September 27, 2018

Let's watch the Kavanaugh hearing.

1. It's about to start. I'll update this post as we go.

2. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford has taken her seat. She's nervously looking around, getting patted on the back. She's wearing a dark blue jacket over a dark blue top and has her hair done in a way that allows it to fall over her face and to need to be pushed back. Senator Grassley begins by apologizing to both Blasey and Kavanaugh for the incivility to which both have been subjected. He says he intends to preserve civility in the hearing and to make it "comfortable" for both witnesses.

3. Grassley criticizes Democrats for sitting on the allegations, allowing them to leak out belatedly, and failing to resolve matters in a bipartisan way. Democrats, he says, are to blame for the pain that "Dr. Ford" has suffered in recent days. He praises himself for doing he could to accommodate her. (I put "Dr. Ford" in quotes to indicate that's what she is being called here. I had switched to calling her "Blasey" after reading in the NYT that she preferred that name. From here on, I'll write "Dr. Ford" without quotes.)

4. Dianne Feinstein: "She wanted it confidential, and I held it confidential, up to a point..."

5. Feinstein casts an aspersion on Grassley: He didn't introduce Dr. Ford. Grassley, angered, interrupts to say that he didn't forget to introduce her. He was going to introduce her at the point when he was inviting her to begin speaking.

6. Still waiting for Feinstein to finish reading her intro statement. Dr. Ford seems to be struggling to keep her composure. After Feinstein, I presume we will hear Dr. Ford read this statement, already released to the press.

7. "I am here today not because I want to be. I am terrified...." she begins, in a creaky voice.

8. Sorry, but I got an hour and a half behind. Will resume.

9. Now, I've watched the entire opening statement by Dr. Ford. She seemed very credible to me. Though she was reading, she seemed to be reliving a real, traumatic experience. It's hard to imagine that she could be infusing her speech with that kind of emotion phonily. Even an excellent actress would have difficulty affecting that kind of emotion.

10.  Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor brought in to ask questions for the Senators, receives 5 minutes of time from Senator Grassley. Mitchell's use of the time is awkward, because she begin with documents that Ford must read and comment on, and Ford takes her time and makes small corrections to the documents. Grassley interrupts to say his time is up, and shifts the proceedings forward to the next Senator, Dianne Feinstein,

11. Feinstein takes her turn and focuses on the difficulties Ford experienced as her name became known. This material bolsters Ford's credibility, especially to the extent that it seems that Ford knew how painful this exposure would be before she decided to go public. Feinstein's time runs out quickly and Mitchell gets another 5 minutes to continue where she left off.

12. Mitchell's approach enables Ford, just by being careful, to slow everything down. The time will run out. The day will end. Maybe Kavanaugh supporters wanted it to play out like that, but Ford is a credible person, and I think the Republicans chosen approach, including the use of Mitchell, will backfire on them, and Kavanaugh will not be confirmed. I'm saying this at 11:06 ET in my recording, that is, an hour before I'm writing this update.

13. At 11:13 ET, Ford speaks of the "indelible" memory of Kavanaugh and Judge laughing — "having fun at my expense." "I was underneath one of them, while the 2 laughed, 2 friends having a really good time with one another."

14. At 11:56 ET, during the questioning by Senator Whitehouse, I exclaim aloud: "The Democrats are winning by a lot here." Whitehouse is talking about the lack of an investigation.

15. Grassley gets angry and yells — about why there is no new investigation — but it feels so wrong that he's yelling in the presence of Dr. Ford. She's the allegedly traumatized victim — don't yell around her! The Republicans are either too bland — operating through Mitchell — or irksomely angry — through Grassley. Do they know how badly they are losing right now? I wonder how Brett Kavanaugh is doing.

16. I'm skipping ahead, looking to see if Kavanaugh's testimony has begun. It has not. I talk with Meade for a while about what Kavanaugh might say if he were asked if he is 100% certain that Ford is wrong when she says she's 100% certain that Brett Kavanaugh did what she remembers. Here's what I imagined Kavanaugh saying: I cannot be 100% certain. I know that I drank far too much on some occasions when I was an immature teenager, and though I've said that I don't remember ever suffering alcohol-induced amnesia, I cannot know for an absolute certainty that it never happened. Watching Dr. Ford testify has been a horrific experience for me. What if there is a blank, dark spot in my memory where drunken young Brett Kavanaugh did what Dr. Ford describes? I pray to God that's not true, but I cannot say 100% that it's not true, and if it is, I am so terribly sorry. I beg Dr. Ford's forgiveness. I hope for God's forgiveness. I hope that my life's work as a sober adult makes up for what I may have done all those years ago. I still believe I have devoted and useful service to give to my country, and I humbly submit myself to your vote, Senators. And I thank all of you for considering my case, and I want Dr. Ford to know that my heart goes out to her, and my heart goes out to every victim of sexual assault. Thank you.

17. I picture Trump watching the hearings with Ivanka. Somehow I imagine Ivanka reacting like me. I wonder what they are saying to each other. Remember that Trump said at his press conference yesterday that he would watch and judge Dr. Ford for himself, that he had an open mind about it, and he could "believe anything."

18. I've been listening to Kavanaugh for a long time without stopping to write anything. Let me quickly say that I'm finding his opening statement extremely powerful and persuasive.

19. It was a long day! Let me try to wrap up this post. I thought Kavanaugh did really well in his written statement, expressing strong outrage and real emotion. In the questioning, this demeanor sometimes felt too strong. He interrupted and shouted back and seemed to show some hate and contempt for some of the Senators. He said more than once that his family had been "destroyed," and yet his wife is his "rock." The rock is not destroyed.

20. This was the ultimate he said/she said. Both were tremendously strong and they told diametrically opposed stories. If I had to decide, I would not go by who's more likely to be telling the truth, but how everything we've heard weighs on the question whether or not to confirm. In view of everything we know about Kavanaugh, does he deserve confirmation even with the degree of doubt we have about something terrible he might have done when he was 17 (and a couple of other, much weaker allegations)? I suspect most people will end up in the same position they had on him anyway, because it's a matter of weighing. But when I think about how BK and CBF could be so far apart, I have 3 explanations: 1. BK has some alcohol blackout holes in his memory, and what CBF remembers is in one of them, 2. CBF has a false memory and really believes it (caused by some genuine trauma), 3. BK has no route but forward, and he knows he did it, but feels entitled to what he's worked all his life to attain. Since there's no way back to his old life, he must force his way through this obstacle. And he's barreling ahead to save his life and save his family. Cornered, he had to fight like hell, and that includes lying.

1,813 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1601 – 1800 of 1813   Newer›   Newest»
Mark said...

Ooh. I win the turnover of the speedometer.

Howard said...

Congratulations Trumpsters! This was a big win... but with all his BFFs, maybe he won't go after RvW and I can still get my abortion in Texas.

Mark said...

The question is not why BK and the GOP "do not want an FBI investigation."

The question is why Ford and the Dems do NOT want an FBI investigation. There was and is no reason that Ford could not go to an FBI office and file a report herself. None. Why didn't they? Why don't they? Nothing stopping them.

Yancey Ward said...

It will be Amy Barrett if Kavanaugh loses. Do you think the Democrats will be shy about going after her the same way? I don't.

BUMBLE BEE said...

Prager has stated repeatedly that democrat party can not convince America of the soundness of it's policy, so it has decided to legislate from the bench. Been goin on for several decades. That is why they fear Cruz and Kavanaugh. You'll recall the last president, (whom I'll call Death to Israel", had to do "Pen and a Phone". Never have we seen such block voting from dems.
Must not want to upser their financier. You remember George "the Kapo" Soros. FYI, google just said the Nazis used Kapos to carry out "administrative tasks". Your grandchildren are fucked.

