"You'll have to wait until the year 3000 to wear glasses like that. Will we even have eyes in 3000?"
I wrote that at 10:08 in the New Year's Eve live-blog.
In the comments, just an hour ago, Peter Hoh wrote: "Someone else noticed the 200X glasses issue." He links here. Ha ha.
That reminds me, Chris explained why I was wrong. Let me illustrate:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
Clean your fingernails, Chris.
Don't worry, everything will be cool in the 2660's...
Symmetricality lost in 2010. Oh The Horror. The Horror.
147
are made up of sticks
2356890
are made up of curves.
use you imagination, ann.
or fine art skills
or math.
but always remember: in nature there are no lines.
save your schtick for that.
"Clean your fingernails, Chris."
It's not Chris, it's me, illustrating Chris's idea, drawing with a grimy Graphtone pencil. Sorry for the gross closeup snap, done with Photo Booth.
Do you think I have man hands????
Send whatever you can to:
A Manicure for Ann
c/o National Association For The Abolition of Man-Hands
1 Hilldale Station
Madison, WI USA
Let's hope that -one- in the middle dosent turn you into a cross-eye jerk
I am grateful that 2010 will still permit revelers to look stupid on New Year's eve.
However, since Russia says the US will be at civil war by then, I wouldn't invest in a pair just yet.
Man hands?
No--the nails are too nicely groomed.
You have mannish aspects, but they are not physical.
The loss of symmetry is perhaps to be lamented. But that dangling 2 (or it could be a dangling 1, if you swing that way) provides useful real estate for antenna of the direct WiFi-Brain circuitry we'll all be sporting in another year.
Oh, goody! A new label! The "I was wrong" tag!
It'll never be used again.
For 2011, we'll just put the 2 on the right side of our face and the 11 on the left, and let our heads be the 0.
Quick, patent that design!!!
Post a Comment