March 4, 2021

"The doctors-facts-science mantras have become familiar over the past year. The experts tell us, expertly, what we need to know, and we do it."

"At least until all this science starts to fog up our mental windshields and we, the people, start to wear out. Our irritability mounts; our attention wanes; the guide-rope in our mouth starts to chafe. It is then that the bawdy obstreperousness and its odd twin, the glory hallelujah, of democracy come into view — a single unit; maddening, infuriating, nevertheless fused. And Greg Abbott or someone else steps up to lead the beast forward, by instinct if not by Hoyle... The love of democratic citizens for experts shouldn’t be overestimated. The nature of democracy is preference for or deference to popular wisdom, however unwise that wisdom may prove in action. It’s been a long time since this pandemic started. People are tired. People want to see, and relate to, each other. That’s human nature. The human nature-affirmers like Greg Abbott, with a little luck and sense of timing, are likely to come out way ahead of their castigators and vilifiers, Robert Francis (Beto) O’Rourke conspicuously included."

Writes William Murchison in "Glory Hallelujah for Texas!/Gov. Greg Abbott takes a calculated gamble on we, the people against the experts" (The Spectator).

The Spectator is British, but Murchison is American. He even went to the University of Texas. I had to look that up because the use of "glory hallelujah" hit my ear as a foreigner's mistake. To me, the phrase — which you see in the title and the text ("its odd twin, the glory hallelujah, of democracy") — is entirely evocative of "The Battle Hymn of the Republic," and Texas was in the Confederacy. 

Puzzling, I ran across this 2018 NPR article, "How 'The Battle Hymn of the Republic' became an anthem for every cause"

There's an episode of The Johnny Cash Show from 1969 where the man himself makes a little speech with a pretty big error. "Here's a song that was reportedly sung by both sides in the Civil War," Cash says, guitar in hand, to kick off a performance of "The Battle Hymn of the Republic.... which proves to me that a song can belong to all of us."

 

Cash was wrong, but in the years after the Civil War, the song came to be sung in church, at football games, and at labor union events. And on all sorts of political occasions:

Anita Bryant, the singer and conservative activist, used to perform the song at anti-gay rallies. During the 1964 presidential race, Republican nominee Barry Goldwater had to disown a campaign film that posed the election as a choice between two Americas — an "ideal" America, where the tune of the "Battle Hymn" scored images of the founders and the Constitution, and a "nightmare" America, featuring black people protesting and kids dancing to rock music.

On the flipside, the day before he was killed in 1968, Martin Luther King Jr. made his famous "I've Been to the Mountaintop" speech, which he ended by quoting the song's first line: "Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord." His home church, Atlanta's Ebenezer Baptist, took up the song after his death as an anthem to him and the civil rights movement.

"How people relate to patriotism is kind of how they come into the 'Battle Hymn,' " says professor Brigitta Johnson, an ethnomusicologist at the University of South Carolina who teaches in the schools of Music and African-American Studies. "For example, your white nationalists digging deep into heavy patriotism messages — they bring up things like 'The Star-Spangled Banner' and the 'Battle Hymn' and it becomes their battle cry, just as easily as it could become the battle cry for Ebenezer in Atlanta."...

"The kumbaya moment will not be happening across the aisles because of this song," [Johnson] says, "because it's really about supporting whatever your perspective is — about freedom or liberation, and having God as the person who's ordaining what we're doing. And 'glory, hallelujah' about that."

As Johnny Cash said in 1969, "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" is an anthem that belongs to everybody. But what really matters is what they're singing it for.

That meshes well with Murchison's point about human nature and human nature-affirmers.

215 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 215 of 215
Robert Cook said...

‘Imagine’ is lame, insipid, and soporific. It's not worse than ‘Oh Mickey You're So Fine,’ though. But it may very well hold pride of place for the distance between its actual musical value and the reverence in which it's held by equally insipid boomers and lefties.”

