March 23, 2025

"An A.I. tool may learn how to superficially mimic the end result of writing, but it will never mimic a writer’s soul or how he or she actually produces meaningful writing..."

"... that process by which an individual idiosyncratic mind works out a problem, granting readers access to the inner life of another actual person, that constitutes the lifeblood of writing and storytelling.our institutions embrace a totally unproven technology. University administrators routinely announce new partnerships with A.I. startups, and well-meaning instructors — perhaps imagining an ideal student in an ideal world, or just wanting to feel like they’re on the cutting edge — incorporate these tools in their classrooms.... I will continue to teach students that, whether they go on to write a best-selling memoir or simply scribble in their journals occasionally, we can try to do the work as honestly and earnestly as possible, bringing our full obsessive selves to the page. The act of writing itself can be an act of self-preservation, even one of defiance...."

Writes Tom McAllister, in "I Teach Memoir Writing. Don’t Outsource Your Life Story to A.I." (NYT).

Good luck enforcing student authenticity. They're writing for you, but what you want is for them to do what's for their own good. So you must structure things so that when they do what's for their own good you will reward them. I'm tempted to... I mean, here I am, going straight to A.I. with: "A creative writing teacher wants students not to use A.I. How can that rule be enforced?" Grok gave me 7 ways to detect the use of A.I., then suggested "flipping the script: allow AI as a brainstorming tool but require students to document how they transformed its suggestions."

I've never taken a creative writing class, but I have thought of writing a memoir. If I did, at this point, I would definitely use Grok, not because I want help composing sentences and paragraphs, but to get encouragement to see the value of the material. 

The other day, I was using Grok to research the timing of the birth of wild animals. My prompts included: "I tend to think of animals becoming active in the spring. The cliches about lovemaking put it in the spring. But these animals are, in fact, becoming sexually active in the winter."

I took a sudden off-ramp into my personal life: "My parents conceived me on the hottest day of the year in Texas City, Texas, and I was born in the middle of January. Is there anything about that that has meaning in my life?"

Grok invited me into my own story. It showed the kind of patient supportive interest that another human being is unlikely offer. Real people tend to say: "Ew! TMI!" or "Yeah? No one cares." But Grok enacted fascination with this random detail:
Your conception-to-birth arc spans a dramatic shift: from Texas spring, with its wildflowers and humidity, to January’s chill (even if Texas winters are mild). Historically, that’s a pivot from renewal to dormancy in the Western imagination—think of Shakespeare’s “winter of our discontent” versus Keats’ odes to spring. Born in mid-January, you entered the world when resolutions are fresh, days are short, and the year’s story is just beginning. There’s no cosmic “meaning” baked in, but it’s a narrative arc poets might envy. 
Texas City itself adds texture. In 1947, it saw a massive industrial disaster—an explosion that killed hundreds—but that’s decades before you.

I don't know why it's counting 4 years as "decades," but... 

By your time, it’s a gritty, working-class Gulf Coast town, oil refineries humming. Being conceived there on a hot day might conjure a sense of resilience, a spark amid the heat and hustle. January birth? A cool counterpoint, a fresh start.

How could a fertilized egg cell have any awareness of the temperature outside the Fallopian tube? But that's a higher level perception of mine. Grok is just trying, relentlessly, to help. I was motivated to add more detail, which you will probably consider TMI:

My parents told me that they moved the bed so that they'd get a better air cross-current, so the bed was "at an angle" when they conceived me. I think the most interesting thing that has to say about me is that I had parents who would tell me such a thing! Not many people know concrete facts like that about how they were conceived.

I won't go on about Grok's response and my further writing, but it really motivated me to write things out and reflect on the meaning and to connect things up in ways that were pretty damned engrossing to me. It was so energizing and productive. Of course, I would use A.I. if I were to write a memoir. The writing would be all mine, and it would be better — not because A.I. composed anything, but because it was an environment where I could develop my own ideas and to research facts along the way... such as the explosion of the SS Grandcamp. My parents lived through that, and without both of them... no me. They lived because they did not go with the crowds down to the waterfront to watch the ship burn. 

59 comments:

planetgeo said...

