Ms. Export was best known for two pieces she staged in the late 1960s and early ’70s. In the first, “Action Pants: Genital Panic,” she walked into a movie theater in Munich in 1968, wearing crotchless pants that put her exposed genitals directly in the sightline of seated theatergoers.... As she walked down the aisle, she announced, “Now you will see in reality what you normally see on the screen.” In a photo taken a year later to commemorate the piece, Ms. Export underscored the radically confrontational nature of the work by accessorizing her all-black, crotchless outfit with a machine gun.
For “Tap and Touch Cinema,” first staged at a film festival in Vienna in 1968 and then in nine other cities throughout Europe, Ms. Export (or sometimes a collaborator) wore a cardboard or aluminum “cinema” — an empty box with curtains at the front — strapped to her chest. Walking down the street alongside the artist Peter Weibel, who drummed up interest with a megaphone, she invited passers-by to “visit the cinema” by reaching through the curtains to touch her bare breasts. She made a point of maintaining eye contact while they did so.
24 મે, 2026
"What distinguished Ms. Export’s work, beyond its aggression and sheer volume, was its lucidity."
I'm reading "Valie Export, Who Made Art With Her Naked Body, Dies at 85" (NYT).

54 ટિપ્પણીઓ:
Just trying to make whores glamorous.
Disgusting, pornographic performance "artists" degrade art, artists, and women. NYT libtards can't get enough of them.
The shifting Overton window, now with curtains and crotchless pants, and a Master of Ceremonies with a megaphone.
Eyes down here.
But did the carpet match the curtains?
If a man exposes his genitals in public, he goes to jail and is placed on the sex offender registry. If a woman does it, it's art.
n.n said...
"Eyes down here"
LMAO 🤣... Eyes down, dink!
https://www.zazzle.com/eyes_down_dink_t_shirt-235126691982652582
The Popular Consensus is that women, and girls, when they can afford them, perform best under the principles of RAAT.
“If a man exposes his genitals in public, he goes to jail and is placed on the sex offender registry. If a woman does it, it's art.“
Life is so unfair.
It's all basic macroeconomics if you ask me:
Gross National Product = See + Eye + Gee + (Export - Import)
#MeToo
Speaking of walking down the street, I want to know who is running Spencer Pratt's campaign. Now he has people walking the LA streets with a pressure washer and a stencil. They're using them to pressure wash the filthy sidewalks with the words: 'Imagine if this street were clean - Spencer Pratt'
Now that's straight-up freakin' brilliant campaigning.
Was she advertising her Trichomoniasis?
“Her longtime gallerist, Thaddaeus Ropac, said her death, at a hospital, was caused by complications of a fall at her home in the Austrian capital.”
You whores and non-whores out there - be careful. The floor is not your friend.
... but is it art?
Eyes down,
It's an artful illustration of what not to do, what not to be. Just because you can... That said, to abort or not to abort? That is the question.
I note a female hairiness theme over the last couple of posts.
@Michael Fitzgerald: I went to the link. It’s a baby’s onesie with the words “EYES DOWN, DINK!”
I couldn’t figure out what it means. I asked Perplexity. This is what Perplexity said:
The “eyes down” part is likely a bingo reference (as in, “eyes down, here we go”), so the full joke is: Eyes down — your DINK (Double Income No Kids) lifestyle is over! It’s aimed at new parents who used to be a carefree two-income, no-kids couple, and now here’s the baby announcing the end of that era.
Is Perplexity overthinking it ir is that what it means? Very clever if that’s it.
Shtick, Gimmick, Peurile
Selfish love, self-loathed, unwashed
No Emperor’s clothes
Only the very *smahtest* people can find interest in a public whore. By calling it art.
We are led by degenerates.
"...her exposed genitals directly in the sightline of seated theatergoers"
Did she walk backwards into the theatre?
So sexual fetishism has been confused with art for more than 5 decades.
I loved her work in the late 90s, nearly all with a dried apricot or prune theme.
For some reason *some* women seem to think it is a smart idea to take something valuable and give it away for free.
Generally it is the women who are *smart* enough to go to college too.
Translucidity - pun intended - is the dark farce.
Ah, no Eva Marie, I thought that there would be more oldsters like me who picked up on that reference.
It's from a 70's movie called Planet Earth starring John Saxon and Ted Cassidy who played Lurch on the Addams Family. The story is set in a post-apocalyptic Earth which has become a matriarchal society where women enslave men, who they refer to as "dinks". If a man dares to look a woman in the eyes, she'll order him to lower his gaze by commanding him "Eyes down, dink!"
When we were kids, my little sister and I saw it one afternoon and whenever a woman said "Eyes down, dink!" we were rolling on the floor. For years after, she could crack me up just delivering that line.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Earth_(film)
then what is it doing on a baby’s onesie?
Nowadays the same mentality tries to shoot the President at the White House.
because the diaper needs changing?
That blind guess by Perplexity is hilariously wrong, but gives an interesting hint at how AI or any search engine works. In this case, mashing up a phrase from a parlor game with a social media acronym which didn't really catch on, and then pulling an explanatory connection out of its nether regions.
