"... we will GIVE Ukraine and the great United States of America, the most revered, respected, and powerful of all countries, EVER, Moscow and St. Petersburg, and everything surrounding them for a thousand miles, the Fake News Media and their Democrat Partners would say that this was a bad and humiliating day for Donald J. Trump, one of the worst days in the history of our Country.' But that’s why they are the FAKE NEWS, and the badly failing Radical Left Democrats. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!"
Trump is on a roll on Truth Social this morning. That may be his best written work — most absurdly comic and yet too true — maybe ever.
41 comments:
There should be a close quotation mark after "miles," and an open quotation mark before "a bad and humiliating day."
WaPo's insufferable David Ignatius was on Morning Joe saying that is very painful for Z to give up land to Ukraine.
Compared to what? Another million Ukrainians dead?
He's just trolling them now. He must know what's going to happen later. If Z is wearing a suit and tie then we will know there is a peace deal coming.
With all the accomplishments Trump has had in seven months, I wonder what the other presidents were doing.
Yeah, it's pretty much a guarantee that even if Trump gets peace in Ukraine, cures cancer, and introduces the Lord Jesus Christ at a press conference that the left would still scream that he is the worst person in the history of the world.
A reminder that peace and ceasefires are not the same thing.
I see Axios reporting that the WH did ask Z to dress for success today. Standing by my 9:10 prediction. Shorter version: No suit = no deal
Nice of the VP to enter the chat.
I agree, the fake news media is truly and comically absurd, yet millions get their "facts", their "science", and their opinions from them. How the 38% of Americans who still support the Democrats got so absurdly dumb should be studied and produce multiple dissertations and PhDs in psychology and political science, but we all know those would never fly in academia. There is not a more serious and substantial issue in the field than this. It's real, pervasive and extremely dangerous to the future of mankind,... and the womens too, whatever that is.
I have such contempt for the MSM, I don't care what they say. What's astounding about their coverage of Ukraine is how childish and clownish it is. They also seem to think they're Ukrainians and not Americans.
Unfortunately, Trump plays into their hands by reacting, he should be contemptous and calling them lying children. Instead, he wants their praise and approval.
The fake newz media adored their fake prezident - Crook Joe.
and trained riot master- Kamala.
Somebody in Trump's white house should go through the WaPo/NYT's achive for the last 10 years and total up the articles/Columns that are pro-Trump vs. Anti-Trump and publish the results. I'd bet the result would be 2000 negative stories vs. 3 postive ones.
Excuse me, but I'll have you know he used three exclamation points, not two.
Trump is singlehandedly redefining the news audience for these losers. All the institutional fakenews pioneers are losing market share, losing audience, losing influence, losing allies in DC while new media proliferates, grows, makes news every day.
Why doesn't he just end the war as he promised (Day 1 I recall). Are we supposed to feel sorry for the nut? That the press may never give him credit he deserves, doesn't mean that when they criticize him that they are always wrong.
I feel sorry for YOU, jim5301 that you are butthurt no matter what Trump does. Grow up.
They would call him an authoritarian for taking that much land.
Will Democrats explain to me how Ukraine can get back the territory that they already lost to Russia?
No treaty is going to do that. The Europeans are not going to send their troops to fight the Russians.
Hmmm. Who does that leave?
More like, Donnie could totally sell out Ukraine to his pal Putin and his sycophantic cult would claim it as a victory.
Did Neville Chamberlain ever get that Nobel?
"I wonder what the other presidents were doing."
They were running for a 2nd term.
Trump has the luxury of not having to do that.
And that's precisely what the Deep State that actually runs the country was afraid of.
Trump is unburdened by what has been.
AMDG said...
A reminder that peace and ceasefires are not the same thing.
This is a very apt and insightful comment. I am not being sarcastic despite who posted this.
The warmongers want a ceasefire so they can lace the ground with tripwires and European troops expand the war.
Trump wants peace.
The path to peace starts and ends with NATO and Russia both giving up territorial ambitions.
The only way to achieve that is pain for the political classes. Elections in the occupied territories and all countries involved would supply this pain.
D-gag-Inag hath spoken.
TeaBagHag said...
More like, Donnie could totally sell out Ukraine to his pal Putin and his sycophantic cult would claim it as a victory.
Did Neville Chamberlain ever get that Nobel?
Obama is on video with Russian leaders promising to commit treason. Imagine what this retard would do with that video if it was Trump.
These people are just really dumb.
What were other Presidents doing: "They were running for a 2nd term. Trump has the luxury of not having to do that."
I love it. President Trump 2.0 ..... the IDGAF version
It has been my experience that today’s Democrats are likely ignoramuses, diehards or communists. It is not productive in individual cases trying to determine which. They are all possessed by the same demon and bent on running the country into the ground. The leftmediaswine are their cheerleaders fooling “some of the people all of the time.” A. Lincoln (?).
Why is Trump posting so much this AM? Is he intimidated by the Europeans accompanying Zelensky today? Does he feel increasingly isolated from the West’s world leaders? Why is Trump sounding antagonistic toward Ukraine again? Is he embarrassed by his meeting with Putin and is trying to rebuild his image as a tough guy?
Putin's messenger boy.
"What was in it for them?"
Inga said...
Why is Trump posting so much this AM? Is he intimidated by the Europeans accompanying Zelensky today? Does he feel increasingly isolated from the West’s world leaders? Why is Trump sounding antagonistic toward Ukraine again? Is he embarrassed by his meeting with Putin and is trying to rebuild his image as a tough guy?
