June 14, 2018

"Former FBI Director James Comey 'deviated' from bureau and Justice Department procedures in handling the probe into Hillary Clinton, damaging the agencies’ image of impartiality..."

"... even though he wasn’t motivated by politics, the department’s watchdog found in a highly anticipated report. 'While we did not find that these decisions were the result of political bias on Comey’s part, we nevertheless concluded that by departing so clearly and dramatically from FBI and department norms, the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the department as fair administrators of justice,' Inspector General Michael Horowitz said in the report’s conclusions, which were obtained by Bloomberg News."

ADDED: The NYT reports:
[T]he report paints an unflattering picture of one of the most tumultuous periods in the 110-year history of the F.B.I.... The report criticizes the conduct of F.B.I. officials who exchanged texts disparaging Mr. Trump during the campaign. The officials, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, were involved in both the Clinton and Russia investigations, leading Mr. Trump’s supporters to suspect a conspiracy against him. Many of those text messages have been released, but the inspector general cites a previously undisclosed message in which Mr. Strzok says the F.B.I. “will stop” Mr. Trump, according to two of the officials.

The inspector general said that, because of his views, Mr. Strzok may have improperly prioritized the Russia investigation over the Clinton investigation during the final weeks of the campaign. The F.B.I. officials “brought discredit” to themselves and sowed public doubt about the investigation. But the report did not cite evidence that Mr. Strzok had acted improperly or influenced the outcome of the investigation, the officials said....

The findings sharply criticize the judgment of Mr. Comey....
ALSO: CNN:
The report from Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded that the prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton case were "consistent" and not affected by bias or other improper actions. But it said that senior leaders' handling of the Clinton case cast a cloud over the bureau and did lasting damage to the FBI's reputation.

"The damage caused by these employees' actions extends far beyond the scope of the Midyear (Clinton) investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI's reputation for neutral factfinding and political independence," the report states.

A key finding: Comey erred in his decision not to coordinate with his superiors at the Justice Department at key moments in the Clinton email investigation. Horowitz said that Comey was "extraordinary and insubordinate," and did not agree with any of his reasons for deviating from "well-established Department policies.",,,

The report found that the Strzok and Page texts "cast a cloud" over the credibility of the investigation, although they found no evidence "that these political views directly affected the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed."...

The report faults Lynch for her meeting with Clinton on a Phoenix airport tarmac. But it says there was no evidence that Lynch and Clinton discussed the investigation into Hillary Clinton or any other inappropriate discussions.

585 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   401 – 585 of 585
Jaq said...

Says the guy who is participating in the conspiracy of silence when it comes to Trump’s victims.

#TrumpistHypocrisy


That’s some defense of your actions, Inga. You have been using the old monkey see, monkey do technique a lot today. But sure, I will bite, which victim? My favorite was the woman who had the world famous billionaire grab her by the pussy in first class on a flight and nobody else noticed anything. It’s almost as if she took the “grab her by the pussy” comment and made up the incident to follow it.... Or another alternative is that she was quiet because she “let him.”

At least Juanita Broaddrick had witnesses under oath, five of them. Witnesses that said that Billy Blythe Jr didn’t have a lot of regard for whether Broaddrick was “willing” or not.

FullMoon said...

IG Horowitz and Comey worked together in 90s in US Attorneys office in Manhattan... Horowitz married to former CNN and PBS producer, who gave money to Obama

Achilles said...

Inga said...
“What victims?

Not a single credible woman has come forward with anything other than consensual relationships.”

You don’t believe they’re credible, but then you’re a nutcase. Clinton had accusers and so does Trump. I believed ALL the women in both cases.

So you have nothing. Not a single credible accuser.

None.

You also admit you supported a rapist knowing he was a rapist.

How disgusting it must feel to be so base.

Jaq said...

I believed ALL the women in both cases.

Something that you kept top secret, your opinion that Bill Clinton was a forcible rapist and that Hillary enabled him, you kept that top secret until he was done and the rubble stopped bouncing. Then, when it no longer mattered, you came around.

Browndog said...

Basically, the IG spent 18 months compiling bullet points for an agency training seminar.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“At least Juanita Broaddrick had witnesses under oath, five of them. Witnesses that said that Billy Blythe Jr didn’t have a lot of regard for whether Broaddrick was “willing” or not.”

As I clearly said, I believed all the women who made accusations against both Trump and Clinton. You however prefer to believe the women who accused Trump are all liars. Ask yourself why.

Jaq said...

Finally, when Billy Blythe’s rotten political corpse has been well buried, Inga will happily throw him under the bus if that’s what it takes to get Trump.

Do you have any sense at all, Inga, that your position is somewhat transparent?

Achilles said...

“My god…. I’m actually starting to have embarrassment sprinkled on my disappointment…. Ever been forced to do something you adamantly opposed,” the agent said in another message.

The agent later told the DOJ inspector general he did not know what he meant by “forced to do something you adamantly opposed.”

Four days after interviewing Clinton, the agent sent an instant message saying he was “done interviewing the President,” in reference to Clinton.

Months later, on election day, the agent messaged his wife, “You should know;…. that I’m…. with her.”

Inga...Allie Oop said...

And Tim, stop trying to hijack this thread with your hypocritical accusations. Was today’s IG report so upsetting to you must distract away from it?

Jaq said...

You however prefer to believe the women who accused Trump are all liars. Ask yourself why.

Because they came out of the woodwork when the call went out to #resist Trump. With Clinton, the accusations go way way back, but you ignored them and now lie that you didn’t. Ask yourself why.

Meade said...

The deep state is deeply disappointed...

that it's been caught deeply red-handed.

Birkel said...

FIVE (5) FBI/DOJ people will be demoted and/or fired after this report.

And that is BEFORE the THREE (3) other IG reports that are scheduled to drop.

That brings the total of FBI/DOJ employees fired/demoted/retired/quit to about an equivalent number as those indicted by Mueller. Except all of these people have actually suffered negative consequences. And they don't live in Russia outside the authority of the U.S. government.

Matt Sablan said...

There's something beautifully tragic that Stzork sitting on the laptop cost his preferred candidate the election and his mentor Comey was forced to pretend he was so stupid as to not know who Weiner was.

Jaq said...

Today’s IG report was like Christmas morning. I will happily let your pussy hat hypocrisy go for now.

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

Bay Area Guy said...
The Russian Hoax IG Report will likely be more exciting.


I expect so. Maybe we see actual heads exploding after that one.

Achilles said...

Inga said...

As I clearly said, I believed all the women who made accusations against both Trump and Clinton. You however prefer to believe the women who accused Trump are all liars. Ask yourself why.

Because in the few stories that popped up the accuser was caught in obvious lies.

Trump hasn't raped or assaulted anyone. He is presumed innocent. You are just lying to make yourself feel better.

But Clinton has admitted to rape and assault and paid court settlements.

You supported him.

It must feel awful.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Today’s IG report was like Christmas morning.”

Sure Tim, sure I believe you, lol.

Meade said...

Thanks to Stzok and others, Mueller's investigation is thoroughly and irredeemably tainted. Time to fire Mueller and start over. I recommend starting with Hillary's emails.

Drago said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Achilles said...

"Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

Strzok reply: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

This Peter Strzok text about “stopping” Donald Trump was hidden from Congressional investigators. We never had it. Absolutely unreal."

— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) June 14, 2018

Drago said...

Inga: "Trump should’ve done his homework. Interesting how Trump’s followers so often don’t hold him responsible for anything."

No way any outsider is going to know all the ins and outs of the literally thousands of personnel who've spent their lives in DC. And even if he did, how many actual candidates were qualified/prepared/mentally aligned with a populist disruption movement?

