February 4, 2021

"I write to you today regarding the so-called Disciplinary Committee hearing aimed at revoking my union membership. Who cares!"

"While I’m not familiar with your work, I’m very proud of my work on movies such as Home Alone 2, Zoolander and Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps; and television shows including The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Saturday Night Live, and of course, one of the most successful shows in television history, The Apprentice—to name just a few! I've also greatly helped the cable news television business (said to be a dying platform with not much time left until I got involved in politics), and created thousands of jobs at networks such as MSDNC and Fake News CNN, among many others. Which brings me to your blatant attempt at free media attention to distract from your dismal record as a union. Your organization has done little for its members, and nothing for me—besides collecting dues and promoting dangerous un-American policies and ideas—as evident by your massive unemployment rates and lawsuits from celebrated actors, who even recorded a video asking, ‘Why isn’t the union fighting for me?' These, however, are policy failures. Your disciplinary failures are even more egregious. I no longer wish to be associated with your union. As such, this letter is to inform you of my immediate resigning from SAG-AFTRA. You have done nothing for me." 

That's Donald Trump's wonderfully caustic letter to the Screen Actors Guild, reported at Fox News

It's so refreshing to get a new blast of Trump rhetoric. Therefore, I hope he says yes to the letter from the House Managers, reported at CNN: "Two days ago, you filed an Answer in which you denied many factual allegations set forth in the article of impeachment. You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense. In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021."

128 comments:

tcrosse said...

The cat is among the pigeons.

DavidUW said...

Again the show trial will hopefully take 100% of the full senate’s time for at least the next 2 years.

n.n said...

Overwhelming evidence, part deux. The sequel to more than 17 trimesters of Democrat-led civil rights violations (e.g. domestic spying without evidence), witch hunts, warlock trials, JournoListic braying to diversity and adversity, and protests in insurrection, violence, occupation, and intimidation, implicating Democrat leaders and affiliated "non-profit" corporate interests in collusion, incitement, and forward-looking constitutional evolution.

Anonymous said...

Trump should say, "Foxtrot Yankee, strong message to follow."

Jersey Fled said...

Refreshing?

I thought you wanted normal and boring.

Charlie Currie said...

Part 1. You can't fire me, I quit.

Part 2. Truth? You can't handle the truth.

J Melcher said...

Jersey, after 4 years, Trump IS the new normal.

Breezy said...

Perjury trap?

Charlie Currie said...

Trump won't testify. Gives credence to an illegal endeavor.

Gunner said...

I wish he had been this direct and concise during the Biden debates.

DanTheMan said...

Dear Sir,
Enclosed is a bucket of sand, and a tamp.
You know what you can do.

DanTheMan said...

>>Perjury trap?

Of course.
If he says "Good Morning", they will point out that it was raining, and therefore he lied under oath.

Mark said...

You hope a defendant says "yes" to a fraudulent, illegal, unconstitutional proceeding and to an attempt at a "perjury" trap, where if he says "I'm innocent" under oath, they will prosecute him for lying?

rehajm said...

Overwhelming evidence, they said without evidence

Humperdink said...

Recall when Trump called his Ukrainian phone call a "perfect" phone call. WaPoo, which was logging Trump's lies, labelled this a lie. Trump repeated the "perfect" phone call term 70+ times, therefore it was 70+ lies, according to the WaPoo. The Senate would charge him with perjury.

Ann Althouse said...

No sooner did I get this post up than Trump declined to testify.

Narr said...

Mencken: American democracy is the most entertaining form of government.

Foe a long time, Trump has reminded me in some ways of Boss Ed Crump of Memphis, who bought full pages of advertising to address critics real and imagined over issues trivial and important--but always with gusto and with no apparent loss of following.

Anyway, what we have here is a crisis of authority presented as farce. NPR (sorry to keep harping on them, but I've been listening as much as I can stand) is presenting insurrection and incitement as proven facts, and describe everything Trump says as disproven conspiracy theories.

Narr
And some of the newstarts sound illiterate

Dude1394 said...

