September 9, 2025

"One woman wrote: 'With you, dear Jeffrey, I laugh like a little girl and feel like a woman.'"

"The next page in the book simply shows a hand-drawn heart, a brief message and a photo of a woman’s buttocks in a thong bikini. Another assistant described how Mr. Epstein transformed her life, from a 22-year-old woman who had been divorced and had worked in a hotel restaurant to a person who traveled the world meeting powerful people. Among them, she listed Mr. Trump, Mr. Clinton and 'brilliant scientists, lawyers and business men.'"

38 comments:

Achilles said...

Let me know when people are arrested.

I also hope that this leads to consequences for piece of shit judges and prosecutors.

Wince said...

One woman wrote: 'With you, dear Jeffrey, I laugh like a little girl and feel like a woman.'"

"Now I'm as happy as a little girl."

Inga said...

Trump could be a national hero if he were to release all the files. Why is he against it? Surely he doesn’t want to protect the evil men who preyed upon underage girls and young vulnerable women?

Achilles said...

Another assistant described how Mr. Epstein transformed her life, from a 22-year-old woman who had been divorced and had worked in a hotel restaurant to a person who traveled the world meeting powerful people. Among them, she listed Mr. Trump, Mr. Clinton and 'brilliant scientists, lawyers and business men.

I wonder if people are going to start discussing the transactional nature by which many women, particularly women without fathers, treat relationships with men.

What percentage of female victims of sex crimes are really women who felt like they didn't get paid enough?

For some reason these women are all rather reluctant to speak out themselves. Seems like NDAs and money are more important than justice.

lonejustice said...

It's one thing for Trump to say that the drawing and signature are not his. It's another thing to say that it doesn't even exist. Once Trump said that it doesn't exist, you knew if would eventually be released.

Peachy said...

Biden could have released the files... He had 4 years... and he would have been a national hero if did so! Why was he against it?
Protecting top level democratics?

fixed.

Achilles said...

Inga said...

Trump could be a national hero if he were to release all the files. Why is he against it? Surely he doesn’t want to protect the evil men who preyed upon underage girls and young vulnerable women?

Maybe because the courts and the laws don't allow the release of victims names or the names of people alleged but not charged?

Not even you are that stupid. You know why.

RideSpaceMountain said...

That much vaunted and celebrated well-heeled NYC high-society? A more wretched hive of scum and villainy you shan't find.

Howard said...

Achilles: Maybe victims of Epstein/Mossad are afraid not of embarrassment but of being disappeared, suicided and/or fitted with cement high heels.

Curious George said...

"Not even you are that stupid."

Don't sell our resident dullard short.

Ann Althouse said...

"Surely he doesn’t want to protect the evil men who preyed upon underage girls and young vulnerable women?"

The quote in this post is intended to make you wonder if he's doing what he's said he's doing and protecting the underage girls and young vulnerable women.

Achilles said...

Howard said...

Achilles: Maybe victims of Epstein/Mossad are afraid not of embarrassment but of being disappeared, suicided and/or fitted with cement high heels.

I agree in part. There is no trust in our federal institutions to protect these victims. That is one of the legion of reasons I want to see 95% of Washington DC put in jail for decades.

But the more insidious damage done to these women was raising most of them without a father and training them to view sex as a transactional event rather than a pair bonding to have children.

Our society is failing women by teaching them that sex outside of a pair bond relationship that has the intent to have children is good. The girl boss mentality is leading to a lot of these cases where women are taken advantage of by men who use their wealth and looks to run through women they never intend to marry.

n.n said...

So, Epstein was not transgender. When he progressed as a transsocial Ass, Trump aborted their relationship, and left social liberal club. #NoJudgment #NoLabels #LoveWins. And Democrats insist on performing human rites for social, clinical, criminal, political, and climate progress in sanctuary states. #HateLovesAbortion

boatbuilder said...

It seems to me that whatever Jeffrey Epstein or anyone else was doing with consenting 22-year-olds is not especially significant, except to show that fraternizing with 22 year-olds might be a "legitimate" reason for hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein.

RideSpaceMountain said...

A female that has reached the age of majority is a woman vested with all the rights to screw up her life and lack of responsibility to be held accountable for. Not only do they not need hand-holding, they require zero sympathy if they knowingly choose the bad hands because they waving dollars in their face.

Girls are not accountable. Women are.

“Trust not a woman when she weeps, for it is her nature to weep when she wants her will.” - Socrates

planetgeo said...

Inga, you'd be a national hero if you were to release a line drawing of yourself so the commentariat could understand how titillated you are by this "Epstein, Epstein, Epstein!" obsession. You certainly seem to be giggling like a girl and kinda-sorta feeling like a woman about this.

Leland said...

Trump doesn’t seem against releasing the Epstein information. The information that can be released is being released. He doesn’t care for the people that want to see it and be his supporter. Which perfectly fits Inga and Kak. People who want to see the salacious details about Epstein and Trump doesn’t want as supporters.

