Said Helen Mirren to Oprah Winfrey on Oprah's post-Oscar show today as she was displaying and explaining the inner structure of the Lacroix gown she wore last night. The camera closeup of the inside of the bodice revealed a delicate structure, the brassiere built into the dress. The audience burst with laughter and applause. Why aren't all our clothes so constructed? Don't you want angel hands for your breasts?
A moment later Mirren makes a gesture with her hand, and I can see that she has some crappy tattoo between her thumb and forefinger. Oh, no! She's so elegant... and then, that!
Oprah asks her if Queen Elizabeth has seen "The Queen." I read a press report -- can't find it at the moment -- that said the Queen is a big Mirren fan but won't watch "The Queen" because it would be too disturbing. Mirren, answering Oprah's question, says "I'm sure she has, because who could resist? Really." She laughs a lot.
"I loved being that woman, and that took me by surprise."
February 26, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
11 comments:
The scoop:
The Queen is planning to invite Helen Mirren to tea at Buckingham Palace.
An embossed invitation will be delivered to the actress after the Academy Awards ceremony in Los Angeles next month, when Dame Helen is expected to win the Best Actress Oscar for playing . . . the Queen, of course.
The original plan, I can reveal, was for the Queen to invite Mirren, along with the film’s director Stephen Frears and screenwriter Peter Morgan, as Oscar-winners. But now she has decided to invite them, win or lose.
The Queen has still not seen Dame Helen’s brilliant portrayal of her in the film, which focuses on the days after Princess Diana was killed in a Paris car crash.
She has certainly heard about it, however. All the senior staff at Buckingham Palace have seen it; some were even invited to a private screening. They think it is an ‘astonishingly lifelike’ portrayal.
Only private secretary Sir Robin Janvrin is said to be underwhelmed with the film.
‘He is seen bowing and scraping to the Queen and wringing his hands in virtually every scene, and that is not Robin,’ says a senior Palace aide. ‘He is a much more positive and robust character.’
Mirren’s sympathetic portrayal of the Queen’s feelings as the Royal Family struggled to cope with public anger over their apparent failure to respond properly to Diana’s death has moved audiences worldwide.
Onetime republican Dame Helen endeared herself to the Queen when, accepting a Golden Globe award for the role, she said: ‘I honestly think that this award belongs to her because I think you fell in love with her, not with me. I just tried to make her as true to life as possible.’
So will the Queen see the film before she greets her alter ego? My understanding is that she wants to meet Dame Helen before deciding whether to take the plunge.
A Palace source says: ‘Any invitation to the Palace will be a personal one from the Queen.’
Patrick:
With all due respect, The Daily Mail is the kind of paper whose 'news' you take with a pinch of salt... and a whole bottle of tequila. Having said that, I don't think The Queen is going to change a single mind whether you're a rabid royalist and Conservative-with-a-capital-C, or a Guardian-reading leftist who thinks the Windsors are all scrounding parasites and should be lined up against the same wall as Tony Blair and shot.
Both Mirren, and director Stephen Frears, are very much of the left but (thank God) they weren't trying to make some anti-monarchist/Tony Blair polemic. IMO, they did something much more interesting: A nuanced tragicomedy of manners about private people living very public lives, how the world can change utterly around you and you don't even notice, and how much politicians and monarchs alike depend on the affection of their public no matter how powerful they are - and just how fragile & fickle (even illusory) power and public opinion really are.
There are several explanations for her tattoo.
Women say they want their breasts held by angel's hands but what they really want is to be undressed by the devil.
Are we bra-blogging again?
Another crappy post from Annie A., faux bad girl.
Another shitty jealous comment from limp-dicked faux-sentient being AJD...
Finding out that someone you like and admire has a tattoo is sort of like finding out that they voted for Dennis Kucinich or that they smoke clove cigarettes; it throws any previous admiration for their judgment and intellect seriously into question. The only people who have any excuse to have tattoos are Holocaust survivors, Maori warriors and Marines.
craig, no respect needed. I pasted a bit of gossip about an Oscar winner in a comment on a post primarily related to an Oprah episode. The source of the news is the least of my problems.
I'm sure my seminary professors would be proud of how far I've come.
If I was Lizzie Windsor, I'd be pretty flattered by Helen Mirren portrayal of a decent woman who is silly enough to think reticence, modesty and placing duty over self - even if that duty means having your every movement in public put under a microscope since you were ten years old - still means s**t. I may be a republican (as in a supporter of abolishing the monarchy rather than a supporter of the GOP), but I thought the hysterics following the death of Diana - and the tabloids demanding the Royal Family parade themselves like circus freaks for their entertainment - was beneath contempt.
...and helps Mirren distinguish her left hand from her right
My admiration is unbounded for any woman so prepared to acknowledge that she makes a naturally crappy map-reader / navigator that she is willing to be scared for life in the greater cause of not sending me down the wrong road.
And no, Her Majesty [echt] has not seen the film. How do I know this? Because that is what she has said.
It's a truth thing. That's just what she is.
Oh, to be an angel.
Post a Comment