Better question, how is it that an American taxpayer-funded organization can participate in an adjudication system in which you get a two-year ban because “there is no reason to exonerate” you? At what point is such an organization shut down and defunded?
In his decision last week, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks declined to intervene in USADA’s case against Armstrong because to do so would “turn federal judges into referees for a game in which they have no place, and about which they know little.” But in the next breath Sparks expressed an opinion on certain matters he does know about. “The deficiency of USADA’s charging document is of serious constitutional concern....”
August 25, 2012
"How does an agency that is supposed to regulate drug testing strip a guy of seven titles without a single positive drug test?"
"How is it that an American agency can decide to invalidate somebody’s results achieved in Europe, in a sport it doesn’t control?"