Unknown said...

A good answer to "will you have the President ask the FBI to investigate" is

No

There is value in it, and I'm not going to do something I don't believe in.
As a Judge one job is to keep out wild speculation.

Michael Fitzgerald said...

I am only disappointed that Kav-Brah didn't give the OK sign about 50 times today.

BUMBLE BEE said...

Howard got all those marks on him from those ten foot poles!

traditionalguy said...

The real aggressive Justice K will be seated by next week. He came out
With his brains and his social intelligence hitting every target in the 10 ring with perfect attacks on easy targets.
And Lindsay Graham turned himself into
Trump’s pit bull winning a battle field commission that granted him
Full pardon for his McCain accessory days.

The Dems have nothing.

Michael K said...

Blogger Howard said...
Congratulations Trumpsters! This was a big win... but with all his BFFs, maybe he won't go after RvW and I can still get my abortion in Texas.


Howard, I suspect you know that reversing Roe V Wade will not make abortions illegal in Texas. Maybe Mississippi or Alabama but I doubt it.

The next nomination will be Amy Barret and the Dims shot all their ammo at the moderate guy and radicalized him. They really need a better leader who is not senile.

Krumhorn said...

Just awful. Squalid business. How do we ever recover from the willingness of the Democrats to behave so dishonorably and dishonestly? I suppose we could have another civil war.

Sign me up!

- Krumhorn

D 2 said...

Three thoughts.
1) Am I wrong to think that the accuser will want to see justice served and the accused also thrown off the lower court? Why stop with today? If the allegations of the assault are true, why would you not continue the process, having swearing to it today? It makes no sense otherwise...

2) apologies if someone else already pointed that (somewhat) logical fact out over the last 42 posts and 24,000 comments on this hearing.

3) Mr D Yoakam's song - "Two Doors Down" came to mind earlier, reading the comments. It was released in the 90s, so, no, it wasn't playing That Night That Summer Some Place Possibly in '82.

I am not saying it would be my first choice, but I think I could listen to "Two Doors Down" on loop for two weeks straight rather than endure this dance again

PackerBronco said...

A good answer to "will you have the President ask the FBI to investigate" is

Kavanaugh: the leaking of this anonymous report to the press? I think that would be a good idea. But Senator why is that necessary when you already know who leaked it?

Dem Senator: No, no. I mean these allegations?

Kavanaugh: Well, I've already been investigated 6 times not to mention all of the investigation your staff did, so I guess you mean do I think the FBI should investigate Dr. Ford. No, I don't see what can be gained by an investigation into that women's life. I think we should respect her desire for privacy.

Dem Senator: No, no! You. We want the FBI to investigate you! We want them to ask you some questions!

Kavanaugh: What questions Senator? You can ask them right now if you like.

Dem Senator: Er ... ah ... bluster ... bluster ...

Darrell said...

Two front doors. Either because I'm claustrophobic after the assault--or for symmetry on the house.

Right

Big Mike said...

@MountainMan, I thought I remembered that. I am worried about Bredesen beating Blackburn.

Anonymous said...

Just watched Lindsey Graham's outburst. Terrific and long overdue! senator-lindsey-graham-spitting-a-righteous-fire-and-brimstone

stever said...

Hillary Clinton was going to win so no need to throw a fit over Merrick Garland and Roe v Wade was safe. Not a good time to run that up the flagpole.

Tommy Duncan said...

I went duck hunting today during the middle of the hearing. The experience was an omen. I was in a swamp. There were annoying mosquitoes everywhere (the media). I shot a female teal that was camouflage colored except for the blue wings (a stealth Democrat.)

The female blue winged duck died. A frost tomorrow night will kill the mosquitoes. Cavanaugh will be voted in.

Michael K said...

Adjourned. VOTE !

BJM said...

Steven Hayward at Powerline has an interesting thought/twist:

Are we sure Michael Avenatti isn’t a Trump plant inside the other team’s camp? I’m having trouble explaining him in any other rational way.

buwaya said...

D 2

Yes you are wrong to think that. It makes perfect sense.
This is a lousy case but good propaganda.
It’s politics after all.
This all is a great show, but when it’s done the guest stars will go home, and the next episode will have another lot of players, plus the regular cast of course.

No point in a dinky community theater production vs an appelate judge.
That’s for when someone has Erdogan-type powers.

Sebastian said...

OK. We knew the Dems were destestabe weasels. We knew they lacked any decency. But cynical deplorable that I am, I underestimated their sheer stupidity.

I mean, to get exposed the way they were, to be reduced to asking about yearbooks and the FBI, to get called out by Lindsey effing Graham of all people, to run into the buzzsaw of Alpha Brett Kavanaugh of all people, is pretty embarrassing.

Serves them right, of course. But I figured they were better about calculating their calculated assault. What happened?

Maybe they were counting on the Althouse strategy, a sorta-kinda confessional apology, or a GOP takedown of Ford.

Althouse has been quiet. Hmm.

wwww said...



People are so, so misinterpreting this by viewing everything through the binary prism of whether or not Kavanaugh gets confirmed or not. This is a singular event which will change, quite profoundly, how people view a branch of government.

- Alex Parker twitter

Tommy Duncan said...

I have offered an omen in a previous post. Perhaps our blogging oracle, Ann of Althouse, will provide a prophecy.

Michael Fitzgerald said...

BJM@7:27 What makes sleazy scumbag Avenatti different than the average deranged Democrat party member? The guy might be their presidential nominee in 2020.

Night Owl said...

And frankly, I don't mind the politicization levels of Merrick Garland. If the Dems just came straight out and said, "look Judge Kavanaugh, I think you are nice guy and I don't hold anything against you personally, but based on some of your opinions and other writings I'm worried you would rule against current Abortion law, and possibly current Gay marriage law, so I have to vote against you."

Yes.

People who are claiming a moral equivalence between Garland's and Kavanaugh's treatment are disingenuous and/or hysterically partisan.

BJM said...

@Michael K...I thought Amy Barret was a better choice and better optics from the get go.

Yancey Ward said...

If Kavanaugh loses, and we will know the answer by tomorrow afternoon, I would not be one bit surprised that Barrett is nominated and the hearings scheduled for next week followed by a vote in late October. The Democrats destroyed what goodwill was left in the Senate today, and a quick schedule would be a logical response, and also a practical one given the calendar.

wwww said...

"Perhaps our blogging oracle, Ann of Althouse,"


She's studied SCOTUS for decades. I'm sure she has thoughts about the extraordinary hearing.




Krumhorn said...

One of the useful services that our hostess has regularly provided has been the important recognition of the degree to which the emotional reactions of women in the middle if the ideological divide affect our politics. Usually, in her view, it is insensitive white Republican men who fail to understand this dynamic.

Ok. Let’s grant that. I wonder if it isn’t also the case that these same women will react predictably to dishonorable and dishonest behavior of leftie politicians on full display here. The argument goes that if the Senate confirms Kavanaugh, Dem voters will turn out in droves as a protest. Certainly, the shriek8ng harpies on the left will drive their heels into the sidewalk cement as they walk intentionally into the voting booth. But what about this same women in the middle?

My law partner is a reliable leftie voter,but, interestingly, she’s not buying any of this. She sees this as the late shitty hit that it is. If she is any indication, I’m thinking that the lefties have hurt themselves.

- Krumhorn

Anonymous said...

