June 25, 2025

If we take "obliterate" literally, it means to cause to disappear.

The media seem to be overeager to undercut Trump's accomplishment by saying that he said the word "obliteration" but there's actually — possibly — something left. 

From this morning's news: "Trump reveals Israel sent agents to Iran’s bombed nuclear sites to confirm their 'total obliteration.'"

He seems determined not to abandon his word of choice, "obliteration."

How literally do we take "obliteration"? Really hardcore literalism would require that the thing be wiped from human memory. "Ob-" means against and "littera" means letter. Strike out the text. It's what Orwell's "memory hole" did. 

So how have we been using the word "obliterate" in recent years? Here's what I've noticed in the past 2 decades, just 11 examples taken from this blog's archive.

1. Quoting Hillary Clinton: "If [Obama] does not have the gumption to put me in my place, when superdelegates are deserting me, money is drying up, he’s outspending me 2-to-1 on TV ads, my husband’s going crackers and party leaders are sick of me, how can he be trusted to totally obliterate Iran and stop Osama?"

2. Quoting Camille Paglia: "Democrats are doing this in collusion with the media obviously, because they just want to create chaos... They want to completely obliterate any sense that the Trump administration is making any progress on anything... I am appalled at the behavior of the media...."

3. Quoting Trump: "As I have stated strongly before, and just to reiterate, if Turkey does anything that I, in my great and unmatched wisdom, consider to be off limits, I will totally destroy and obliterate the Economy of Turkey (I’ve done before!)."

4. Trump on Mother's Day: "Happy Mother’s Day to ALL, in particular the Mothers, Wives and Lovers of the Radical Left Fascists, Marxists, and Communists who are doing everything within their power to destroy and obliterate our once great Country. Please make these complete Lunatics and Maniacs Kinder, Gentler, Softer and, most importantly, Smarter, so that we can, quickly, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!"

5. "'Bomb North Korea, Before It’s Too Late.' That's the title of an op-ed in the NYT by a Jeremi Suri, a history/public affairs prof.... 'The United States should use a precise airstrike to render the missile and its mobile launcher inoperable. President Obama should state clearly and forthrightly that this is an act of self-defense in response to explicit threats from North Korea and clear evidence of a prepared weapon.'...  And here's Rush Limbaugh, a couple days ago: 'Folks, we have discovered the missile silos in North Korea. We know where they are. My question is, why are they not rubble? If we know where they are and we haven't taken them out, what is this automatic assumption that if they launch, we are going to obliterate their country? Do any of you believe that would happen? I'm serious. North Korea launches nukes at us. They can't hit us yet, so they fall whatever hundreds, thousands of miles short. But the intent was clear. You think we'd retaliate?'"

6. "Trump isn't telling them what to do, but he is telling them what to do. Here's the full transcript of Trump's speech in Saudi Arabia...'This is not a battle between different faiths, different sects, or different civilizations. This is a battle between barbaric criminals who seek to obliterate human life, and decent people of all religions who seek to protect it. This is a battle between Good and Evil. When we see the scenes of destruction in the wake of terror, we see no signs that those murdered were Jewish or Christian, Shia or Sunni. When we look upon the streams of innocent blood soaked into the ancient ground, we cannot see the faith or sect or tribe of the victims -- we see only that they were Children of God whose deaths are an insult to all that is holy."

7.  "'Obama’s Effort on Ethics Bill Had Role in Governor’s Fall.' That's the headline on the lead article in the NYT right now. Why am I getting the feeling that the mainstream media will do what it can to obliterate the connection between Rod Blagojevich and Barack Obama?"

8. "'The film, sponsored by the [Chinese] government, depicts an against-all-odds American defeat in a battle known in the United States as the Battle of Chosin Reservoir.'.... Statement from the People’s Liberation Army: 'Some individuals still try to completely deny the War of Resistance against the United States and Aid Korea, question the justice of sending troops, and try to erase the great victory. No matter how they distort, obliterate, falsify, tease and denigrate the facts, history is written in the hearts of the people.'"

9. "These presidential journeys to console the community [after a mass murder] — when do they work? How can a President obliterate the perception that it's a political stunt? Obama could do it...."

