There is artistry to dance as well as to stunt work and gymnastics and overlap of dance, stunt work and gymnastics. Categorizing as one or another would depend on degree of physicality, nuance and execution.
I find Building Jumping fascinating. It is probably more stunt and gymnastics with demanding choreography and control but obvious is the artisty and beauty of form.
Boston Globe:Thousands gather in DC to support Democrats' agenda
"Tapping into the same anger that fuels the tea party movement, a coalition of progressive and civil rights groups marched Saturday on the Lincoln Memorial and pledged to support Democrats struggling to keep power on Capitol Hill."
There were so many thousands of people in attendance that the Boston Globe decided to run a file photo of Benjamin Todd with this story - you know, to demonstrate how powerful a visual symbol these thousands of demonstrators signify.
Also note the deliberate use of small caps to describe the "tea party".
The wind was gusting and the sunlight glared. I was walking through the alley on my way back home about to click open the garage door when my path intersected the path of two ladiez, attractive and svelte which is irrelevant to the incident but not to my memory of it, when at that same moment I noticed two guys at the tippy top of the Hamilton building 1/2 block distant, the area that the women had just been and which presented a natural wedge.
"Hey, look at those two guys up there."
I pointed to the men on the point of the roof and the ladiez agreed that was a fierce sight indeed even without the wind. We chatted it up and I sensed a break approaching to our contact, so I go, "JUMP!" To win them over with my ebullient warmth and irrepressible charm.
edutcher's comment about Donald O'Connor made me think of Fred Astaire in, I think, Royal Wedding when he danced on the walls and the ceiling. The mechanics were hidden from the audience; the illusion was complete. That is art.
A guy secure in his safety harness pretending to walk on the side of the building--pure stunt. And really, was it even a very good one? The only thing that makes it art is that his stunt was labeled that way....which makes it "art" not art.
Maybe as soon as you add an element of extreme danger, any dance becomes a stunt too?
What's also interesting is how this factors into the question of what makes good art. These days so much of art seems to be about pushing boundaries or doing things that haven't been done before - just because they haven't been done before, and not necessarily because of any additional merits or beauty or ideas (a friend in a fine arts program told me about a guy who essentially stuck his face in some sort of powdered chemical and made his eyes bleed - and then called it art. Whereas others, my friend and I included, would call it a stupid stunt...) Walking down a side of a building at least has more of an element of inspiration to it; this is the human body, look at how controlled and magnificent and gravity-defying it can be...
"These days so much of art seems to be about pushing boundaries or doing things that haven't been done before - just because they haven't been done before, and not necessarily because of any additional merits or beauty or ideas"
The horrible toll of the institutionalization of the avant-garde.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
27 comments:
Here's the line: A "stunt" is being paid by the NY Times to link it, but not informing your readers of that fact.
Art is this comment.
A bit OT but this old "Batclimb" collage is a hoot: linkage
I'd have to call it a failure.
Not innovative, not thought-provoking, not even particularly fun to watch.
In another vein, art will always need the sevices of engineers, and I offer mine.
wv:menial-- I know, but somebody has to comment on Althouse.
"Not innovative ..."
Didn't Steve Ditko do this in 1962?
There is artistry to dance as well as to stunt work and gymnastics and
overlap of dance, stunt work and gymnastics. Categorizing as one or another would depend on degree of physicality, nuance and execution.
I find Building Jumping fascinating. It is probably more stunt and gymnastics with demanding choreography and control but obvious is the artisty and beauty of form.
Man On Wire was kinda artsy fartsy stuntsy.
Boston Globe: Thousands gather in DC to support Democrats' agenda
"Tapping into the same anger that fuels the tea party movement, a coalition of progressive and civil rights groups marched Saturday on the Lincoln Memorial and pledged to support Democrats struggling to keep power on Capitol Hill."
There were so many thousands of people in attendance that the Boston Globe decided to run a file photo of Benjamin Todd with this story - you know, to demonstrate how powerful a visual symbol these thousands of demonstrators signify.
Also note the deliberate use of small caps to describe the "tea party".
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2010/10/02/thousands_gather_in_dc_in_support_of_dems_agenda/?p1=News_links
The Boston Globe, by the way, is owned by the New York Times.
