August 7, 2025

"Young women are constantly warned of the dangers of the manosphere.... The cult of 'toxic masculinity' is now so overcooked as to be limp..."

"... and meaningless, and, crucially, it entirely misses one key thing: feminine men can be just as 'toxic' as bodybuilders. It is Gen Z’s shallow sexual politics, which privilege 'looking' progressive over deeply felt values, that have landed us here. If the feminisation of culture has succeeded, it is because posing as effete gains men access to the women they want to sleep with. Cultural capital has deserted roided-up meatheads and landed in the lap of the moustachioed, mulletted lothario who professes to be a harmless feminist and who wields just enough knowledge about Judith Butler to talk a blushing sociology major into bed.... When visibly masculine men are maligned as potential abusers, women choose the wolf in vintage clothing. But this is all based on false assumptions: performative matcha is one more way that ill-intentioned loverboys can game our sexual politics’ daft stereotypes, joining tried-and-tested tactics like professing to be left-wing, painting one’s nails and listening to Phoebe Bridgers. You are just as likely to be shagged and bagged by a matcha drinker as a craft beer enthusiast, or indeed, a plain old lager fan...."

Writes Poppy Sowerby, quoted in "Ladies, if you see a man with a matcha latte — run/Male poseurs have abandoned macho and embraced matcha. Is it just another ploy to seduce women?" (London Times).

I haven't used my "performative (the word)" tag in a while. Here's the post where I created it, back in 2022 about a NYT piece titled, "Should Biden Run in 2024? Democratic Whispers of ‘No’ Start to Rise." I said:
I should make a tag for "performative." It's a buzz word these days, I believe, and I'd like to keep track of it. 

Did it come from gender studies? The most notable appearance of "performative" in my archive was a quote from the famous hoax "The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct": "The penis vis-à-vis maleness is an incoherent construct. We argue that the conceptual penis is better understood not as an anatomical organ but as a gender-performative, highly fluid social construct."

And from the field of racial studies, there's this, quoted from a NYT op-ed about Rachel Dolezal (the white woman who identified as black): "But Ms. Dolezal’s view of herself — however confused, or incongruent with society’s — reveals an essential truth about race: It is a fiction, a social construct based in culture and not biology. It must be 'made' from what people believe and do. Race is performative."

And I quoted this, about an "anti-racism" mural in Madison: "[The artist] said her intent is to show the nature of performative allyship and the manner in which white savior complex permeates Madison."

We talked about the word a few days ago, in connection with a Georgetown professor who'd tweeted that the defenders of Brett Kavanaugh "deserve miserable deaths." She called her tweeting "performative."

I got some push back in the comments saying that the word "performative" should be restricted to the "How To Do Things With Words" philosophical meaning — speech that performs an act. Indeed, that is the only meaning of the word in the OED

But the vogue usage of "performative" that I'm seeing in the media these days isn't that. "How To Do Things With Words" was required reading in my first semester of college. That was 1969. These days,  more than half a century later, young people are picking up different ways of thinking and talking in college, and performativeness is something different. 

If people these days are finding the word "performative" useful, it suggests that they also believe in a more authentic and substantive aspect of life that is deeper and more important than the things we do for show — the theater of politics and society. I hope so! 

But it is also possible that people are coming to feel that there is nothing inside, that it's all performative, that everything is fluid. That's not a new idea, that we are empty and soulless — that Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player/That struts and frets his hour upon the stage/And then is heard no more. 

76 comments:

Wince said...

Male poseurs have abandoned macho and embraced matcha. Is it just another ploy to seduce women?

"It's just this damn war and that lying son of a bitch Johnson."

n.n said...

The authentic selfie is a transgressive orientation with a forward-looking risk profile. A relationship planned accordingly isn't viable at best and a burden at worst. Abort.

n.n said...

Feminists are from Venus. Masculinists are from Mars. Social progressives are from Uranus. Men, women, and our Posterity are terrestrial. War of the worlds.

mikee said...

I have a problem with the use of currently popular food items such as matcha drinks to define a group and then deify or demonize that group. Often the popular item, from matcha to lattes to pumpkin spiced coffee is justly popular because it tastes good. And I want to enjoy such things without carrying along the cultural baggage dropped onto them by faux intellectuals. I, for one, proudly cooked a mean quiche back in the Reagan era, and was man enough to take my quiches to potlucks, where they received high praise, without being thought any less of a real man (hey, I used EXTRA BACON). Leave my food alone!