Kavanaugh's righteous anger was not misplaced. If it carried over into the questioning that is good. Out in the real world it is not wrong to show some anger when it is deserved. Not calling the Dems on their outrageous behavior would have been something Kavanaugh couldn't live with.

If I were Diane Feinstein I would be so embarrassed by what I did that I would vote to confirm. Never happen, but it should.

Ann, sometimes it's not the clarity of the phrasing but the passion with which it is delivered that causes people to listen and agree. I am sure no one, other than you, was prepared to nit pick the rock comment at the moment it was delivered.

I am going to interpret the lack of blogging from you about Kavanaugh's testimony as an admission that your knee jerk support for Ford was misplaced and you may be rightfully embarrassed by your willingness to "believe the woman" who made uncorroborated statements.

wwww said...


My Take:

It's much more significant then if he gets voted on or not. It's much more significant then the outcome of Nov. 2018.

Watershed moment in the history of SCOTUS and politics in the USA.

Birkel said...

Again, the non-partisans around me were incredibly disgusted with the Democrats.

And the conservatives I know are saying "Fuck you, War!" a la Andrew Breitbart.

PBUH

Michael K said...

This is a singular event which will change, quite profoundly, how people view a branch of government.

I agree but it will take Amy Barrett to complete it and reverse Roe v Wade. Then the Supreme Court will be out of the abortion cul de sac that the Burger Court put us in.

Then, the Court can move on to Chevron and other subects.

Night Owl said...

Every clear-headed person knows that the call for more FBI investigations is a bullshit delaying tactic. The FBI already said they wouldn't investigate further and the judge has already had 6 background investigations. Not to mention that there aren't enough specific facts for them to even begin an investigation. The Dems may count on their base being fucking morons, but the rest of us can clearly see them for the slime that they are.

Michael Fitzgerald said...

Looks like the only fact established in this hearing was the fact that "doctor" Fraud was lying about her fear of flying. So we know only that this woman, such a sympathetic accuser, is a liar.

Anonymous said...

I may be proven wrong but I think McConnell has had the votes for Kavanaugh all along barring a disaster today. Today was certainly not a disaster. I can not see Susan Collins deserting the ship after the Kavanaugh/Graham show. I thought Graham's performance, though more animated ranks right up there with Joseph Welch's question to McCarthy: " Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"

MayBee said...

Ford comes across to me as someone something happened to. Her little kid voice and he over-wide eyes make me think something happened when she was little. I don't know if someone attacked her at a house party, but I find it interesting she actually dated the guy that Ed Whelen named, who lived where she described and had a house as she described and who introduced her to Kavanaugh (she says) and she wanted him protected.

Also she was very quick to say no, she did not discuss her Kavanaugh allegations when she was visiting them and speaking with her Congressman and Senator and attorneys.
I also find it interesting nobody asked her who her "beach friends" are.

sane_voter said...

God Bless Lindsey Graham.

wwww said...



Personal responses or the responses of friends are notoriously unreliable as a accurate gage of public opinion.

I'll wait for the polls. They need to be in the field for about 3 days. By the end of next week we'll know the average response. We'll know the response of men, the response of women, the response of R & D partisans, and the response of Independents.

I am curious to see if the shouting & rage played differently for Independent women and Independent men. The polls have shown eye popping gender gaps in some districts.

Oso Negro said...

@Althouse - What corroboration of Ford's claim about Kavanaugh did you see today? What evidence was entered against him? Ford was proven to be a liar - "I can't fly". So.... you just "feel" that Kavanaugh assaulted Ford.

MayBee said...

Michael Fitzgerald - I couldn't tell if she lied about that, or if her lawyers did her no favors by asserting she was afraid of flying and (allegedly) not telling her the Senate investigators offered to come to California. Her little girl voice covered for her in that, like she's just too childlike to understand just big people negotiations.

wild chicken said...

Yeah I was thinking #3 too. Never admit anything - opens a door and would be hell on his family. So, categorical denial.

You'd think an ex GF or mistress would have come out of the woodwork if was still such a dawg as an adult.

If not, then he has redeemed himself and should be affirmed.

No one really knows the truth if the matter.

readering said...

Of Althouse's three options I go with 3. Sorry to say and I think he'll be confirmed and he's no worse as a judge than anyone else on the last short list. Seems like he grew up a lot after college, but today he reverted to the jock-lout of yesteryear. All this will have accomplished is to have put a second exceedingly bitter YLS grad on the Court together. (And Alito sometimes comes across as bitter, for no apparent reason. What is it about that place?)

Amadeus 48 said...

Athouse appears to have always been down on Kavanaugh, so nothing he has said has persuaded her. I completely disagee with her.

This was an ambush. Ford has some psychlogical problems. Buy her lapses are just too convenient. Where did it happen? Who else was there? Whose house was it? What day was it? What month wasit? Kavanaugh cannot mount a defence because Ford’s charges are too amorphous, except for a lot of lurid, emotional stuff. It is just too convenient.

Althouse, wake up. You were played.

cronus titan said...

Possibility number 4 is that Ford glibly told a vague story that got progressively worse over the years. When she wrote the letter, after being egged on by the vague "beach friends" who probably believed the more spectacular stories, there was no going back for Ford.

Krumhorn said...

Any thought that Kavanaugh would try to emulate Justice Kennedy as the swing vote is gone. This boiling acid bath to which the libruls have subjected his has cooked the squishy right out of him. In his shoes, I’d be looking for years and years of revenge as I read my opinions from the bench that would be written as if Scalia himself had drafted them.

- Krumhorn

Dave64 said...

She came across as a very credible victim, but isn't that what she has been prepped for since Feinstein received the letter? Great actors/actresses win awards for not looking like they are acting. A very fine performance, but that is all it is. Kavanaugh is not lying , you can see the anguish and confusion in his face and words. This is a smear that will never go away, he will always be damaged goods in some peoples minds, the faint stink of an attempted rape always surrounding him. I think the left got what they wanted out of this, a man that will always be associated with sexual abuse. He still should be voted on and if he wins take his seat on the bench.
If it's awar the left want we should accommodate them post haste!

readering said...

Michael K, why the hell do you care about Chevron? Even Scalia supported it!

Anonymous said...

For those of you too young to remember the moment Joe Welch made his statement was the beginning of the end for McCarthy.

HT said...

1600 posts, wait - am I reading that correctly?

I actually said omygosh out loud. Has this happened before??

No one's reading my little contribution, but I'll give it anyway -- my wish is for AA to go on the air somehow (due to my time constraints:)) and synopsize it all for us. In addition, I would love to see an online dialogue between her and Crack MC. I haven't controlled f'ed to see if he's posted yet.

So many interesting ways to carve this up.

FWIW - my prediction - anger'll carry the day and he'll be confirmed.

Oso Negro said...

Khesanh said "I am going to interpret the lack of blogging from you about Kavanaugh's testimony as an admission that your knee jerk support for Ford was misplaced and you may be rightfully embarrassed by your willingness to "believe the woman" who made uncorroborated statements."

Apparently, Althouse was impervious to the lack of evidence introduced in the 8+ hours of testimony. BUT - the woman emoted. She emoted, Khesanh.

Chuck said...

Sen. Bob Corker announces that he is voting "Yes" to confirm Kavanaugh.

No surprise (and very satisfying) to me. Just as I wrote several days ago when some of the Trumpists suspected that Corker would be one of several Republicans to vote "No" out of spite for Trump.

Dude1394 said...

Wow, not even a touch on the other witnesses who refute her testimony under sworn statement. You really are sticking to your tribe. That’s okay, I will also.

chickelit said...