10. Quoting RFK Jr., describing his reaction to his father's statement that if nuclear war came, you'll be better off dead: "I, for one, intended to be among the survivors. Nuclear holocaust, I reasoned, could hardly be worse than school. I had never really caught on to academics, and my grades were disappointing at best. I was pretty confident that nuclear war would end school and obliterate my 'permanent record.'"

11.  "Why is DeSantis peeling an orange?"

 

"... So I'm convinced that Time intends the orange to be seen as Trump's head. The Daily Mail calls it a painting, so I'm going to assume that this is an artist's illustration and they didn't get DeSantis to pose holding and tearing into an orange. Notice the juice dripping down all over his hands. Such brutal orange peeling! Brutal and messy. What man in a suit would handle an orange like that? The idea is that's Trump's head and the powerful, remorseless DeSantis will obliterate the orange man." 

79 comments:

bagoh20 said...

Obliterate has a more reliable meaning than "fact check".

hombre said...

“Obliterate” Israel on behalf of Islam is the stated objective in the Hamas Covenant of 1988. I don’t think that is lost on the Trumpsters.

RideSpaceMountain said...

As many here can attest, the problem with "obliteration" is how truly rare it is to see. People would be amazed at what can survive the most earth-shattering kabooms. Hillary was supposedly "obliterated", but she's still Xwatting around. They literally tried to "obliterate" Trump but his orange remains intact...if not slightly nicked.

It is very hard to obliterate something, most especially when those things are buried under 800 meters of bullcrap...figuratively and literally.

Yancey Ward said...

It is reasonable to assume we know the precise specifications of every buried Iranian facility that was bombed on Saturday. We also know with precision the explosive power and ability to penetrate the surface of the weapons used. So, it also likely we know from the location of the strikes the probabilities of destruction of those facilities. However, it take weeks of eyewitness reports from human agents on the ground to confirm or negate the above calculations and we will likely never get to see that information in a public forum.

Is "obliteration" the right word? I don't know and neither does anyone at CNN, the NYTimes, or here in comments section.

gilbar said...

now, for FUN! think about the word disintegrate?
If you disintegrate a military unit.. Did you kill All, Most, ANY?
or, just stop it from working as a unit?

gilbar said...

oh! now do DECIMATE !
protip: it's not really as bad as you think

Rocco said...

gilbar said...
oh! now do DECIMATE !
protip: it's not really as bad as you think


It is if you’re the tenth guy.

FormerLawClerk said...

Trump is lying. His statements thus far have amounted to "Trust me, bro."

How bout you show me, bro.

There is literally nothing stopping Donald Trump from sending Seal Team 6 to that mountain and inspecting it in full view of CNN cameras.

RCOCEAN II said...

Great write up. They've been doing this for years. Since august 2015 to be exact. Everytime Trump says something they either put "the dumbest interpetation possible" on it. Or they take his obvious hyperbole and pretend its to be taken literally.

Remember when Trump said the FBI had been "wiretapping" him. The MSM interpeted that narrowly and literally. And then had a field day showing Trump was a dummy because his Tump tower phone wires were untouched. Or claiming the FBI doesn't wiretap phones anymore because its obsolete technology. Haha Stupid lyng Trump.

If Trump jokes or uses sarcasm - they will dishonestly pretend he was serious and attack him. If Trump makes a vague broad statement, they will pretend it was specific and assume things. Cf: "fine people on both sides" = Nazis are good people".

RCOCEAN II said...

As for the damage to Iran's nuclear plant. Obviously there was some. But unless we have spies on the ground and examining the actual damage, we have no idea how much. And if we do have top secret intelligence detailing the damage, its not going to disclosed to the USA public.

And I'm not going to trust some DNC-MSM anonymous "source". Which is probably just a lie.

Aggie said...

But yesterday the press was screaming at full volume that Iran's nuclear program had only been set back a few days, maybe a couple of weeks. Now today, they're objecting to the use of the word 'obliterated'. Surely the sites must be nearly intact, if they're ready to resume in a couple of weeks. Surely, this would be easy to prove. Doesn't a news organization stand behind its reporting? Don't they provide verification, evidence, and proof, as advocates of the truth?

RCOCEAN II said...