Ampersand said...

If Edward O. Wilson's effort to make sociobiology a science had succeeded, Poppy Sowerby's wise counsel would be conventional wisdom.

RideSpaceMountain said...

Loverboys CAN game!
But "be limp and meaningless"!?!
Green dildos say no!


- Trump, Haiku Master

n.n said...

Girls who wear provocative dresses will attract the Macha male. When did our liberal culture become so repressive?

RideSpaceMountain said...

Green matcha latte
Green money, green trees, green grass
What else I wonder?


- Trump, Haiku Master

Iconochasm said...

Classic "sneaky fucker" strategy.

Biff said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Biff said...

How did I make it 50+ years without ever hearing the word "matcha" before, despite having eaten at quite a few multi-Michelin starred restaurants and having had my share of snooty coffees and teas?

I guess I'm non-performative.

jim said...

gay like a fox

RMc said...

People actually get paid money to write this dreck?

Bob Boyd said...

The progressive look she describes and warns about only applies to white males.

Joe Bar said...

"Matcha[a] (抹茶) /ˈmætʃə, ˈmɑːtʃə/ ⓘ[2][3] is a finely ground powder of green tea specially processed from shade-grown tea leaves."

How is this "performative?
Or, are they just writing nonsense?

Joe Bar said...

I sense that the article is about feminist men pretending to be so, in order to attract women. Out here, in the sticks, young men still look like young men, not "allies."

RCOCEAN II said...

Almost every "Male Feminist" who isnt gay is a fake. And a young man telling a young woman what she wants to hear to get her into bed. Wow, I've never seen that before.

Too bad we're not peacocks. Then men could just unfurl our display feathers, and the women could choose.

RCOCEAN II said...

And who is warning women of "toxic masculinity"? Lesbians?

Jaq said...

"Women are the gatekeepers of sex, and men are the gatekeepers of commitment."

Women evolved to deceive and manipulate men, and before you explode, hear me out. Of the great apes, only human women have evolved to hide their estrus from men. This incentivizes men to hang around all month, and not only do men have no way of knowing if a woman is ovulating, unlike every other species of mammal I have ever heard of, maybe there are some, she is also, unlike most every mammal, sexually receptive all month, which also keeps a man hanging around, and, not for nothing, protecting the woman from threats, not just sexual rivals, but from whatever harms might befall her to prevent her being sexually available to him. So the old joke, "Why do women have a c*nt? So men will talk to them," is based in evolution. Except it should be, why does it have the specific properties that it has, unlike that of gorillas or bonobos?

So sure, men will take advantage of women's gullibility to "get some" but women are famous for being highly selective about the men they will sleep with, in terms of attractiveness, for short term "relationships" so I doubt that a lot of women are being deceived who don't want to be deceived. This seems like judgements by some women about other women. Long term, no guy could keep this up.

Peachy said...

I'm more fearful of the unhealthy fat white leftist mamdami-Hamas supporter - child groomer Maddow left.

Jeff Vader said...

“That lyin' son of a bitch Johnson” Forrest Gump was many years ahead on this

n.n said...

Girls should have tea parties, not Matcha lattes. Noted.

n.n said...

It's a competition between Mars and Uranus to go where no normal human has gone before.

RideSpaceMountain said...

RCOCEAN II said, "And who is warning women of "toxic masculinity"? Lesbians?"

Would you be shocked to know that it's mostly perpetually-online tranzgenderizzes?

Jaq said...

This lady wrote a book about a man who put himself out there as a feminist writer pushing ideas that he doesn't believe for purposes of manipulating women, but I get the feeling that the bashing going on, I haven't read the book, and won't, is of the stupid women who fall for it, not the guy who is doing what he thinks he has to do.

The End of Books As We Know Them: Where Men Are Finding Books They Love

Jaq said...

It kind of reminds me of a comment I read once about the evolutionary psychology behind why women push other women to get abortions, or at least to make it easy for other women to get abortions. Because there are a couple of ways for your genes to die out, and a common one is to be outbred. The Europeans massively outbred the Indians, for example, until population dynamics took its course. So it is a successful evolutionary strategy to limit reproduction of your competition, and it is less costly than having more children yourself.

"Avoid men! They are bad for you!"

n.n said...

If you're invited to visit planned parenthood umbrella corporation, run, don't walk. If a man visits you from Uranus, and invites you to visit the "Farm", don't look back.