“I am going to interpret the lack of blogging from you about Kavanaugh's testimony as an admission that your knee jerk support for Ford was misplaced and you may be rightfully embarrassed by your willingness to "believe the woman" who made uncorroborated statements.”

Althouse going to wait until the vote in the hope that BK is rejected. Then she’s going to rub it in your faces and remind you what splooge stooges you all are.

I missed most of the hearings up until the very end. Did they ask Althouse’s “killer” question — the one that depended on conflating Kavanaugh and Judge?

Rick said...

In a related matter someone doxxed Graham, Lee, and hatch (home addresses added to wiki) from a House of Representatives office.

Francisco D said...

BK has some alcohol blackout holes in his memory,

Althouse,

Can you elaborate? What EVIDENCE convinces you that he had blackouts? I capitalized evidence because you hold yourself to be an expert in that area.

This is a nerdy guy who drank beer and was extraordinarily successful in scholarly and athletic pursuits, yet you seem to believe he was a dysfunctional drunk who magically reformed himself at some point in time. Was he in treatment? Do you have any EVIDENCE to support your suppositions?

Right now, I am thinking that you are completely full of shit.

Thank God you never became a judge.

n.n said...

4. Without corroborating independent testimony or physical evidence, and with a wandering personal recollection, F is overlaying a prejudice or external influence to filling in missing links from a recovered memory. K is telling the truth.

Chest Rockwell said...

Brett Kavanaugh was right about one thing. All this spectacle does is discourage honorable people from seeking higher office.

All we're going to be left with is jackals and scumbags.

cacimbo said...

How do you not contemplate that Ford is just lying? That is also a real possibility. I read that her husband said she moved west to get away from her family because she had strong political disagreements with them.The family has not come out and said they believe her.A woman who feels that strongly about politics may be willing to lie.After all in her mind she is saving the country. She supposably lied about her fear of flying, why not about something much more important. Far from ruining her life, in the lefty world of academia she will be hailed as a hero.What turned me to firm disbelief is when her lifelong friend said she did not know Kavanaugh and never attended a party with him.

readering said...

What's with the hate on Althouse's three alternatives? She didn't pick one.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Cornered, he had to fight like hell, and that includes lying.”

Not what we need on the Supreme Court. He’s sounded like a spoiled only child having a melt down. Pathetic and bizzare.

Oso Negro said...

@Francisco - at the end of the day, Althouse is a liberal, feminist, former Law Professor from Wisconsin. She's great company a lot of the time, but other times, you just have to shake your head.

Michael K said...

All this will have accomplished is to have put a second exceedingly bitter YLS grad on the Court together.

I agree and the Democrats could have had another Kennedy who would "grow in office." That was muy initial impression of him from the first hearing.

Now, he is pissed and they shot all their ammo.

I'm not a lawyer, but Chevron is the basis for the Administrative State.

In recent years, scholars — and, importantly for present purposes, Supreme Court Justices — have expressed skepticism regarding Chevron. Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch are in the camp of Chevron skeptics. And in a concurring opinion issued in Pereira v. Sessions, shortly before announcing his retirement, Justice Anthony Kennedy announced that he too has joined the Chevron skeptic ranks. Decrying what he called the “reflexive deference” courts often accord agency actions, Justice Kennedy declared that “it seems necessary and appropriate to reconsider, in an appropriate case, the premises that underlie Chevron and how courts have implemented that decision.”

This was a huge strategic mistake by the Dims, probably because of abortion money.

Short term thinking.

readering said...

"All this spectacle does is discourage honorable people from seeking higher office."

Whatever encouraged them before today?

HT said...

Sen. Bob Corker announces that he is voting "Yes" to confirm Kavanaugh.

++++++++++

Literally nothin to lose.

readering said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
DAN said...

Did Ford ever drive by the house again?

gg6 said...

Althouse, reading your 'conclusions' - aka warped fantasies - it's totally clear to me you are even more wacky than 'The Doctor'. It's a damn good thing you are just a blog pushing Amazon commissions and "barreling ahead to save your life and family" and not a practicing attorney, or you would starve to death.

Tarrou said...

This "something happened" bullshit has got to stop. Women are not magic. They can lie as easily as anyone, and convince themselves of it too. Stop trying to cushion it to spare the feelings. Either Kavanaugh is a liar and a rapist, or else Ford is a liar, a crook, and a DNC plant. Right now the outside testimony is 8-0 for Kavanaugh.

Michael K said...

Thank God you never became a judge.

Or even a real lawyer, with clients and stuff,

Ford and Althouse are professors, like the one in my family who is as nutty as Ford

chickelit said...

“Can you elaborate? What EVIDENCE convinces you that he had blackouts? I capitalized evidence because you hold yourself to be an expert in that area.”

The “evidence” is that Judge wrote about blacking out and Judge mentioned that “BK” puked after drinking. In Althouse’s mind, the facts are a blur and should be blurred in order to prevent a square from become a SCOTUS judge.

Night Owl said...

But the fookin' Republicans have a really sad excuse of an incumbent, drunken puppet as the R candidate this year. (Only my opinion, of course - but I'm right.)

Dammit, straight R except for Governor where I'll vote D.


Not good enough, imho.

I'd pick a drunken puppet over a power-hungry douchebag in an election. The drunken puppet can be voted out; the power-hungry douchebag will be there for life.

tim maguire said...

I think there's non-trivial chance they are both telling the truth--mistaken identity. She was sexually assaulted, but she was drunk and she didn't know Kavanaugh very well. It was some guy, and looking back on it, she thought it was him, but it wasn't.

HT said...

What's with the hate on Althouse's three alternatives? She didn't pick one.

________

Right?

Michael K said...

He’s sounded like a spoiled only child having a melt down. Pathetic and bizzare.

"Calling Inga. There are full stinky bedpans on 6L !"

Sebastian said...

"Cornered, he had to fight like hell, and that includes lying."

So the Althouse rationalizations continue. Oh, well. I figured. The Dems know their women.

Unmentioned was the actual evidence Judge K supplied, like diaries and witness testimony.

Unmentioned were the holes in the "tremendously strong" Ford testimony.

And by the way, who did pay for the polygraph? And oh, by the way, why did you scrub your social media stuff?

n.n said...

the woman emoted

As did the man. So, given the available evidence, and consistent testimony from one of two principals, we must conclude the deciding factor is sexism, and selective-child at the twilight fringe.

MacMacConnell said...

Strange, we are suppose to believe Dr Ford memories from 36 years ago when she couldn't remember shit from the last 36 days.

HT said...

Ford and Althouse are professors, like the one in my family who is as nutty as Ford

__________

And yet here yall hang out, day after day, page after page of comments. Get real - it's a BLOG.

Mark said...

This boiling acid bath to which the libruls have subjected his has cooked the squishy right out of him.

One would think, but Winston did cry tears of love for Big Brother.

Hagar said...

They keep saying "serious charges," but they were not. The only thing inside that fog bank was a charge of teenage groping - no crime.
And on that charge, the accuser cannot remember anything that is verifiable, except naming 4(?) individuals, all of whom absolutely flatly deny everything - very weak.

There never was any "there" there, and these charges would never have been entertained, but for Roe vs. Wade.

Saint Croix said...

CBF has a false memory and really believes it (caused by some genuine trauma),

I'm of the opinion she is malicious.

I was particularly struck by the mean-spirited way she turned on one of her good friends, Leland Keyser.

Question: Why did everyone you named as witness come out against you? Including your best friend who says she never met Kavanaugh & the party did not happen?

