We’ve looked into the claim... and statistically, it doesn’t check out....I'm skipping a lot and jumping to the last paragraph, which is funny and fascinating:
It’s possible nonetheless that the election was hacked, in the sense that anything is possible. (And the best hackers are experts in erasing their tracks.) Maybe hackers knew which control variables we’d look at and manipulated the vote in a way that it would look like it was caused by race, education and population driving different voting preferences....Yeah, in the future, we need to expect some really sophisticated hacking. I'm glad they brought that up.