September 8, 2019

"Toward the end of the book, Kantor and Twohey devote two chapters to Christine Blasey Ford and her decision to air her sexual-assault allegations against the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh."

"This, and the book’s finale, 'The Gathering,' seem appended, an anticlimactic climax. In 'The Gathering,' the reporters assemble 12 of the sexual abuse victims they interviewed (including a McDonald’s worker, Kim Lawson, who helped organize a nationwide strike over the fast-food franchise’s failure to address sexual harassment) at Gwyneth Paltrow’s Brentwood mansion to talk, over gourmet Japanese cuisine, about what they’ve endured since going public with their charges. The testimonials inevitably descend into platitudes about personal 'growth' and getting 'some sense of myself back.' At one point, Paltrow starts crying over the way Weinstein had invoked his support for her career to get women to submit to his advances, and Lawson’s friend (a McDonald’s labor organizer who came with her so she wouldn’t feel alone in a room full of movie stars) hands the actress a box of tissues. These therapeutic scenes paste a pat conclusion onto a book that otherwise keeps the focus not on individual behavior or personal feelings but on the apparatuses of politics and power."

From Susan Faludi's review of "SHE SAID/Breaking the Sexual Harassment Story That Helped Ignite a Movement" by Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey. (Kantor and Twohey are NYT reporters, and the review is in the NYT.)

Interesting detail about Paltrow, the tissues, and the McDonald's workers.

76 comments:

buwaya said...

Ref the story you posted of the two fast food workers who met each other.
Imagine how that could have turned out, but for the grace of God.
Imagine how many failed attempts have to be made, to get one click.
Imagine how these failed attempts can be construed.

David Begley said...

Who buys that book? How many copies sold?

hombre said...

So we are to forget that Blasey Ford’s testimony, inadequately probative from the outset, was thoroughly refuted and discredited and abide by the old lefty/Democrat adage that perjury for a good cause is laudable?

Well, why not?

Michael K said...

That's old news. We have to get ready for the next nominee but I'm sure they are ready for it.

I was raped by whoever Trump selects to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg for the Supreme Court.

It was in the 1990s and the details are a little fuzzy. We were at a party and I distinctly remember this person coming on to me and rubbing up against me.
?

If it's Amy Coney Barrett, it might be difficult but I'm sure they are ready for any eventuality.

rehajm said...

This series of articles in many ways ignited the #MeToo movement, already smoldering in the atmosphere of frustration after reports of Donald Trump’s alleged sexual predations (a story that Twohey broke with another reporter) and the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape failed to slow the reality star’s march to the White House.

Startling in its honesty. #MeToo was a political ploy to stop Trump and deny conservative nominations to the court. At least we don’t have to pretend anymore.

narciso said...

Jodi cantor wrote that eye opening piece, on the eve of his obamas convention speech, about the radical roots of obamas academic indoctrination, then did nothing with it, she did apparently unearth the extent of lisa bloom's defamation campaign against Weinstein's accusers,

rehajm said...

If it's Amy Coney Barrett, it might be difficult but I'm sure they are ready for any eventuality.

She’s a zealous follower of a extreme religious cult, Catholicism. Disqualified.

chuck said...

The Kavanaugh accusers broke the story for sure. Broke its back. It's dead. Who will believe women after that?

Rob said...

You know what's indelible in the hippocampus? Putting a jade in your hoo-hah.

Bill, Republic of Texas said...

Why use Blasey-Ford as the center piece. More than half the population thinks she lied and the other half thinks so to but don't care. Everyone agrees her allegations and lack of proof were unfair.


I wonder if they had to cut out the chapter on the campaign worker who falsely accused Trump of sexually assaulting her.

Another cognitive dissonance. Why hold this meeting at Paltrow's mansion? She screwed Weinstein to jump start her career. Isn't she guilty of fostering the rape culture the other women or complaining about.

Why write this book. Why not write one with women's stories that are sympathetic. What's the point?

Bay Area Guy said...

These people are disgusting smear artists.

Yancey Ward said...

I would still boink Paltrow if I had the chance.

Anonymous said...

You know that when Gwyneth Paltrow is involved, there is a heavy degree of sober seriousness and gravitas.

Shouting Thomas said...

I get a kick out of looking at PR pics of young actresses and musicians.

They all want to sell T&A, because T&A sells, but they want to let you know that they are serious artists and feminists, too.

So, maximum cleavage, crotch shots, etc., but their expression must be dour and off-putting.

Bill, Republic of Texas said...

You know that when Gwyneth Paltrow is involved, there is a heavy degree of sober seriousness and gravitas.