Dr. Ford (literally): "Leland has significant health challenges, and I am happy that she is focusing on herself"


Absolutely bitchy comment. And mean-spirited. Ford herself can't remember the year it happened, or where it happened, and her story constantly changes. Why would she expect one of the downstairs guests at this party to remember it better than she does? And yet she attacks her friend for simply telling the truth.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

The local butcher Michael K says he has dog bones for free, first come first serve.

Hagar said...

And you, a law professor?

readering said...

Michael K, Althouse started out at Sullivan & Cromwell, considered one of the top 3 White Shoe firms on Wall Street at the time (and still).

Ken B said...

For all the years I,ve read this blog rhhardin has annoyed me. Not that he doesn’t make good points well sometimes, because he does, but because his repeated hammering on one particular topic seemed noxious. Well, I was wrong, rhhardin was right. Althouse really is like that.

She offered no corroboration at all. Her witnesses, hers not his, hers, contradict her. He story changes. There is only one testable claim that I heard: the claim she has a fear of flying. That is demonstrably false. I don’t know the truth, but I know she hasn’t met any burden at all. Can’t give the month, can’t give the year, can’t give the house, can’t give the town.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“And yet here yall hang out, day after day, page after page of comments. Get real - it's a BLOG.”

Chuckling. They are so hurt that their Althouse hasn’t come through for them this time.

chickelit said...

I believe that Brett Kavanaugh is a frat boy archetype, and many females are projecting their prejudice onto Kavanaugh. The opposite could be true: Had Hillary won, we might be watching the appointment hearings of a squeaky clean feminist SWJ archtype. Many men would be prejudiced against such a candidate. So I cut Althouse some gender slack.

Oso Negro said...

Any new information on: 1) the two men who claimed responsibility? 2) the BJ Blasey moniker? 3) the scrubbed social media?

HT said...

They are so hurt that their Althouse hasn’t come through for them this time.

______

She has offered 3 scenarios, she hasn't come through for "anyone," as far as I can tell.

Responder67 said...

Really Althouse? You conclusively think he was lying? I’ve had enough of you, I’m out of here.

chickelit said...

“And by the way, who did pay for the polygraph? And oh, by the way, why did you scrub your social media stuff?”

Excellent questions not being asked by serious media outlets.

Responder67 said...

Really Althouse? You conclusively think he was lying? I’ve had enough of you, I’m out of here.

Gahrie said...

In the questioning, this demeanor sometimes felt too strong.

So Althouse felt he was too manly (aggressive) while twitter apparently feels he was a girly man for nearly breaking down.

He interrupted and shouted back and seemed to show some hate and contempt for some of the Senators.

Why wouldn't he have hate and contempt for those senators? I do too, and it wasn't even my reputation they destroyed and family they persecuted.

readering said...

The word is that Manchin (D WVa) is a yes.

chickelit said...

If it goes the way I hope it goes tomorrow — wow! What a career suicide for Feinstein. I’d buy a Woodward book about that one.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“She has offered 3 scenarios, she hasn't come through for "anyone," as far as I can tell.”

Right. They wanted her to unequivocally state that she is behind Kavanaugh, apparently she cannot do that. And that makes them angry.

HT said...

Really Althouse? You conclusively think he was lying? I’ve had enough of you, I’m out of here.


That is one of THREE (3) possible explanations she puts forth. It's a sad, weird day when I am the one with the reading comprehension.

Amadeus 48 said...

This isn’t about being a lawyer or a law professor. It is about common sense.

This is a highly scripted “Ben Rhodes” type operation to knock off Kavanaugh.

Gahrie said...

But when I think about how BK and CBF could be so far apart, I have 3 explanations:

And all of them involve Ford telling the truth (or at least her truth and two of them assume that Kavanagh did it. Evidence and due process be damned. You should be ashamed of yourself. It betrays everything you pretended to stand for your entire career.

Oso Negro said...

@Inga - No. But many thought there would be more than YOU might have written

Gahrie said...

That is one of THREE (3) possible explanations she puts forth. It's a sad, weird day when I am the one with the reading comprehension.

All three assume that Ford is telling the truth, and two conclude that Kavanagh actually did it.

MikeR said...

Huh?? How about 4. (a) Ford is lying completely, or (b) taking a traumatic event involving someone else and lying by repurposing it on Kavanaugh. In either case she is trying to defend Roe v. Wade at the cost of an innocent man's reputation.
Why are you suggesting that Kavanaugh might be lying but not Ford? Given the story Ford told, having heard neither of them at the hearing, I would think 4(b) the most obvious possibility of all of them.
If so, I don't see why "sounding convincing" at the hearing is the least bit relevant.

readering said...

Where is Ford's motivation to lie? Didn't hear it today.

Gahrie said...

They wanted her to unequivocally state that she is behind Kavanaugh,

That was never going to happen, because he is "too perfect" and a possible fifth vote to overturn Roe.

We just wanted her to acknowledge that Ford was a liar, the Democrats behaved badly and we cannot reward the Left for this behavior.

paminwi said...

Does it surprise ANYONE that Inga & Althouse are on the same side on this issue?That Kavanaugh is a lying sack of shit?
Doesn't surprise me!
This is all about ABORTION, ABORTION, ABORTION! Nothing else.
The baby killers always stick together.

Gahrie said...

Where is Ford's motivation to lie? Didn't hear it today.

Possible fifth vote to overturn Roe.

Rosa Marie Yoder said...

Well, AA, you've lost me completely. Unbelievable.

Unknown said...

I would have asked CFB for her birth certificate

Why is she so much older and wrinkly than Kavanaugh who is supposedly two years older?

HT said...

surfing?

Saint Croix said...

"Cornered, he had to fight like hell, and that includes lying."

I think he did tell some white lies. Namely, when he said he bore no ill will to Ford. It's a beautiful thing to say, an attempt to be better than we are. It's a striving to be Christ-like.

But he was seriously angry and pissed that she was calling him a rapist.

He tried to transfer his anger to the Democratic senators. I think in part this was calculated. (Don't get mad at the woman accusing you of rape. Rapists are mad! Don't get mad!) But if you are an innocent man, accused of rape--and, worse, many people believe the charge--that's infuriating. It's so awful you can't even grasp it. It's going to ruin his life in many ways, big and small.

Anyway, his attempt to love his enemies rang a little false to me. (Christianity is hard to do!) But for the most part I thought he was very, very honest. And his opening statement was really powerful. I was very impressed with how he responded to these awful accusations.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“We just wanted her to acknowledge that Ford was a liar, the Democrats behaved badly and we cannot reward the Left for this behavior.”

Maybe she’s not as brainwashed as you folks are and won’t surrender to Trumpist Cultism.

readering said...

Fifth vote to overturn Roe? Any Republican can supply the 5th vote and if he's confirmed it's because Murkowski and Collins have deluded themselves that he believes settled law can't be changed.

stever said...

This is about Roe v Wade. Everyone's backing up from there to conclude he's unfit.

Amadeus 48 said...

Don’t discount the research skills of the techno left. Ford is gone from the internet. Her high school yearbooks were gone but recovered. She had an apparent recovered memory of the attack that came from a house renovation. She changed her story again today without consequence. Her story makes it impossible for BK to definitively attack it. None of her backup backs her up. Mike Judge is easy to find on the internet. He wrote about his life including blackouts. He anBK are friends. So they associated them in Ford’s story.

This all smells to high heaven.

I have never before thought of Althouse as a chump. But she got played on this.

