February 7, 2018

"The whole story is basically that Facebook gets so much traffic that they started convincing publishers to post things on Facebook."

"For a long time, that was fine. People posted things on Facebook, then you would click those links and go to their websites. But then, gradually, Facebook started exerting more and more control of what was being seen, to the point that they, not our website, essentially became the main publishers of everyone’s content. Today, there’s no reason to go to a comedy website that has a video if that video is just right on Facebook. And that would be fine if Facebook compensated those companies for the ad revenue that was generated from those videos, but because Facebook does not pay publishers, there quickly became no money in making high-quality content for the internet.... Facebook has created a centrally designed internet. It’s a lamer, shittier looking internet. It’s just not as cool as an internet that is a big, chaotic space filled with tons of independently operating websites who are able to make a living because they make something cool that people want to see.... "

Writes Sarah Aswell in "How Facebook Is Killing Comedy" at Splitsider.

What happens when (if) no one but Facebook makes money from writing, video, and photography? Perhaps there is some beauty in the leveling, with all of us simply expressing ourselves in pure amateurism. But Facebook is still making money and making decisions about how things will be served up to readers — what will be highlighted and what will be pushed down into oblivion.

I'm resisting the vortex of Facebook, but I know a few former bloggers who've moved their work onto Facebook. Some of that has to do with the fact that they never tried to monetize their blog at all (or tried and failed). But I think these are people who would prefer an independent blog — making no money — if only they had good traffic. So people migrate to Facebook, which gives the impression that there are a lot of people present, and they accept that all the money to be made goes to Facebook.

I, one of the holdouts, have good traffic on this blog and I have it monetized to some degree — not enough to live comfortably if it were my only income, but enough to make me feel that it's money that should come to me and not get redirected to Facebook. But I'm happy with the amateurism of writing as long as it is read, and it feels all-important to me that I'm writing in this separate place — my place — and I decide what goes on top.

50 comments:

phantommut said...

Keep on keeping on. (I will now go buy something from Amazon through your portal.)

Ann Althouse said...

At this point, having blogged for 14 years, I would not be able to stand doing this through Facebook. I am on Facebook (with only people I know as friends), but it's like being seen now and then as you walk down the street. It's not the same as having a home.

Jim Gust said...

I read zero blogs on Facebook. I'm not about to start now.

I've mostly stopped posting to Facebook also.

R C Belaire said...

When ordering via Amazon, you're on my list. Hope it helps.

rehajm said...

Facebook started exerting more and more control of what was being seen, to the point that they, not our website, essentially became the main publishers of everyone’s content

This statement seems rather Underpants Gnomish. How do they do this exactly?

The whole lament is rather strange. If you wish to monetize your content but Facebook gets the money for what you post on Facebook then why do you post on Facebook?

robother said...

As Laurence Sterne said, "I write, not to be fed, but to be famous." Of course, in his time, as in ours, that is a stance not many can afford to take. But there is a freedom to it, and as much as I enjoy opening this site every morning to some fresh new blogging, I suspect Ann's freedom to say "fuck it, I'm not writing anything today" plays a part in that freshness.

Big Mike said...

I don’t want to have to join Facebook to read your blog.

Unknown said...

Facebook will censor the content before too long anyway. Publishing anything that isn't in lockstep with CNN will be removed as "hate speech" soon.

So it's good that you aren't there, Althouse. Yes, you are a lefty, but you are an honest and independent one. And that's a rare and rapidly vanishing species anymore. Keep up the good work!

--Vance

Rob said...

Your writing isn't amateurish, Ann. Just the other day, when your name came up, I said, "Oh yeah, Althouse is an old pro."

Anonymous said...

Am I reading / watching things on FaceBook? no. I don't want to give them money

Am I happy they are destroying the employment prospects of a bunch of leftists? Why yes, I am!

Are the "comics" almost all leftists? Well, here's a question:

How many comics were mocking President Obama from 2008 - 2016?

How many are mocking Trump?