Leland said...

Question for Mz. Sowerby, does heterosexual sex only occur by the man fooling and thereby abusing the woman?

FredSays said...

Adaptability is an evolutionary concept.

Levi Starks said...

Is it so impossible as to believe that women can enjoy sex as just that? Why is it necessary to put their desires under a microscope? No one subjects a man’s desires to this level of scrutiny. He simply likes sex. End of story. If at some point in time after an amazing sexual encounter with a woman, a man discovers he’s been “used” in some way it does not in any way diminish the pleasure obtained during the act. A woman on the other hand is told that to be a proper “feminist” ( as opposed to “Lady”) she must after the fact reject any pleasure obtained in the moment and forever detest the man by which it whom it was obtained, and become ever more vigilant lest any future similar infractions should occur.
The end result being that it’s more important to deny sex to an undeserving male than to gratify the need and wants of the female body.

RideSpaceMountain said...

"Cultural capital has deserted roided-up meatheads..."

What twaddle. Perhaps in Poppy's culture, but the cultural capital of fit (not necessarily "roided-up") and healthy fuckboys with confidence to match is nowhere near depleted in every other "culture" I'm paying attention to.

There will ALWAYS be women that enjoy fit men and prefer the traditionally heterosexual female role in a romantic relationship. Hell, most dudes that fit the bill don't have to do any real hunting much of the time. Those women will seek them out.

Oso Negro said...

Pro tip - don’t fuck Sociology majors,
Don’t take advice from women named “Poppy”

PM said...

Matcha? Gotcha. Thanks, Poppy.

RideSpaceMountain said...

"Is it so impossible as to believe that women can enjoy sex as just that?"

It is impossible for Poppy and millions like her. Who cares about nails in foreheads when there's overanalyzing to be done!

n.n said...

Toxic trans/homosexual females, too, exhibit a dual gender nature. How about the trans/bisexual females?

john mosby said...

Every man wants to be a matcha, matcha man
To have the kind of wokeness always in demand
Beauvoir in the mornings, go man go
Book group at Lambda, bona fides glow
You can best believe that he's a matcha man
Ready to get down with, anyone he can

[Chorus]
Hey! Hey! Hey, hey, hey!
Matcha, matcha man (Matcha man)
I've got to be a matcha man
I've got to be a matcha, matcha man
I've got to be a matcha! Oooh!

RR
JSM

Achilles said...

The core issue here is the amount of freedom we give women to choose mates. Every culture and society has struggled over this issue. The Fiddler On A Hot Tin Roof was popular because it pushed the pendulum in the direction it was moving at the time.

From the 40’s to present society has been pushing towards more freedom for women to choose mates. It started at marrying who you wanted to marry. Everyone more or less agreed with that. But then we moved to sex before marriage, no fault divorce, free abortion, Tinder, alimony and child support, cohabitation and single motherhood.

It is becoming clear to society that most modern women do not have the virtues required of a woman to live in a society that gives them freedom. Single motherhood is disastrous for society. It is so bad that it should be dissuaded with jail time.

The pendulum is going to swing back. Women are going to lose the freedoms granted to them because they proved they are not capable of accepting the responsibilities that come with freedom.

robother said...

A man can feign interest in Leaves of Grass for only so long, before he whips out his cigar.

gilbar said...

so, Wait A Minute..
are they Seriously saying? that Men* would LIE to a woman..
Just to try to get the chance, to LAY with a woman?
and what about Trans men? where do THEY fit in
or Trans women? you know? the Chix with dicks

Men* Evil Disgusting MEN! Men with THAT THING between their legs!

Art in LA said...

Which suffix is worse -- -sphere or -gate? The blogosphere is up in arms about Emailgate!!

Sebastian said...

TLDR article. Should we infer that, according to feminism 3.0, any male strategem to seduce women is inherently toxic? While, at the same time, according to NYT writers, men should "come back"?

Achilles said...

The primary lesson everyone in society is learning now is that freedom without responsibility leads to disaster and tyranny.

Women have a much harder time learning this than men.

RideSpaceMountain said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
RideSpaceMountain said...

"Women have a much harder time learning this than men."

In society's current structure, most women don't even have to try.

n.n said...

Speaking of [toxic] masculine males, Edward "Big Balls" Coristine and his girlfriend were attacked by hoodies in DC, and he had the presence of mind to push her into the car and tell her to call 911, while he weathered their assault. A man's man who places women, and children, first.

chuck said...