I wouldn't speak to ANYONE under oath anymore in this country. NO ONE.

rehajm said...

In a kangaroo court never talk to the kangaroos...

JMW Turner said...

Once again, we are witnessing leftist Democrats overplaying their winning hand. They "won" the election, own the media, academia, overall culture, even the corporate leadership, yet, it isn't enough. Now, they Hector and bully a vanquished president and any citizen aligned with him. Forget about last summer's riots, destruction of personal and public property causing huge financial losses, as well as, leftist support of all that chaos in support of political goals. All that memory holed. They want more than mere victory, they want *vengeance*...

mccullough said...

I am in receipt of your letter
And after due consideration
Decline your invitation
For something better.

Greg Hlatky said...

Dear Disciplinary Committee,
I am sitting in the smallest room of my house. Your letter is in front of me. Soon, it will be behind me.

Yours sincerely,

Temujin said...

That actually was surprisingly refreshing to read Trump's comments to the SAG. Gosh, I do miss him after all. He has that ability to not just cut through the bullshit, but to actually run over the people dispensing it. Damn...that was fun reading.

Humperdink said...

The Commie-Pinko libs continue to kick the sleeping dog, our recently "retired" Commander-in-Chief. He has been minding his own business for the most post. At least since Biden's emancipation from his fruit cellar on 1/20/21.

Now we have the city of West Palm Beach and the actor's union going after him. The Commies may want to back off a back a bit, but you know they can't help themselves. I do not think DJT will sit idly by forever.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

JMW Turner..

Indeed.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Cherry Trump said..

Your organization has done little for its members, and nothing for me—besides collecting dues and promoting dangerous un-American policies and ideas—as evident by your massive unemployment rates and lawsuits from celebrated actors, who even recorded a video asking, ‘Why isn’t the union fighting for me?' These, however, are policy failures. Your disciplinary failures are even more egregious.

That is most delicious

Matt Sablan said...

That's not how trials work. The prosecutor has to prove things. Trump doesn't need to prove a single disputed fact. If the prosecutor can't prove the fact, then the defendant wins the point at best, it raises doubt at the worst. Teump is right not to testify. If they dispute his facts, they can prove their assertions instead of the weak House Brief that just asserted them.

Inga said...

“No sooner did I get this post up than Trump declined to testify.”

Of course he declined.

rehajm said...

Donald Trump was in Celebrity with Dylan Baker who was in Planes, Trains and Automobiles with Kevin Bacon, giving Trump a Bacon number of 2.

rehajm said...

You have done nothing for me

They were supposed to help him with residuals, retirement benefits. He could sue...

sakredkow said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Matt Sablan said...

"Of course he declined. "

-- As is anyone's natural born right when accused of something. It is morally reprehensible to imply anything by a refusal to testify, even in a non court of law.

Calypso Facto said...

Matt Sablan said..."Of course he declined. " -- As is anyone's natural born right when accused of something. It is morally reprehensible to imply anything by a refusal to testify, even in a non court of law.

Or a court of non-law, in this case.

Chennaul said...

they want *vengeance*...

............

Oh so close! They want more power. “More Power!” Captain Joseph Robinette Biden on the USS Enterprise poop deck.

Lewis Wetzel said...

How awful and dismal the Democrats have become. They are like some dull, minor bureaucrat in a colonial outpost, fussing with a bad comb-over while he complains to his long-suffering native valet about imaginary injuries to the dignity of his office.

tim maguire said...

I don't think I've ever said this about a Trump statement before: that was a breath of fresh air. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

Breezy said...

Re perjury trap - they would have to prove he’s lying, not just state so.

I do think it best to avoid though, since he would crush them and make them cry and run from the gallery. That would be tough to watch. Or maybe not.

tim maguire said...

You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense

What is this garbage? Are they just rerunning their taking points from the last impeachment?

Jim at said...

It is morally reprehensible to imply anything by a refusal to testify, even in a non court of law.

Simply consider the source.