Once you've sold your soul to the Left, I want to see you destroyed. Which is why I no longer pay any attention to the NFL

Ann Althouse said...

"Your writing isn't amateurish, Ann."

I agree, but this amateurism (in the positive sense of done for love).

Michael K said...

Facebook is losing lots of subscribers.

I keep getting little messages telling me how they are so happy to have me there.

I turn down almost all friend requests.

Meade said...

I used to be an ordinary blog reader until my wife showed me the subscribe button in the Althouse blog sidebar. I was delighted and impressed. So impressed, I married the blogger.

Bob Boyd said...

Dat muddafuggin Zuckabug...

Meade said...

"Dat muddafuggin Zuckabug..."

LOL. Never gets old.

Mike of Snoqualmie said...

Anne, never move to facebook! Though I have a facebook account, I hardly use it. (I almost wrote "belong." Facebook does not own me!)

As for comedy, does that still exist? SJWs suck the life out of everything, including comedy.

Bob Boyd said...

"I married the blogger."

They say it's not bragging if you can do it.

Anonymous said...

Being an old curmudgeon I absolutely refuse to use Facebook. The more I learn about what Facebook is doing the more I congratulate myself. PowerLine only allows Facebook comments and I find that very frustrating. I also find that the quality of Ann's commenters is considerably better than those blogs that restrict themselves to using Facebook. I find those blogs seem to deteriorate into 6th grade name calling much more quickly.

Ann, please don't go on Facebook. Maintain your proud independence as well as your cruel neutrality!

Left Bank of the Charles said...

Or maybe funnyordie stopped being funny and died.

Ken B said...

I won’t read it if it moves to fb.

Rosalyn C. said...

You made the right choice and stuck with it long before it was the cool thing to do.

cubanbob said...

I don't use Twitter or Facebook and have no intention of using either. I find them find fine for commercial purposes but worthless for intelligent commentary and blogging. Stay independent please, I'll use the Amazon link.

Jim Grey said...

Sometimes I wonder if all the handwringing over net neutrality (which I'm for) is for naught, as Facebook's algorithms determine what we all see anyway.

I link my daily blog posts on my personal FB page, and I have my security set to allow anybody to follow me and even to comment. I get as many likes/comments on FB for each post as I do on the blog itself. Thing is, people have to click away from FB to read the post and then go back to FB to comment there! I don't understand why those people don't just comment on the blog itself. But whatever.

Sydney said...

Facebook is a terrible platform for a blog. You can't do multiple links, for one thing, and you can't design the layout of your posted photos, either. One photo per post only and that at the bottom of the word content. Why would anyone want to put their blog there? Wouldn't it be better to just post a link that takes readers back to the main blog without giving away the whole content of the post?

YoungHegelian said...

'm resisting the vortex of Facebook, but I know a few former bloggers who've moved their work onto Facebook.

Oh, yeah, like FB would just love to have us troglodytic sewer-dwelling committers dragged along with your blog. Seriously, we'd get censored out of existence.

I've really learned to loath the denizens of Silicon Valley 2.0.

eddie willers said...

Sometimes I wonder if all the handwringing over net neutrality (which I'm for)

You haven't thought it all the way through, then.

wildswan said...

Don't send your blog to Facebook, the dying mother said
Don't hand control to Zberg,
Soon you'll be unfriended
Soon you can't be read.

rhhardin said...

My computer doesn't even work with facebook. Nothing shows up.

One less virus vector.

whitney said...

Please don't move to Facebook. I read several bloggers that periodically ask for money and every time they ask, i send money. it's generally about twice a year for the ones that I support and the last time you asked I sent you money. I'm not alone here, others will too. Ask more.

Bill Peschel said...

I use Facebook for the very good writing group I belong to. I have a personal and professional page and send links there from my blog.

But every time I try to read my feed, I get nauseous. The layout is complicated and ugly. I get very little pleasure from scrolling through the bland feeds. (My posts are bland as well. You have to talk to everyone who follows you, so you can't talk politics with the people who want to hear about it, and your dog with that other group of people, so you're forced to deliver the lowest-common denominator.)