I didn't notice that to be a baby onesie. I thought it was just a t-shirt. I dunno... my eyes are down here.
“For some reason *some* women seem to think it is a smart idea to take something valuable and give it away for free.
Generally it is the women who are *smart* enough to go to college too.”
I am begging you, please stop before you become the “It’s a Small World After All” of the comment section.
Every time I see your comments all I hear are those stupid dancing dolls. Round and round they go.
Eyes up here? She was Antifem... feminism. Fight!
A model of garish genderism. The liberal farce of social progress.
Just recently, Althouse linked to a NYT article about another femrad artist. The article showed her boobs. I didn't think the NYT featured boobs but there they were. She was hanging upside in a bell and posing as a clanger. Not much in the way of prurient interest, but you could see her boobs.....I clicked on this article, hoping for more groundbreaking NYT stuff. No such luck. They showed a film clip of her with a cardboard box placed in front of her chest. You were supposed to reach in the box to feel her boobs and some men did. They had goofy expressions on their face as they did so. I wouldn't have done it. I can just imagine some femrad artist putting a hungry rat in that box......Anyway, the obit says she had a garter belt tattooed on her leg. That's really caught on so you can't say her influence was ephemeral. .
It’s a world of whores, a world of tears
It’s a world of voting and a world of fears
There’s so much for us to blame
On all the women we can name
It’s a small world after all
Chorus:
It’s a small world after all
It’s a small world after all
It’s a small world after all
It’s a small, small world
Michael Fitzgerald writes. "Disgusting, pornographic performance "artists" degrade art, artists, and women."
Stop trying to elevate Export's body of "work" to the level of pornography when lizard-brained stupidity is tailor-made for the task at hand.
"NYT libtards can't get enough of them."
Lizard-brained stupidly finds its natural audience among the reptiles of journalism.
"If a man dares to look a woman in the eyes, she'll order him to lower his gaze by commanding him "Eyes down, dink!"'
And then when he stares at her chest, she'll say "My eyes are up here!"
Like 3D OnlyFans !
RIP.
She was ahead of her time...
If a man exposes his genitals in public, he goes to jail and is placed on the sex offender registry. If a woman does it, it's art.
I don't have a problem with that.
An exhibitionist who turned a fetish into an income stream? That sounds like an excellent way to beat the daily grind.
Bragging about having pubic hair and armpit hair has been a new theme the past few months among young women on Facebook. It’s revolutionary and daring. It was also revolutionary and daring during the hippie era. Then, following that into the porn era, shaved pits and pussy were revolutionary and daring.
Just so, Thomas. The bold heroine featured in the article was actually showing only her pubic hair.
"Work"?
Nothing of value has been lost.
Three years ago, I planned to travel out to Malibu to bring the FWB home to Florida. I discovered she had grown back her pubes. I told her I wouldn't tolerate that, and to trim that bush back down to nubs. After a few days of disagreeing, then hemming and hawing, she sent me a video of her doing the necessary mowing.
I AM the Rizz.
"Then, following that into the porn era, shaved pits and pussy were revolutionary and daring."
There are, as I understand it, two theories about this. One is that women shave their genitals because men don't like to get hair in their teeth. The other is that women shave their genitals (and their armpits) because men are attracted by the characteristics of pre-pubertal females.
I would like to think, that the first reason is right. But I have to say, I don't think women are trying to get guys to lick their armpits (Am I wrong about this?). So, the second theory seems to have more explanatory power.
I guess I will just testify, that I can recall when the photographs of women in Playboy were carefully arranged so that no pubic hair was visible. It was a big deal, in Playboy circles, when Playboy decided to publish photos with pubic hair, and this was taken to be a heightening of sexual stimulation. But then Penthouse began publishing photos that not only showed pubic hair, but exposed the lips of the vulva, glimpsed through the pubic hair. This was known as "going pink". In the natural course of these things, this soon led to photographs of women manipulating their genitals like surgical specimens -- What a girlfriend of mine called "the roast beef". Sigh.
But I have to say, I don't think women are trying to get guys to lick their armpits (Am I wrong about this?)
A girl asked me once if I was into feet.
Girls seem to view their entire body as a battlefield. "Oh my gosh. He could go anywhere. I better be ready."
I do think smell and body odor plays an under-appreciated role in sexual attraction.
I mate like a dog and I love everything. I may or may not wag my ass.
The sex robots need to install smell-o-vision
My Yves Klein post disappeared. He was the father of painting with the naked body. Too patriarchal? Too naked? Too blue? Internet goblins? The damn A.I.? My sweet and neutral hostess? Anyway, it's gone.
Yves Klein and the Birth of the Blue.
It's fun to count the pregnancy references in that article.
"birth of the blue"
"Klein also blurred the boundaries between painting and sculpture by impregnating a range of objects"
"pregnant with possibilities"
Oso Negro said...
Just so, Thomas. The bold heroine featured in the article was actually showing only her pubic hair
Or a merkin.
So... Annie Sprinkle was a hack? Who'da thunkit?
ટિપ્પણી પોસ્ટ કરો
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.