Heh. I blogged about this last week as one of my first posts.
That National Post article is a little imprecise. Here's a more informed read on the same topic.
It all depends on whether Nero's name is being transliterated into Hebrew as Nero or Neron. Adding a final "n" was common practice in that period. And then once transliterated into Hebrew, the values of the letters of Nero(n)'s name were added together to arrive at the sum of either 616, or 666, respectively. This practice is known as gematria - a way of deciphering information from ancient Hebrew texts based on commonalities in the numerical significance of certain words.
Given the variant spellings of the name in first century Hebrew, it's not surprising alternate traditions arose. I don't think there is yet any way to determine which one is first, just guess work. Simultaneous strikes me as logical. And this, after all, is a 3rd century text fragment. Not an original.
I guess all those folks who underwent unnecessary exorcisms can sure for malpractice now. As if the Catholic Church didn't have enough lawsuits to worry about.
Comments older than 2 days are always moderated. Newer comments may be unmoderated, but are still subject to a spam filter and may take a few hours to get released. Thanks for your contributions and your patience.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
7 comments:
That must mean he's from the Grand Rapids, MI area.
Nick: I did my update before I read your comment. Funny!
Great minds, etc.
I was hoping when I looked it up that Flint would have ended up being in that area code... sadly it didn't work out that neatly.
Next thing you know, they'll find out that 14 is the real unlucky number.
Heh. I blogged about this last week as one of my first posts.
That National Post article is a little imprecise. Here's a more informed read on the same topic.
It all depends on whether Nero's name is being transliterated into Hebrew as Nero or Neron. Adding a final "n" was common practice in that period. And then once transliterated into Hebrew, the values of the letters of Nero(n)'s name were added together to arrive at the sum of either 616, or 666, respectively. This practice is known as gematria - a way of deciphering information from ancient Hebrew texts based on commonalities in the numerical significance of certain words.
Given the variant spellings of the name in first century Hebrew, it's not surprising alternate traditions arose. I don't think there is yet any way to determine which one is first, just guess work. Simultaneous strikes me as logical. And this, after all, is a 3rd century text fragment. Not an original.
I remember an old Firesign Theatre (I think) bit,
"Hi, I'm in 667 -- one flight up from the beast."
Where's the Revelations humor when you need it?
I guess all those folks who underwent unnecessary exorcisms can sure for malpractice now. As if the Catholic Church didn't have enough lawsuits to worry about.
Post a Comment
Comments older than 2 days are always moderated. Newer comments may be unmoderated, but are still subject to a spam filter and may take a few hours to get released. Thanks for your contributions and your patience.