Believe me, there are no blogs, comics, or any other creator I follow on Facebook. I don't care if it's Neil Bloody Gaiman, I wouldn't go there.

Don't miss it, either.

campy said...

not enough to live comfortably if it were my only income, but enough

So you could maybe eke out a subsistence living on the blog's income?

Cool!

Howard said...

Facebook going to die with Gen-X. Millenials and GenZ (iGen) moving on to twatter and instaglib

Lexington Green said...

Facebook is not good. I deactivated my account. The world was a better place when we had a blogosphere.

Jaylat said...

Why are you still using Blogger? Start your own url and leave the Google walled garden.

Fred Drinkwater said...

I left Facebook years ago, and would not go back to read Althouse.

RichardJohnson said...

Michael K:
Facebook is losing lots of subscribers.

This graph doesn't show a loss of subscribers. Even if Facebook is losing subscribers here and there, Facebook continues to have net gains of subscribers, quarter upon quarter, year upon year. Number of daily active Facebook users worldwide as of 4th quarter 2017 (in millions)
This statistic presents the number of daily active Facebook users as of the fourth quarter of 2017. During this period of time, it was found that 1.4 billion active users visited the social network on a daily basis. Overall, daily active users accounted for 66 percent of monthly active users.

Disclosure: I do not use Facebook.

RMc said...

Facebook Is Killing Comedy

Good. Most comedy today is awful.

Ann Althouse said...

“So you could maybe eke out a subsistence living on the blog's income?”

I’d be frugal. Meade and I would have fun being frugal if we had to. We are pretty frugal without having to. I’m not interested in most material things. We’ve both been interested in living small since long before we met, both read books about frugality when we were young. I care about money mostly so I don’t have to think about money. I’ve known people who found money interesting to think about, but I just find it very boring and annoying.

jb said...

Ann-

Good on you!

jb

bozonomous said...

Your the greatest

Steven said...

I've really learned to loath the denizens of Silicon Valley 2.0.
What? What's wrong with Atari?

1.0 was people actually making silicon chips, whence the term was invented. Shockley, then Fairchild, and then the Fairchildren like Intel and AMD and National Semiconductor and such. 2.0 was the computer system makers like Apple and Atari and Sun. 3.0 was the traditional software companies like Oracle. The web companies aren't any earlier than 4.0.

Jupiter said...

robother said...
"... and as much as I enjoy opening this site every morning to some fresh new blogging, I suspect Ann's freedom to say "fuck it, I'm not writing anything today" plays a part in that freshness."

"Althouse
This is where Ann Althouse has been writing every day since January 14, 2004."

stlcdr said...

“Blogger Jim Grey said...
Sometimes I wonder if all the handwringing over net neutrality (which I'm for) is for naught, as Facebook's algorithms determine what we all see anyway”

Two completely separate issues. But Facebook is now much more brazen with what they feed you. It is designed as an ad revenue system, in a sociopolitical structure.

PB said...

IT's not Facebook that is killing comedy. "Comedians" who aren't funny are killing comedy.

tim in vermont said...

That is a pretty good example of "net neutrality" Facebook gets to monetize stuff it never made. YouTube, Amazon. They made billions on a platform they don't control, so now it's time to bring in the government that they bought to seize that control.

tim in vermont said...

If Althouse could not make a secure living blogging, it explains a lot about what we are seeing around the web.

tim in vermont said...

She could sell out, of course, like most of the others who have survived.

rdasher said...

So Facebook is becoming AOL.

tim in vermont said...

By lamenting the control that Facebook has, you have taken the first step to understand that net neutrality is just a sop to the web billionaires. That's good, you should follow that line of thought,

Unknown said...

Hey what a brilliant post I have come across and believe me I have been searching out for this similar kind of post for past a week and hardly came across this. Thank you very much and will look for more postings from you. brsm.io/buy-real-facebook-auto-likes