The quality of “Something” is not under discussion. As with any song (or book or movie or ballet or symphony, etc.), each beholder will form his or her own opinion. What I argue against is the absurd, if not totally nutty, idea that it promotes a “horrible” message and advocates any kind of imposed program of “right-think” or behavior. Boiled to its essence, it amounts to nothing but Lennon saying, “Wouldn’t it be nice if people could get along and set their differences aside?”

Static Ping said...

Robert Cook, when John sings "imagine no possessions," he is most certainly endorsing forced social engineering. There's no way to get to that goal, even in imagination, without force and pain. What "Imagine" describes is Oceania if it managed to win the forever war. Maybe there is some way to have a benevolent Oceania, but that requires much greater imagination than I possess.

I will grant you that John does not realize the consequences. He comes across as quite naive. That's not terribly surprising. Many of our greatest creatives were and are... off in some way, often being geniuses in their field and possessing childlike understanding of other topics combined with various neuroses and personal issues. Nonetheless, I stand by my statement: it is a beautiful song with a horrible, if probably unintentional, message.

Michael K said...

It took Lincoln several years to conclude that abolition was the only way forward.

I don't trust Brands on anything remotely political. He is pretty far left. I read his "A Traitor to his Class" and the first half is good but once the Depression begins and FDR is elected, it is hagiography from there on. I don't think I finished it.

Gravel said...

John henry -

For a more entertaining rabbit hole, I recommend Flashman and the Angel of the Lord, a satirical historical rendering of the raid. Lots and lots and lots of fun, with plenty of original sources listed in the footnotes if you want to dive even deeper.

Robert Cook said...

"Robert Cook, when John sings "imagine no possessions," he is most certainly endorsing forced social engineering. There's no way to get to that goal, even in imagination, without force and pain. What "Imagine" describes is Oceania if it managed to win the forever war. Maybe there is some way to have a benevolent Oceania, but that requires much greater imagination than I possess."

Nope. Completely wrong. You're imposing a tendentious reading onto the song because you want to do so. Or else you're so literal-minded you cannot imagine that Lennon was just asking us to imagine a world in which we recognized each other as fellow humans, as far more alike than different, as all wanting and needing to give and receive love and companionship, and, recognizing this, to treat each other with compassion. He makes the uncontroversial point that our disputes have to do with differences that are extraneous to our common humanity,(religious beliefs, tribalism, greed) and that we should try to imagine how we might behave toward others if we did not let ourselves be guided by the differences between us.

Narr said...

I'm with mushy Cook on this one, as far as the teeth-gnashing about bloody "Imagine." Personally I can't stand it or it's admirers, but FFS it's just a bad pop song, not The 95 Theses.

Doc K, thanks for the red flag, but I think I can sort out Brands's slant on the ACWABAWS for myself, whatever his teachings on FDR.

Narr
I second the Flashman nod--all of them are excellent

Lurker21 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lurker21 said...

Much agitation about the Battle Hymn being theologically unorthodox and tied to extremist, apocalyptic politics. The controversy is similar to the on involving the song Jerusalem in Britain. Some very orthodox and conservative clergymen supposedly don't like either song being sung in church.

mockturtle said...

FDR was far from being A Traitor to His Class. His measures saved Capitalism by preventing a mass revolt from unemployed workers. He wasn't being altruistic but practical at the time. The problem was that, like all Democrat programs and policies, they persisted long after the need for them disappeared.

mockturtle said...

Actually, TR was more a traitor to his class than was FDR.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Balfegor said...
Me: I've got N95 masks. None of them filter my great going out, they only filter the air coming in.

You're wearing a vented mask. I have one like that, with a rubber seal and the removable/replaceable intake filters. It's pretty nice (and the filters I attach are better than N95, I think), but for the precise reason you note, it doesn't comply with the mask requirements on, e.g. airlines (at least United), which forbid vented masks.


Nope, I'm wearing an N95 mask that has rubber bands holding it to my head.