HT said...

dump is not gonna nominate someone who doen't think r v wade should not be overturned

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Does it surprise ANYONE that Inga & Althouse are on the same side on this issue?That Kavanaugh is a lying sack of shit?”

I don’t think Kavanaugh is lying. I believe he believes he didn’t do this. He drank wayyyyyy to much beer, yes, yes we all know how much he loves beer, he said so several times. I think he had blackouts in which others saw this behavior as indicated by his ex roommate and others. My opinion of him has nothing to do with abortion.

FullMoon said...

Anybody notice her lack of surprise when told of the offer to meet in CA? She claimed her lie about flying was to generate a CA meeting.

Gahrie said...

dump is not gonna nominate someone who doen't think r v wade should not be overturned

And nobody should! Even if you are pro-abortion:

A) Roe is nonsensically "reasoning" and simply bad law.
B) If Roe finally is overturned it won't make abortion illegal.

Fitzhugh said...

In my experience of alcoholic blackouts (that I have not experienced in years and I can count on one hand), it is true that the next morning you forget everything (so nice) but then as the days progress you remember the major things that happened, like say...sexually assaulting someone. And the chances that both Judge and Ford were blacked out is, I think, slim, though not impossible. And in that case, one of them would probably have mentioned the attack (at least obliquely and casting it in the most innocent light). Even seeing someone who was present during your blackout can trigger your memories to come flooding back. I am not saying that Judge Kavanaugh did not do this--I have no idea. But the idea that he would never remember such a thing is implausible in my mind.

Amadeus 48 said...

If Roe v Wade is ever overturned I’ll be surprised. Maybe when 40 states have fallback permissive abortion laws.

Unknown said...

> 1. BK has some alcohol blackout holes in his memory, and what CBF remembers is in one of them, 2. CBF has a false memory and really believes it (caused by some genuine trauma), 3. BK has no route but forward, and he knows he did it, but feels entitled to what he's worked all his life to attain. Since there's no way back to his old life, he must force his way through this obstacle. And he's barreling ahead to save his life and save his family. Cornered, he had to fight like hell, and that includes lying.

So, he is lying to protect his way forward, but she can't be lying to prevent The Handmaids Tale.

Watching our own movie...

choirmom said...

It seems that we have forgotten that Dr. Ford is a professor of PSYCHOLOGY. Such a performance could be totally calculated on her part. Anyone seen the video of Maxine Waters handing an envelope to Dr. Ford’s attorney? Interesting.....

MikeR said...

"Where is Ford's motivation to lie? Didn't hear it today."
"Fifth vote to overturn Roe? Any Republican can supply the 5th vote"
That's silly. If Kavanaugh is not confirmed, the next nominee won't be either. There is now a veto power on any nominee.

Big Mike said...

In view of everything we know about Kavanaugh, does he deserve confirmation even with the degree of doubt we have about something terrible he might have done when he was 17 (and a couple of other, much weaker allegations)?

Of course. How not? I lived in Montgomery County in the 1970s, 1980s, and into the 1990s. I find it as likely that a spoiled, rich girl from Holton-Arms got falling down drunk and pulled a couple boys into a bedroom as the other way around. As a hippie chick back in the 1970s, you probably did much the same, but with pot, Althouse.

Seeing Red said...

Maybe she’s not as brainwashed as you folks are and won’t surrender to Trumpist Cultism.

So sez the one boomer womansplaining the other.

Different cult.

Marcus said...

And our hostess was a professor of LAW? Bwhahahahaha.

She has proved herself to be just another POS #MeToo feminist who believes feelings over facts. Her comments today sicken me. I just come to this blog to watch the commenters kick her ass, call out her bullshit and ridicule her emotional "logic"

bpk said...

"3. BK has no route but forward, and he knows he did it, but feels entitled to what he's worked all his life to attain"

No, I don't think this is possible. If what Dr. Ford is saying is true, and BK knows it is true, his only rational defense would have been some variant on "yes something happened but not like what she said". He could not have known that all the witnesses she brought up - who he also would have known were there, would end up going against her. You would have to be crazy denying you were at the party if you were, and multiple people could confirm it.

ThunderChick said...

As a former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney, I have personally had victims lie and make up sexual assault accusations. It is not the norm, but it happens. CBF's story keeps changing and her witnesses to the alleged event do not back her up. When she said she left the party and left her friend there with two drunk guys that attempted to assault her - and I say assault, not rape, because there was no attempt at penetration as per her own testimony - that makes no sense at all. Her story, the timing of it coming out and the endless demands and attempts to delay the hearing and the vote, destroy any credibility on her part. There is no evidence that Kavanaugh participated in this and it is simply a campaign to smear his name. It worked with Roy Moore in Alabama - decades old allegations that cannot be proven - so hell, the Dems figured they'd give it a try with BK. Also, it gives the several red state senators up for reelection a good excuse to vote NOT to confirm BK. This is so contrived and I'm amazed some people don't see it for what it is.

Rick said...

How do you not contemplate that Ford is just lying?

Allegiance to the sisterhood.

Where is Ford's motivation to lie? Didn't hear it today.

Protecting RvW. Oh she didn't say that today? Well it can't be possible then.

It's never made sense a 2 minute drunken incident from high school would effect someone for a lifetime as she described. Nor is her attack on her supposed friend reasonable. She could have just said since it didn't happen to the friend she's not likely to remember it. I think one of them is lying, the efforts to split the baby aren't compelling and seem mostly driven by people's unwillingness to call someone a liar.

The soft lies are better. From his end maybe he doesn't remember attacking her but was a habitual drinker and thinks he may have made a pass at her he is lying about. From her side maybe there was an incident but it was more of a pass and the "attack" elements are embellished to justify the accusation.

I don't know which if any of these are true. But her story was clearly managed to avoid verification. That combined with absolutely zero corroboration - including rebuttals by her own witnesses who have no reason to lie - mean I wouldn't give her story any weight. If her story constitutes a credible accusation literally anything counts. Not only can society not function this way but we've already seen at lest two liars make politically motivated false accusations in this case. We would be guaranteeing this circus recur forever.

OldManRick said...

How about this. Confirm Kavanaugh and continue the investigation. Interview her witnesses and the two other accusers. Investigate the hell out of it. If we find proof that he did it, he resigns. If you can provide it, I'm sure he will resign. If his crime is he drank some beer in high school, he gets a pass.

But fair is fair - also investigate Ford, her lawyers, and the democrats. Find out who leaked it. Find out if she was paid. Let's grill the polygraph expert. Let's see the therapist's notes. Let's catalog her false statements (afraid to fly, different participants, different versions of the story). Let's see her social media that was scrubbed. Let's see her published papers. Let's get some testimony about her high school and college behaviors. Let's she her yearbook, we saw his. Let's see how hard core left wing TDS she is. If this turns out to be a set up smear, the every one involved is disbarred, resigns from congress, fired from congressional staff, and pays Kavanaugh 10% of their net worth for defamation of character.

I call this a fair bargain, no delays - but if he lied (like Althouse wants to believe) he's gone and his reputation is ruined like all the left wants, and when the democrats take the senate they can obstruct as much as they want. If he's right, the people who smeared him are punished and punished hard as a warning not to try this again.

Amadeus 48 said...

Thanks, Thunderchick. You said it better than I did.

WWIII Joe Biden, Husk-Puppet + America's Putin said...

Saint Croix said

I'm of the opinion she is malicious.

I was particularly struck by the mean-spirited way she turned on one of her good friends, Leland Keyser.

Me Too!#

I think malicious is the perfect description.