Mikey NTH said...

Giving Donald Trump a stage? Why yes, throw him into that briar patch.

rhhardin said...

Under oath is a perjury trap.

Matt Sablan said...

Testifying when you're told the facts are known and any contesting of them is lying is stupid. The House Brief said the proof was plain and required no analysis. So they should get with refuting the defense's rejection of their baseless assertions instead of making bad Faith offers to listen.

Mikey NTH said...

It must be disconcerting for the House impeacment managers to discover that their target doesn't accept their premises.

Francisco D said...

Matt Sablan said...As is anyone's natural born right when accused of something. It is morally reprehensible to imply anything by a refusal to testify, even in a non court of law.

The rules are different. It's Trump.

In any case, WE make the rules.

Francisco D said...

I am curious as to what questions they would ask Trump.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Collective bargaining and unions are really useless in this modern age.
The only thing union dues accomplish is removal, like a tax, of income from the paycheck. Rest assured that money goes straight to the union bosses easy gig, and the democrat party.

Francisco D said...

Trump would be testifying before the Senate NOT a court of law.

When was the last time a POTUS testified before the Senate?

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

The judge on the trial is Patrick Lahey(D) - a person who already stated that Trump is guilty.

Is this how Democrats see our courts and a fair system of justice?

The democrats are the mob.

pacwest said...

Trump says he's not coming, but I heard Pelosi's planning on leaving a trail of double quarter pounders leading into the Senate chambers, so who knows.

Mark said...

"Factual allegations," if not an oxymoron is certainly tortured english. And these are supposed to be our intellectual superiors?

Matt Sablan said...

"When was the last time a POTUS testified before the Senate?"

-- See, is Trump technically the president while he's there? Since he's being impeached "as if he were president," does he get to be president during the impeachment, or is he only still essentially the president for instances where it is beneficial, but not still the president, for instances that it wouldn't be. Like, how much executive privilege can he claim? Can he claim Executive Privilege for conversations he's been having about the impeachment, as that is while he is acting in his capacity as President?

Jersey Fled said...

Remember when Clinton (Bill that is) pleaded no contest to a perjury charge?

I must have missed the impeachment.

Matt Sablan said...

Wait: "We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt." That's... that's the best legalistic "f--- you" I've read.

boatbuilder said...

"Don"t try to confuse the issue of your guilt by disputing 'critical facts.'

The fact that you have denied our statement that you are guilty means that you must be guilty.

Go away, but stick around so that we can make a show of convicting you.

Case closed."

tim maguire said...

Inga said...
“No sooner did I get this post up than Trump declined to testify.”

Of course he declined.


People of high station don’t duel with people of low station. It is beneath them. It was impertinent for Congress to even propose it.

Jess said...

John Roberts declined to judge the trial. The Constitution mandates the Chief Justice presides. Without the Chief Justice, the trial can't proceed, and the current clown circus has no authority.

For Trump to agree, he acknowledges credibility to what is already only a group of Senators flapping their guns. Considering the amount of money spent on this kangaroo court, it appears Congress is again wasting money for political theater.

boatbuilder said...

Also--Isn't it the Senate that has the prerogative of inviting the former President to testify?

The House Managers can subpoena witnesses, but the Senate is supposed to be running the "trial."

narciso said...

You didnt drown, so you're a witch.

Hammond X. Gritzkofe said...

We talking OATH oath fer real here? Or HRC oath?

Mark said...

This being a quasi-criminal punitive proceeding, of course it was HIGHLY improper for the prosecution to even ask the defendant to testify, much less bait him. That in itself is grounds for a mistrial and dismissal.

Matt Sablan said...

"We talking OATH oath fer real here? Or HRC oath?"

-- I wonder if Trump would get into trouble for disposing of his mobile devices with hammers to avoid having to hand them over during an investigation, or if we'd get to laugh it off.

Jersey Fled said...

I must be getting old. Bill Clinton WAS impeached.

But only once.

Mikey NTH said...