Trump has claimed a victory. So the MSM can't let him do that. So they came up with some mysterious (and fake) source that makes him out to be a liar, and cause doubt. Did we really obliterate them? Well Source X says No. MSM has accomplished their mission of diminishing Trump's achievement.

Howard said...

Because rendered temporarily inoperable isn't punchy.

rhhardin said...

Iran's nuclear capability has been set aside. That's an ambiguously obliterated or preserved.

RCOCEAN II said...

These reminds me of Russia-gate, where we had "top secret" sources "inside the FBI" "inside the Mueller investigation" "Inside the intelligence community" that were claiming Trump had colluded. "Based on the new evidence from source X, Trump did..."

And when asked for proof, the MSM would say "Oh sorry, top secret info, investigation ongoing, cant provide proof or identify source. Trust us."

jim5301 said...

Whether or not Obliterate is the best word, it seems the bombing was precisely targeted and largely achieved the objectives. See https://primarynewssource.org/sourcedocument/iran-update-special-report-june-24-2025-evening-edition/

Bill Crawford said...

We have "one scintilla of regret", no degree of consternation, and now "total obliteration." Easy to see which is Trump's.

Josephbleau said...

I do feel sorry for Democrats and I feel their pain. Their hopes have been truly obliterated for 2026. “I must aver, I thoroughly examined her. And she’s not only merely dead, she’s really most sincerely dead!”

I think they have been cheated, they tried so hard to make Trump a war monger and he did not bite. They called a good play but flubbed.

The leaker at the DNI needs to go to jail.

Megthered said...

The last time SEAL TEAM SIX was in the news is when Biden had leaked information to the enemy and had the helo ahot down. I don't think the dems or the media are going to get any Intel from Trump.

mezzrow said...

Now you see it,
Now you don't

Iman said...

Pull the other one, Aggie, @9:13AM.

Iman said...

FLC bears the taint of rotten, high-priced eggs

Christopher B said...

So we've now moved on from the "it's only a flesh wound" narrative? I've seen several people sharing a post comparing Erin Burnet reporting Iran was 'years' away from constructing a nuke before Midnight Hammer to her reporting that the attack only set back the program 'months'.

Rocco said...

FormerLawClerk said...
There is literally nothing stopping Donald Trump from sending Seal Team 6 to that mountain and inspecting it in full view of CNN cameras.

So they would be going in to another country and doing jobs the natives don’t want to do?

Creola Soul said...

Mossad knew where all the generals and nuclear scientists were, and they even had their addresses and phone numbers. With Mossad inside it’s hard for me to believe they don’t know where the uranium is or what happened to it. Plus, they likely had agents onsite during the bombings, perhaps to guide the weapons with lasers. At any rate, Mossad is still inside so I expect they know what the damage really is. Either way, if Iran tries restoring or recovering the program, they know they will be hit again, harder.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

14 bunker busters. That’s a lot of bunker busting power. Even if one or two were off target that would still leave over 10 bombs. Obliteration sounds good to me.

William said...

Mossad knows where Iran's nuclear scientists sleep and their wives' names. If the Iranian program had only been dented, I'm pretty sure the Israelis would tell us about it.......The bomb was delivered through the ventilation shaft. You cannot work a few hundred feet underground without ventilation. The Iranian OSHA is very strict on this point........Those trucks were more likely delivering nuclear material to the site than removing it. Does Iran have other, safer sites than the one buried in a mountain?........A note of caution. Our wars over there always begin strong but grind on. They say you should never bet against the pessimists. Well, maybe this time it will be different.

bagoh20 said...

The media can't get things right even when the truth is easy to find, especially when it involves Trump. No chance in hell they know what they are talking about here. I don't expect Trump to say anything less than it was a total success, but I also know the media could never admit the same, so we have two sources, one that will not admit failure and one that will not admit success, but we have a range to work with. If the media says it was a partial success that's our bottom.
Personally, I think we should have held off on the cease fire. There is more work to do.

Peachy said...

Fake experts (D) WRITE FAKE NEWS.

Peachy said...

"The bombs were a dud - story" turns out leaked by ..
"This CNN story was written by the same "reporter" who wrote the very first FAKE NEWS story claiming the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation."
--- Author(D) Natasha Bertrand(D)

PrimoStL said...

