January 7, 2019

"I am not surprised that this call could disturb people who are not familiar with insect sounds."

"The recording is definitively a cricket that belongs to [the Indies short-tailed cricket, known formally as Anurogryllus celerinictus]. The call of this Caribbean species is about 7 kHz, and is delivered at an unusually high rate, which gives humans the sensation of a continuous sharp trill," said Fernando Montealegre-Zapata, a professor of sensory biology at the University of Lincoln, quoted in "'Sonic attack' on US embassy in Havana could have been crickets, say scientists/Noise which saw diplomats complaining of headaches and nausea could be song of Indies short-tailed cricket" (The Guardian).

44 comments:

Ignorance is Bliss said...

It was an explanation that appeared to gain weight when an audio recording of a persistent, high-pitched drone made by US personnel in Cuba was released to the Associated Press.

Why were the US personnel making a high-pitched drone?!?

tomaig said...

Many more "insect politics" posts than I expected.
You cover it all!

Darrell said...

Great explanation. Too bad microwave detectors actually registered the attacks in Cuba and China.

The Gipper Lives said...

Yoko.

Earnest Prole said...

Oh fer fuck's sake. It's almost certainly a Chinese or Russian eavesdropping device that malfunctioned.

Wince said...

Would forever change the no-response expression... "crickets".

rhhardin said...

I have a MFJ ultrasonic parabolic ear that's for finding sparking powerline transformers in the 40kHz range
https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-5008

All I've detected so far is buried natural gas line compressor noise, which is all over the neighborhood. So far nobody is reporting brain damage.

rcocean said...

And the USA has done what exactly - in retaliation?

Unless there was retaliation, there was no attack.

Skeptical Voter said...

Who knew that crickets had names like Fidel and Raul--maybe even Che. The cricket named Che rode up on a motorcycle. You have to be an editor at the Guardian to swallow hogwash like this.

narciso said...

We pulled the diplomats out of the country, recall entous at the new Yorker didnt think much of it, it's not crickets.

NotWhoIUsedtoBe said...

The attack probably wasn't sonic, and the sound was a coincidence.

Darrell said...

The Guardian is still ticked off because the US killed a Guardian journo in the first Bourne movie.

narciso said...

That was the only commendable part of it, remember this was seven years before snowden

HoodlumDoodlum said...

Yeah, as an explanation of the problem "crickets" doesn't really cut it.
People reported serious injuries--permanent hearing loss. Unless that's been revised we don't have an answer as to what harmed them.
It makes sense to say "the noise that some people thought might have been what caused the injuries to staff turns out to have been crickets and not what caused harm" but it does not make sense to say "the thing that caused harm wasn't some weapon but was instead crickets."

daskol said...

I had no idea you could train crickets.

narciso said...

They have background:


https://babalublog.com/2019/01/06/surprise-scientist-at-uc-berkeley-backs-up-castro-regime-lies-about-sonic-attacks/

rcocean said...

So, why the sonic attacks? I thought we loved the Castro family, and Cuba has wonderful health care!

rcocean said...

BTW, people on the Youtube have uploaded 8 hours of "Cricket Sounds".

NO bot would do that!

BJM said...

Good Lord, have these idiots never been in Georgia when millions of cicadas emerge?

Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

Crickets can be loud. Ear plugs can help you sleep.

I've slept out in the quiet, peaceful country, and sometimes just tried to but couldn't, with all the wildlife noises. I can just imagine what it's like in Cuba.

narciso said...

It's fake news, probably some kind of ultra high frequency signal.

Darrell said...

It's microwaves. It was proven. The sound the person hears is generated in their own head--like tinnitus. Microphones in the room didn't pick up any sound during an attack. This microwave response by the body has been documented before.

Sydney said...

I doubt that crickets would cause these neurological findings.

But maybe they have bad ass crickets.

John Ray said...

We can believe this. I think Al Gore's and Obama's scientists have already endorsed it. Of course, these scientists have inhaled too much jet exhausts from the respective private jets.

And, the same people will be saying that ebola is nothing but a mild skin rash caused by ant bites. We can believe that too? Of course.

Darrell said...

If you didn't have commie apologist Professor Shoe, you'd have Freder or Cookie coming up with porkies to protect their Cuban and Chinese friends. Commies close ranks/protect the franchise.

Darrell said...

Of course Cookie isn't a commie. He's just the only world authority on who is and isn't a real one.

Infinite Monkeys said...

Crickets in the building. I guess that means it was rat-free, so there's that.

n.n said...

The leading alternative theory is that the concussion-like symptoms were the result of a mass psychogenic event, which was apparently induced by crickets.

tcrosse said...

Bugging other peoples' embassy is hardly Cricket.

Mr. Groovington said...

Was up a track in the Okavango Delta to a hippo pool 2 days ago. They make this really loud sound like a groaning fart. Hard to describe but one of the worst sounds from an animal I’ve heard yet. The more I learn about them the more hippos gross me out.

StephenFearby said...

Let's look at this puzzle from the perspective of a multiple [4-]choice test. If you know that 3 of the answers are probably wrong, and the 4th you're not sure about, you quickly pick the 4th. And move on to complete the test before time expires.

Since the same kind of brain damage experienced in Cuba has also been reported in China (and previously in Moscow), were Cuban crickets imported to China and Russia? Probably not.