Gahrie said...

This is so contrived and I'm amazed some people don't see it for what it is.

Some people are determined not to see it for what it is, no matter what.

wildswan said...

Red State is saying Collins, Murkowski, Manchin and Donnelly will support Kavanaugh. Meaning he gets in.
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2018/09/27/breaking.-collins-murkowski-donnelly-make-decision?

Rumor?

Night Owl said...

This needs a "Disappointing Althouse" tag. And it's a good tag because it works two ways.

FullMoon said...

Looking forward to unredacted explanation of his roommates claim.

Gretchen said...

This entire fiasco makes me embarrassed to be a woman. We cannot ruin a man's life because we feel sorry for some injured nut, who just happens to be politically active. Ford had some problems in her life. She seemed strange, and oddly not so bright for a PhD, but I know a few PhDs I wouldn't trust to watch my dog, much less make any decision.

Innocent until proven guilty, period. There is no corroboration, other than her recollection. Kavanaugh liked to have a beer, other than that he has lead an exemplary life. Stuff in his HS year book??? Seriously?

Ford is a political operative, period. Democrats have been lathered into a frenzy and believe Trump and Republicans will outlaw not only abortion, but birth control, bring back slavery, internment camps, and attack minorities. They are fanatics.

HT said...

Rumor?

_________

I don't know, but the manly anger is what will win the day, I predict. He's banishing the irresponsible, vulgar, mean boy.

Chest Rockwell said...

"Whatever encouraged them before today?"

I can't speak to that, but I'm pretty sure the possibility of having their lives destroyed want part of the calculus.

Night Owl said...

This is so contrived and I'm amazed some people don't see it for what it is.

The Dems know what works on their base. Unfortunately for them their base is shrinking.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

What he is lying about is the amount of drinking that happened in that rich boy prep school and the claim to virginity into his college years is probably a lie. These boys were popular, spoiled, entitled teens who probably got away with a lot. This is a good cautionary tale for young people, a misspent youth may come back to bite you in the ass one day.

walter said...

So she had her polygraph after flying to grandma's funeral..because "could see no reason not to".
Good conditions for such a fragile being?
Did meds help?

Unknown said...

Althouse reveals a gender bias here - she considers it plausible that K is lying but not CBF.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“Unfortunately for them their base is shrinking.”

Most young people are leaning left and every year more of them are of age to vote. The Democratic base is growing, not shrinking.

HT said...

This is a good cautionary tale for young people, a misspent youth may come back to bite you in the ass one day.

________

This is true, and the quicker one gets to realizing it, the more one can turn the boat around. Helps if there is a big old hand atop his head to guide him, but failing that, you gotta hope the person himself sees the picture.

walter said...

"popular, spoiled, entitled teens who probably got away with a lot.'
Did you see the yearbook entries about the "one beer" gals?

narciso said...

She was so blitzed back in 1982, she probably didn't know what day of the week, blotto was the team sport at Holton arms

Night Owl said...

Most young people are leaning left and every year more of them are of age to vote. The Democratic base is growing, not shrinking.

Young people grow up and wise up. I voted for Carter and Mondale at 18 and 22.

Seeing Red said...

Most young people are leaning left and every year more of them are of age to vote. The Democratic base is growing, not shrinking.

Then you get Venezuela.

gbarto said...

Reading Althouse, I see one scenario where Kavanaugh is knowingly lying, one scenario where he is unwittingly lying and one scenario where she is unwittingly lying. The omission of the fourth scenario, that she is knowingly lying, is unfortunate. But what I don't see here is a definitive conclusion. She started by saying the real question is if this warrants keeping him off the court... and she never answered that question.

If Althouse were in the Senate, I can see her voting no if the outcome was clear one way or the other. If she were the deciding vote, I think we'd be right where we are right now: She doesn't like him, but she's not sure that justifies keeping an him off the court all other things being equal.

gbarto said...

Both parties are shrinking. Every time the news turns to Washington, it is obvious why.

Known Unknown said...

"Most young people are leaning left and every year more of them are of age to vote. The Democratic base is growing, not shrinking."

Thanks for the citation, Pauline Kael.

Party self-identification for the Democrats was 33% in 1994 and is 33% as of March 2018. The only growth has been independents, from 30% to 37%, according to Pew.

According to Gallup, D identification has dropped from 37% in 2008 to 26% today. R IDs were 26% in 2008 and 26% today. Independents have risen from 37% to 44%.

Known Unknown said...

"Anyone seen the video of Maxine Waters handing an envelope to Dr. Ford’s attorney? Interesting....."

It was Sheila Jackson Lee. You know, all black congresswomen don't look alike, even if they sound alike.

Known Unknown said...

The Leland Keyser "health issues" answer was a disaster for Ford.

Rick said...

These boys were popular, spoiled, entitled teens who probably got away with a lot.

Class hatred and bigotry driven by envy is a poor framework of governance. You have to give some credit to the old style political radicals though. They've been gone for centuries but their hatred lives on.

Leave something behind!

Rick said...

Seeing Red said...
Then you get Venezuela.


Right, as they figure out how the world works they stop voting Dem. Come to think of it that also explains why Inga still does.

Known Unknown said...

"All we're going to be left with is jackals and scumbags."

Outside of a tiny minority, that is what we have. And always have.

Ken B said...

Gbarto
You give her too much credit. You are not alone, many of us did. She won’t even mention the fear of flying lie.

M Jordan said...

I don’t understand the consensus view of the pundit class that Ford came across as credible. To me she was an emotionally retarded adult academic talking in a goofy small voice and feigning lack of understanding at questions, memory gaps, and authenticity. She seemed completely fake to me. Utterly. When she faltered on the Who’s paying your lawyers question, her lead attorney leans in and says We’re pro bono. I almost screamed at my TV for Ms. Mitchell to follow with, “Why doesn’t Dr. Ford know that?” Catch her red-handed lying. But alas, Mitchell whiffed.

This was how her entire testimony came across to me: fake. She was lying from top to bottom. Mitchell could have pierced through every single statement, had she tried.

Known Unknown said...

"What does Boof mean?

The left is claiming it means anal sex."

BOOF!

Known Unknown said...

I went over to Althou.se

The hostess there thinks Ford is lying. ; )

iowan2 said...

What he is lying about is the amount of drinking that happened in that rich boy prep school and the claim to virginity into his college years is probably a lie

Oh yes, the real anger comes out. The Duke LaCross players gambit. Rich boys are guilty, so there!

The drinking thing is a non starter. I'm to believe that some random blogger and the commenters there, have found an alcohol abuse problem that 6 separate FBI investigations overlooked. Facts matter. wishing it so, does not make it so.

LilyBart said...

She won’t even mention the fear of flying lie.

It wasn't just a lie - it was manipulative. She didn't just say she was afraid of flying - she said it had to do with the 'attack' that has altered her life.

She's a lying drama queen.

Greg P said...

Althouse writes:

He said more than once that his family had been "destroyed," and yet his wife is his "rock." The rock is not destroyed.


Every grain of sand on a beach used to be part of a rock that was destroyed

Yes, Kavanaugh got uppity with lying sack of shit Senators who pushed BS ("FBI investigation"), or who tried to destroy other people's lives to go after him (like his female friend mentioned in his yearbook. Only a total lowlife like Durbin would assume "X Alumni" MUST mean "I screwed X").

Kavanaugh was entirely right to go after them.

Koot Katmandu said...

Wow. Of your three options one has BK as lying. No option for CBF to be lying? The charges lack key details like date, time and place. Could that be on purpose so she can make the charge and no one can disprove it? I have no idea what happened. I hope she has a false memory or mistaken identity. I think he should be confirmed too many details missing.