"We impeach you."
"I deny your authority."
"We try you."
"Sod off."

Okay - now what?

DeepRunner said...

Jamie Raskin (D, People's Republic of Maryland) threatened Trump with some alleged strongarm tactics. I wish Trump would go to the "trial" and troll all of the managers. I know it's a perjury trap setup, but the way to answer a question is with a question:

Swalwell: Will you just admit you're guilty of this fake high crime and misdemeanor we took all of 3.7 seconds to charge you with?

Trump: Hey Eric, old buddy, did you know I have a son named Eric? Anyway, how's Fang Fang? Say, since she's Chinese, did you ask Hunter for sex advice? Aren't you glad you could sleep with the enemy and yet be a prosecuting attorney?

Leahy: The witness will admit what he did.

Trump: Hey aren't you the guy from Bernieland who previously voted to convict me and who voted to keep this trial moving forward? Don't you know it's a Big Lie to be prejudicial and claim to be impartial?

This could be the stuff of TV legend. Alas, not to be.

JaimeRoberto said...

Recall when Trump called his Ukrainian phone call a "perfect" phone call. WaPoo, which was logging Trump's lies, labelled this a lie. Trump repeated the "perfect" phone call term 70+ times, therefore it was 70+ lies, according to the WaPoo. The Senate would charge him with perjury.

That WaPo lie counter is total BS. I searched the database for "vaccine", and most of his so-called lies aren't even lies. For example, this was counted as a lie: "More than one million Americans have already received the China Virus Vaccine, a record pace!”

Factually true, but counted as a lie because they didn't meet the target of 100 million doses.

His claims that the vaccines would end the pandemic were counted as several lies, because WaPo says the vaccines won't end the pandemic quickly.

Absolute propaganda for people who don't want to look at the details of the database.

The Vault Dweller said...

The best thing the right can learn from Trump is to always fight, and never give up, but in a moderated tone. These words are not the scathing rebuke some would have issued. They are mean, certainly, but nothing that goes over the line. Next time you want to yell at someone on the other side, you may feel like doing at a 10/10, and then you may think the wise course is doing it at a 7/10, but really it should be like a 3.5 or 4.

Leland said...

Trump declined
House managers claim his choice to not testify is a “negative inference”

Are you not bored?

Fandor said...

The members of House and Senate are a disgrace, with few exceptions.
President Trump need not appear before these before these low life creeps.
He took an oath in 2017, and has been true to it.
Trump need not take another.
He does not need to talk to any FBI agent without a lawyer present.
But, he should speak to the American people, especially his supporters.
Again, and again, he needs to remind the citizens of this country how corrupt our government is.
He is a citizen who has civil rights under the Constitution.
We have seen the enemy.
It is the congress and the MSM.

Mike of Snoqualmie said...

For the Senate to impeach Trump, he must be President. So, while he was in the Senate chamber, could he sign an executive order rescinding all of the executive orders FICUS has signed? Wouldn't that just blast the poor, poor Dems' minds?

Just asking for a friend.

Mutaman said...

"No sooner did I get this post up than Trump declined to testify."

The notion that Trump was going to get within 500 miles of this proceeding much less represent himself has always been pretty inane.

Humperdink said...

I am hoping not only does President Trump get within 500 miles of this proceeding, I am hoping he gets in their faces..

Readering said...

I also hope he says yes. Or writes to explain why he is resigning from the office of former president immediately. (Surprised he replaced his bold Trump Organization letterhead with an eagle symbol.)

Humperdink said...

I am also hoping President Trump holds up the impeachment charges for all to see and then tears them in half.

narciso said...


What really matters.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-thirty-tyrants

FullMoon said...

Dear Disciplinary Committee,
Obviously some asshole has pilfered your stationary.

Your Pal,
President Trump

narciso said...

Indeed


https://mobile.twitter.com/Doranimated/status/1357473270501683201

Wince said...

“You have done nothing for me."

Trump should have added... “as a member of this union.”

mockturtle said...

Narr asserts: Mencken: American democracy is the most entertaining form of government.