As for protecting young women, save some thought for Iryna Zarutska, while you thirst over the Epstein files.

Achilles said...

This story is stupid and people have already moved on by the way. Only the NYT's cares about these stupid pictures that Trump may or may not have drawn. Epstein is boring at this point.

We all know why the NYT's is flooding it's pages with hand drawn pictures.

It has to do with the video and picture everyone else is talking about.

Achilles said...

Caroline said...

“ Let me know when people are arrested.” —@achilles, expressing the prevailing Epstein mania.

The victims were clearly paid to not file charges. There are clearly NDA's involved.

The main reason this story is dying is because there is a massive systemic issue here and the Democrats ignored everything except their goal to take out Trump. No matter how stupid they sound they are fixed on power.

If Democrats weren't such depraved amoral worthless shitheads we could actually address this issue and improve society.

But they aren't. The only thing Democrats care about is power and that means attacking Trump. They are just terrible people.

Howard said...

I'm in complete agreement, Achilles. Fatherless children grow up twisted into many different pathologies. The true definition of an alpha male is the head of an intact family.

doctrev said...

I naturally have a lot of interest in the Epstein files being fully released. The Democrats are trying to use smears to paint President Trump as Epstein's only client- see this particularly stupid entry.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/09/trump-epstein-photo-check-woman

If Pam Bondi was qualified for her position, she would have a single Democrat "donor" to Epstein arrested and watch the protests crumble overnight. She isn't, so this issue will nag the President until he makes examples of some clients.

Kakistocracy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kakistocracy said...



These are all the kind of drawings one makes for a guy who definitely isn't a sexual predator. It's just so clear that everyone around him knew, and thought it was fine.

wild chicken said...

This is why the plea bargain. The girls did not want to testify against him in fact they liked him. And I think some of the formerly underage ones were a little embarrassed that they had given him hand jobs for cash.

It was the victim's funds that made the heritage come out of the woodwork. And boy, are they cleaning up!

Kakistocracy said...

There is a whole section of Epstein's Birthday book labeled "Children," with photographs of a very young girl posing and what appears to letters in a child's handwriting.

Kakistocracy said...

These children are alive today and able to tell what happened to them. Now you know why MAGA Republicans are fighting so hard to keep those 100,000 pages of files secret and are releasing them with pages blacked out and as slowly as possible.

This is only the tip of the iceberg

Achilles said...

Kakistocracy said...
These children are alive today and able to tell what happened to them. Now you know why MAGA Republicans are fighting so hard to keep those 100,000 pages of files secret and are releasing them with pages blacked out and as slowly as possible.

This is only the tip of the iceberg
of Chuck’s deranged imagination.

Don’t worry Chuck. The files are coming out and you will look stupid again.

But I do want to give you props for your spittle flecked craziness around here. You are creating a lot of Trump supporters today.

Kakistocracy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ficta said...

"Lecherous" "Suggestive". Is this actually supposed to be serious journalism in the year 2025? Those are words out of a Don Knotts movie.

Readering said...

Now that the birthday book has been published, it's easy to see how Trump arrived at his $10 billion reputation damage claim against Rupert Murdoch personally. Worth spending a couple of bucks on a handwriting expert.

Kakistocracy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kakistocracy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kakistocracy said...

MAGA took emails of Hillary Clinton ordering pizza and turned them into a child trafficking scheme, but you’re perfectly fine with Trump being best friends with the most notorious sex trafficker of our time.

I’ve said — if Bill Clinton was involved in trafficking, lock him up.

MAGA says that if Clinton was involved, lock him up. But if Trump was involved, that’s fake news.

Oso Negro said...

What??? Could it be evidence of a young woman with agency enjoying her sexual power over older men and the relationships that flow from it?

JIM said...

I just want to know when the Democrat run media and Democrats will start caring about sex trafficked children that came North through Biden's open border. I guess if you call them "unaccompanied minors" then it doesn't sound so bad.

Kakistocracy said...

Where’s Biden’s card? If he forgot to send one, it could mean the then-senator’s memory was failing much earlier than previously thought.

Ronald J. Ward said...

Ann Althouse said...
"Surely he doesn’t want to protect the evil men who preyed upon underage girls and young vulnerable women?"

The quote in this post is intended to make you wonder if he's doing what he's said he's doing and protecting the underage girls and young vulnerable women.

Given Trump’s own record — his words, actions, and even the warnings from people close to him like his niece — is it really reasonable to think that anyone, including young girls or sexual victims, would be spared from being thrown under the bus if it served his interests?

Bushman of the Kohlrabi said...

Jim said “I just want to know when the Democrat run media and Democrats will start caring about sex trafficked children”

Jim, seeing that the left had no interest in Epstein until it became a way to smear Trump, there is little reason to believe they will develop any interest in acknowledging the horrors Biden unleashed on this country

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.