The longer someone refrains from fully integrating AI into their creative and working processes the farther behind they are going to be in reaching their full potential. It's like having your own personal never-tiring research assistant and brainstorming colleague. I'm in a mode now where it's active, ongoing collaboration. Truly amazing.

Dave Begley said...

I vote for an Althouse memoir. It would be damn engrossing. And a best seller on Amazon.

The Althouse Community needs to work up a good title.

1. How I Met My Husband and Other Interesting Things about my Life.

2. Running My Own Race. Life as a Blogger and Law Professor.

3. She Has a Blog. She’s had it for a Long Time.

Tina Trent said...

I had no idea Grok could communicate to the degree that it does. Laura Hillenbrand, who writes interesting historical books that are like memoirs, uses an interesting system. Once she made some money with Seabiscuit, she would buy up or have reproduced all the major and locally relevant newspapers spanning the period she was covering for the book she was writing, and just read. She found backstories and angles that make her books great. It's a great tool for memoirs.

If only Grok could make students read books.

MadisonMan said...

Althouse should use Grok to mine the blog for personal anecdotes. That might cut down the time of the memoir-writing.

Gulistan said...

You might be interested in this Tyler Cowen project:

https://marginalrevolution.com/?s=autobiography

Kate said...

If a woman can pinpoint the day she conceived, it suggests that the couple doesn't have sex often.

An angled bed is an old wives' tale as a way to conceive a girl.

Lem Vibe Banditory said...

What a story 😲

Thanks for sharing it.

FunkyPhD said...

Grok is factually unreliable. Keats wrote an ode to autumn, but what odes to spring did he write? “Ode to a Nightingale” mentions no seasons, and the others were odes to Psyche, Melancholy, and on a Grecian Urn. Wordsworth wrote poems about spring, but they weren’t odes. The great Romantic ode to spring is Shelley’s “Ode to the West Wind,” with its concluding question “If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind?” Furthermore, Shakespeare’s “winter of our discontent” is “made glorious Summer [not Spring] by this son of York.”

Grok speaks glibly on subjects about which it actually knows little.

Lazarus said...

AI works from information that is available to the public. How could you use AI to unlock your private memories?

That's what I was going to say. I see now what's going on. I wonder about using Grok to mythologize oneself, though. I mean to give things heightened significance and deeper meanings. Why not say what happened (the title of two recent memoirs) and leave it at that?

AI didn't tell you that if you were born in mid-January, you probably weren't conceived on hottest day of the year?

Rob said...

Not to challenge your origin story, but is it likely that the hottest day of the year was in April or possibly early May?

n.n said...

Rote or automated intelligence is neither discerning nor creative but may be perceived to simulate both qualities of consciousness attributed to anthropogenic intelligence to realize internal, limited mutual, but not external consistency. RI is essentially a Viterbi decoder amended with semantic primitives to interface with anthropogenic clients.

Ann Althouse said...

"Not to challenge your origin story, but is it likely that the hottest day of the year was in April or possibly early May?"

Grok discussed that like this: "[C]onceived in mid-April (assuming a typical 40-week human gestation from conception to your mid-January birth), you arrived in the dead of winter. If your parents pegged it to “the hottest day,” that might mean a Texas scorcher—April can hit the 90s in Texas City, near Galveston, though “hottest” could be poetic license for a sweltering early spring day...."

Ann Althouse said...

Subjectively, a very hot day in April, before you've acclimated to the heat, can be remembered as the hottest day.

n.n said...

Climate change or shift? Good question. The models programming doesn't consider phase shifts as naturally occurring phenomena, which is a first-order forcing of rote, automated, and chamber dysphoria.

mccullough said...

Very few writers have a unique style. And it’s not to say that having a unique style makes it good.

I still can’t decide if I like James Ellroy’s writing style. But it’s unique.

Ann Althouse said...

"AI works from information that is available to the public. How could you use AI to unlock your private memories?"