If Mossad and the Israelis knew everything and have total military dominance across Iran, why did they need any help?

Peachy said...

Impressive work - Ann.

bagoh20 said...

The Ayatollah may be a Mossad plant. Things are going that well. We quickly adopt a new baseline. Just a couple weeks ago we were expecting Iran to test a nuclear weapon within days. Now that's not possible, and we are arguing over how impossible that is and how biggly we have won.

tcrosse said...

If Iran's nuclear capability had not been obliterated, it would be in their interest to say that it had been, so they could continue in secret.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

In the context of drinking alcohol, obliterated doesn’t quite make a drunk disappear 🫠 At least not literally.

Maybe using that word in that context is an exaggeration.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Then again. To make something disappear is kind of like a Penn and Teller thing. I mean even after you completely destroy something there are little pieces left? Even a cremation leave ashes for a proper somber disposal.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

The nuclear program was not cremated.

n.n said...

obliterate = abort+sequester

boatbuilder said...

Seriously, not literally. What the hell is wrong with these people?

Dave D said...

"There is literally nothing stopping Donald Trump from sending Seal Team 6 to that mountain and inspecting it in full view of CNN cameras."

Boots on the ground! screams from the cackling left press. Possible American deaths. Seriously!?!

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Obliterated could mean passed out 😵, unconscious. That’s probably it.

n.n said...

There is supposition that information is not aborted+sequestered, but survives penetration of a black hole... whore h/t NAACP. A memory. A carbon footprint, pethaps.

n.n said...

Blitzed? Out of your mind. Obliterated, but not forgotten.

Jaq said...

400 tons, IIRC, of highly enriched Uranium that, if the Iranians didn't move it before the highly telegraphed strikes, is in a place that they have successfully dug to already once. Would have been far better off to make a deal, and know where it went. IAEA no longer has eyes on it.

Nobody wants to state their true objectives, though, and the true objective of this strike was probably not to "obliterate" this stuff, although I am sure that that is what they told Trump would happen, but to drag us into Netanyahu's war with Iran and put back the Shah's son, the "crown prince" of Iran.

Everybody talks about 1979, but nobody talks about 1953

By 1953, Mohammad Reza Shah's rule became more autocratic and firmly aligned with the Western Bloc during the Cold War in the aftermath of the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, which was engineered by the United Kingdom and the United States. In correspondence with this reorientation of Iran's foreign policy, the country became an ally of the United States in order to act as a bulwark against Soviet ideological expansionism –Wikipedia

The more you know...

JAORE said...

As noted, try the use of decimate.
Or, better, genocide. Used as in Israel has practiced genocide in Gaza As the Palestinian population grew substantially.
Language has become quite flexible. And usually flexes to the left.

Enlighten-NewJersey said...

Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, confirmed Wednesday (June 25, 2025) that the country's nuclear facilities had been “badly damaged” in American strikes over the weekend. Speaking on Al Jazeera, Mr. Baghaei refused to go into detail but conceded the strikes on Sunday by American B-2 bombers using bunker-buster bombs had been significant. “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,” he said.

narciso said...

not that old chestnut, tim, as pointed out by Taheri, it was the mullah and the merchants who did in Mossadecq, but his town cries like Bani Sadr couldn't stop whining about it,

Maynard said...

Let me see if I understand the Dem media narrative about the Iran strike.

Trump should not have done it because the Obama deals were going to work, somehow.

Trump is so incompetent that when he failed to follow the correct advice, he bombed the nuke facilities, but didn't destroy them.

Trump was going to screw it up, no matter how successful the decision was.

Did I get that right?

Joe Bar said...

gilbar said...
"oh! now do DECIMATE !
protip: it's not really as bad as you think"

I had the same thought.

Peachy said...

Corrupt liar left democratic egos cannot give Trump a win.

All are the same ugly petty females sitting on their hands, holding dumb bingo paddles, and refusing to stand for a young black kid and his dream.

narciso said...

Bani Sadr who came up with the October Surprise, thus giving the Dems an excuse for their failure,

Peachy said...

Delusional to make a deal with Theocratic male Islamic superiorists.

Joe Bar said...