One good thing about Trump, due to his background in business and disruptive endeavors as so many of them are, is that he adapts and adjusts on the fly rapidly.

We are currently involved in the biggest "turnaround" scenario that has ever existed at the governmental level.

The results so far are extraordinarily encouraging in terms of the economy, our military and foreign policy and the judiciary.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“But Clinton has admitted to rape and assault and paid court settlements.”

Cohen the fixer took care of Trump’s little secrets, lol. We’ll soon find out just what those secret “fixings” were. Now Achilles is desperate to distract from today’s bad news, can’t blame him. Maybe it’s a good if he becomes distracted...

Jaq said...

Inga, if you actually believe most of the the stuff you have written here today, what you believe or don’t believe about anything is of zero concern to me. But you are sort of entertaining in your transparent partisanship. I mean, to paraphrase Tropic Thunder, “Never go full libtard.”

Matt Sablan said...

Does the FBI routinely hide things from Congress? Will there be training to discourage that?

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

Republican Comey harmed Democrat Clinton's election chances and has now been chastised for his behavior which was unprecedented. I am bit more sympathetic to Comey's position than many because Republican FBI agents in NY were believed at the time to be leaking to Giuliani. It would have been worse for Clinton and for the FBI if the story about Weiner leaked out via Giuliani rather than be revealed directly by Comey.

Jaq said...

Strzok got something wrong, it was Hillary who was never going to be president. And she still isn’t. That was our choice, remember?

traditionalguy said...

The IG pulled another Comey exoneration nonsense conclusion with smooth talking BS. He said the FBI's top people were all biased as hell, but they never decided a single a solitary thing that they decided which could be proven to be based on that bias.

Meanwhile every single person who ever helped the President run is completely guilty of mythical false charges until they have been tried and been acquitted after 5 years of wasted attorney fees.

It is a slow motion Coup D'Etat , month 18 . Maybe after the mid-term Trump will be safe from impeachment. Then he will just need more personal body guards until the Coup leaders are all arrested.

Jim at said...

How anybody can believe a single, fucking word put out by the FBI after reading this report is beyond my comprehension.

Read this crap. Read what they wrote thinking they'd never be caught.

It is unreal.

Firings should be the least of their concerns.

Achilles said...

In response to the IG report disclosing that James Comey used a private GMail account to conduct official business for the investigation Hillary Clinton took to her Twitter account Thursday and trolled the hell outta Comey.

Hillary tweeted: “But my emails:”



But my emails. https://t.co/G7TIWDEG0p

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 14, 2018


It is going to be fun watching them turn on each other.

Drago said...

Meade: "Thanks to Stzok and others, Mueller's investigation is thoroughly and irredeemably tainted."

When even Gowdy is alluding to such you know its going to be effective politically.

Matt Sablan said...

If Comey wanted to screw Clinton ARM she'd be in jail. He did everything he could to protect her.

Jaq said...

Republican Comey - ARM

“Just years apart in the 1990s, they both gave up their top-tier private law firm jobs to return to the trenches of prosecuting criminals — Mueller as a junior prosecutor in Washington, DC, and Comey in Richmond, Virginia,” Washingtonian reports. “Both men were rising stars mentored and guided by Eric Holder in the 1990s during Holder’s time in the Justice Department under the Clinton administration.”

Washington Post

Drago said...

Wow.

ARM just went full gadfly. I didn't think he could do that even if he tried.

But then again, these are trying times for the left.

On the plus side, perhaps Bobby DeNiro can shout the f*** word a few more times to shore up their spirits.

RichAndSceptical said...

The Swamp seems to be winning.

Achilles said...

Inga said...
“But Clinton has admitted to rape and assault and paid court settlements.”

Cohen the fixer took care of Trump’s little secrets, lol. We’ll soon find out just what those secret “fixings” were. Now Achilles is desperate to distract from today’s bad news, can’t blame him. Maybe it’s a good if he becomes distracted...


What? That Trump wanted to build a condo in Russia?

ooohh.....

Is that illegal?

IMPEACH!

Is that harder than selling Uranium?

The midterms are going to be glorious.

Drago said...

Matthew Sablan: "If Comey wanted to screw Clinton ARM she'd be in jail. He did everything he could to protect her"

All Comey had to do was simply not usurp the authority of the Justice Department and then re-write the relevant law on the fly with that bogus "intent" addition which was completely made up.

LOL

Comey exonerated Hillary months before the investigation even really got going....because he wanted to harm her!

Achilles said...

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...
Republican Comey harmed Democrat Clinton's election chances and has now been chastised for his behavior which was unprecedented. I am bit more sympathetic to Comey's position than many because Republican FBI agents in NY were believed at the time to be leaking to Giuliani. It would have been worse for Clinton and for the FBI if the story about Weiner leaked out via Giuliani rather than be revealed directly by Comey.


This kind of knowing stupidity is a sure winner in November.

How far the left has fallen.

There are still really stupid people who will buy this.

But not enough for democrats to win.

Drago said...

Comey literally claimed, literally, he had no idea Abedin was married to Weiner!

LOL

And that's the kind of "State Secret" he could never hope to uncover......

Matt Sablan said...

Comey could simply have thrown the book at witnesses that lied to them. Imagine Abedin being perp walked in October when they learned she held out on giving them all her devices. If he wanted Clinton to lose he had the tools. But did not use them.

Drago said...

Its unfortunate that Comey was not the head of the supposedly largest and most effective Investigative service in the world, otherwise he might have been able to figure out if Abedin was still married to Wiener.

Sebastian said...

"Read what they wrote thinking they'd never be caught."

A key takeaway.

It's what makes the deep state deep.

Of course, not being caught assumed a Hill win.

They tried by any means necessary. They still do, with Mueller and the subpoena resistance.

rcocean said...

Today, it seems like November 2016 and May 2017 were a million years ago.

'member when Comey was a non-partisan, upright, honorable FBI director?

'mmeber when the FBI above politics?

'memeber when Mueller (the "Greatest Roman of them all") and his non-partisan legal was going to get to the bottom of Trump-Russia Collusion?

Have some 'member berries!

Achilles said...

Former President Obama’s White House Counsel, representing the brother of slain DNC staffer Seth Rich, are “desperately” working to obstruct WikiLeaks from revealing the truth of how it obtained troves of DNC and Clinton campaign emails during the 2016 election, an attorney who’s been subpoenaed by Rich’s legal team warns.


Nothing to see here.

Drago said...

Listening to Gowdy now, if I had to guess, I would guess that the entire deep staters know that someone is going to have be thrown to the wolves.

My guess is that they will sacrifice McCabe, Strzok (lots of folks yelling at him from all sides), Page, and potentially a few others.

The idea being you build the firewall just below the Comey/Lynch levels to limit the damage.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“I am bit more sympathetic to Comey's position than many because Republican FBI agents in NY were believed at the time to be leaking to Giuliani. It would have been worse for Clinton and for the FBI if the story about Weiner leaked out via Giuliani rather than be revealed directly by Comey.”

It appears that Giuliani isn’t only in deep poo with his soon to be ex third wife, but there isnt there an ongoing investigation into people leaking things from the FBI and other agencies? Just which FBI agents were feeding things to Giuliani and then Giuliani bragging about it way back during the campaign? Or was he lying?

Matt Sablan said...

If Rudy leaked, I hope he suffers for it as much as Comey did.

Matt Sablan said...

Also. Rudy wasn't part of the I investigation. He can receive leaks like any journalist can without being beholden to keeping the secrets.

Crimso said...

Over/under on how long it takes for someone to unearth something along the lines of Comey dancing with Abedin at her wedding? Or a picture of the three of them together?

"No man has a good enough memory to make a successful liar" Lincoln

bagoh20 said...

