September 24, 2017

"Some of the words of the national anthem are white supremacist."

Said Stephen Henderson, editorial page editor of the Detroit Free Press, on "Meet the Press" today. Rich Lowry, editor of the National Review, had just said:
The president is not randomly attacking these players. He is attacking them because they're kneeling during the national anthem. And the national anthem is not a white-supremacist symbol.
When Henderson responded with "Some of the words of the national anthem are white supremacist," it surprised me. I thought about the first verse — the only verse that's sung at games and the only verse I have uploaded to memory — bombs bursting in air? dawn's early light? land of the free? — and briefly considered whether "land of the free" celebrates white supremacy before vaguely remembering reading something about some other verse.

A quick google got me to "Star-Spangled Bigotry: The Hidden Racist History of the National Anthem" at The Root, which I read and puzzled over. There's a line in the third verse, "No refuge could save the hireling and slave," which The Root says exults at the idea of Americans killing freed slaves who were fighting with the British in the War of 1812. "'The Star-Spangled Banner' is as much a patriotic song as it is a diss track to black people who had the audacity to fight for their freedom."

Wikipedia says: "A diss track or diss song is a song primarily intended to disrespect people," and gives examples, including John Lennon's "How Do You Sleep?" which lashed out at Paul McCartney. Every line of that — from "Those freaks was right when they said you was dead" to "You live with straights" — was aimed at Paul. "The Star-Spangled Banner" may have one line about slaves in verse 3, but even that one line isn't aimed at slaves. It's aimed, like the rest of the song, at the British.

I'm not going to attempt to resolve the question of what was in the mind of Francis Scott Key when he mentioned slaves in that verse we don't sing at sports events and maybe don't even ever sing,* but here's a beautiful monument to him in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco:


CC — King of Hearts

Is that on the list of tear-downs?

Back to "Meet the Press." Stephen Henderson said, "Some of the words of the national anthem are white supremacist," and Rich Lowry seemed surprised: "You think the national anthem is racist?"

Henderson said: "I think this is a country whose history is racist, whose history is steeped in white supremacy, and the anthem reflects that in its very words." He had no chance to explain which words or to argue about why they are racist, which might make us think that he's only making the weaker argument that because the country has been racist, the song must reflect that racism.

Lowry's parry — "Well, it's also a nation with very important ideals that have worn down those injustices over time and created a more just society" — makes it most likely that viewers will think Henderson was only making the weaker argument.

Meanwhile, on State of the Union, the host Jake Tapper was talking to Nina Turner, a former Ohio state senator who's now a CNN commentator, and she said it was "utterly ridiculous" for Trump "to pick up this fight" about protesting the anthem. Tapper said he had "a feeling" she's right and that "this is going to drive people to Kaepernick's side." Tapper asked Turner if she thought "it's an accident that he's talking about predominantly African-American players." She said:
Not at all. Look at his audience. It's no accident. He doesn't do anything by accident, he's very strategic about this. 
So Trump is not the chaotic, impulsive, crazy man?! He's got it all planned out. Turner went all Scott Adams there for a second. She continues:
And this kind of (INAUDIBLE) is right up his alley. He loves when all this chaos and confusion -- this feeds his agenda. 
Oh, so it only seems like "chaos and confusion," but that's what's so deviously strategic about it. Maybe Turner got an advance copy of Scott Adams's forthcoming book.

_____________________

* The song has 4 verses. Have you ever heard anyone sing them all? I have a feeling I've heard at least one other verse sung, but the 3d verse is completely alien to me and, I presume, to the vast majority of American sports spectators who care about the opening ceremony. I went looking for the full version, and this was the finest one I found, by Tom Callinan (even though he botches the word "hireling" in the crucial line):



Midway through that recording, I suddenly wondered whether I was enjoying it because of whiteness. Colin Kaepernick is not going to allow us to go back to our lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.

213 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 213 of 213
Ron Winkleheimer said...

And now I see someone on the local news explaining that the president should be focusing on a long list of issues, not inserting himself into something as petty as football players protesting by refusing to stand for the national anthem.

Hint, he isn't doing that because he thinks his side is besting Trump on this issue.

Ron Winkleheimer said...

Apparently, we have a crumbling infrastructure that needs fixing.

I thought Barack Obama fixed that.

JAORE said...

"It's a shame that DJT and so many other white dudes have small cocks.


Those of us who are well hung, PBJ, don't go on and on about it.

That's what our women are for."

Judy says she refuses to advertise for me.

Bad Lieutenant said...

Judy says she refuses to advertise for me.

What, and miss a chance to brag to her friends? In the words of a Bugs Bunny character, dooon't yooou belieeeve iiit!

Look her women friends in the eye sometime. They know.

Rance Fasoldt said...

The second verse is where the question in the first is answered. Does the Star-Spangled banner yet wave?
Yes. Yes, it does.
"..Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected, now shines on the stream:
'Tis the star-spangled banner: O, long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!"

Known Unknown said...

I was talking about our societal and institutional racism.

So, how do we fix those things?

Rusty said...

"It's a shame that DJT and so many other white dudes have small cocks."

Speak for yourself. Mine won't return the Koch brothers calls. That's how big it is.

Douglas B. Levene said...

I have a suggestion. Let's replace the Star Spangled Banner (which, at 4 octaves, is impossible for any ordinary person to sing) with the Battle Hymn of the Republic. The Battle Hymn is not only much more melodic but it would piss off both the anti-Christian left and the Neo-Confederates, and so it would be a win/win.

MikeR said...

http://www.esquire.com/sports/a12461075/nfl-national-anthem-protest/
Wow. They really doubled down.
I am all curious to see what will happen. I can actually imagine football bankrupting itself with these kind of antics. You can't do this to half your customers.

Anonymous said...

Douglas: The Battle Hymn is not only much more melodic but it would piss off both the anti-Christian left and the Neo-Confederates, and so it would be a win/win.

When I was a kid we regularly sang both The Battle Hymn of the Republic and Dixie at school assemblies, without pissing off anybody.

gadfly said...

So "hirelings" were Hessian mercenaries manning the British front lines and "slaves" were the 4,000 or so blacks freed by the British to fight as sailors and marines on their warships. That is the history that is what the NFL millionaires are ignoring.

Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

Anybody with a job is either a hireling or a slave, and that rules out a very large percentage of blacks.

Joseph W. said...

The innocuous reading fits an Irish rebel song, "Boolavogue."

"Look out for hirelings, King George of England!
Search every kingdom that breeds a slave.
For Father Murphy, from the County Wexford,
Sweeps o'er the land like a mighty wave."

...that dates from the 1798 rebellion, long before the "Star-Spangled Banner" was written, and had nothing to do with black slaves.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 213 of 213   Newer› Newest»