For the record: "Sex and the City" was a current TV show from 1994 to 2004. My own West Village experience was long before that: 1976 to 1981.
Back to the article: "This isn’t the first time a generation of socially ambitious young women has descended on the West Village and, as one fashion executive explained to me with just a hint of an eye roll, 'made the neighborhood their whole personality,' fundamentally changing it along the way. If Sex and the City washed out the last of the neighborhood’s bohemians two decades ago and turned the West Village into a celebrity playground where real adults with real incomes live, the pandemic turned it into something else entirely: a bustling sorority house. 'Everyone has the same mind-set. We’re here, we’re young, we’re single. Let’s go out and have fun and be ourselves. Work hard. Play hard,' said a new arrival from Texas with blonde highlights while polishing off a bottle of rosé with her girlfriends one afternoon. They’re basic, they told me proudly. 'Basic isn’t a bad thing,' a crew of Cosmo drinkers at Anton’s, just down the street, elaborated. 'There’s a reason everyone wants to be like that.'"
Is this article about how much things have changed or about how things never really change?
43 comments:
They are not immigrants. They are illegal entrants - who were brought in, on purpose, for the purpose of power and grift, illegally - by communists.
Vapid young females.
I hear New York City and areas around are a crime-ridden urban decay sh*t show. I hope these ladies are wearing sensible shoes.
Peachy: immivaders.
"Vapid young females."
On the plus side, that'll change. They won't always be young.
That would have put you there in the neighborhoods Barney Miller era.
"Is this article about how much things have changed or about how things never really change? "
As Jordan Peterson said, we've only had women in the workforce for about 75 years. We really don't know what the outcome will be.
I suspect most of them have "email jobs", anyway.
This never happens in Chillicothe.
'You can have a ( currently fashionable, very expensive accessory) and still care about (currently fashionable identity group) rights'
IIRC, it was Manolo Blahnik shoes and gay rights on the TV show.
I used to pretend I was in the show "Sea Hunt." (I especially liked the underwater knife fights.)
My age, however, was in the low single digits.
Nobody ever got stabbed, they just had their air hose cut.
They were Just waiting for Lena Dunham to move away.
There was an SATC ep where the oldest gal was in a fight with noisy drag queens left over from the old nejghborhood. The tension eventually resolved and the two groups had a joint party.
Of.course, left unsaid were the suggests that the four SATC gals were basically gay men, and as they got older, female drag queens.
JSM
They have seemingly endless disposable income.
Alternatively, they have excessive credit card debt.
This article is one massive euphemism. It’s women with a fetish for double penetration . This works out with the gay boys until their mid 20s, after which they tire of the demands of women and go full gay.
Joe Bar - the result is clear. Declining fertility.
There's something very reassuring about how ordinary they are. Everyone has their time to be young, beautiful, and a bit clueless - before real life takes over.
My own West Village experience was long before that: 1976 to 1981.
Living out the "That Girl" fantasy? Today's young women may never have heard of Marlo Thomas, but I suspect this is less about sex and more about the fantasy of having a glamorous career.
I guess the underground weekly, "The East Village Other" has been dead for years. The title would be great for a magazine for today's non-binaries.
What kept the urban weeklies going was the personal ads -- SWM seeks SWF. When all that went to Craig's List, the papers folded. It's just as well. "SWM" and "SWF" are racist and imagine all the abbreviations they'd need to accommodate all 63 genders.
Ugh
This has a bit of a harem feel to it. Do they actually need men for any reason? In Herland, there are no men and apparently no female orgasms. Of course, they are focused on social justice.
If I had to guess, I'd say the the author of the article is a middle aged spinster living in a rent stabilized apt. With four cats.
"Lawcruiter said...
There's something very reassuring about how ordinary they are. Everyone has their time to be young, beautiful, and a bit clueless - before real life takes over."
I never got to be beautiful, but it sounds nice for them. I'm with you, the girls are doing fine, and that is reassuring.
They aren't on Onlyfans, or doing something else that will diminish their long-term prospects.
NYT reporters and readers never-ending resentment that someone is having more fun than they are.
The old MadTV show did some wicked parodies of “Sex and the City” a couple of decades ago.
I hope things work out better for these young women than I suspect they will.
Sounds boring
as i said in the previous GIRLS post..
If Carrie and Charlotte hadn't aborted their children..
They'd be GRANDMOTHERS now (30 years later)
Which would be happier?
Dried up, and drugged out still single Carrie?
or
Mother of three, with 4 grandchildren (ALREADY!) Carrie?
Brando used to talk about screwing Jewish girls who'd come to NYC for a couple years of fun before they got married and moved to Long Island or Scarsdale. So, its been going on for a long time.
I guess SF and LA are off the list of "cool places" for young women. Frankly, Paris or Rome sound better to me, but Jobs are no doubt scarce.