So, CNN and the MSM are arguing that the strikes didn't damage Iran's nuclear program enough, so we should abandon all efforts and just accept a Terhanian bomb? Is that what they want?

I await destruction of oil transfer facilities at Kharg Island.

narciso said...

you would think, people would realize this, but it's striking with all the info available, the people choose poorly, well some do,

RideSpaceMountain said...

Lem Vibe Bandit said, "The nuclear program was not cremated."

Singed. Busted. Bruised. But definitely not cremated, sadly. Hopefully their resolve to keep going is, but I feel it is simply singed, busted, and bruised.

The fat lady hasn't sung yet.

narciso said...

Paul Erdman in his Harold Robbinesque Crash of 79, predicted what a Iranian nuke would do the Saudi oil fields, (hence the spolier,) four years earlier,

RideSpaceMountain said...

Trump's "Obliterated" doesn't sound like GWB's "Mission Accomplished!"...but it certainly rhymes.

Peachy said...

Hack D press dutifully ignore Obama's pallets of US tax payer cash to the Ayatollahs - delivered in secret w/dead of night shipments.
Dead of night shipements - similar to the dead of night shipments of illegal immigrants to all corners of the US.

Bushman of the Kohlrabi said...

We’ve sure gone from “Trump just started WW3” to “the mission is a complete failure if there isn’t proof that every facility wasn’t reduced to gravel” at breakneck speed.

This from the same people who applauded the Dem approach of cash gifts and an agreement that guaranteed the acquisition of of nuclear weapons by Iran.

Rusty said...

RCOCEAN II said...
As for the damage to Iran's nuclear plant. Obviously there was some. But unless we have spies on the ground and examining the actual damage, we have no idea how much.

Mossad agents on the ground at the site have reported the bombs worked as advertised. There will be no resurrecting those particular uranium enrichment plants.

TeaBagHag said...

Trump is as full of shit as any person has ever been. So when he makes a statement, thinking Americans have to assume there’s a much greater than zero chance that he is flat out lying,
I think Donnie has obliterated Althouse’s ability to reason and destroyed many of his MAGAts sense of reality, to the point where they just lap his bullshit and viciously defend him blindly, even when he is clearly lying.

Big Mike said...

We’ve sure gone from “Trump just started WW3” to “the mission is a complete failure if there isn’t proof that every facility wasn’t reduced to gravel” at breakneck speed.

@Bushman, yeah, I noticed that too. And do have a lot of other people people loving in deep blur bubbles cannot see that they further estrange themselves from the ordinary people who constitute the vast majority of the voting public.

Enigma said...

The misuse of "decimate" "literally" makes me "livid."

Marcus Bressler said...

Only poor writers use "decimate" as a synonym for "destroyed" ... but you can't fix stupid.

Michael McNeil said...

“Obliterate”—or o-blue-terate—has been a favorite ever since the Beatles' great animated musical (their best work, in my humble opinion), Yellow Submarine.

Yancey Ward said...

"400 tons, IIRC, of highly enriched Uranium"

400 kgs, not tons.

Peachy said...

D-bag hag,
False reality addict, hate-addict, and soviet-stupid are real mental disorders. You should seek help.

Scott M said...

I gave up on pendancity after sentient replaced sapient and decimate was decimated.

gadfly said...

Trump's Ministry of Truth is far worse than Orwell's Memory Hole in "1984." Pretention does not pass muster.

Michael McNeil said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Michael McNeil said...

Regardless of what decimate meant in Latin (and perhaps even there it didn't always strictly mean “kill a tenth by lot”), today in English that meaning lies far down the list. For example, dictionary.com: {quoting…}

decimate
[des-uh-meyt]

Definition for decimate (1 of 1)
verb used with object
dec·i·mat·ed, dec·i·mat·ing

1. to kill or destroy a great number or proportion of:
The population was decimated by a plague.

2. to greatly reduce in number or amount:
From 1975-1981, our country was not driving the space exploration agenda, and our aerospace workforce was decimated.

3. to cause to suffer great loss or harm:
The constant eruptions that spewed forth decimated the forest and turned it to ash.

4. to select by lot and kill every tenth person of.

5. Obsolete. to take a tenth of or from.

{/unQuote}

Rigidly requiring only the use of meaning 4 above in modern English is much like critiquing use of the word (emotional) “hysteria” because it doesn't strictly refer to a woman's uterus (hystéra in Greek).

boatbuilder said...