Vox offers 4 choices:

What’s happening to US diplomats in Cuba and China? Here are 4 theories.
One of them is an attack from a “sonic weapon.”
Updated Jun 8, 2018

'...1) Sonic weapon

The first and most obvious one is that there is some kind of sonic weapon being used to target the diplomats, although it’s unclear if Cuba or China has that kind of weaponry, even though sonic devices exist.

For example, there’s a “mosquito” that produces a high-pitched sound and long-range acoustic devices that police sometimes use to disperse crowds.

But there’s a big problem with this theory, says Sharon Weinberger, an expert on weapons technology and author of the book The Imagineers of War: The kind of weapon that does what the victims describe would defy the laws of physics...“The danger of saying it’s a sonic weapon is that you’re focusing on the least likely explanation,” Weinberger told me.

2) Sonic listening device

US diplomats could be the victims of a sonic listening device that emits harmful waves. A sonic device used for spying — and wielded by Cuba, China, or even another country like Russia — could unintentionally cause brain damage.

These devices usually operate at the ultrasonic level (above audible range) or the infrasonic level (below audible range). Some doctors believe infrasound is more likely to have been used because it travels greater distances than ultrasound, so attackers could use it from farther away...


3) Toxin


4) Mass hysteria

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/8/17438032/china-cuba-diplomat-attack-sonic-weapon

NYT (Dec. 12, 2018)

"...Two years after Americans posted at the United States Embassy in Havana began experiencing the peculiar phenomenon, doctors at the University of Miami on Wednesday published a scientific paper that confirms what these patients have said all along: Their condition is real, not the result of mass hysteria, a response to intense news media coverage or a stress reaction to being evacuated, as doctors in Cuba had suggested."

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/world/americas/cuba-embassy-attacks.html

My quick, but not perfectly informed choice is: (2) Sonic listening device (infrasound) even though it doesn't make the noise of Cuban crickets:

Lifehacker 6/07/18

Can Sound Make You Sick?

How Infrasound Affects the Human Body

'Infrasound, or infrasonic sound, on the other hand, is a completely different beast. These sounds come in under 20Hz...But infrasound can also be manmade, and it can have some seriously weird effects on the human body. It’s been known to cause symptoms like headaches, dizziness, annoyance, fatigue, tinnitus, heart palpitations, and a general feeling of pressure on the abdomen. It’s also not uncommon for people to experience nausea when exposed to infrasound, which is funny when you realize the word “noise” is derived from the Latin word “nausea.”.'

https://lifehacker.com/can-sound-make-you-sick-1826641222

RK said...

Al Sharpton's office has been known to get infested with crickets whose mating call sounds like "niggardly, niggardly"

n.n said...

The "cricket" hypothesis would be easy to test. It's putative cause is unambiguous and could be tested in a laboratory. 11 women and 10 men exhibited concussion-like symptoms, which should improve selecting a population sample.

Fernandinande said...

Sonic listening device

Why would crickets want to listen in on an embassy?

Molly said...

(eaglebeak)

Isn't The Guardian the one that recently published an article claiming that Paul Manafort visited Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy?

https://theintercept.com/2019/01/02/five-weeks-after-the-guardians-viral-blockbuster-assangemanafort-scoop-no-evidence-has-emerged-just-stonewalling/

Publishing since 1821 and still stupid.

YoungHegelian said...

I guess Cuban crickets never took Josquin as their mentor.

n.n said...

Isn't The Guardian the one

They are also critical of "white girls next door". And are committed advocates of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, an "existential threat."

LakeLevel said...

Most likely electro-magnetic beams of some sort are being aimed at some cleverly designed recording device hidden or built into the embassies. Depending on the frequency, these beams could go right through any conventional walls etc. In order to avoid detection, a device could be completely electrically passive until lit up with some specific EM frequency. Transmitting power like this would probably be very dangerous, tending to cook anyone in the way. It would also tend to mess with people's sense of hearing. Whoever is doing this are supreme assholes.

LakeLevel said...

Another explanation is that they don't even need to hide devices in the embassy. Just shoot something like T-waves in and have arrays of antennas gather the scatter and analyze it for images and sound vibration. Search "camera that can see around corners" to see the amazing technology that is publicly known.

Gk1 said...

I had remembered the tale of the US embassy that was built with Soviet labor in the 1970's and then basically abandoned by the U.S because they had too many listening devices imbedded in concrete and structural members. Employees at the U.S embassy were developing cancers and leukemia rates that far exceeded actuarial norms because of the microwave energy beamed into it 24/7. Why would it surprise anyone that a socialist shithole like Cuba was doing this too? Its who these people are, its what they do.

Gk1 said...

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/U-S-Finally-Opens-Moscow-Embassy-Building-was-2714015.php

Biff said...

FWIW, here are some clips of the cricket sounds - https://entnemdept.ifas.ufl.edu/walker/buzz/492a.htm

Openidname said...

StephenFearby said...

"Vox offers 4 choices:

"1) Sonic weapon

"The first and most obvious one is that there is some kind of sonic weapon . . . . But there’s a big problem with this theory, says Sharon Weinberger . . . : The kind of weapon that does what the victims describe would defy the laws of physics.

"2) Sonic listening device

"US diplomats could be the victims of a sonic listening device that emits harmful waves. A sonic device used for spying — and wielded by Cuba, China, or even another country like Russia — could unintentionally cause brain damage."

But mustn't the objection to #1 -- that it would defy the laws of physics -- apply equally to #2? It sounds like #2 is a weapon in all but name.

Good old Vox, dispassionately logical as always.

Josephbleau said...

My name is cuban Pete, I am the master of the Cricket beat, In HAVANNNA!