Women just hate being seduced :)

Who is Judith Butler? Oh ... nvm, I'll pass.

n.n said...

The point is to be your authentic self. A man is a man, a woman is a woman, and never the two shall be conflated.

Anthony said...

People will lie and mislead to get someone into bed, news at 11. . . . .

Levi Starks said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jupiter said...

"shagged and bagged"? I get the shagged, that's Brit slang for fucked, but what's "bagged"? Discarded? Counted as a trophy? Encased in a burka?

Achilles said...

Anthony said...
People will lie and mislead to get someone into bed, news at 11. . .

Society only exists when the incompatible elements are suppressed. The social contract is defined by the actions that are rewarded and punished.

Some actions come with a reward for the individual at the expense of the society.

Men and women both lie to each other to procreate. There are obvious incentives for individuals to do this.

What we should be discussing are the sanctions society should apply to behavior that harms the social fabric. Are the sanctions worse than the problem?

Do we want a society that rewards lying? Do we want relationships that start with deceptions?

Rocco said...

Biff said...
How did I make it 50+ years without ever hearing the word ‘matcha’ before … I guess I'm non-performative.

I’d say you were being “authentic”.

Aggie said...

'Poppy Sowerby', what a great name for such a sarcastic wit. She's in the same vein as Maureen Dowd, in the early days, and she looks like she's a handful. It was a pretty funny read.

hombre said...

Three of my five granddaughters qualify as young women. I will ask, but will be amazed if they are concerned about the dangers of the manosphere or toxic masculinity or if either will affect their lives. It’s really just New Feminist bullshit in the same realm as “depressed young men in basements” and trans surgery for minors, isn’t it. The people obsessing over this nonsense are loons.

Achilles said...

RideSpaceMountain said...
"Women have a much harder time learning this than men."

In society's current structure, most women don't even have to try.

There are always consequences for making bad choices.

It is true that there are no immediate sanctions placed on women who act in a morally retarded manner by society currently. We are at the peak of women’s freedom on the individual freedom vs societal good spectrum.

What we are all learning is that modern women as a group can’t handle freedom well. They make really poor choices and this leads to really bad outcomes for children in society.

It doesn’t really matter what we want. There are going to be limits placed on women’s choices. This is a historical pattern with deep roots in our biology.

We have sacrificed at least two generations of kids on the alter of women’s freedom. The peak of this is the current movement by single women to mutilate their kids on the transgender alter as a religious offering.

This abomination is what has pushed the pendulum in the opposite direction.

Achilles said...

The difference between me and feminists like Ann is that I actually want women to have more freedom.

In order for women to BE free they must first be virtuous.

Allowing women who are not virtuous to be free is a death sentence for society. It will lead to tyranny and suffering.

The same is true for men by the way. Allowing men without virtue freedom also leads to tyranny and suffering.

The current system however only sanctions non virtuous men. We need to address the low expectations for women.

Lazarus said...

Isn't that old news? Aren't we sort of familiar with that theme from all the Hallmark movies? Woman leaves big city and phony city slicker and picks the "authentic" small town guy.

Template may be "Sweet Home Alabama" where Reece Witherspoon rejects the Kennedyesque New York fellow to take up with good old boy Josh Lucas.

But doesn't it go back further than that? Villains in old movies were always sophisticates. Heros were unpretentious and didn't talk much. Surely there's something of that in Dickens, Austen, Fielding. Proggo male feminists are the fops of our day.

Lazarus said...

It is Gen Z’s shallow sexual politics, which privilege 'looking' progressive over deeply felt values, that have landed us here.

At 20 years old, the difference isn't always clear. It hasn't had time to develop. "Deeply felt values" haven't been tested and proven yet. Vague "values" and "feelings" versus fakeness isn't a real opposition. Plus, women like the bad boys. They would prefer a fake feminist gamesman to a dour, censorious male feminist from conviction.

Josephbleau said...

“I’d say you were being “authentic”.”

And “relevant “ too.

RideSpaceMountain said...

@Achilles,

“In one sense, I do believe I am “like a man,” as Parthe says. But how? In having sympathy? Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream out at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving any in return, for they cannot state a fact accurately to another, nor can that other woman attend to it accurately enough for it to become information. Now is not all this the result of want of sympathy?