Though I haven't watched it lately, Prime Ministers Question Time was far more entertaining than American politics.

Clayton Hennesey said...

Blogger DeepRunner said...

This could be the stuff of TV legend. Alas, not to be.

DeepRunner, your consolation prize:

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/392531.php

FullMoon said...

Your organization has done little for its members, and nothing for me—besides collecting dues and promoting dangerous un-American policies and ideas—as evident by your massive unemployment rates and lawsuits from celebrated actors, who even recorded a video asking, ‘Why isn’t the union fighting for me?' These, however, are policy failures. Your disciplinary failures are even more egregious.

See, this really fucks with the celebrities who hate Trump but agree with his statement. Will some of them come to the defense of their union? Will any of them have the guts to agree publicly? This is perfect. Now any commenter here who is on twitter, get busy asking celebs if they agree, or disagree. Pin 'em down haha!

MountainMan said...

mockturtle said..."Though I haven't watched it lately, Prime Ministers Question Time was far more entertaining than American politics."

I totally agree. Especially when Margaret Thatcher was the PM. It was the most entertaining program on TV. I have not watched Boris Johnson. I have seen a few YouTube videos of Leader of the House Jacob Rees-Mogg and he is fun to watch.

n.n said...

Immigration reform, not limited to labor arbitrage, but also democratic gerrymandering. People... persons recognized it, and voted for America, first. Another reason to question the irregularities, perhaps fraud, in several Democrat districts - notable Atlanta of Every Child Left Behind fame - and, despite Democrat resistance to guarantee civil rights, collusion with foreign and domestic patrons, and multi-trimester legacy of insurrection and diversity, audit the vote.

Big Mike said...

No sooner did I get this post up than Trump declined to testify.

@Althouse, do I understand that you are upset over Trump actually listening to his lawyers? Strange.

pacwest said...

Speaking of unions - nationalized AB5 is on the way. If you are part of the gig economy you are screwed. Royally.

Narr said...

PMQT is debate; what we have is supposed to be governance.

Narr
Ass ertive

Narr said...

BTW, I have seen Boris et al recently CSpan), and they're not all that.

Narr
Boris was better as a smart-ass journo

gilbar said...

Has anyone taken down their TRUMP banners and flags yet?
Up here in Northeast Iowa... I don't think a single one has come down.
I've NEVER seen campaign signs still be up in February ...
But, on the other hand; i never saw an election Openly Stolen before
TRUMP 2024 Keep America Great!

Matt Sablan said...

"I've NEVER seen campaign signs still be up in February ..."

-- I still see Obama stickers and signs in random places. I think stickers though are different than signs or flags, because stickers are a pain to get off. I saw a Bob Dole sticker a few years ago, but the car was new, so I wasn't sure if I was seeing irony or dedication.

StephenFearby said...

rehajm said...
In a kangaroo court never talk to the kangaroos...

Wikipedia:

"A kangaroo court is a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice and often carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides.[2] A kangaroo court may ignore due process and come to a predetermined conclusion. THE TERM MAY ALSO APPLY TO A COURT HELD BY A LEGITIMATE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY WHICH INTENTIONALLY DISREGARDS THE COURT'S LEGAL OR ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS.[3]"

[Emphasis added.]

'...The term kangaroo court is often erroneously believed to have its origin from the courts of Australia's penal colonies.[5] The Oxford English Dictionary cites the first published instance of the term as from an American source, A Stray Yankee in Texas by Philip Paxton, published in 1853.[6] There are, however, earlier instances of the term including an 1841 article in The Daily Picayune in New Orleans that quotes another publication, the Concordia Intelligencer, reporting several lynchings instituted "on charges of the Kangaroo court". The Picayune article also asks "What is a Kangaroo court, neighbor?"[7] Some sources suggest that it may have been popularized during the California Gold Rush of 1849 to which many thousands of Australians flocked. In consequence of the Australian miners' presence, it may have come about as a description of the hastily carried-out proceedings used to deal with the issue of claim jumping miners.[5]...'