When I breathe out, the air pushes the mask slightly off my face, and it escapes that way, rather than going through the filtration.

When I inhale, it's pulled against my face, and the air is forced to go through the filter.

And I going to wear a mask that is so tightly bound to my face that it takes less energy for the air to push through the filter, than to push the mask away enough to escape directly?

No, I'm not.

Do I see people walking around with their masks below their noses? Coughing, with their mask pushed out of the way of the cough? Pulling their mask off so they can talk on their phone and be heard? Pulling their mask off because there's no one within 6 feet, and the mask is uncomfortable?

Yes, I do.

Do I see Biden's spokescreature talking to the press with her mask off? yes, I do.

I fact, I can't recall seeing a picture of Jen giving a briefing with a mask ON.

So much for Biden's mask EO. So much for it all being the fault of "that idiot Trump".

Mask mandates are walking, nothing more

Michelle Dulak Thomson said...

Robert Cook,

Not horrible at all. Just a wistful "imagining" of a world where humankind were not violently divided by selfishness, self-centeredness, and illusory "differences" and beliefs.

So you think Lennon is just saying "Can't we all just get along?" Look, Lennon isn't shy about what he wants (and, no, it's not just what he "imagines"). He wants no countries, no possessions, no religion -- heck, no God. IOW, he wants a world state (how else do you get rid of countries?), religion to vanish, "possessions" to vanish (what, if I make something with my own hands it goes into the vast crockpot of "all the people sharing all the world"? Nothing I make, even if it be a sculpture made out of a handful of twigs, is ever to be "mine," but always and forever "ours"?) He wants "all the people" to be not merely equal, but identical. No one is to be above anyone; no one is to be below anyone; where you live is utterly immaterial to anything; the government (there's still government, don't ya think?) is exactly the same everywhere you go; and this whole dystopian monstrosity is to be thought of as Heaven, even though we have just been instructed that Heaven doesn't exist.

And "You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one/I hope some day you'll join us, and then the world will live as one." All too literal, that. The person above who said that this is Oceania is right. Really, if Lennon were advocating that we all be considerate and kind to one another, why not say so? Why conflate "religion" with "selfishness"? Why conflate "love of one's home" with "selfishness"? Why conflate "This is a thing I made; it belongs to me" with "selfishness"?

Lennon wants a world where everyone is exactly the same as anyone else, and therefore there's no need for such things as Gods and possessions and countries and the like; we are all interchangeable dots on a very large board. It's the most hateful vision I have ever heard that isn't literally, nakedly dystopian.

Is it the worst song ever written? Possibly not. "We Are the World" comes pretty close; so does "Little Boxes." But for my money, it takes the prize.

Michelle Dulak Thomson said...

Robert Cook,

I ought to add that the closest actual analogue to the world of "Imagine" I know is B. F. Skinner's Walden Two. But Skinner didn't propose subjecting the entire planet to his experiment. His work does, though, give one an idea of how much "re-education" of the people subjected to such a scheme the enterprise would require.

Anonymous said...

Joe Smith - "It's schlock wrapped in garbage, smeared with shit, and covered in treacle."
Joe, stop mincing words. Don't hold back. Tell us what you really think.

Tim (the mask wearer)in Vermont. Study after study say 85% of covid positive tests are from people who say they always wear masks. They also constantly touch their face to adjust their mask. Constantly. Always. A lot. Aerosol transmission is not the only form of transmission. A virus will take hand to face transmission. It's not like a virus cares.
I'm neutral on this. I don't wear a mask. I haven't worn a mask. I don't make fun of those who wear a mask. From now on, for the rest of my life, I expect to see people wearing a mask during flu season. The hypochondriacs and drama queens. I'm ok with that.

Mock -The only way to healing as a nation is through Christ. Seriously.
Can't argue with that.

Robert Cook said...

I see some persist in their paranoiac readings of an anodyne pop song. Well, there’s no talking to crazies.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 215 of 215   Newer› Newest»