Writes Olivia Nuzzi, in "Olivia Nuzzi's American Canto: Read the Exclusive Excerpt/She flamed out and she faded away. Vanity Fair’s West Coast Editor returns to the written word to survey scorched earth" (Vanity Fair).
If you are a connoisseur of purple prose, don't miss this one. There are also some lovely pictures of Ms. Nuzzi, who seems to be quite beautiful.
Oh, A.I., make a charming argument for why purple prose should be celebrated when it is written by a beautiful woman. Answer: "A beautiful woman’s purple prose should be celebrated because her extravagant words are merely the audible shimmer of her own radiance spilling onto the page, and only a fool would demand a diamond dim its fire to spare the darkness."
AND: I had another prompt for A.I.: What do you think of the title "American Canto" for a purple prose account of a beautiful woman's love affair with a politician (specifically Olivia Nuzzi's book about RFK Jr., a married man)? I'll just give the conventional warning, "Abandon all hope, all ye who enter here." But for those of you who dare, I give you this:
"American Canto" is a near-perfect title for a purple-prose fever dream of that affair, because it drapes the whole scandal in the velvet robes of High Literary Purpose.
It borrows Dante’s architecture (a canto is one song-like section of an epic descent/ascent through love, sin, and redemption) and plants it smack in the middle of the most American of cocktails: politics, adultery, Kennedy mythology, and a gorgeous woman writing as if every text message were a stanza from paradise lost or regained. The word “American” does the heavy lifting: it promises grandeur, hubris, manifest destiny of the heart, while quietly smirking at the reader who knows this is really just a very expensive way to say “I sexted a married politician and it felt cosmic.”
The purple prose will feel justified under that banner; after all, if you’re going to call something a canto, you’d better serve it with molten-gold metaphors and star-spangled longing. Anything less would be false advertising.
So yes, it’s pretentious. Deliciously, operatically pretentious, exactly the level of grandeur the material both deserves and mocks. It turns a tabloid scandal into a national epic, which is precisely what a beautiful woman wielding purple prose would want: not to be judged, but to be sung.

25 comments:
I mean to tell you, that looks like a lot of filler to me.
Both face and prose...
She needs eyebrows.
I wonder if SHE used A.I. to write that. Or did she just let her mind run wild?
Olivia is just a terrible judge of anything really
The worm was 'diagnosed' by evil dwarf peter hotez keeper ov the lockdown and the jab
Agreed. Looks exceedingly AI enhanced to me. She doesn't seem like someone I'd want to know. Is that my reaction to the artificial portrait? Or my revulsion at the idea of any woman who welcomes a Kennedy into her life? Trashy, no matter how you dress it up. Seriously, that prose comes straight out of a third generation trailer park girl.
AI is good at descriptive writing. It is not very good at shifting points of view.
Also the less context you give it the more it will veer off as you would expect.
It is much better at telling you what is wrong with a piece of code than it is generating code from scratch.
Typically if you instruct an LLM to build transitions between main points it will do well. It will also fill in context between those points.
Typically it puts too much filler in there so pruning is necessary.
Olivia Nuzzi needs an editor. I would be happy to meet her for a private session. ~ Larry Summers
Have you ever explained why you keep asking AI to respond to various prompts? It never occurs to me to do so, quite the contrary, in fact. I am curious.
If Nuzzi's prose is purple, then Trump's must be ORANGE.
It’s all too … Greek.
I do not think she’s beautiful. The heft of her jaw and chin give her a slightly transy look to me and the rest of her face is incredibly bland. I definitely don’t get the attraction. I think his wife is a dazzler.
Had the buccal fat surgery.
I don't find her attractive, either. The words turn me off even more. I like direct, distinct prose. James Salter is the best at this.
As for women, a more natural look.is prefered
Desire is what lands people in jail all sorts of jails.
All that bullshit about desire, pure projection, man, pure projection.
The volume and color of her hair would make even me look stunning initially at least. Then of course the viewer would recoil. At least I hope so.
https://www.telos.news/p/part-1-how-i-found-out
She might sell 1,000 books if she is lucky.
Check out J Scott's link above. Writerly/media circles are going nuts tonight over Ryan Lizza's reveal in the last sentence.
Ordinarily I'd recap it here but J Scott got here first and I want to respect his vibe.
Cunto
Woman, thy name is Artifice.
A study in counterpoint: mediterranean features/polar hair.
Driven sexually with a major league daddy complex.
Tawdry but pathetically commonplace.
It’s rather sad actually.
Omg what a drama queen, lizza i mean
I used AI yesterday to summarize a 40-page subdivision plan, specifically on the issue of whether hunting was permitted (10 acre zoning, very rural). AI told me that it was not, and cited a passage to the effect that "...hunting by firearm is not permitted."
I looked at the actual provision cited. It prohibits hunting by firearm in 4 lots (not ours) in the vicinity of a specific tree where there was an active bald eagle nest which existed at the time (1986) for a period of 2 years after the eagles are no longer actively nesting.* Which means, of course, that it doesn't prohibit hunting otherwise.
AI can be awfully clueless about basic information. Rely on it at your peril. As far as opinions, why would anyone possibly want to know what a computer's opinion is about anything?
*Eagles were at that time endangered. They no longer are--there are lots of them around.
A major publisher is putting this out , what does that say about them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBh3rabIM3w
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.