Bad Lieutenant said...


Blogger Howard said...
Congratulations Trumpsters! This was a big win... but with all his BFFs, maybe he won't go after RvW and I can still get my abortion in Texas.

9/27/18, 7:01 PM


What happened, Titus got to you and you're carrying a fetal lawyer in your large intestine? That could be the fourth exception after rape incest and the life of the mother.

Inga...Allie Oop said...

Pew research

“Generational differences have long been a factor in U.S. politics. These divisions are now as wide as they have been in decades, with the potential to shape politics well into the future.

From immigration and race to foreign policy and the scope of government, two younger generations, Millennials and Gen Xers, stand apart from the two older cohorts, Baby Boomers and Silents. And on many issues, Millennials continue to have a distinct – and increasingly liberal – outlook.

Millennials remain the most liberal and Democratic of the adult generations. They continue to be the most likely to identify with the Democratic Party or lean Democratic. In addition, far more Millennials than those in older generational cohorts favor the Democratic candidate in November’s midterm congressional elections.

In fact, in an early test of midterm voting preferences (in January), 62% of Millennial registered voters said they preferred a Democratic candidate for Congress in their district this fall, which is higher than the shares of Millennials expressing support for the Democratic candidate in any midterm dating back to 2006, based on surveys conducted in midterm years.“

Michael K said...

The bedpan commando has not seen this.

@AandGShow @yesnicksearcy Kavanaugh's 1st day at USSC:

Walks into Clarence Thomas' chambers.

Thomas shakes his hand and nods. Hands Kav a glass.

Kav takes a sip of his rye

Kav: "Let's burn this motherfucker to the ground."

Thomas grins.


traditionalguy said...

We listened on car radio while heading to the mountains. My wife heard Ford as a believable woman, like The Professor did. But I heard a total fraud that used a sudden switch into an innocent Shirley Temple voice the moment she began lying responses. She would have a confident woman’s voice all the est of the time, but hid behind that innocents . Child persona when lying. A true actress with a fictional script deserving of an Academy Award were she not out to destroy a good man for money.

Michael K said...


Blogger Known Unknown said...
"Anyone seen the video of Maxine Waters handing an envelope to Dr. Ford’s attorney? Interesting....."


No that was the Texas Congress critter, Shelia Jackson Lee of limousine fame.

She calla one to go 100 yards.

Annie said...

It was not 'he said, she said". It was "she said, they said". The people she named said it didn't happen.d

mikee said...

Not one mention of the Kavenaugh calendar in the post or in this thread.
Odd that the only contemporaneous evidence is completely and absolutely exculpatory, and gets no mention. Well, not odd. Wrong.

That calendar is about as close as anyone can come to demonstrating what one guy did and did not do in 1982. His reason for keeping it is delightful, and it deserves to be in the Smithsonian right alongside that blue dress and Obama's birth certificate.

Gahrie said...

She doesn't like him, but she's not sure that justifies keeping an him off the court all other things being equal.

But all other things aren't equal...he's the possible fifth vote to overturn Roe. Believe me Sen. Althouse would find justification to vote no.

steve uhr said...

It isn't consistent to argue both she is honestly mistaken as to the identity of the person who assaulted her and that is a Clinton-inspired hit job.

readering said...

the woman she named said she didn't remember being there but knowing her friend believes her story.

The calendar, hah! Kavanaugh focused on weekends. It didn't sound like a weekend gathering.

Seeing Red said...

n fact, in an early test of midterm voting preferences (in January), 62% of Millennial registered voters said they preferred a Democratic candidate for Congress in their district this fall, which is higher than the shares of Millennials expressing support for the Democratic candidate in any midterm dating back to 2006, based on surveys conducted in midterm years.“



Then they will live in Venezuela and wondered how it happened.

Seeing Red said...

It’s just “bad luck.”

readering said...

Durbin wasn't trying to establish I screwed X, he established I was a lowlife and i'd rather lie today than admit it.

readering said...

Big Mike, so much anger. And this when you are winning!

readering said...

One thing I find funny is rich boy prep school thing. I didn't go to Georgetown Prep but I did attend a Jesuit HS (giving me soft spot for Scania, and Gorsuch and this guy). Jesuit schools significantly less expensive than other preps, at least in those days when a living wage did not need to be paid to Jesuits.

readering said...

Scalia. Few Jesuits teachers today.

Birkel said...

$50 million raised by a Di Chi Spy Fi ex-staffer for Fusion GPS.
And all the Democrat senators got were those lousy Kava-Nope T-shirts.

Greg P said...

readering said...
Durbin wasn't trying to establish I screwed X, he established I was a lowlife and i'd rather lie today than admit it.

No, Durbin was trying to establish that the only reason a guy would mention a girl in his yearbook is because he's claiming he screwed her.

The reflects very poorly on Durbin, and not at all on Kavanaugh

Birkel said...

Just wait until Democrats learn what Senator Bob Menendez was found to have done to teenage girls, per an FBI report.

Won't that be something.

HINT: Menendez paid underage girls (as young as 13) to have sex.

elkh1 said...

4. A leftist activist, Ford lied to keep BK off the Supreme Court.

Too bad, it's hard to find "witnesses" who lied under oath to support Ford.

readering said...

Greg L you do know that it was part of a joke at her expense by a group right? That she only learned about now.

readering said...

But hey you probably believe all the obvious lies he told about the yearbook.

Drago said...

Seeing Red: "It’s just “bad luck.”

It does seem about the right time for a Heinlein quote.

Drago said...

Readering: "the woman she named said she didn't remember being there but knowing her friend believes her story."

Note to self: this is the lefty definition of a "witness"

LOL

Try harder....

LakeLevel said...

readering: "Where is Ford's motivation to lie?"

Anita Hill is a left wing feminist icon. She has received awards, accolades, and career advancement that she probably never would have received if she were not the Democrat's character assassin of Clarence Thomas. She is an academic just like Ford.

Birkel said...

Wow.
We finally found a person who cares about a 36 year old yearbook.

Bruce Hayden said...

“Where is Ford's motivation to lie? Didn't hear it today.”

Most obvious is that she is a pussy hatted anti-Trump protestor. Also, with the mention of Roe v Wade, note that she was a researcher for the company that sells the RU-486 “Day After” abortifacient. And she was a coauthor on six papers, two as first researcher, involving the active ingredient in RU-486.

Bruce Hayden said...

1798 - things slowing down.

Bruce Hayden said...

1799 - finally

Bruce Hayden said...

1800!!!!!

The Genius Savant said...

Althouse you can really only think of 3 possible scenarios and 2 are against Kavanaugh? I like and respect you a lot but you're way off base here. He acted so innocent and you give him no credit for anything. I don't doubt Dr. Ford believes she was assaulted but there is NO CORROBORATION. I thought you were a law professor who cares about shit like this this???

readering said...

All this stuff about, but it's a 36 year old yearbook. The alleged event was 36 years old. Contemporaneous documents are evidence, often stronger than 36 year later testimony. BT recognized as much by producing 36 year old calendar-diary.

PhilD said...

Trolls,

- Pickering is doing his duty as an undercover Republican (how else to explain his insane vileness, he isn't doing the democrats any favors)
- SS-Inga is her usual moronic douche bag self. But while I normally ignore her BS I must admit some of her comments made me 'LOL'. Being a complete idiot suits her at times.

«Oldest ‹Older   1601 – 1800 of 1813   Newer› Newest»