Inga wants Trump to shut up.
Inga supported the US Government colluding with the largest corporations in the world to censor Trump and remove him from the Town Square. Then she supported efforts to throw him in jail. Then she supported efforts to kill Trump.
Make no mistake about Inga’s intent or the meaning of her questions. She wants her political opponents censored and in jail or dead.
We have Obama on video colluding with Russia and we have the receipts for millions of Russian dollars flowing into the Clinton foundation.
We have the documents showing both of them working with Russian spies to create the Steele dossier.
We have the documentation of the conspiracy to use that dossier to spy on the sitting president of the USA.
And yet we still have retards pretending that Trump is colluding with Putin.
Trump knows that he is not going to be able to negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, even though he promised to end the war within 24 hours, so he's posting this as a distraction, like he usually does when things aren't going his way.
That the press may never give him credit he deserves, doesn't mean that when they criticize him that they are necessarily always wrong.
@jim5301, FIFY. My point being that it might be right to criticize President Trump on some issue or another, but since his election his sole misstep has been that it is taking more than 24 hours to bring peace to Ukraine. Apparently he thought the US had some leverage that we don’t have after all. On everything else — literally everything else — he’s been right and his critics wrong. Considering that so far in this term he’s been the most active President since FDR in 1933, that’s saying something.
You can keep sniping at the President; it’s a free country after all (at least until the next Democrat occupies the Oval Office), but you do look kind of stupid, you know.
I’m an old man now, almost an octogenarian, and I can remember that when liberals believed that they were the smartest people in the room, that they had the best ideas, and they weren’t all that wrong. These days liberals still think they’re the smartest people in the room, but now they’re just being delusional and their ideas suck. A woman gets five years for welfare fraud, and thanks to 21st century liberals she gets to share her cell with a biological male convicted of rape. He says he’s trans, you see, so the state provides him a biological female cellmate to prey upon. Good work liberals! Good work, feminists!
"I am totally convinced that if Russia raised their hands and said, 'We give up, we concede, we surrender...we will GIVE Ukraine and the great United States of America, the most revered, respected, and powerful of all countries, EVER, Moscow and St. Petersburg, and everything surrounding them for a thousand miles…”
Hmm….is he giving us a hint on what the 52nd state is going to be?
Trump is right wrt the US MSM.
With all the accomplishments Trump has had in seven months, I wonder what the other presidents were doing.
Cashing Burisma checks from their bagman son.
“Inga wants Trump to shut up.”
No I don’t. It’s good to know what is buzzing around in his brain at any given moment.
And while I was typing my comment who should show up to prove my point but Inga the Stinka and lonejustice.
Point proven.
Case closed.
AMDG said...
"A reminder that peace and ceasefires are not the same thing."
To the people who are getting killed it is.
NATO is a collective defense association. They dont have territorial ambitions, it just doesnt work that way. Its like the EU, which is hard to join.
Countries beg to join, because they feel threatened. Usually this perception is accurate. Putin got two more to join, Sweden and Finland. Putin is the best salesman of NATO memberships since the USSR.
Most of the complaints about NATO expansion leave out the reason why. Its because the Soviets were such utter shits.
The more Putin acts like USSR II the more "NATO" he will sell.
If Putin wants less NATO then he, and Russia, should, maybe, act differently.
buwaya said...
NATO is a collective defense association. They dont have territorial ambitions, it just doesnt work that way. Its like the EU, which is hard to join.
You can’t post something this obviously wrong in good faith.
Mommas gaddafi would disagree with you if he was alive and hadn’t been drug through the streets and sodomized because Europe was trying to hold on to the Sahel.
Rusty said...
AMDG said...
"A reminder that peace and ceasefires are not the same thing."
To the people who are getting killed it is.
A ceasefire for them is at best a temporary reprieve.
If Europe succeeds in installing a tripwire force and dragging the US into the conflict WWIII will make Ukraine ground zero for something more the scale of what happened in 1944.
Buwaya, what was the Cuban Missile Crisis about? Why did the world come to the brink of nuclear war? Let me remind you, we put missiles in Turkey, which the press never reported at the time, and the Soviets responded by putting missiles in Cuba, which lead to the brink of WWIII. Why? Did the Russians push it to the brink over those Cuban missiles? Nope, we did.
Why should any country that the US doesn't like want NATO in the area? Look what NATO did to Qaddafi, who died with an AK-47 rammed up his ass, this is what a "defensive only" military alliance does?
NATA has been involved in other wars of aggression that have led to refugee crises in Europe as well, Syria, first time, Iraq, in fact the Nazi states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania were awarded NATO membership on account of sending troops to participate in Desert Storm.
What about Yugoslavia? NATO divided that country up by force, which makes it pretty ironic when NATO complains about what Russia is doing by intervening in a civil war on its border that the US started by fomenting a coup in Kiev, which the Russian speaking parts of Ukraine rejected, and so took up arms in 2014.
Your press in Europe does not give you the whole story.
Why were the Soviets such utter shits? Because Hitler, like Napoleon, showed up in Moscow bent on conquest. The Soviets invasion of Europe was a counterattack against the second Western European attempt to conquer Russia. Stalin wasn't even Russian, he was Georgian, and Krushchev was Ukrainian, but let's forget all of that!
You should read some history to go along with the firehose of propaganda that is European media today.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.