Despite so many false statements and lies, total and complete vindication...and WOW, Comey is a leaker!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 9, 2017
Yesterday's silence was effective. This tweet is getting maximum attention, and the foregoing silence gives resonance to today's message: Comey didn't lay a hand on him.
Posts
218 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 218 of 218@ Chuck
Why do you insist on using homophobic and misogynistic terms to attack other commenters? You are giving other lifelong Republicans a bad name. Please resist your reptilian impulses.
Chuck says:
I never apologized. I had nothing to apologize for. And you, perhaps more than anybody, have gotten repeated bitch-slappings for your other misquotes, mischaracterizations, and misrepresentations of things you say that I wrote. Like this time.
Get to work, chief. Find a quote from me where I "apologized." And be quick about it.
I don't expect, and I don't get, any "gentle treatment" from the ever-descending Althouse commentariat. I have zero expectations from, or for, you in particular. You have tried to make this business with Greta van Susteren a repeated theme from your end and it always ends the same way, with my turning you into a digital punching bag.
6/9/17, 12:26 PM
Bitch slapped? Haha, you been listinin' to rap songs, Chickie? Watchin'lots of R rated movies?
Digital punching bag? Good one. Your punching power sub light featherweight.
Fact is, everybody laughing because you are so easily manipulated into saying something stupid.
As pin worm infected assholes go, I actually find you kind of interesting.
Now, go twist a titty and shut the fuck up.
"Trump hits like a girl!", they whined as they picked their teeth out of the dirt.
I must say, it's karmic to watch as tne Left blinds itself witb their usual "dumb hick" narrative. 7 months and they still won't learn.
Yes, the Stupid Hick just bumbled his way into the endzone for a touchdown. Again. Must be the luckiest man on earth.
63-0 with 7 mins left in the 1st Quarter
Brookzene said...
"Yes, I was on Judiciary Cmte that impeached Clinton/sent him for trial in the Senate for matters less serious than the ones before us now."
- Bob Inglis
6/9/17, 12:21 PM
Sure except for Alan Dershowitz: History, precedent and James Comey's opening statement show that Trump did not obstruct justice
But other than that, sure.
People who "hate Trump but hate (the opposition) more" will be astonished when they discover what is nakedly obvious to everyone else already, that he will serve the same oligarchic interests Hillary would have and will prove just as damaging as she to the interests of ordinary Americans who are not already wealthy and powerful.
Just because a rich man is a crude boor and oaf does not mean he is a man of the people. It just means he is another rapacious fuck who just couldn't care less about being polite.
Lifelong republican fapping off to fantasy violence directed at Trump.
@ Robert Cook
What do you, a communist, know about oligarchs? The nerve!
Brookzene said...
"Yes, I was on Judiciary Cmte that impeached Clinton/sent him for trial in the Senate for matters less serious than the ones before us now."
- Bob Inglis
6/9/17, 12:21 PM
Or did I misunderstand and he was referring to Loretta Lynch? Cause that might make some sense...
No Cook. You are confusing Oligarchs with the Establishment Party. I advise you read the article "After The Republic" over at Clairmont.
And I'm not being snarky, even though you and I are usually at odds. You have one of the sharpest minds on the Left here (I know, faint praise) and while your comment appears valid, it's based on incomplete and inaccurate information.
You really won't start understanding Trump supporters until you read that one article
.
Hey Bob Imglis, perjury and obstruction of justice to deny an American citizen her right to discovery in a sexual discrimination case? Lesser than this nothing burger?
How the FUCK did you get on the Senate Judiciary Committee?
"Hey Bob Imglis, perjury and obstruction of justice to deny an American citizen her right to discovery in a sexual discrimination case? Lesser than this nothing burger?
How the FUCK did you get on the Senate Judiciary Committee?"
As The Real comes down on them.
Fen, I'll check out the article. Thanks.
Trump says he wants to testify under oath. The jig is up.
Brookzene said...
Trump says he wants to testify under oath. The jig is up.
Brooksie, Ann doesn't like racist remarks, even about insomniacs.
lol.
Trump won't answer the straight question, "Are there tapes, sir? [Of his White House conversations with Comey.]
Instead, Trump says that we will find out about it "in a short period of time." And that the answer will disappoint us.
Not as much as your performance as president has disappointed us, sir.
The next obvious question being, "If there are no tapes, and never were any tapes, then what was the meaning of your Tweet indicating that Comey "had better hope there aren't any tapes"?
Chuck said...
The next obvious question being, "If there are no tapes, and never were any tapes, then what was the meaning of your Tweet indicating that Comey "had better hope there aren't any tapes"?
The next obvious answer being, "You are misstating/characterizing our discussion, and if I have and release such tapes, you will be shown to be a liar." In other words, the meaning is exactly the same as if there were tapes.
"lifelong republican" Chuck: "Not as much as your performance as president has disappointed us, sir."
LOL
"us"
@ Chuck, so called fopdoodle
When you pretend the Leftist newspaper employees ask straight questions, actual lifelong Republicans may grow concerned that you are a homophobic, misogynist liar.
Post a Comment