It's amazing how government investigations of government never find any corruption, no bad guys, no bad motives, just mistakes, errors in judgement, or unfortunate timing. Government clearly has the most noble, and honest people in it. It must somehow turn average people who always include bad apples and corrupt motives into much better actors than the population they come from. I'm always impressed with their high standards. It makes me proud to be an American.

Original Mike said...

Blogger Matthew Sablan said...”Comey could simply have thrown the book at witnesses that lied to them. Imagine Abedin being perp walked in October when they learned she held out on giving them all her devices. If he wanted Clinton to lose he had the tools. But did not use them.”

I could almost accept that as the best outcome; the election was only 6 months off, let the electorate decide. But what I find outrageous is that Clinton is given a pass on her crimes and yet she and her supporters have the temerity to blame Comey for her loss.

Michael K said...

The fool is still relying on the "Executive Summery" written by political actors.

The truth is coming out and there are two more OIG reports coming.

Browndog said...

Blogger Inga said...

And Tim, stop trying to hijack this thread with your hypocritical accusations


Says the one that has been trying, unsuccessfully, for two hours.

No, don't respond- I've said my peace and I'm out.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“The truth is coming out and there are two more OIG reports coming.”

So we’re back to the “Just you wait! Democrats are going to jail I tell ya!”

Matt Sablan said...

I never believed a Democrat would suffer real repercussions. Hell. The worst that has happened is a few people are making less money now. No one will actually pay the piper for selling government Intel to the press, lying to the FBI or the IG.

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

Inga said...
So we’re back to the “Just you wait! Democrats are going to jail I tell ya!”


Seems it's mainly Republicans looking at jail time at the moment, but that is because of the swamp.

Drago said...

Multiple FBI agents interviewed said, under oath, if they did what Hillary did they would be prosecuted.

bagoh20 said...

"The report faults Lynch for her meeting with Clinton on a Phoenix airport tarmac. But it says there was no evidence that Lynch and Clinton discussed the investigation into Hillary Clinton or any other inappropriate discussions."

"There was no evidence". Now why the hell would they let there be evidence. It was a private one on one conversation, and they knew it was wrong, very wrong to discuss Hillary's case. They are not going to provide evidence, when the only way there could be any would be if they told someone what they did. Therefore, I'm sure they went through all that and met in person just to discuss grandchildren. That's what we all do.

Drago said...

We now have conclusive evidence that Hillary lied under oath to the FBI regarding classified information on her server and in her emails.

Above the law.

Matt Sablan said...

I thought she was never put under oath?

bagoh20 said...

We also know for absolute certainty that Hillary, per her own testimony, destroyed thousands of emails that were under subpoena. Nothing wrong with that, as I'm sure all democrats would agree if Trump did it. Am I right?

Birkel said...

Michael K,

I count three (3) more promised IG reports.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

But, but, but... the emails!


Hahahahaha, it never ends.

Matt Sablan said...

The most interesting comparison between this and the Trump investigation is this. The FBI ordered agents not to follow any leads about anything but the most surface level crime for Clinton. For Trump, the FBI sought secret authorities to pursue as broad an investigation as possible even into unrelated matters.

Matt Sablan said...

I'm more interested in her obstruction of justice. But I doubt she'll pay any consequences for that either.

Drago said...

Matthew Sablan: "I thought she was never put under oath?"

Any falsehoods told to FBI investigators is prosecutable.

Achilles said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Birkel said...

FIVE (5) FBI/DOJ have been recommended for negative employment actions.
I'd bet they are all Democrats.

Achilles said...

12 things you need to know about the IG report:

1. FBI Agents Lisa Page and Peter Strzok Texted About Stopping Trump. As already reported, Strzok texted Page that he would “stop it” – it being Trump’s election.

2. Comey Concluded That He’d Let Hillary Off In Spring 2016. While Comey didn’t announce his decision until July 2016, he made his decision in Spring 2016 that Hillary was off the hook.

3. Comey Watered Down His Draft Statement On Hillary Dramatically. The original draft statement on Hillary said she’d been “grossly negligent”; that was changed to “extremely careless.” And finally, the original statement mentioned that President Obama had been in an email exchange with Hillary; his name was removed.

4. Comey Is A Glory Hound. He had already concluded before the tarmac meeting that he was likely to make his own statement on Hillary.

5. The FBI Wildly Botched The Re-Opening Of The Hillary Case. The IG report found that the Anthony Weiner case agent had spotted Hillary emails on September 26, and he informed the New York Field Office on September 28. Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe knew about it the same day. He then mentioned it to Comey – and nobody mentioned it again for nearly a full month, until just prior to the election.

6. The FBI Agents Prioritized The Russia Investigation Above The Hillary Investigation Reopening. According to the report, “The FBI’s failure to act in late September or early October is even less justifiable when contrasted with the attention and resources that FBI management and some members of the Midyear team dedicated to other activities in connection with the Midyear investigation during the same period.”

7. Comey Revealed The Reopened Investigation To Congress Because He Thought Hillary Was Going To Win, and He Wanted To Preserve Her Legitimacy.

8. Five Separate Agents Sent Pro-Clinton, Anti-Trump Texts — Many Of Which Implied Using Official Authority To Target Trump. The IG report is brutal.

9. Comey, Strzok, and Page Used Personal Email To Conduct FBI Business. Perhaps this is why they went easy on Hillary Clinton — they were all participating in similar activity.

10. FBI Employees Leaked To The Press Regularly. According to the IG report, “We identified numerous FBI employees, at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters.”

11. FBI agents received “benefits from reporters” as well, including golf outings, drinks and meals.

12.Former Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik Should Have Recused. While Hillary was under investigation, Kadzik tried to get his son a job on Hillary’s campaign.

Francisco D said...

Francisco struggles everyday around this time when the alcohol he’s consumed all day starts making him lapse into black out territory. Soon he’ll be talking about enjoying a some sautéed brains and liver with a good Chianti.

Inga,

You obviously have projected your substance abuse problems onto me because (1) you cannot accept that you are an alcoholic and/or (2) you lack the imagination to think outside of your own narrow experience.

You really are quite easy to figure out and quite sad.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

Francisco cannot make a substansive comment regarding the topic and once again focuses on me instead of the fascinating discussion at hand.

Quite odd.

bagoh20 said...

"But, but, but... the emails!


Hahahahaha, it never ends."
.

Kinda like "Russia, Russia, Russia", but one is a definite, known, high level violation of the law, and one has no evidence produced to show it ever happened, let alone that it's illegal.

Why would an American dismiss such blatant illegality at the highest levels which likely damaged national security according to Comey. Is that just OK if the person is a Democrat? Such an position is just as deplorable as the crime itself, and if widespread and long term, much more damaging to the country.

Birkel said...

FIVE (5) more FBI/DOJ will suffer negative employment consequences.

That brings the total to eighteen (18).

That is 18 actually suffering negative consequences as opposed to the handful who have suffered consequences from the Mueller investigation.

rcocean said...

"The FBI ordered agents not to follow any leads about anything but the most surface level crime for Clinton"

Great point. To Comey/McCabe - the goal of the email investigation was to whitewash Hillary and find her not guilty. The goal of the Trump investigation was to damage him and find him guilty. Different methods for different goals.

Mission accomplished - except for the guilty part. Its obvious now that Mueller is as dirty as Comey. He hired every Trump hating FBI employee he could, and only dumped them when he had too.

Crimso said...

"Any falsehoods told to FBI investigators is prosecutable."

And that is why, in this day and age, no court in the land should accept written summaries of responses to questions, summaries prepared by the FBI agents themselves and not a neutral third party. I really can't understand how a Federal judge did not, decades ago, demand that any such questioning that was to be used as evidence be recorded. "FBI agents? Hell, those guys would never lie!" Bullshit. And I count an FBI SA as an old friend (known him since he was 3, and he'll be 50 very soon). Him, I know. Him, I believe. Absolutely rock-solid guy, even more amazing an individual when you know the circumstances under which he grew up. And don't ask what he thinks about all of this, because I haven't asked him and won't.

Michael K said...

The fool is reduced to more personal attacks as people start to read the actual OIG report and not the "Executive Summary" written by political types.

This is just the start. It will take weeks to get all this out.

Next is to force Rpsenstein to disgorge all the hidden redactions. That leads to the FISA scandal prosecutions.

We might even make a dent in the Intelligence agency branch of the swamp.

rcocean said...

Ah yes, the strawberries. But that's where I had them...Russia collusion.

They mocked me at every turn, but I proved with Geometric logic, that Russian collusion did exist.

Captain Comey.

Jon Ericson said...

It's just about Pedro time innit?

Michael K said...

in this day and age, no court in the land should accept written summaries of responses to questions, summaries prepared by the FBI agents themselves

I expect this will be a reform probably by a court. The Flynn case should be illuminating when we get to the FBI misbehavior.

Ted Stevens lost his election. I think Flynn might have a pretty good case against Sally Yates and Strzok. I would like to see their sovereign immunity stripped.

Just like I would like to see Lois Lerner begging for her bread on the street.

bagoh20 said...

page 144 of the IG report:

"INSD assessed the FBI Midyear Exam investigation successfully determined classified information was improperly stored and transmitted on Clinton’s email server, and classified information was compromised by unauthorized individuals, to include foreign government’s [sic] or intelligence services, via cyber intrusion or other means [referring to compromises of email accounts associated with certain individuals who communicated with Clinton’s server, such as Blumenthal]. However, the structure of the investigation and prosecution team, as prescribed in the CD PG [FBI Counterintelligence Division Policy Implementation Guide], and treatment of the investigation as a traditional espionage matter rather than a criminal investigation significantly hindered the ability of the investigative team to obtain full, accurate and timely information."

Even if Trump turned out not to be the great President he is already, preventing Hillary from winning and then burying all this corruption and incompetence is one of the best things anyone has ever done for America. Although it was not an enthusiastic vote from for Trump at the time, I now see it as possibly the best vote I ever cast just for stopping the infection that was Clinton. You're welcome, America.

rcocean said...

I'm pretty cynical. But I was pretty naive about the FBI before this. I thought the FBI was either non-political or like most military/law enforcement leaned conservative.

That the FBI was stacked with Liberal trump haters, who were primary interested in helping the Democrats - and willing to break the rules to do it - was shocking.

And then there's the CIA. Brennan is an actual, fucking, commie.

Astounding.

Howard said...

Yawn. The big fish walk and some minnows are turned into cat food

rcocean said...

"I expect this will be a reform probably by a court. The Flynn case should be illuminating when we get to the FBI misbehavior."

I hope so!

Why in this age of cell phone recordings, is the FBI using "summaries"?

This isn't 50 years ago, where tape machines were the size of suitcases.

grackle said...

The only surprising aspect of this is that many people apparently expected an honest report. The Swamp always takes care of its own. Horowitz is a longstanding and valued member of the elite, who are at the head of the Get Trump parade.

I believe that Obama illegally spied on various perceived enemies – probably throughout his second term – certainly on the Trump campaign organization. Post-Obama, the leftover Swamp took up where Obama left off.

The spying on the Trump campaign was to punish an outsider irritant who they never expected to win. The spying on the transition team and Whitehouse after the election was to frantically cover up their previous misdeeds by fabricating the Russian Collusion fantasy and deposing the POTUS.

If you have the elite in Congress on both sides covering for their fellow Swamp members, the MSM in your pocket and the Deep State against you there is little chance you will survive – unless you are Trump. Trump alone has a chance to overcome them.

If they succeed in bringing Trump down I believe something really bad and irretrievable will follow. I have no idea how it might manifest itself, whether it would be subtle or obvious but if Trump is removed the actors in this sordid drama will not be happy with the aftermath.

Bob Loblaw said...

Seems it's mainly Republicans looking at jail time at the moment, but that is because of the swamp.

Oh? So far we have a bunch of investigations based on Democrat oppo research that aren't going anywhere. Papadopoulos maybe, but that's for being an unregistered agent of... Israel.

On the Democratic side we have Hillary, Comey, Rosenstein...

Totally equivalent. I put Comey on the Dem side because, well, if it walks like a duck...

wildswan said...

This report makes a lot of Trump's tweets look credible.

Lots of people who didn't know what was going on have now found out from a source they trust that the FBI was not neutral.

Lots of people who did not believe it was happening now know that FBI agents tried to affect the election.

And there's more to come.

We just have to wait while it all sinks in.

Let's be patient - these are our fellow countrymen. They've been following a familiar story in which they, the brave liberals, stand up to racists, sexists, &c. But now in a startling plot twist the liberals find that their leaders tried to steal an election a- as Trump said. Already it was uneasy to think that Harvey Weinstein and other abusers would be sitting next to Hillary at parties if she had won the election. It was a little difficult to explain why Democrats hadn't created jobs for the black community. Why was Trump the jobs train while Pelosi called for job training? And it was hard to say why taxes fell instead of rising as the Democrats predicted. And why had an anti-semite like Trump moved the US embassy to Israel's capital, Jerusalem? But now the FBI is shown to have been unfair. A major institution has damaged itself. Suddenly everything Trump said seems true or at least much more probable and everything the media has been saying seems untrue or at least much less probable. Let the sun shine in.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

https://mobile.twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1007274931640467458/photo/1>It appears that there are Republican officials not as satisfied with the IG report as some here who are trying hard to be positive about this report.

Darrell said...

You have to read the whole report--that's where the dirt is. The Dirty Democrats got to write the Executive Summary and it has more to do with covering their asses than summarizing the report.

grackle said...

The IG report found that the Anthony Weiner case agent had spotted Hillary emails on September 26, and he informed the New York Field Office on September 28. Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe knew about it the same day. He then mentioned it to Comey – and nobody mentioned it again for nearly a full month, until just prior to the election.

They felt it was “safe” to do so because according to the polls Hillary was certain to win. They were sure at that point in time that the disclosure wouldn’t hurt Hillary to the degree that she would lose to Trump.

After Hillary’s triumph they knew they would have no cause for concern. None of this would have been revealed if Hillary had won.

Birkel said...

Summary = Headline

Report = 31st paragraph of the news article

madAsHell said...

C'mon 500!!!

Jon Ericson said...

Pedro will come.

FIDO said...

I am expecting that there will be about 20 FBI agents who 'seek other career options' or 'retire early' as a result of this fiasco.

They won't be cashiered outright because they were not media beacons like Strozk or Comey or McCabe...but they provided enough support that their careers are essentially over as compromised in the fine print. All those guys taking in free meals, dates, drinks, vacations...in return for leaks.

One has to wonder what these 'nonpublic social venues' were. Were they anything like that London Charity Event with the half naked groped hostesses? Considering thestate of the NY AGs office as an example of , I wouldn't put anything past the press to get the anti-Trump goodies.

Dan Hossley said...

That paragraph was the product of the draft review procedure. Clearly written by a committee.

FIDO said...

Shrug. Not everyone in America is as obdurate to evidence, facts and inferences as Inga and her ilk are.

We could have a video of Hillary, cackling drunkenly as she was getting money from Sheik Iwannarapeyourdaughter for a visa as Sec State and Inga would believe that this was 'just a loan repayment' because Nick Kristof said it in the NYT...without evidence.

walter said...

Achilles said...And finally, the original statement mentioned that President Obama had been in an email exchange with Hillary; his name was removed.
--
Makes sense when combined with Comey's admitted ass kissing of Obama in his book.

Achilles said...

walter said...
Achilles said...And finally, the original statement mentioned that President Obama had been in an email exchange with Hillary; his name was removed.
--
Makes sense when combined with Comey's admitted ass kissing of Obama in his book.

Who was president during this investigation?

Oh yeah...

There was a criminal president.

If you count Clinton you have two admitted felons as the last 2 democrat presidents.

Michael K said...

Blogger Howard said...
Yawn. The big fish walk and some minnows are turned into cat food


I fear you could be correct in which case we will be another step closer to a violent revolution.

I'm still hopeful the system can clean itself, if it is pushed hard enough.

Otherwise we have The French Revolution.

Jon Ericson said...

Let them eat fish.

FullMoon said...

Jon Ericson said... [hush]​[hide comment]

It's just about Pedro time innit?


May be on a four day 5150 due to over excitement

madAsHell said...

Otherwise we have The French Revolution.

I share your sentiment, but you can still buy a quality S&W, or Colt AR-15 for under $800. A box of 50 9mm cartridges are under $12.

Maybe Cabelas is fueling the revolution, but nobody is buying.

Well.....I might be buying.

Anonymous said...

I have been reading the executive summary and without much reading between the lines it is clear that Trey Gowdy is correct in saying that insufficient evidence of Clinton's "gross negligence" was not found because it wasn't looked for hard enough. If a real investigation had been conducted there would have been no question about indicting Clinton. No jury in this land would remain unconvinced that Clinton clearly "intended" to use her server for classified information. It defies logic and common sense that she did not.

rcocean said...

Isn't it amazing how this character "Peter Stzrok" who talks about "insurance policies" and "Not letting Trump get elected" is somehow he in the Center of everything?

He's like a fucking Left-wing FBI Forest Gump.

Hillary's Email, Trump-Russia, Flynn, the Mueller Investigation.

Hell, he'd be "heading up" the Mueller investigation right now, if people hadn't blown the whistle.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

I like how they say "No bias". It's all bias. It's ALL political.
The STrozk texts are unfreaking real.

They thought Hillary would win and happily willfully covered for her.

She's a felon.

Jon Ericson said...

Executive summary not written by, but sounds like Andrew McCarthy.
"Go easy on my friends." "We all have alibis." "Nothing to see here." "All is well." "The FBI is a fine, fine institution." "Mistakes were made."

rcocean said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Hard to reconcile the headline claims of "No Bias' with these paragraphs in the executive summary: "We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia

A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election
investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”, it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects."


Though the IG passes some of this off as Russia related remember Strzock is a key player in the Hillary "investigation".

If this made it into the executive sumary imagine what the body of the report is going to reveal when we get there.

rcocean said...

Like Darrell says, you have to look at the DETAILS and skip the Exec Summary.

The IG Report makes it clear that Comey and his gang NEVER wanted to find Hillary guilty. The whole investigation was a whitewash from the beginning. The problem to be solved was: How do we investigate Hillary - yet find her innocent so she can be elected?

And Comey and his gang found a way to square that circle - primarily by giving people immunity, letting them destroy evidence, investigating as little as possible, and then twisting the law to justify a "we could never convict her, so what the use?" conclusion.

Anonymous said...

Strzock is toast.

chickelit said...

“Hell, he'd be "heading up" the Mueller investigation right now, if people hadn't blown the whistle.”

And his little gum-toothed floozie would be cheering him on: “My hero!”

Loren W Laurent said...

A few will actually slog through the hundreds of pages and read the facts contained in the report, and then apply their own analysis.

Many will just accept the summary's opinion on what to believe about those facts, as further condensed and summarized in the NYT and WashingtonPost and in their favored cable and internet chop-shops.

The really smart ones will not bother with any of this and just wait for the relevant Snopes article.

-LWL

mockturtle said...

We're supposed to believe Billy just wanted to talk golf and grandkids?

The temperature in Phoenix was something like 112 degrees but he was there playing golf?

To say there was no 'direct evidence' that he was there to influence the AG, may be technically true but there is enough circumstantial evidence to convince most juries. And she, under the circumstances, should have recused herself.


Inga...Allie Oop said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Matt Sablan said...

It Stzork hadn't been sleeping with Page, would he have been as sympathetic to her attempts to interfere? Likewise, if she hadn't been sleeping with him, would he have felt the need to show as much loyalty to Clinton?

I honestly feel like Stzork was being groomed for something greater at the FBI, and that's why they haven't fired him yet. They wanted him to be the next big boss or at least up there. Alas.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“The really smart ones will not bother with any of this and just wait for the relevant Snopes article.”

Stop bashing Althouse for linking to that Snopes article last week. You’re just jealous you don’t have a successful blog like her. Hater.

walter said...

In this particular investigation, wonder what the metric is to determine no systemic bias...Wray wants to discuss other areas less prone to it.
Terrorism thwarted!

Rabel said...

"The IG Report makes it clear that Comey and his gang NEVER wanted to find Hillary guilty. The whole investigation was a whitewash from the beginning. The problem to be solved was: How do we investigate Hillary - yet find her innocent so she can be elected?

And Comey and his gang found a way to square that circle - primarily by giving people immunity, letting them destroy evidence, investigating as little as possible, and then twisting the law to justify a "we could never convict her, so what the use?" conclusion."

Excellent summary. There's still a question of why? Orders or politics or megalomania.

Jon Ericson said...

Frau Inga:
Did you have trouble downloading the new talking points?
Or were they just a bit late?
I thought you fell in.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Frau Inga:
Did you have trouble downloading the new talking points?
Or were they just a bit late?
I thought you fell in.”

Sorry I was otherwise occupied with the nice man who fixed my dishwasher.

Big Mike said...

Glenn Reynolds has, I think, the right position on the report:

“It’s 500 pages long, it’s got some serious dirt in it, but overall it’s a modified limited hangout. There’s much worse stuff still waiting to be reported. Or not reported.”

I am cynical enough to believe that they’ve tossed us a couple chunks of red meat in hopes that they can continue to hide the really serious stuff. I lived in or around Washington for almost 50 years; the games are old, the script is utterly predictable, but it’s still effective.

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

There are two incompatible interpretations being peddled here. First, it was a whitewash. Second, it is a devastating indictment of X.

mockturtle said...

Walter writes: n this particular investigation, wonder what the metric is to determine no systemic bias...Wray wants to discuss other areas less prone to it.
Terrorism thwarted!


What I have inferred from what I've read so far, systemic bias isn't being denied. What is being denied is that the systemic bias influenced the investigation. Really.

MD Greene said...

From CNN: The report from Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded that the prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton case were "consistent" and not affected by bias or other improper actions.

Hahahahaha.

Time to examine all the IG reports from the relevant years.

In a democracy, respect for the rule of law only works if people believe it is applies to all citizens -- rich or poor, politically connected or out of the loop, one political party or the other, public employees or private citizens.

Who will clean our Augean stables?

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

One other odd thing here is the fuss over the delay to work on the emails on Weiner's laptop. The FBI may have reasonably concluded that it was very unlikely to produce new data in a case that had already been closed, as proved to be true.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“We found no evidence that Lynch and former President Clinton discussed the (email) investigation or engaged in other inappropriate discussion during their tarmac meeting,"

IG Horowitz

Sorry if someone has already mentioned this tidbit.

Birkel said...

ARM,
The FBI concluded that other people outside the 'small group; now had access to the evidence that Hillary clearly violated the law.

You're welcome.

Birkel said...

Two people participated in a conversation.
Neither admitted anything.

That IS NOT evidence of what was said.

Matt Sablan said...

"The FBI may have reasonably concluded that it was very unlikely to produce new data in a case that had already been closed, as proved to be true."

-- Unfortunately, that's not what the IG determined. They determined the FBI provided no valid reason for the delay.

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

It's a judgement call. The FBI's judgement proved correct.

rcocean said...

The real questions are:

Why did we get a special prosecutor to look into Russia-Trump when no crime was committed?

And NOT get a special prosecutor when Hillary committed a crime with her private email server?

And the answer to the first question is: Rosenstein.

Which brings up questions that still have not answered - publicly.

-Why was Rosenstein appointed Deputy AG?
-Why did the Democrats love him so much and approve him immediately?
-Why did Session immediately recuse himself and let Rosenstein take over Russia-Trump?
-Why did Rosenstein give Mueller a blank check and rubber-stamp his expanded scope?
-Why has Rosenstein been fighting Congress tooth and nail to not release stuff that makes the FBI or Comey or Mueller look bad?
-Why is Sessions backing Rosenstein?

Birkel said...

ARM,
Correct in what?

rcocean said...

Rosenstein seems to be like Peter Strzok. An obscure person who mysteriously is the Center of EVERYTHING.

Why?

rcocean said...

Matthew: Unfortunately, that's not what the IG determined. They determined the FBI provided no valid reason for the delay.

Another excellent point.

Anonymous said...

I have gotten through the executive summary and the first three chapters. A lot of fine distinctions being made about was it classified or wasn't it when the 800 pound gorilla is that Hillary was knowingly using an illegal server for government correspondence. Lots of ass covering and "lack of evidence" because events were planned that way. IG did a good job of presenting facts for "management " to act upon. Recommendations are your usual marshmallow fluffy stuff.

Some significant damage is going to come from the report : Stzock, Page and three others have been criminally referred; Comey has been crushed; obstruction of justice in Comey firing is no longer a viable concept; McCabe will end up in court most likely; the FBI/DOJ don't have a leg to stand on not releasing material to Congress.

I'll take what we got today as a major victory with a lot more clean up needed and remember HILLARY IS NOT PRESIDENT!

Big Mike said...

@ARM, not at all incompatible. As I commented at 8:55, there’s red meat in the report but only enough to get people to stop digging for the real stuff. For instance, Weiner’s laptop. If there really was classified information on his laptop, he and Huma should have been looking at lengthy jail terms. The relevant regulations DO NOT accept “I didn’t have criminal intent” as a defense.

Sebastian said...

"the prosecutorial decisions in the Clinton case were "consistent""

They were not consistent with precedent, for the simple reason that Hill's use of an entire private server to evade completely the relevant legal requirements to safeguard all official communications was unprecedented.

They were also not consistent with the actual law, which simply provided sanctions for anyone mishandling official documents, regardless of intent.

They were also not consistent with precedent in cases of minor officials and service members being held accountable for far more minor violations of records laws.

The only explanation for the inconsistency is the pervasive and brazen bias, which the IG amply documents.

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

The left can reasonably argue that the most problematic double standard here is that Comey broke protocol to hammer Clinton in a nationally publicized speech but nothing was said about the then ongoing problems in the Trump campaign, which led to actual indictments.

mockturtle said...

As Gowdy apparently pointed out, finding no evidence [because they didn't look for it] is not the same as there being no evidence. These are lawyers, after all. They think they can fool people with clever technicalities. Many--maybe most--of us aren't that easily fooled.

Birkel said...

ARM,

I agree that you can ignore the eighteen (18) firings/demotions/quittings within the DOJ/FBI but I think that's a harder sell than do you.

I think people recognize the truth.

Good luck.

MD Greene said...

Inga said: “'We found no evidence that Lynch and former President Clinton discussed the (email) investigation or engaged in other inappropriate discussion during their tarmac meeting,' -- IG Horowitz"

This is a joke, right?

I don't blame Loretta Lynch. It just so happened that Clinton had been playing a little golf in the 100-degree Arizona heat, and he just happened also to be at the airport when he learned that his dear friend, Ms. Lynch, was leaving in a private plane. He could not pass up the opportunity to meet his old friend (and compromise her integrity) in a chat in her plane before it took off. She was too nice a lady to tell him to FO. Pres. Clinton's goal -- to shred her credibility in the email investigation -- was accomplished.

So, sure, the IG couldn't make a connection. Bill Clinton isn't stupid. You don't have to be a conspiracy monger to see what happened there.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Comey hammered Clinton, sort of, switched the words around to let her off the hook, as planned, because institutionalized bias at the FBI.... and then let her off the hook. AS planned. She is a felon.

btw- if the FBI is mostly OK, why is everyone expected to take training now?

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Smashed hard drives and devices, bleach bit, removed sim cards. all after her stuff was subpoenaed. Anyone else would be in a large amount of trouble.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

ARM - per Clinton and her private server - the FBI's judgment call was not correct. it was corrupt.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Mockturtle said: What I have inferred from what I've read so far, systemic bias isn't being denied. What is being denied is that the systemic bias influenced the investigation. Really.

Wray is also trying to thread the needle with the word "appearance."

You see, it only appears that the FBI showed bias. Really.

Because if it appears to be bias, we can magically say - "oh yeah -there is only an appearance of it, it's not real."

horse shit.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“She was too nice a lady to tell him to FO. Pres. Clinton's goal -- to shred her credibility in the email investigation -- was accomplished.

So, sure, the IG couldn't make a connection. Bill Clinton isn't stupid. You don't have to be a conspiracy monger to see what happened there.”

I agree.

walter said...

Blogger Dickin'Bimbos@Home said...
btw- if the FBI is mostly OK, why is everyone expected to take training now?
--
Odd that...but I hear they are hiring the same firm Starbucks used.
Or maybe a 12 step program to resist media bribes.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

btw - Strozk does not need to be investigated. He must be fired and prosecuted.
Oh no wait. We must waste millions of tax payer dollars getting to the bottom of it with a pointless over-price BS investigation.



Geez Inga - do you ever leave?

Inga...Allie Oop said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Geez Inga - do you ever leave?”

I was gone for over two hours thanking a nice man for fixing my dishwasher, but I hurried back here as fast as I could. What ? I can’t be here 24/7 ya know. Sheesh.

Jon Ericson said...

Staring at the pile of poop next to the "holiday tree".

Original Mike said...

“We found no evidence that Lynch and former President Clinton discussed the (email) investigation or engaged in other inappropriate discussion during their tarmac meeting.”

We asked Lynch and she said, “Oh no, didn’t talk about it”.
We asked Clinton and he said, “Oh no, didn’t talk about it.”.

Birkel said...

I pay the people who fix small appliances.
Some people take two hours.
'Payment' is a funny thing.

Achilles said...

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...
The left can reasonably argue that the most problematic double standard here is that Comey broke protocol to hammer Clinton in a nationally publicized speech but nothing was said about the then ongoing problems in the Trump campaign, which led to actual indictments.


Notice ARM and Inga never actually claim Clinton didn't commit the crimes.

Just that she wasn't indicted.

Because they know she is a criminal.

Bay Area Guy said...

I was born in a cross-fire hurricane
And I howled at the morning driving rain
But it's all right now, in fact, it's a gas
But it's all right. I'm Jumpin' Jack Flash
It's a gas, gas, gas

I was raised by a toothless, bearded hag,
I was schooled with a strap right across my back
But it's all right now, in fact, it's a gas
But it's all right, I'm Jumpin' Jack Flash
It's a gas, gas, gas


Jumpin' Jack Flash, The Rolling Stones (1969)

Lucien said...

I'm sure I'm commenter #600 but what the hell. I'm struck by the fact that NYT and CNN are leading with "nothing to see here" while Fox News is leading with 5 FBI/DOJ given criminal referrals and "FBI agent calls Trump voters lower/middle class POS". So coastal elite Democrats can relax that this was a nothing-burger, while blue collar types will be outraged that the Deep State despises them and their representatives, got caught, and are going to jail for trying to give the American people the middle finger.

As Scott Adams says, same screen, different movies. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“I pay the people who fix small appliances.
Some people take two hours.
'Payment' is a funny thing.”

Birkel!

You said you wouldn’t respond to any of my comments ever again! You couldn’t help yourself, lol. Mockturtle will be disappointed in you. Tsk tsk. Your moratorium on me didn’t even last 24 hours.

John henry said...

They didn't find any "evidence" of bias but immediately after saying that the report says:

"However, we also did not identify a consistent or persuasive explanation for the FBI's failure to act for almost a month after learning of potential Midyear-related emails
on the Weiner laptop."

So no evidence of bias but no other explanation.

John Henry

Lucien said...

I should add that when I say Democrat coastal elites can call this a nothing-burger because CNN said so, ARM is not a Democrat coastal elite. He's a moderate. It says so right there on the tin.

FullMoon said...

The Justice Department’s Inspector General report states that former FBI Director James Comey and other bureau witnesses claimed Hillary Clinton’s legal team “intimidated” DOJ attorneys to place unusual restrictions on the bureau’s investigation of her private email server.

The report says, “Comey, Baker, and other FBI witnesses told us that they believed the prosecutors were overly cautious about obtaining the laptops because they were intimidated by high-powered defense counsel like [Beth] Wilkinson.”

The report also describes other FBI witnesses who made the same claim — including agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, whose text messages in the report revealed their political bias against Donald Trump becoming president.

“Some FBI witnesses told us, consistent with text message exchanges between [Peter] Strzok and [Lisa] Page, that the FBI was concerned that the line [Network Security Division] prosecutors were intimidated by the high-powered attorneys representing Clinton and her senior aides and, as a result, did not negotiate aggressively with them,” the report states.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/14/comey-claimed-doj-intimidated-clinton-lawyers/

Original Mike said...

”The Justice Department’s Inspector General report states that former FBI Director James Comey and other bureau witnesses claimed Hillary Clinton’s legal team “intimidated” DOJ attorneys to place unusual restrictions on the bureau’s investigation of her private email server.”

Threats from the soon-to-be President are hard to ignore.

Bruce Hayden said...

Blogger Drago said...
"Also remember that it was Sally Yates who specifically went against the law and dept policy by forbidding the OIG to pursue inquiries within the DOJ National Security Division...the very division where the FISA 702 abuses in the DOJ side were ocurring..."

I should add that this OIG ban also covered the Clinton email "matter" and the Trump/Russia probe.

Ray - SoCal said...

Worried of threats of retaliation by a person famous for never forgetting a slight?

And even having a spreadsheet rating political supporters?

“The spreadsheet not only contained those who did and didn't endorse Clinton in 2008 but any favours they had done and a betrayal rating from 1-7.

US Senator Claire McCaskill rates a 7.”
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/books-magazines/hillarys-betrayers-ranked-in-spreadsheet-according-to-book-hrc-state-secrets-and-the-rebirth-of-hillary-clinton/news-story/453cb45dafd51525cf294224effd7757

Bruce Hayden said...

I actually think that Comey was being played by his top people, and, most notably McCabe. We have other places where McCabe seemed to be running Comey around in circles. Which I think might well have been the case with the Carlos Danger laptop. Comey said that McCabe telling him in Sept didn't register. And maybe alluded that that may have been because of how he was briefed on it. Which, I think probably involved McCabe, responsible for the day to day operation of the FBI, probably just included it in the middle of a long list of items he was bringing to Comey's attention, knowing that it would be lost in the details. I admit to having done that before on several occasions. For example, at one point I added a 151st reference to a list, then alphabetized the list so that it would be easier to understand (prior to that the list had been chronological in time of insertion). The new item wasn't material, just additive, so there was no legal duty to call it out. I was actually deposed about it a half a decade later, in an attempt to prove unclean hands. It passed with flying colors. In any case, from all the text messages, it really appears that McCade really was the ringleader If the pro-Clinton/anti-Trump cabal at the top of the FBI. It was in his office that they discussed the "insurance policy". And, the IG seemed to suggest that they may have been just trying to run out the clock, with the election a week away. The problem was that McCabe apparently hadn't mentioned the Weiner laptop to Comey in the intervening month, and if it showed up after the election, with the FBI having sat on it for over a month, and Crooked Hillary had won, her win would have been tainted. So, McCabe CYAed himself by telling Comey in late October, putting the target on his back. Except that I think that Comey realized at that point that he had been sandbagged by McCabe, and panicked. If he said nothing, and Clinton won, it would have been the FBI, and not just the cabal, led by McCabe, who had deceived the American public.

grackle said...

Why is Sessions backing Rosenstein?

A plausible theory:

Sessions was/is a Swamp member of good standing. At that time a member of the US Senate, Sessions realized early on that Trump was wildly popular among his base constituency in Alabama. Partly out of the benefit of riding Trump’s popularity coattails, partly out of a desire for survival against the Trump wave breaking over his state, Sessions signed on.

But Sessions, like any good Swamp member, never liked the Trump agenda. The status quo was too personally rewarding for Sessions to be in favor of upending the Swamp. And like everyone else he never expected Trump to win so what would be the harm?

But Holy Shit! Trump actually WON!

Sessions is a poser. Trump insults him on any excuse. Trump seems to have decided that because of the political fallout that would inevitably result that now is not the time to fire Sessions. In the meantime Trump is going to regularly and publicly humiliate Sessions.

Readers – most people in a similar position and with the resources Sessions has for a comfortable life other than his present job in the Whitehouse would have resigned by now. But Sessions has an agenda – get rid of Trump – and resigning would not help him fulfill that agenda.

Bruce Hayden said...

"Worried of threats of retaliation by a person famous for never forgetting a slight?"

I think that this is underappreciated. Strzok was one of two agents to interview Crooked Hillary. One of the things that he and Page discussed in their text messages was that he was going to treat her with kid gloves, because he very much did not want to be on her shit list, once she became President. This is a woman who never forgot a slight, and to the extent possible, got her revenge. She is famously vendictive, and that fear of her, much more than political leanings, was a lot more of a factor in the FBI going soft on her and her minions. Little love for her, but a lot of fear.

Francisco D said...

This has been an interesting speculative thread. As more info is analyzed and discovered, there will be more speculation.

Talk is cheap. People at the FBI and DOJ losing their jobs and careers is meaningful. People going to jail is meaningful. Keep count.

Also keep count of the childish and inane ramblings from the usual suspects.

Be patient. It is going to be fun.

Bruce Hayden said...

Some of the leftist here have claimed that Crooked Hillary was exonerated, as were the DoJ prosecutors and FBI agents working her case. Not even close. As any atty here will tell you, a double negative doesn't equal a positive. Saying that they couldn't prove that there was illegal or political bias shown in the investigation of her email server doesn't mean that there wasn't any. And, the Executive Summary is a sanitized political document. The actual evidence is pretty damming - but isn't conclusive, which is all, really, that the IG was saying there He laid out the damming facts in the body of the report, and then refuses to make the obvious conclusions in the sanitized Executive Summary. Little different from what Comey did in his June, 2016, closing of the Clinton email investigation.

Oso Negro said...