I am sick with indignation at what wives and mothers will do of the most shocking selfishness. And people call it all maternal or conjugal affection, and think it pretty to say so. No, no, let each person tell the truth from their own experience.”


- Florence Nightingale

Hassayamper said...

There are men who choose stereotypically leftist/gay/female-dominated environments and careers - - drama club, ballet dancing, ice skating - - specifically for the opportunities they offer for female sexual conquest. Think Baryshnikov, not Nureyev.

A fellow I met when our sons played Little League together came from a Northeastern town that was crazed for hockey. He was an excellent hockey player, but chose to compete in figure skating instead. He took some homophobic abuse from the boys for it, but said it was worth it for the opportunity to have sex with dozens of physically fit, beautiful women who were starved for robustly heterosexual male companionship.

He claimed to have screwed more women than the whole hockey team put together. His wife was a former figure skater who was drop-dead gorgeous and way, WAY out of his league, so perhaps he wasn't just boasting.

Temujin said...

Yesterday I was reading some health article in one of the one thousand morning emailed journals I know get (How did I Iet this get to out so of hand? Was I thinking I'd actually get around to reading all this stuff?).
The article was about the steps I should take to prevent prostate cancer. One of the steps was to drink matcha daily.

I deleted the article.

Hassayamper said...

The pendulum is going to swing back. Women are going to lose the freedoms granted to them because they proved they are not capable of accepting the responsibilities that come with freedom.

In much of Europe, sixty or eighty years hence, there will be an Islamic caliphate. Girls will have their clitorises excised at age 10 or 12, and shortly afterwards will be married off to polygamous, violently abusive, much older men. They will live out their lives under a burka as socially isolated sex slaves and beasts of burden. Very old women who are today's purple-haired, tattooed radical feminists will weep bitter tears when they reflect on how they destroyed the so-called "patriarchy" of their youth.

Ron Winkleheimer said...

" I, for one, proudly cooked a mean quiche back in the Reagan era"

Real men eat whatever the hell they want!

RideSpaceMountain said...

@Hassayamper, the Handmaid's Tale is always descending on Western Civilization, but always lands almost everywhere else on Earth.

When radical feminists hop a plane to Riyadh to complain to King Salman and the Wahhabi council, I'll give a damn.

Assistant Village Idiot said...

This was true when I was in college in the 70s, just with different feminist signifiers. If feminism did not teach women to be suspicious of false allies, does it not follow that many women simply want to be "fooled" so they can have an excuse and not be blamed for the seduction?

Mason G said...

"when they reflect on how they destroyed the so-called "patriarchy" of their youth."

I suspect they will find someone else to blame.

FullMoon said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Rusty said...

"Avoid men! They are bad for you!"

The war cry of fat ugly women.
Most women are a 5. 6 at best. Look in the full length mirror ladies and be honest.

Narr said...

"Real men eat whatever they want." I would have bought the bumpersticker if there was one.

I worked in a female-dominated field, and had plenty of opportunity for dalliance, but sadly there are not many hot lady librarians.

OTOH the campus got hundreds of new hotties every fall. I realized I was getting old when I kept seeing girls who looked exactly like ones I went to school with--because they were their daughters.

Mason G said...

"Most women are a 5. 6 at best."

I watched a video discussion about rating looks between half a dozen guys and the same number of girls, they looked to be in their mid 20s. When the guys were asked to rate themselves, the numbers ranged from 5 to 7. All the girls said they were 10s.

FWIW...

cfs said...

One journalist thinks trans men are the key to changing the problem of masculine men "crippling society".

"Trans Men? WUT?! Welp, Here's the Dumbest Thing You'll Read Maybe EVER About Masculinity (No, Really)"

https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/08/07/heres-the-dumbest-thing-youll-read-today-no-really-n2416894

RideSpaceMountain said...

@cfs, whether they're thrown or worn, there's nothing fake green penises can't solve!

Narr said...

"there's nothing fake green penises can't solve!"

But the real green penises are best avoided.

n.n said...

Trans men are male homosexuals, gender simulants, or males in women's dresses. A grog of guac and chips.

ALP said...

If Reddit is any guide to what modern women are thinking (debatable, I know) I'd say the problem is caused by feminism/women failing to understand what it's like to be a man. Lots of women whining and jabbering about what the female experience is like, along with insistence that men listen and UNDERSTAND. No such thing has happened on the female side. Instead, the prevailing stance is that men are such horrible creatures, why on earth would any woman try and put herself in their shoes?

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.