There is also a photograph captioned: "A session of the People's Court in Nazi Germany, a kangaroo court that conducted show trials of political enemies[1]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court

Mr Wibble said...

My guess is that the impeachment managers and the Senate Dems are trying to figure out how to compel him to testify. They'd want to play some semantic game where it's not a trial trial, so he doesn't have Fifth Amendment protections, or at the very least want news footage of Trump invoking his Fifth Amendment rights while being questioned in the well of the Senate.

readering said...

I kept my Clinton 16 bumper sticker on.

narciso said...


That waa then

https://mobile.twitter.com/rising_serpent/status/1357496284127645702?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Yancey Ward said...

Petty games is what all of this is at this point. The House has to prove its case, Trump and his team don't have to prove anything. They don't even have to present a defense, just a closing argument.

Gospace said...

Gilbar,

Taken down their Trump banners and flags? I live in central New York. 36 mile one way commute that takes the same amount of time no matter which of the 6 routes I take. New flags and banners and homemade Trump displays are going up.

I’m waiting for a thaw to take mine down. The 6 different flags I have are worn. The Trump flag will be replaced with a “F —- Cuomo” flag available through the Althouse Amazon portal, the 50 star flag with a Bennington 76 flag, the Navy flag and generic Christian flag will remain. Haven’t decided whether to replace the Gadsden Flag with the original Navy Jack, same message. Leaving spots for which two historic flags I decide on. Under the f—- Cuomo flag will be a Confederate battle flag since he’s banned them. I’m leaning toward the Choctaw Brigade, with the Cherokee battle flag as my second choice.

narciso said...

Former President Trump’s lawyers plan to display a timeline and images from the #USCapitol on Jan. 6 that back up the case that he didn’t incite the storming of the building, an adviser said.

The Epoch Times
@EpochTimes
·
16m

Joe Smith said...

The man (metaphorically) puts asses in the seats.

The media will lose billions if he does actually go away.

Btw, his lawyer already responded to the invitation to testify...

It was essentially, LOLGF : )

Too bad they didn't take the opportunity to rake Spy-fucker Swalwell over the coals in front of a global audience.

Big Mike said...

Admit it, Althouse, you miss the Man.

Mikey NTH said...

"They don't even have to present a defense, just a closing argument."


Consisting of a fifteen minute clip of Donald Trump flipping them off.

effinayright said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
stephen cooper said...

there have been times when creepy people like the wannabe Democratic overlords of today's lockdown censored country have succeeded in gaining power and maintaining it.
RINO
THESE AIN'T THESE TIMES ---- they are messing with a WWE Hall of Famer and his 80 million voters and with their friends who were too young or too drunk to vote ---- they are gonna lose big time

stephen cooper said...

If you can't see the super creepiness in Pelosi's anxious angry face, in Schumer's extremely self-centered and unloveable mug, and in the puppet theater that the less than kind Harris is putting poor Biden through, then you are missing one of the weirdest, saddest episodes in the history of your country because you just .... don't .... get it ..... Those people are not your friends.

I believe Camala believed Tara Reade.
She sold her soul and for what ---- to be Nancy Pelosi's friend????

She works for a man she considers a rapist.
She wants his job, I get it ....
but rape is bad, Kamala thinks Joe raped that poor woman and Kamala will never ever admit publicly that she rejoices to watch the poor man suffer from dementia, from weakness, from the sort of retribution that old people suffer after a lifetime of bullying others and lying.

Think I'm being mean?
Well I know what abortion at 6 months is, and so does poor Biden, in the coldness of his heart. Difference is, I'm against it, he rejoices in it.

effinayright said...

Trump could show up with a bunch of magazines and read them silently while our New Commissars threaten him for not talking. Or play "Words with Friends" on his iPhone.

Because the Senate can't compel him to say a single syllable. He can't be FORCED to take an oath, and he can't be compelled to testify by granting him immunity, since he's not a witness with potentially damaging information about Mr. Big: he IS Mr. Big.

Can you imagine the irony of Chuck Schumer screaming, "VEE Haf VAYS of making you Tolk!"

Pure gold.

walter said...

readering said...I kept my Clinton 16 bumper sticker on. 2/4/21, 7:35 PM
--
It was high time. She wanted it.
And it couldn't be wiped with a cloth.

walter said...

Blogger narciso said...
Former President Trump’s lawyers plan to display a timeline and images from the #USCapitol on Jan. 6 that back up the case that he didn’t incite the storming of the building, an adviser said.
The Epoch Times
@EpochTimes
--
Better have more than that since the goal posts have been moved to 11/4 start.

walter said...

Could Trump team recruit Bezos and Elias to explain issues surrounding mail in voting and machine counts?

Narayanan said...

The House has to prove its case,
000000
I am seeing this repeated

Q - to whose satisfaction?

asking for all the Kangaroos in the world.

DanTheMan said...

>>Speaking of unions - nationalized AB5 is on the way. If you are part of the gig economy you are screwed. Royally.

If you want to lose about 10 million votes, drive Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash out of business.

stephen cooper said...

walter at 9:09 that was priceless, gotta give you that

walter said...

I wish I could ascribe it to a deep dig.
It's ___ in our face.

I'm Not Sure said...

"If you want to lose about 10 million votes, drive Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash out of business."

10 million voters maybe. But who needs voters?

Drago said...

readering: "I kept my Clinton 16 bumper sticker on."

Democraticals defending actual rapists has always been closely correlated with those same democraticals falsely accusing political opponents of leading mythical rape gangs.

Skeptical Voter said...

Are the House Managers really that stupid? Why Shirley, I believe they are. Going to be a reaal whuppin!

Gunner said...

If these SAGgots had any actual integrity, wouldn't they refund Mr. Trump all of his dues that he has paid for years? Otherwise, they would be profiting from his deplorableness, wouldn't they?

LA_Bob said...

tim maguire said, "I don't think I've ever said this about a Trump statement before: that was a breath of fresh air. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it."

Same here. And as Temujin said, it cuts through the baloney and gets to the point. This is an important reason Trump got elected.

But once elected, you have to tone down the rhetoric a bit. Ronald Reagan understood this very well. Trump never managed to make the full transition to "presidential". It's a damn shame.

John henry said...

Lots of trump yard signs and flags hear in flatlandia I even saw one that Sai "donald trump is still my president.

He's still mine. At least in my heart.

Best president ever.

John Henry

Readering said...

For some constituents, sure.

gadfly said...

Blogger Jess said...
John Roberts declined to judge the trial. The Constitution mandates the Chief Justice presides. Without the Chief Justice, the trial can't proceed, and the current clown circus has no authority.


Article I, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution stipulates that the Chief Justice shall preside over the Senate trial of an impeached president of the United States.

We can thank the Chief Justice for making it crystal clear that Donald Trump is no longer the president of the United States.

Robert Cook said...

My guess is someone other than Trump drafted the statement, or at least edited it after the fact. It’s too measured—saying THE APPRENTICE was “one of” the most successful tv shows ever? Trump would have claimed ”the” most successful! Also...”egregious?” Too fancy a word for Trump. Not not that I think he doesn’t know the word, but it doesn’t sound like the vocabulary he uses, at least not publicly, where his statements are public performances for the edification of his base.

Xmas said...

I wish Trump would testify and just ask, "At this point, what difference does it make?" Over and over again.

wendybar said...

The President of SAG is Gabriella Carteris who was Andrea Zuckeran on the original 90210. A 26 year old high school student. How fitting.

wendybar said...

Zuckerman. Spell check sucks.

iowan2 said...

President Trumps downfall was the result of not being a DC denizen, and had no DC experienced advisors who could carry his message. The "unpresidential" stuff, was because the normal procedure of underlings floating trial balloons did not exist. The President had to do it himself.

President Trump did his own wet work. The same amount of wet work happened. Tt just fell to the Executive to get it done.