And lots of vagina steaming.

chuck said...

> because T&A sells

True, dat. Sex is the currency of the realm. Always has been.

Big Mike said...

Christine Blasey Ford was lying. Even her own family refuses to support her claims.

Kathryn51 said...

If Paltrow didn't bother to invite Juanita Brodderick, Paula Jones or Kathleen Willey, then. . . .pfffttt.

Fernandinande said...

sexual abuse victims they interviewed (including a McDonald’s worker, Kim Lawson,

"I put my arm around her shoulder, and we kissed."

That kind of "sexual abuse"?

Sebastian said...

"a book that otherwise keeps the focus not on individual behavior or personal feelings but on the apparatuses of politics and power"

Women's feelings are the apparatus of prog power.

Sebastian said...

"More than half the population thinks she lied and the other half thinks so to but don't care"

Minus one: Althouse believed her.

Shouting Thomas said...

Did Althouse believe her?

I don’t recall that.

A lot of people completely misunderstand Althouse’s tactics for encouraging discussion.

She tries, more often than not, to avoid stating her opinion. She’s quite good, really, at summarizing an issue or an event and leaving it up to the commentators to state opinions.

I get frustrated with this tactic sometimes, too. But, I’ve observed over the years that her strategy works over the long term in clarifying issues and leading people to the best conclusion.

wildswan said...

Interesting that the article tries to celebrate the book as an example of "legacy journalism" at its best - as a search for the truth, as looking for verification and checking sources and combing through mounds of data - and yet at the end authors of the book uncritically accepts Christine Blasey Ford and her story.

Ice Nine said...

>>Sebastian said...
Minus one: Althouse believed her.<<

Is that true? If it is, I missed it. And if it is, that is almost painful to know, since that would be the very definition of doctrinaire.

Shouting Thomas said...

My impression is that Althouse explored both possibilities, that Ford was lying or telling the truth.

If you wanted a condemnation of Ford, you weren’t getting it from Althouse.

That’s frustrating, but that’s the prof’s method.

Birkel said...

Other than Blasey Ford, how many others were liars?

Mark said...

She tries, more often than not, to avoid stating her opinion.

Passive-aggressiveness is rarely obvious in the short-term.

Ice Nine said...

>>Blogger Shouting Thomas said...
My impression is that Althouse explored both possibilities, that Ford was lying or telling the truth.<<

-shrug- Most thinking people did that.

narciso said...

Susan faludi of backlash fame, shirley.

Darrell said...

The #metoo movement was taken away from the women that first came forward and was given to women like Meryl Streep that used to stand on stage and shout "Weinstein is God" while jilling vigorously.

Odd. Hollywood moves in mysterious ways.

Skeptical Voter said...

But would Paltrow ever be caught eating a Big Mac? Not good for her image or her figure.

Shouting Thomas said...


Passive-aggressiveness is rarely obvious in the short-term.


You think so? Consider this.

During the 2016 primaries, this board was mostly anti-Trump. I was one of the few adamantly pro-Trump people.

Althouse reported the primaries and the general election run-up in her usual style.

This board is now solidly pro-Trump.

Darrell said...

Michael K said--
If it's Amy Coney Barrett, it might be difficult


Nah. They will say Barrett bullied them until thoughts of suicide crossed their minds. Or fat-shamed them.

Mark said...

This board is now solidly pro-Trump.

This board is now solidly anti-anti-Trump.

Birkel said...

I am pro-most-Trump policies.
They seem to be working.
The China reset is going swimmingly.
Judges.
Deregulation.
Energy production.

If I trusted another person to pursue these policies, I would support them.
Not you, Mittens.
No Bushes.
No Paul Ryans.

rhhardin said...

The #MeToo movement was always a fraud. Women nagging. Life is too tough for them.

If it's illegal, turn the guy in. Otherwise act like a man and own it.

rhhardin said...

I'd recommend never kissing the boss's ass. It worked out fine for me.

It also defeats the Peter Principle (a person is promoted to his level of incompetence). Avoid that fatal promotion.

Shouting Thomas said...

All I’ve got to work with is my own experience.

Worked in corporate and art video in NYC. Lifelong pro musician.

Actresses and female musicians of my acquaintance whored themselves out for career gain with exuberant enthusiasm.

rhhardin said...

Mozart Requem
The soprano could do with less vibrato. It's probably a #MeToo movement of some kind. Think of vibrato as whining.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPlhKP0nZII

Mozart in his Bach/um-pah days.

Ralph L said...

She tries, more often than not, to avoid stating her opinion. She’s quite good, really, at summarizing an issue or an event and leaving it up to the commentators to state opinions.

