March 1, 2010

"Wouldn't it be *awesome* if Obama were as radical as the Rights thinks he is?"

Tweets Ana Marie Cox about an article that I didn't click to when I originally read it yesterday. This morning, I happened upon an Andy McCarthy post over at NRO, decided to blog about it, and thought it would go perfectly with what Cox had written. I'd almost blogged Cox's remark, because I thought it was scarily left wing, and I wanted to blog McCarthy because I thought interestingly extreme. I thought it would be clever to put Cox and McCarthy together. Digging out the Cox tweet, I finally clicked her link. It went to the McCarthy post.

Here's what McCarthy said:
Today's Democrats are controlled by the radical Left, and it is more important to them to execute the permanent transformation of American society than it is to win the upcoming election cycles. They have already factored in losing in November — even losing big. For them, winning big now outweighs that. I think they're right.

I hear Republicans getting giddy over the fact that "reconciliation," if it comes to that, is a huge political loser. That's the wrong way to look at it. The Democratic leadership has already internalized the inevitablility [sic] of taking its political lumps. That makes reconciliation truly scary. Since the Dems know they will have to ram this monstrosity through, they figure it might as well be as monstrous as they can get wavering Democrats to go along with.... [I]f the party of government transforms the relationship between the citizen and the state, its power over our lives will be vast even in those cycles when it is not in the majority....
I hope McCarthy's understanding of what's going on is wrong, and it shapes my view of Cox to know that's what she thinks is "awesome."

209 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 209 of 209
Mick said...

Jason said...
"The State of Hawaii says he's a citizen. Therefore he's a citizen. Why don't you go join the Flat Earth society, or obsess over how 9/11 was an inside job?"


Nice Alinsky tactic! But the question is whether he is a Natural Born Citizen, not just a citizen, that is the requirement.

Mick said...

Jason said...
"See also United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

The Civil Rights Act of 1866.

But most powerfully of all, if Congress had any problem with Obama's lineage, they could move to remove the President. They have not. The matter is settled."


The Congress is complicit in the fraud perpertrated on We the People, and they prove that by allowing McCain, another non eligible non Natural Born Citizen on the ballot (he was born in Colon, Panama. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was encorporated into the USC by the 14th Amendment. It is about birthright citizenship, not Natural Born Citizenship.
Wong Kim Ark deemed Wong to be a "Citizen" due to his birth on US soil to UNNATURALIZEABLE RESIDENT aliens (parents were subject to the Chinese Exclusionary Acts). It did not say he was a Natural Born Citizen.
Try Again???

master cylinder said...

Mick, you are tenacious M!
I am impressed, with the amount of scorn you have received, you have held forth. Ill be looking for your posts on other topics to see if you are also batshit
crazy in addition to focused.

Mick said...

master cylinder said...
"Mick, you are tenacious M!
I am impressed, with the amount of scorn you have received, you have held forth. Ill be looking for your posts on other topics to see if you are also batshit
crazy in addition to focused."

Thanks... I think. Breaking preconceptions usually brings resistance. NOBODY has proved me wrong here, maybe it will get some people thinking. By the way, where does it say that anyone born in the US, regardless of parentage, is eligible to be POTUS.

Jason said...

NOBODY has proved me wrong here, maybe it will get some people thinking.

I'm thinking you're an idiot.

At any rate, the burden of proof is on you. Not anyone else.

Go tilt at windmills.

Mick said...

Jason said,

"m thinking you're an idiot.

At any rate, the burden of proof is on you. Not anyone else.

Go tilt at windmills."

Nice Alinsky from you also. I know it's frustrating when you preconceptions are broken. I have well proven the case (look back), and have proven you, for one, wrong. Would you like to try again? Where does it say that anyone born in the US is a Natural Born Citizen eligible to be POTUS?

Jason said...

The burden of proof is on you, and nobody else.

Mick said...

Jason said...
"The burden of proof is on you, and nobody else."

Look back, I've given plenty of proof, you? not so much.

Jason said...

You have proven nothing except that you're an idiot.

Let me know how that useless argument works out for you, kid. We're done.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 209 of 209   Newer› Newest»