They did not pay me to link to this article because it shows just how much of a fucking joke the NY Times is.
Donald O'Connor did the same thing without a wire.
New "Hussein" Ham said...
Boston Globe: Thousands gather in DC to support Democrats' agenda
This is going to be just another nail in the coffin for 11/2.
"This is going to be just another nail in the coffin for 11/2."
This is - really - the story of the day.
Thousands - 'count 'em - thousands of people have joined forces in our nation's capital to support the Democrat Party agenda.
This from the NY Times.
And I quote: "thousands."
Barack Obama - demigod- can't even draw a crowd of "tens of thousands."
What a fucking joke of a president we have.
Fake! I totally saw the wires.
The wind was gusting and the sunlight glared. I was walking through the alley on my way back home about to click open the garage door when my path intersected the path of two ladiez, attractive and svelte which is irrelevant to the incident but not to my memory of it, when at that same moment I noticed two guys at the tippy top of the Hamilton building 1/2 block distant, the area that the women had just been and which presented a natural wedge.
"Hey, look at those two guys up there."
I pointed to the men on the point of the roof and the ladiez agreed that was a fierce sight indeed even without the wind. We chatted it up and I sensed a break approaching to our contact, so I go, "JUMP!" To win them over with my ebullient warmth and irrepressible charm.
The art of defying gravity has a long tradition. Then Wilbur and Orville sort of made it into an everyday so what.
edutcher's comment about Donald O'Connor made me think of Fred Astaire in, I think, Royal Wedding when he danced on the walls and the ceiling. The mechanics were hidden from the audience; the illusion was complete. That is art.
A guy secure in his safety harness pretending to walk on the side of the building--pure stunt. And really, was it even a very good one? The only thing that makes it art is that his stunt was labeled that way....which makes it "art" not art.
I once saw a mime walking inside of a box on the sidewalk in Miami.
But then Rick Sanchez ran him over.
"But then Rick Sanchez ran him over."
You don't marvel that Barack Obama is our "cotton picking President" without getting fired from your CNN job on whatever pretext they can gin up.
The cotton-picking president of the United States can order the murder of American citizens and get away with it.
So, taking out a CNN anchor is child's play.
Frankly, I think it's fun watching all these Socialists "cleansing" each other.
It's hilarious.
Trooper - if that is true, then Rick Sanchez needs to get his job back.
WV: foinn - the Irishman thinks it's foinn to run over a meem.
How much did they get from the NEA for this?
Oh, and check out
http://plixi.com/p/48409449
The Aussie's do their rappelling that way for decades:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOkBE2qt-V4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERcadSA9UUU
Is Bob Dylan a racist?
Maybe as soon as you add an element of extreme danger, any dance becomes a stunt too?
What's also interesting is how this factors into the question of what makes good art. These days so much of art seems to be about pushing boundaries or doing things that haven't been done before - just because they haven't been done before, and not necessarily because of any additional merits or beauty or ideas (a friend in a fine arts program told me about a guy who essentially stuck his face in some sort of powdered chemical and made his eyes bleed - and then called it art. Whereas others, my friend and I included, would call it a stupid stunt...) Walking down a side of a building at least has more of an element of inspiration to it; this is the human body, look at how controlled and magnificent and gravity-defying it can be...
"Is Bob Dylan a racist?"
Why yes, yes he is.
And anyone who goes to his concerts must be a racist too.
That means you, Ms. Althouse.
"These days so much of art seems to be about pushing boundaries or doing things that haven't been done before - just because they haven't been done before, and not necessarily because of any additional merits or beauty or ideas"
The horrible toll of the institutionalization of the avant-garde.
Shoot, every college ROTC program in the country does that, and way better.
My first thought was "big deal. Australian-style rappelling. Someone beat me to it.
When art fails, it is often difficult for even experts to agree that it is so. When a stunt fails we can all tell and it often entails loss of life.
I call this artisitc failure, but at least nobody got hurt, except aesthetically.
Just viewed video. Stunt, definitely stunt.
Marine Rappelling plus he kicked in a door.
If the "artist" were to lose his balance and end up hanging upside down face to the wall, would that be modern art?
Post a Comment