Who are you and what have you done with Shouting Thomas?

Shouting Thomas said...


Who are you and what have you done with Shouting Thomas?


I’ll tell you something odd and funny about the prof that I think very few people notice.

She wants certain commenters to float ideas that she doesn’t want attached to her name.

I’m not saying what those ideas are.

donald said...

I see literally dozens of chicks who are better looking, hotter, more physically fit than Gwyneth Paltrow just tootling around the metro Atlanta area every single damned day. I mean it’s a goddamned smoke show around here.

rhhardin said...

The idea with actresses as stars is that you get fond of some character they played, not that they look great. You're supposed to think of that character.

gilbar said...

a McDonald’s worker, Kim Lawson, who helped organize a nationwide strike over the fast-food franchise’s failure to address sexual harassment

We were JUST READING ABOUT THIS!

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Blasey Ford and her creepy lawyer are not trust worthy.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Teens do stupid and silly things. Nothing Blasey Ford said made me think of it as anything near rape. Then the 1500 women claimed "rape room gang" and the whole thing shot to hell. Of course all the lies about fear of flying didn't help.

And there's this. Creepy liar lawyer with Hillary

Francisco D said...

Nah. They will say Barrett bullied them until thoughts of suicide crossed their minds. Or fat-shamed them.

Yes. It will be quite a production.

Histrionics galore!

Bob Smith said...

Birkenstock’s said:

“Other than Blasey Ford, how many others were liars?”
Lemme see. That skank involved in Duke LaCrosse, that skank at UVA. And the lying skank who accused a guy I knew long, long ago and got him two years in the Army.

Bob Smith said...

And guess what? Not one news outlet has followed up. “D” I can’t imagine why not. “D”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/24197/there-are-rapists-building-nancy-pelosis-daughter-joseph-curl

walter said...

Attendees received goody bags full of Goop.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

OPED: I was raped by whoever Trump picks to replace Ginsburg on the Supreme Court

n.n said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
n.n said...

If it's Amy Coney Barrett, it might be difficult but I'm sure they are ready for any eventuality.

She's pro-human rights, which is, in principle, a deal breaker for many liberals, progressives, and probably libertarians, too. I believe she is pro-choice: abstention, prevention, adoption, compassion, as are most people... persons, and perhaps everyone, but does not share the Twilight faith, indulge the Pro-Choice ethics, and will not be a "good American" and support the wicked solution. If the conservative women were hunted and judged as witches and conservative men were judged as warlocks, and if Sanders thought the female chauvinists were vicious, the catastrophic anthropogenic [political] climate change that will be forced by Judge Barret will be evolutionary in civil society. Then there is diversity or color judgment, sex chauvinism, and the politically congruent constructs or selective exclusion favored by "=" and tolerant people.

n.n said...

"I put my arm around her shoulder, and we kissed."

She kissed me back, then decades later, coinciding with polling and voting, the Ass came, offered her an indecent proposal, and she experienced pangs of social regret.

Michael K said...

Even her own family refuses to support her claims.

That is interesting. Not even her husband, as far as I know, was there.

It would be interesting to find out the real story some day.

Shouting Thomas said...

People assume that trading sex for career advancement is something that only afflicts women. It isn’t.

I have had many gay male friends who struggled to work in modeling, theater and film. Group sex parties are the normal, established method of making connections leading to deals in that milieu. The AIDS epidemic devastated the acting world. And whoring out for roles and recognition played a major role in that.

Or, maybe we just don’t have the same sympathy for men as we do for women. We assume the men want the sex.

William said...

Is there anyone alive who would convict Kavanaugh of attempted rape based solely on Ford's testimony? And yet they want to deprive him of his reputation and career based on that woman's testimony. This is extravagantly, maliciously wrong. The fact that no one on the left recognizes this as a wrong just intensifies the jaw grinding.

Bay Area Guy said...

"Who are you and what have you done with Shouting Thomas?"

Heh - Fawning Thomas.

But I like it when ST says nice things about Althouse, our National treasure of a hostess.


Drago said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Drago said...

William: "Is there anyone alive who would convict Kavanaugh of attempted rape based solely on Ford's testimony?"

Every single leftist alive, 75% of the liberals and all of the NeverTrumpers.

But thats all.

chuck said...

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#318 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in Journalism Writing Reference (Books)
#1 in Journalism Writing Reference (Kindle Store)
#3 in Sociology of Abuse

Looks like a niche book for the circle jerk. #METOO was last years sharpie-gate.

gilbar said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
gilbar said...

