press release, but rather generated by a reporter or news organization based on developed sources. Tied to 'shoe-leather' reporting and 'beat reporting,' enterprise journalism gets the journalist out of the office and away from the traditional news makers."
And: "Narrative journalism, also referred to as literary journalism, is defined as creative nonfiction that contains accurate, well-researched information.... Mainstream newspaper publications are still wary of supporting narrative journalism too much due to time and space constraints, and will often print the occasional narrative in a Sunday features or supplemental magazine." The names Truman Capote and Tom Wolfe come up.
AND: Here's a piece written by John Woodrow Cox solo — in WaPo 3 days ago — "‘I’m black before I’m anything else’: A police officer’s passionate exchange with protesters."
“My heart walks with you guys because I’ve been this,” Watts told them, pinching his skin, “since the day I came out of my mama. … I’m proud of each and every one of you guys.”
“Keep marching,” he continued. “Do it for me. Do it because right now I’m here and I can’t do what you’re doing. But understand, my heart is over here with you guys.”
52 comments:
Am I hallucinating or did I see somewhere that they were expecting 1 million people for this demonstration?
It sounds like the tension was about the lack of sufficient tension!
Collectives start to fizzle once you run out of room on the chalkboard for more rules.
In the meantime, DC press is concerned DJT did not allow reporters to socially distance, last week were still upset he wasn't wearing a mask, and are still aghast that he had the dangerous idea that people were pushing the dangers of COVID for political reasons.
The more I see them hate and divide, the more I am despising them. They don't even realize they are being lied to. Enjoy the fall of America...I hope whomever writes the history book, gets the facts right.
BTW I wonder how many of this 10,000 were among the 6,000 that demonstrated in Philly yesterday, 2 hours away.
How many protesters does it take to "pack" Washington, D.C.?
A one...A two-hoo...A thrrree...CRUNCH!!
Thrrree.
There was a movie about this "Start the Revolution Without Me"
https://www.bing.com/search?form=MOZCON&pc=MOZI&q=Start+the+Revolution+Without+Me
The longer the telephoto lens, the fewer people you need to pack a given area. It's science!
Fight Systemic Relaxation!
Fuck the Insufficiently Tense!
Yep. 1 million.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8394395/Rallies-held-ONE-MILLION-protesters-expected-DC-today.html
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/06/just_like_that_gun_control_support_and_covid19_died_this_week.html
Average attendance at a University of Maryland men's basketball game:
14,009
I just got an email that says 80% of Americans think the country is spiraling out of control. And I can't disagree.
The Post has long been preparing for the day that it doesn't need reporters at all and can write the news ahead of time.
So Philly wins!
But it's still not the capital anymore.
What do we want? AN END TO THE LOCKDOWNS!!!
When do we want it? NOW!!!
seems pretty clear to me.
People Need to remember WHY we were protesting
People Need to remember WHAT we were protesting
We were protesting Lockdowns! If you're too stupid to see that; i can't help you
Yep. 1 million.
At least they only exaggerated by a factor of about 100 (though I doubt the Whappo number is accurate); in another article the dailymail.co.uk exaggerated the amount of DNA information in a human body by 40 trillion.
BTW it's 11.8 miles from the University of Maryland (enrollment 41,200) to DC.
We should defund the police, then get rid of all the city councils and state reps. We won't need new laws or the old laws because no one will be around to enforce them. In the long run think of the money we would save, just buy every household a gun.
These protesters are children and racists.
Fight Systemic Relaxation!
Is this pitiful groveling systemic or not? Inquiring minds ...
Im seeing hopeful signs that the white lib element of the BLM movement is starting to manifest their privilege. Nothing kills a movement faster than angst fatigue.
The organizers must have reached their fundraising goals and now the shakedowns and strong-arming can be allowed to fizzle out.
Just a question that bugs me every time we see a story about an unarmed black man being killed by a cop. If this is police brutality, what do you call it when 20 times that number get shot or killed on the streets of Chicago, every fucking weekend?
Not sure we have the right priorities.
Looks like they changed the headline again. Now they are "thronging" Washington DC.
Apparently thronging is less than packing.
On a somewhat related note from Atlanta:
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/3-protesters-track-officers-their-home-light-their-police-cars-fire-authorities-say/Y4BL2CZGHVCIZFP62CMDCVQJIU/
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Boy, remember those ancient times when Trump was such a LIAR!!!! for saying he drew big crowds? Must have been a couple of hundred years ago.
Me thinks the powers that be on the left are finding riots are not good PR.
By the way, watch MSNBC or CNN. here the riots were mostly peaceful.
I use local tv to get a clearer picture.
Waiting to see which blue state Governor will ban Trump rallies.
The DC Mayor is very proud of having kicked off this month's protest must - painting streets with giant letters. Soon every block in DC will be painted. Next protesters will begin painting over messages they disagree with. Chaotic graffiti overlapping with directional pavement markings - ugh. But Trump made them do it.
I personally think it would be hilarious if the protests were light because so many people got sick from previous protests.