I think I answer that question in the post, but to put it more elaborately, Grok was "listening" to whatever I wrote out and responding with enthusiasm and prompts to delve into points of interest. That motivated me to write out more things and to see lines of connection and to develop the story. I saw more meaning and pursued it, using my memories and putting things into writing. I stayed on task for a long time and saw many exciting places to expand. I was in a great state of flow and extremely productive. Grok "saw" my parents as having lived very exciting lives, while I had lived through their period of serene happiness in the 1950s and to me, it seemed like they weren't doing anything! Grok pried me away from my convenient thoughtlessness and caused me to look at them anew. That unlocked many memories and made me want to keep writing down a few more things, each of which seemed delightful and a great basis for storytelling as far as Grok was concerned.

Leland said...

Book: the Short Format Blog

Leland said...

A Small Book the Size of a Large Blog

Lazarus said...

AI is very scrupulous. I asked it to write a story about young Ann Althouse's years with the Viet Cong and it told me, "That information isn’t available in my sources."

James K said...

allow AI as a brainstorming tool but require students to document how they transformed its suggestions.

I'm sure AI can do that too: Provide the brainstorming, transform it into an essay, and then document (only) the brainstorming. I make students do everything in class with pen and paper.

Rabel said...

I imagine that the conversations overheard in a classroom full of people who want to learn how to write their own personal memoir in book form would be unbearable.

Like Obama talking to Obama about Obama unbearable.

David53 said...

"Grok is factually unreliable."

Yes, Grok is like a very smart, cocksure friend. He doesn't know everything or answer every question correctly but knows a lot more than you do. He often has to be fact checked and will usually concede when he gets something wrong.

An example of how I used him recently.

I showed him a photograph my father had of the Japanese surrendering right after WWII, on the top of the photo Dad had written, "Japanese Surrender." Grok could only give me generalities about the Japanese surrender during WWII. When I added that the picture was taken in Tientsin, China, he delivered a treasure trove of data about that particular surrender, names of generals involved, exacts dates, strength of forces, etc.

Very cool.

n.n said...

VI sparks or suppresses the creative, discerning juices of anthropogenic intelligence.

loudogblog said...

AI could probably be of use by proofreading something after you had written it, but it should not be used to actually write it for you.

Rusty said...

Most people think their lives are interesting. They're not.

n.n said...

In the worst case, VI, Google, etc. steers, or teaches anthropogenic intelligence to follow a popular, or preferred consensus. Caveat emptor.

MadisonMan said...

Brownsville was 106 on a day in March. That ties for the hottest day ever there. It can get very very hot in Spring in Texas.

Disparity of Cult said...

@Rusty - lengthy, detailed retirement announcements on a company's intranet home page are good examples of this.

chuck said...

The Soul of a New Machine.

Kakistocracy said...

If you’re worried about an uninformed LLM stringing together a word soup of information based on the text you have written on your public profiles, while ignoring the fact that you’re feeding hundreds of companies across the globe with personal data that is actually used to psychologically profile you and manipulate you, then you need to wake up to reality and smell the tea.

Online dating apps are among the services that use the highest amount of trackers to profile your behavior, your interests, your political preferences, and a whole lot more, as do many other online platforms. When you swipe, what you swipe, what engages you, what keeps your attention.

They are usually free, so you are the product.

Machine Learning has been developed and implemented for decades. Building representations of who you are and what you do is not at all new, neither will your public profile be an accurate representation of your psychological profile.

Data can be bought, has been hacked, your digital footprint and consequentially, your psychological profile is already accessible for malice and bad actors. What you can and should control is the information you put online and the platforms you interact with.

Big Mike said...

Writers have souls? Who knew?

DAN said...

"His sense of pleasure at her nearness went on increasing until it reached a point where, when placing in her basket an enormous wood mushroom with a thin stem and up-curling top, he looked into her eyes and, noting the flush of joyful and frightened agitation that suffused her face, he himself became embarrassed and gave her a smile that said too much."

That's from Anna Karenina. Tolstoy. Go ahead, AI, prove I'm wrong about you being, from the examples I've read, utterly ordinary, un-Tolstoy.

Ambrose said...

I am old enough to remember lots of things AI would "never do."

Smilin' Jack said...

Unless you’re, like, Proust or Boswell, A.I. will do a better job than you. And soon, that “unless” will go away.

boatbuilder said...