Gravel said...

DanTheMan said...
>>Speaking of unions - nationalized AB5 is on the way. If you are part of the gig economy you are screwed. Royally.

If you want to lose about 10 million votes, drive Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash out of business.

2/4/21, 9:24 PM



Democrat voters have proven, time and time again, that they're entirely too fucking stupid to understand who is responsible for costing them their jobs and their toys.

Success James said...


I am so Happy to be writing this article in here, i am here to explore blogs forum about the wonderful and most safe cure for HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS.I was positive to the Virus called HERPES and i lost hope completely because i was rejected even by my closet friends. i searched online to know and inquire about cure for HERPES and i saw testimony about DR Ebhota online on how he cured so many persons from Herpes Disease so i decided to contact the great herbalist because i know that nature has the power to heal everything. i contacted him to know how he can help me and he told me never to worry that he will help me with the natural herbs from God! after 2 days of contacting him, he told me that the cure has been ready and he sent it to me via FEDEX or DHL and it got to me after 4 days! i used the medicine as he instructed me (MORNING and EVENING) and i was cured! its really like a dream but i'm so happy! that's the reason i decided to also add more comment of Him so that more people can be saved just like me! and if you need his help,contact his Email: (drebhotasoltion@gmail.com) You can contact him on WhatsApp +2348089535482 He also have the herb to cure difference cure for any sickness (1) HERPES,
(2) DIABETES,
(3) HIV&AIDS,
(4) URINARY TRACT INFECTION,
(5) HEPATITIS B,
(6) IMPOTENCE,
(7) BARENESS/INFERTILITY
(8) DIARRHEA

Brian McKim and/or Traci Skene said...

When the standup business hit an iceberg in '93, we loaded up the truck and bugged out of L.A. and headed back to the Delaware Valley. As we had been appearing on some television shows in the previous two years or so, we were, of course, forced to join AFTRA (now known as "AFTRA-SAG").

The business was tanking, but, upon moving back east, we still were able to nail down two more appearances on union television shows (on VH-1 and on A&E, if I recall).

The producers sent our checks to Philly AFTRA! And, when we asked for our checks, they told us they were going to use them to pay our dues for Philly AFTRA! (Which was a higher figure than L.A.'s dues!).

We told them that, since the business was rapidly disintegratin, we'll probably never do another TV shot, so we really have no need to be members of Philly AFTRA (or any AFTRA, for that matter).

The receptionist reluctanly handed over the checks.

I have not re-joined. (I think they "Taft-Hartley-ed" me on my Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson appearance because it had been so long. And I lived in Vegas by that time. So I didn't have to join AFTRA this time.)

AFTRA never did anything for me that I couldn't have done for myself. I'm not a joiner. And, back in the early 80s, the dimbulbs in the comedy biz were agitating for an "Association," by which we could band together to fight for higher pay, obtain health insurance, etc. They eventually exhorted members to avail themselves of the opportunity to get insurance under an umbrella group that catered to independent artists. I called them up and asked them, "Do I have to be a member of the Professonal Comedians' Association to get this insurance," they said, "No." I relayed this to a colleague (who was running for president of the PCA) and he said (and I quote, exactly): "Well, we'll see about that!" The only other time I tried to get the PCA to actually go to bat for me (as I was cancelle with less than 60 days, in spite of a CONTRACT!) I was told that there was nothing the PCA could do because... wait for it... the club owner was an "Associate Member" of the PCA, so their hands were tied. A club owner was a member of the comedians' union? Sounds like a fox being an "Associate Member" of the chickens' union.

I cheered the letter.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

narciso said...
What really matters.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-thirty-tyrants


Socrates deserved his sentence. It was, essentially, his punishment for supporting the 30 tyrants.

Something our "educated" class should think about. Of course, that would require that they be capable of thinking

Biff said...

I seem to recall Trump mentioning being a fan of The Fountainhead somewhere along the way. I wonder if he imagines himself giving his own version of the novel's courtroom speech.