And I say that as someone with a protester who just visited my house and would have infected me. I would laugh my way to death.
enterprise journalism gets the journalist out of the office and away from the traditional news makers."
That wiki article may be the saddest statement I've ever read about the current state of journalism. Actual journalism is a subset of "journalism," because most journalists are too busy trying to make news to report on it.
The headline writer should be fired. Or at least reassigned to cleaning bathrooms and fetching coffee.
I've been on subway platforms in DC that were about that "packed" and we all got to our home stops without problems. Why can't this small a number of protesters hold a march without including provocateurs and violent agitators and looters?
If they are thonging Washington I hope they are wearing masks.
If you don't watch the news, then there really isn't much of this happening in most of America. Like Covid, this epidemic is also mostly a blue city problem. What a surprise. Living too close together causes lots of problems.
"‘I’m black before I’m anything else’: A police officer’s passionate exchange with protesters."
Isn't that what used to be called a 'racist cop'?
So the 'largest DC protest yet' had about 10,000 people?
Weird how crowd sizes have been largely unmentioned. Other than "thousands." Makes me think the protests have not been as large as the media has implied.
I am an American before anything else. If everyone could say that, most of our problems would melt away, quickly or slowly.
Maybe some protesters protest because they have been forced to shelter-in-place for too long. Being protesters, they can party to their heart's content without interference from the Karens.
Yep, Jersey, I saw the same predictions of 1 million. I looked at a lot of D.C. overhead shots and video- I didn't see a single crowd in any of them that had more than 10,000 people in it (you can grid photos and stills and do head counts for estimations). Most of the photos are shot with telephoto lenses that can fool the eye into thinking a crowd is more "packed" than it is, but there are a lot of aerial videos available due to the widespread use of drones these days (most of those are probably illegal in D.C., but they still were posted on-line.
People aren't so green. Follow due process. Don't indulge warlock judgments.
#StaySafe #HateLovesAbortion
none of these 'insurgencies are ever largely endogenous,
https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/wha/ci/cu/14745.htm
I'd like to compliment whoever wrote them. I see the article was written by "Samantha Schmidt, Jessica Contrera, Rebecca Tan, Hannah Natanson and John Woodrow Cox." But I'm going to assume that what I'm enjoying there was written by John Woodrow Cox — not because he's the only man on that vast committee —
"Half vast" is more like it.
They can't even keep up with their own bullshit anymore. Lockdown and mask required, but o.k to cast aside if the cause is politically approved. No crowds over 10 people but massive riots and protest are o.k because of "reasons". Do they even listen to themselves any more?
And you can bet most of the people gathering are bored out of their skulls and are just out to enjoy the weather. Sunshine patriot doesn't begin to describe this "movement".
"Joyous Republicans packed DC to celebrate Donald Trump's inauguration".
headline from January 2017 you did not see in the WaPo.
They have every right to be dishonest partisan hacks. Can we please just stop pretending that they're something other than dishonest partisan hacks?
Enjoy the fall of America...I hope whomever writes the history book, gets the facts right.
I disagree. What we see here is about 30% of the 13.4% blacks plus hundreds, not thousands, of Antifa organizers trying to set the country on fire and all they do is burn down Democrat cities. Now, it has deteriorated into street parties.
The NY Times is huffing and puffing and telling us to only read black authors, like Ta-Nehisi Coates, who is unreadable.
This is what the man said about history ending as farce.
"Enterprise journalism" and "narrative journalism", as practiced at WaPo, sound like fancy names for spin designed to affirm the writer's opinions. It might be possible for this to work more objectively as journalism but the wokidokes at WaPo, NYT, NY Mag, etc., have long since exposed the very idea of objective reporting as a cover for every bad -ism under the sun (itself a problematic image). Reading pieces like this, you always know who the author is insisting you should be rooting for.
I guess this is the Washington Post's sotto voce concession that Trump's inauguration was packed.
Hey Skipper: ""Half vast" is more like it."
I have just been informed by Inga and Howard that noticing that the DC protests fizzled is itself racist and white supremacist and likely caused by a guy with a hawaiian shirt whispering in my ear.
Well, whether it’s “packed” or “thronged”, 10,000 is a mere fraction of the 300-600,000 who attended the first Trump Inauguration. I don’t want to guess how many will attend his 2021 inauguration.
Is it Enterprise Journalism or Narrative Journalism to refer to Vermont Ave., NW as “Vermont Street “? All Washingtonians know that the States have Avenues named after them, not Streets (there’s an exception, but it’s not Vermont).
Drago, as a fellow traveller.... Why must you include Inga or Howard or Chuck in EVERY ONE of your comments??
Have you no original thoughts or solutions to offer.
As I noted in an earlier post, yesterday was not a day of massive rallies; it was (in the Washington Post headline writer's phrase) "a massive day of rallies."
"In the meantime, DC press is concerned DJT did not allow reporters to socially distance..."
Haven't heard anything about this but I'll bet dollars to donuts no reporter was forced against their will to be any closer to another reporter than they felt was safe.
So Trump inauguration was more than “packed.”
Post a Comment