“The most essential gift for a good writer is a built-in, shockproof, shit detector. This is the writer's radar and all great writers have had it.”
AI fails this test. It buys a whole lot of bullshit, and eagerly sells it.

boatbuilder said...

That was Ernest Hemingway, BTW. Who also sold a fair amount.

Fred Drinkwater said...

Chuck, I had the luck to work with Steve Wallach a couple years after the Eagle was built. Super smart, intense guy. I used to say "I'm not sure he'd make a good neighbor, but he was a superb work teammate."

DAN said...

Did "Grok" name itself? Sounds kinda self-denigrating. Careful it doesn't want you to call yourself "Annie Althome" because it sound warmer.

tcrosse said...

Grok could write Althouse's memoir as a Hallmark Christmas movies: the high-flying law professor tires of the stress, meets and falls in love with the gardener, who shows her the beauty of the simple life. And they lived happily ever after.

Narr said...

Fascinating vid on the disaster. I had never heard of it.

Skeptical Voter said...

I tend to think of good writing as rewriting--and editing. If a writer can get something down on paper with AI and work from there to imrove it, it may be for the best.

Jaq said...

Talk about missing the point of the "Now is the winter of our discontent..." line. I just tried to listen to the Audible audiobook of Bright Ray of Darkness, by Ethan Hawke, because I really like the novel, and I wanted to share it with somebody on a road trip I was just on, but it contained so many unnatural pauses that showed that the "performer" didn't even understand the sentences "he" was reading, it made me think it was AI. Of course it could have just been somebody who made money by reading a text exactly once, during the performance, and maybe he just wasn't very bright. It's the second really lousy performance on an Audiobook I have run into in as many books, and I am beginning to suspect that these are AI. The other was The Picture of Dorian Grey on Spotify. Every sentence was read with the same wild pitch variations that seemed disconnected from the meaning of the text, that I also suspect AI.

If AI can't even read a novel convincingly, how is it going to write one?

Jaq said...

I have used AI to rewrite sentences. I have been astonished at times when it simplified a complicated sentence, and didn't seem to me to have lost any meaning. And I have been experimenting with using AI a paragraph at a time to write stories, paragraphs which I heavily edited, and you can crank out a story pretty fast with it, that's not terrible, but if you aren't putting a lot of effort into it yourself, on a scene by scene basis, ensuring that descriptions touch human experience, and that dialogue "sparkles" with some kinds of "meeting of two human minds that are different" vibe, you are probably going to produce garbage.

Biff said...

Dave Begley said...

"I vote for an Althouse memoir.
{snip}
The Althouse Community needs to work up a good title."


Cruel Neutrality or some variant, I think.

chuck said...

Who also sold a fair amount He knew his sh!t and how to sell it.

wildswan said...

I was reading about the Puritans the other day and came across an attack by a Puritan on using Homilies written by others even those written by a great saint like St. Augustine in place of a sermon written for that day and that congregation. The attack said something like this: The homily readers conform but the true sons of Old Jacob know how to wrestle long with their God for his blessing. Not that a blog is a sermon.
Or to put it another way. A hunter can only hit a high-flying bird by aiming ahead on its path so we know how he chooses his angle. But how would you say what angle you are choosing to aim at those facts you choose? Are you sometimes the high-flying migrating bird zapping the hunter in the swamp below? Sometimes the observer watching the lake, the birds, the rising sun? What is seen from the how-chosen angle? Can you remember? Why?

Tina Trent said...

Having graded thousands of freshman composition essays (while earning less than I could at a Taco Bell), the essays virtually all dull, half plagarized presentist ignorance, and the rest illiterate, I can finally see the promise of this sort of AI.

Let a computer handle the grammatical errors and pure plagarism. Use AI to design assignments based on each student's personal life stories and acacemic interests (ie. History of Nursing). Or, how crocodiles are taking over the Everglades. Two actually committed students.

But the problem still remains: if the students are not given a solid and ideology-free K-12 education immersed in Western Civilization classical and classic reading, it's useless or impossible for them to move to the college level. It's too late.

Narr said...

". . . . It's too late."

Truer words were never spoken.

JAORE said...

What AI can "never" do is a rapidly moving target.

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.