I think Donnie has obliterated Althouse’s ability to reason and destroyed many of his MAGAts sense of reality, to the point where they just lap his bullshit and viciously defend him blindly, even when he is clearly lying.
Expert testimony, right there.

hawkeyedjb said...

My sister hired a junk hauler to get rid of stuff on her farm. Their slogan is "We make it go away." Maybe they'll do subcontract work for the air force.

gadfly said...

Peachy thinks that D-bag hag is mentally impaired for disliking Trump.

Perhaps The Peach should invesigate the obvious bulge on on one of Trump's already large legs, which is likely a urinary drainage bag, Urinary incontinence is a symptom of late-stage prefrontal temporal dementia, which can lead to aphasia - a terrible way to die.

Donald's father, Fred, Sr. and his older sister Maryann, died of Alzheimer's disease.

MadTownGuy said...

"How literally do we take "obliteration"? Really hardcore literalism would require that the thing be wiped from human memory. "Ob-" means against and "littera" means letter. Strike out the text. It's what Orwell's "memory hole" did. "

Reminds me of the old joke where a man received a letter at his address, damaged in transit so the addressee was illegible, stamped with "OBLITERATED." Puzzled, he exclaimed, "There's no Irishman here!"

MadTownGuy said...

RCOCEAN II said...

"As for the damage to Iran's nuclear plant. Obviously there was some. But unless we have spies on the ground and examining the actual damage, we have no idea how much. And if we do have top secret intelligence detailing the damage, its not going to disclosed to the USA public.

And I'm not going to trust some DNC-MSM anonymous "source". Which is probably just a lie."

IAEA has boots on the ground in Iran, though understandably, not at the sites. Here's what they say:

"IAEA inspectors have remained in Iran throughout the conflict and are ready to start working as soon as possible, going back to the country’s nuclear sites and verifying the inventories of nuclear material – including more than 400 kg of uranium enriched to 60% - which they last verified a few days before the Israeli air strikes began on 13 June.

Even though the conflict interrupted safeguards inspections in the country, the IAEA has been closely monitoring the impact of the military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites at Arak, Esfahan, Fordow and Natanz as well as the possible consequences for human health and the environment, based on relevant information received from Iran’s Nuclear Regulatory Authority.

“As I have repeatedly stated – before and during the conflict – nuclear facilities should never be attacked due to the very real risk of a serious radiological accident,” Director General Grossi said.

“During these attacks, we have seen extensive damage at several nuclear sites in Iran, including its uranium conversion and enrichment facilities. Our assessment is that there has been some localized radioactive as well as chemical release inside the affected facilities that contained nuclear material – mainly uranium enriched to varying degrees – but there has been no report of increased off-site radiation levels,” he said.

Still, the IAEA is aware of concerns in the region regarding any radiological consequences as a result of the strikes on nuclear facilities.

“Based on the data available to us, the IAEA can provide assurances that there has been no radiological impact to the population and the environment in neighbouring countries. Crucially in terms of nuclear safety, Iran’s research and power reactors were not targeted,” Director General Grossi said.

In addition to the detailed assessment that Director General Grossi provided to the IAEA Board of Governors on Monday, the IAEA has identified additional impact points at nuclear sites at Fordow and Natanz as a result of strikes carried out before today’s announcements on the situation in Iran.

Regarding the additional strikes to Fordow that were reported early on Monday – after the U.S. bombing of the facility early on Sunday – the IAEA assesses that access roads close to the underground facility and one of its entrances were hit.

At Natanz, the IAEA has identified two impact holes from the U.S. strikes above the underground halls that had been used for enrichment as well as for storage. Based on its knowledge of what these halls contained, the IAEA assesses that this strike may have caused localized contamination and chemical hazards."

MadTownGuy said...

Link to IAEA update: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-on-developments-in-iran-6

stlcdr said...

You would have to say 'literally obliterate' to give the word its true meaning, but these days 'literally' literally doesn't mean literally.

Yinzer said...

Only retired professors with websites :-) have any interest in splitting the 'obliterate' hair. Such supercilious navel-gazing!

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.