Shouting Thomas asked...
Did Althouse believe her?
I don’t recall that.


Ann Althouse said...
I've got to admit that if I had to say right now, who is more likely to be telling us what is closer to the truth — no stakes, no burden of proof, just who is more likely — I'd have to say her.
That's how I feel right now. I'm letting you know.
9/22/18, 9:39 AM

Big Mike said...

FWIW, since Christine Blasey Ford I am inclined not to believe the woman in a he said-she said complaint about sexual harassment. Women lie. Christine Blasey Ford lied. Some women believe the lies because they are gullible, and there is no help for it.

Qwinn said...

Women don't believe clearly lying women because they are gullible.

Women believe clearly lying women because they are very, very, very, very sexist.

Big Mike said...

I fear Qwinn may be right.

Crazy World said...

I still cannot believe that whole “incident’ happened, truly awful and pathetic. Embarrassing to womanhood. Just ick, Blessings to the Kauvanaugh family.

PhilD said...

Say, about that supposed non-rape. Suppose it were two black men who supposedly had entered the supposed room and Ford recalled that she felt afraid she supposedly was in danger of being raped.
Wouldn't that make Ford the greatest racist ever, even worse than Hitler? Think of Obama's grandmother.

Amadeus 48 said...

My impression was that Althouse didn’t believe Kavanaugh. I think that she mentioned that she had been sexually assaulted, not raped, by a teacher. Put those two things together and you get a doubting hostess, as gilbar noted at 9:51 pm.

Kevin said...

Toward the end of the book, Kantor and Twohey devote two chapters to Christine Blasey Ford and her decision to air her sexual-assault allegations against the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

So what begins as a book about sexual assault victims ends as a book about sexual assault allegators.

That’s a nice visual.

Mr. O. Possum said...

"Gourmet Japanese cuisine"

O, the suffering of the millionaire elites.

Tina Trent said...

Paltrow was also deeply involed with Weinstein outside of acting for years. They co-chaired the incredibly powerful Robin Hood Foundation, where Weinstein was very involved in RHF's "hands on" approach to reforming public schools, which meant, for board members, touring schools and meeting scores of children and adults whose jobs depended on your philanthropy.

No worries there, right? Paltrow isn't a #metoo: she's a #sheknew. And who knows how many non-Hollywood little people were preyed on by Weinstein in his capacity as a RHF board member.

Tina Trent said...

@PhilD: no kidding. Most people don't remember quite how much Obama used that ztory about his grandmother being a racist on the campaign trail in 2008. He also routinely called his grandfather "white trash" before cheering crowds.

Selective memory courtesy of the media.

JAORE said...

Is there anyone alive who would convict Kavanaugh of attempted rape based solely on Ford's testimony? And yet they want to deprive him of his reputation and career based on that woman's testimony. This is extravagantly, maliciously wrong. The fact that no one on the left recognizes this as a wrong just intensifies the jaw grinding.

Is there a mother of a son who can not see her child similarly destroyed w/o the protection of power?

Amadeus 48 said...

Barry Fein in David Mamet’s new play: “I am a good person. Do you realize how much money I give to the Democratic Party?”

Fen said...

Robyn Wright doesn't even know his name: Sgt. 1st Class Elis Barreto Ortiz, 34, from Morovis, Puerto Rico.

Althouse: :"You're wrong. The name is in the article. Why make assertions without checking?"

I did check. My mistake was when I got to the bottom of the page where it says:

MORE FROM
Our Columnists

I thought that was the end. Although now I see the article continues beyond that. Thank you so much for taking the time to point out my mistake.

Althouse: Really, Fen, your commenting needs improvement.

No, it really doesn't. It's been very sharp lately, more than usual. You are just saying that because I challenged you yesterday on another topic and you are holding a grudge. You sure you want to play that game? Because I am more stubborn than you.

Althouse: I'm going to start deleting you a lot more, beginning with this comment in half an hour. You may copy what you've written and attempt to rewrite it. If you don't want to go to the link and read or you need and don't want to get a subscription, you need to be circumspect about what you say is in the article.

OH. GO. FUCK. YOURSELF.

I will now happily copy everything I post here to repost 10 times over every time you delete it. And if you manage to ban this profile I will make several more and do it all over again.

OR

You can front page a public apology to me for being a vindictive bitch and singling me out because I had the audacity to challenge you on something stupid. What was it again? Oh right, I said I was "skeptical" that you were aware of the NPC meme. LOL.

(lets see now... New desktop folder: Althouse, new txt doc: Althouse1, copy and paste and save. Ready to launch upon deletion. Your turn....)