I read the whole report. It led me to think that the progressive mindset is so thoroughly ingrained in most of the members of the government that they are not really cognizant of it. No more than fish are aware of the fact that they are swimming in water. The contents of the report will be interpreted differently by the different sides and we will move closer to civil conflict. It is amazing to me that people who are able to be so sympathetic to Islam, for example, can't understand that the people they detest who are much closer to home may rise up against them.

Matt Sablan said...

"The Justice Department’s Inspector General report states that former FBI Director James Comey and other bureau witnesses claimed Hillary Clinton’s legal team “intimidated” DOJ attorneys to place unusual restrictions on the bureau’s investigation of her private email server."

-- I'd... I'd consider that bias.

Unknown said...

The biggie remains that, but for Comey's repeated insubordination, Clinton gets the win.

Matt Sablan said...

"The biggie remains that, but for Comey's repeated insubordination, Clinton gets the win."

-- We'll never know for sure, but I doubt it.

Birkel said...

Carly Simon called.

Birkel said...

Everybody knows the fix was in.
Democrats know and are largely unperturbed that Hillary broke the law.
Republicans know Hillary broke the law but are resigned to the fact that the Deep State will likely win.

Independents will get the news because the gatekeepers have lost their ability to stop the signal.

The simple fact is that none of this plays in favor of the status quo that the eGOP and the Democrats are working to protect. No amount of online silliness or MSM faux-ignorance is going to stop people from understanding the endemic corruption these documents reveal.

Unknown said...

Democrats are more concerned about the crook that won ...

Jaq said...

Democrats are more concerned about the crook that won ...

If Democrats had 1% of the evidence against Trump that there is against Hillary, he would be rotting in a jail cell. Democrats nominated Hillary knowing full well that she used all of her previous positions to enrich herself and that to maintain power, she enabled her sexual predator husband, who was also a thief.

Jaq said...

The biggie remains that, but for Comey’s repeated insubordination, Clinton gets the win.

Yes, he had been damn well ordered to clean up Hillary’s mess and he was insubordinate, didn’t he know that his betters had cut a. deal on the tarmac of that airport?

Jaq said...

"Also remember that it was Sally Yates who specifically went against the law and dept policy by forbidding the OIG to pursue inquiries within the DOJ National Security Division...the very division where the FISA 702 abuses in the DOJ side were ocurring..."

I should add that this OIG ban also covered the Clinton email “matter" and the Trump/Russia probe.


Not to mention that no IG was appointed for the Department of State during Hillary’s time there. A simple action that could have spared the nation the morass that has been Hillary’s run for president.

Jaq said...

Hard to reconcile the headline claims of “No Bias' with these paragraphs in the executive summary:

I think that what he said was that there was no hard evidence of bias. I don’t think there was any reason given to support the inference that there was “no bias.” If we are going to start inferring stuff, I think the inference of bias is more heavily supported, but this is how it works with our “justice. system”:For Democrats, you have to drag hard evidence out of the stonewalling deep state, and without the dead girl in the bed “live boy” is never a problem, as Gerry Studds, still an inference of not just not guilty, but innocent is supported. With a Republican, you can infer everything about his guilt from the R after his name.

Bruce Hayden said...

"The biggie remains that, but for Comey's repeated insubordination, Clinton gets the win."

Not in the least. But keep dreaming. You are suggesting that if Crooked Hillary had gotten away with committing literally thousands of felonies, as she legally did, thanks to essentially orders from Obama and AG Lynch, then she would have been President. The problem was that by the time that Comey was first insubordinate, and violated DoJ policy, the specifics of her crimes were fairly well known, and that last week or so, there were increasing rumblings of a revolt in the ranks at the FBI, where the specifics of the coverup would have been leaked, and leaked big time. We were hearing that it was going to happen any day now, it was that imminent. Don't know if you remember this, but the anti-Clintinistas were all ready chanting "Lock Her Up!" Comey got ahead of this with his June insubordination. Being a somewhat decent attorney, Comey and his staff were able to weasel word her expected be ration to cover up that the DoJ wasn't cooperating with the FBI, and wouldn't prosecute, regardless. This way, Crooked Hillary had a fig leaf of a technical exoneration, instead of the lead stories having been all the dirt that ultimately came out about the Midyear Exam investigation. Dirt that would likely have been dumped within days.

As I read the tea leaves so far, at the top levels, the only somewhat honorable people were Comey and Priestap. Clinton very brazenly flaunted the law, doing something that she knew was highly illegal, knowing that she was untouchable. Which she essentially was. And, we find out she was very likely doing it for monetary advantage, to cover up their pay-to-play scheme that ultimately netted her family and their foundation well over a billion dollars. She didn't want the nosy Republicans in Congress, or nosy watchdog groups line Judicial Watch, finding out the gory details. And thanks to her use and control of that private server, they never did. Obama, Lynch, Yates, etc, figured that they could just run out the clock, and Crooked Hillary would be President, and could clean up her own mess. This wasn't the only time that the White House told the DoJ not to prosecute, and they didn't. Indeed, it had become fairly common in the "scandal free" Obama Administration to have the DoJ bury the dirt and scandal throughout the Administration. Think about what happened with Fast and Furious, Lois Lerner and the IRS, etc. There was a lot of dirt to bury, because Obama had sold departments to constituency groups (with the biggest, most lucrative, dept going to the Clintons), and allowed them to run them as private fiefdoms. The problem was that the supposedly independent and honest FBI was being expected to go along with the program here, and pretend that there was nothing to investigate, when the rank and file knew that there was a whitewash going on, and their beloved agency was being used to cover for Clinton's brazen lawlessness. Comey is the one who seemed to do what he thought best for the FBI, as an institution, and for its good name, ahead of what his bosses wanted him to do. He would go along with cover ups and witch hunts, as long as they didn't harm the FBI. That is where he seemed to draw the line.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Bias for political reasons is ALL of it. 100%

Wray moving the goal posts and whining and pointing to thwarted terror attacks is just so much bull shit.,

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

"No bias" is right up there with Peter Strtozk decision to change the wording for HIllary.

chickelit said...

Grackle wrote: “Sessions is a poser. Trump insults him on any excuse. Trump seems to have decided that because of the political fallout that would inevitably result that now is not the time to fire Sessions. In the meantime Trump is going to regularly and publicly humiliate Sessions.”

Sessions is the real hardliner in the fight against illegal immigration. It was Sessions who was spoke up about visa abuse by STEM employers — years before Trump did (and Trump even waffled once, saying it was a great thing). Trump only cares about his stupid wall. Sessions is the true bad cop in the larger immigration struggle: sanctuary cities, confronting wayward states like California.

I predict that Trump will eventually go soft on immigration, once the moderate and GOPe regain their voice and begin arguing that unchecked immigration is “good” for American businesses because demographics, you see. This fight has barely begun.

Unknown said...

I agree with chickelit regarding Trump & immigration. In fact, I think if he gets some part of the wall built it will happen faster and will be even softer. After such a robust erection, so to say, a flaccid policy is just the natural order of things.

Drago said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
mockturtle said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Birkel said...

Let's see, shall we? The Republicans who are retiring will largely be replaced by much more conservative Republicans. Throw in the fact that the incumbents who lose are already replaced by more conservative Republicans. And from that chickelit and 5794 think Congress will go more the route of the Chamber of Commerce?

Will the newly elected 5 or 6 Republican senators, taking the number to 56 or 57 overall, give more power to the eGOP 'moderates' or will it make their pleas less effective? My bet is that Lindsay Graham will have a lot of TV interviews and fewer allies.

The pessimism for policy victories is wrongheaded. Call you congress and write letters too. Conservatism is winning and now is no time to go wobbly.

«Oldest ‹Older   401 – 585 of 585   Newer› Newest»