I don't know, maybe this is sour grapes, but for some reason I'm put in mind of the instant-makeover shows where a team sweeps in and remodels a house in a weekend or whatever - and you just know that if you were actually there, you could see how crappy the finish work was.
This article is one massive euphemism. It’s women with a fetish for double penetration . This works out with the gay boys until their mid 20s, after which they tire of the demands of women and go full gay.
Well, that seems like quite a stretch to me. I wonder how you get there from here. Feel free to enlighten us.
I will say, given the imbalance of single heterosexual women to single heterosexual men in a place like this, they are probably little more than harem girls for a subset of those "fratty" guys, desperately hoping to snag one of the relatively few budding Masters of the Universe for a life of ease in Scarsdale.
Most of them will end up back in their hometowns in their early to mid 30's, still single, jaded, bitter, unable to pair-bond properly, and dealing with a couple of the more minor but persistent sorts of venereal diseases.
I'm thinking Nail Salon.
Nobody ever got stabbed, they just had their air hose cut.
Always the one on the left, which was the exhaust on those old-fashioned double-tube regulators. It could be cut at will, producing an impressive cloud of bubbles at no risk to the diver. The one on the right was the intake and could not be safely cut in an underwater knife fight.
A quote from the article (from one of the "girls"): "Our guy friends live nearby too. They all work in finance. They do what we do; we live parallel lives. They’re boys; we’re girls. We see them all the time. They do their dinner; we do ours."
Young people confounding nostalgia yearning middle age by being young for the nth power of forever.
Why, here’s one of those happy young women now:
https://x.com/thegaywhostrayd/status/1909256074101764500
One of the arguments made in literary YouTube is that the real problem with book publishing today is that the only people who can afford to live in NYC on what publishers pay editorial assistants who really are the gatekeepers on new talent are young women from affluent families to support them living there.
I'll give 'em one thing: not a fatty in the bunch.
Life will always be unfair. The affluent, the clever, the beautiful, the young, the fertile sexually available female, and the socially graceful have won a sort of social/genetic/chronological lottery and will have many more opportunities for hedonic excess than the rest of us. Plus ça change
Is all of this for real? It sounds like a recurrent dream that Dylan Mulvaney has.
Ann Althouse said...
A quote from the article (from one of the "girls"): "Our guy friends live nearby too. They all work in finance. They do what we do; we live parallel lives. They’re boys; we’re girls. We see them all the time. They do their dinner; we do ours."
5/6/25, 11:10 AM
Separate but equal? Actually, it sounds like pretty much every middle/high school dance ever. Guess they never grew up! Forever young...
«They aren't on Onlyfans, or doing something else that will diminish their long-term prospects»
Sorry to burst their bubble, but for women, increasing the number of sexual partners decreases their likelihood of snagging quality men, and in this case, the types of guys that they are dating and banging. The TV show Sluts in the City was fantasy. Not a how-to guide.
One reason that previous sexual availability reduces the marital value of women is that men are wired to worry about being cuckolded. Spending their hard earned resources raising another man’s biological kids. Besides that, by their early 30s, they are competing for men against women a decade younger, now more beautiful, and more fertile. And not just more fertile, but less likely to have damaged children.
Paraphrasing Joan Rivers:
A man has multiple sexual partners and he's a stud.
A woman makes 15 - 20 mistakes and....
"Our guy friends live nearby too. They all work in finance. They do what we do; we live parallel lives. They’re boys; we’re girls. We see them all the time. They do their dinner; we do ours."
AMERICAN PSYCHOS
"I hear New York City and areas around are a crime-ridden urban decay sh*t show. I hope these ladies are wearing sensible shoes. "
Ridiculous. Don't believe everything you hear. I moved to NYC in 1981. At that time, the crime was much higher than today, and the city was dirty and deteriorating physically. And yet, my one street crime encounter was an very early morning non-violent mugging by two guys who stopped me as I was heading to the subway to go to work. They didn't even touch me, but flanked me as I took out my wallet to pull out the $40.00 I had it in it. (They didn't take the wallet.) As they left, they even apologized to me saying they had to go uptown to buy drugs.
Now, there was violent crime in the city then, as there is now, but, given the vastness of the city and the density of the population, most citizens will not be victims of crime, even then, and much less so today. In comparison to 1981 (and the next 12 years or so, when the city started fixing itself up), the city today is like a Disney World, both aesthetically and in terms of the danger any person must be concerned about. (I left the city three years ago, at my wife's wishes, but I miss it and still am happy and thankful for every day of the 40 years and 8 months I lived there.)
Sex in the City ended more than 20 years ago. The women profiled were in kindergarten.
Also, oh no, a bunch of successful, happy straight people. How terrible! They aren't miserable!
Worse, they are straight!
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.