२१ सप्टेंबर, २०१२
I must say I find the ongoing back and forth between these 2 judges irritating.
Both know what the other is saying, which is what he's been saying for years. Why must they act out their diva drama in public… if TNR may be considered public.
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
११ टिप्पण्या:
"Why must they act out their diva drama in public… if TNR may be considered public."
Prseumably this is snarky vortext speaking, and TNR is the real target. Because it's not like, you know, academics don't sometimes act out their diva drama in public ... if blog posts, law reviews or the Chronicle of Higher Education may be considered public.
Good luck getting comments on this post.
Atheists and secularists are really left hanging when judges are all we have left as ultimate authority. It was much better when the top of the totem pole was too high to see clearly.
Free speech, and all that.
Good for their High Pomposities too.
Posner woke up one day and realized he's never going to be on the Supreme Court, and he's been pissed at conservatives ever since.
Teacher, teacher! I saw Tony doing legislative history in the bathroom!
"Prseumably this is snarky vortext speaking..."
It's my email voice, in response to someone sending me that link. I was saying, essentially, why I don't want to blog stuff like this, but since I made my correspondent laugh, I decided to blog it.
Let this be the tip of the iceberg of things I don't blog. It's what I do for you, not blogging. There's tons of stuff that people think is the sort of thing that I would blog, but I'm quite resistant.
Thank you for not blogging on not blogging this Professor...no, wait!...Thank you not blogging on this...no...Thank you for blogging on important sub...ject...mmmmmmm....Thank you professor!
*each knows
And you, a law professor and writer!
Wait, is this Stuff White People Like?
"if TNR may be considered public."
Credit where credit is due.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा