२६ जुलै, २०२४
"Look how angry the regime gets when you ask simple questions about what it’s doing."
Writes Sean Davis, who'd had the gall/wit to ask, last Monday, "Do we have any evidence that Biden is even alive right now?"
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
४५ टिप्पण्या:
It wasn't a comment. It was a question.
I guess that actually makes it worse, doesn't it. "I just want to ask -- just asking, you understand -- on what basis you asked that question. Like, why would you ask that? Shouldn't you have not asked that?
On what basis does someone ask a question? Who are these people?
Doubleplus ungood. Memory hole.
There was never any "border czar". Move along.
Nothing to see here.
"Who are these people?"
“The powerful people you have not heard of, the ones who keep people out of the race, the ones who demographically engineer your replacement, are people we have not heard of either.”
- Love and Unknowing, The DNC Plutocracy
Dead parrot sketch
The symbiotic relationship between Right Clickbait & Left Clickbait.
What would they do without an audience?
Dear NewsGuard,
Go pi$$ up a rope.
Sincerely,
Sean
There never was a border ear.
"News Verification Reporter" seems both circular and rather 1984-ish at the same time.
That's quite an accomplishment.
So far, FJB has failed in that main mission: To bankrupt, incarcerate or assassinate Trump. Democrats will keep trying. Stalinism abides.
The insinuation that they were behind the Trump shooting is something the regime might legitimately be pissed about.
Blogger Paul Zrimsek said...
The insinuation that they were behind the Trump shooting is something the regime might legitimately be pissed about.
True things make evil people mad.
It is as obvious as it can be without them saying it out loud at this point that there was a conspiracy of government agents who tried to kill Trump and Wray is in the know and covering it up at this point.
Well, I wouldn't characterize it as 'Look how angry..', because the tone of the email is not obviously angry. It's more of a slimy, Wormtongue type of question, insinuating itself into position for a passive-aggressive attack that you'd hear about later, once you start investigating why your accounts have been closed down. I know what he means, though. If this was a normal case of cockroaches, we'd be treating for them.
Yes, the Biden administration has tried lawfare and accidentally-on-purpose surrounding Trump with demonstrably incompetent Secret Service agents in hopes someone would take a shot at him (someone did), yet it’s Biden who is out of the race. The Gods of the Copybook Headings are laughing.
Over the last month you could not make it more obvious that there is a conspiracy by the deep state in Washington DC to destroy our democracy and install an unelected government.
Over the last month you could not make it more obvious that there is a conspiracy by the deep state in Washington DC to destroy our democracy and install an unelected government.
This is why they fight tooth and nail against any attempt to make sure dead people and foreigners aren't voting in our elections. Honest people don't do that. Democrats are not honest people and I have no doubt that they are benefitting from tens of millions of bogus votes in every election.
It will likely require a second revolution to free ourselves from their clutches, and in the aftermath, one of the first items of business will be a Constitutional amendment to restore same-day in-person voting, with photo ID, on paper ballots, with no electronic machines involved, and public counting of the ballots in the precinct where they were cast. Like every other free country in the world does it, developed countries and third world shitholes alike. They all know that vote-by-mail is tailor made for fraud and tyranny.
"Big Mike said...
Yes, the Biden administration has tried lawfare and accidentally-on-purpose surrounding Trump with demonstrably incompetent Secret Service agents in hopes someone would take a shot at him (someone did), yet it’s Biden who is out of the race."
Or it was a hit. The SS set up a hole in protection and then schooled the shooter on that hole. They also provided sub standard agents to prevent someone from saving the day.
Beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep.
"Norman, coordinate!"
What evidence do you have for asking a question? Now, someone using the old standard journalistic Who? What? Where? When? needs to demonstrate they had evidence that such questions need to asked. A wrinkle even Orwell missed.
When you lose the election will you respect the results of the election and go peacefully? Of course you won't...
While I was 95% confident Biden wasn't dead or in a coma after the Sunday letter, I wasn't 100% sure as is actually a requirement for Biden being President. It was a perfectly valid question to ask.
The fuckers lie about everything, including their previous lies.
Joe Bidenroom is a massively coordinated anthropogenic construct of Darth Joey.
Two things - you damn well know if Trump went missing for days the "news" would ask ad nauseum if Trump was alive and demand absolute proof. And if his staff responded with anger the conspiracy theories would be turbo-charged.
If you were actually trying to annihilate your credibility then this is the blueprint.
Obviously the regime lied about Biden's cognitive ability for a long time. That doesn't make Davis credible, though. Sure, he's Just Asking Questions, but when the question is that inflammatory, it's entirely fair to then ask him whether he had any basis for asking that question or was just pulling it from thin air.
Curious George said...
Or it was a hit. The SS set up a hole in protection and then schooled the shooter on that hole. They also provided sub standard agents to prevent someone from saving the day.
The SS created an obvious security flaw. We don't have to beat that dead horse. That security plan has only one explanation.
The FBI told the shooter where to go and how to get there. Nobody just walks up onto a site cold and sneaks up on the target like that.
The shooter was the only one doing drone surveillance that day because the SS specifically kept local law enforcement from doing so.
SS agents took pictures of the shooter through the windows that had full view of the roof the shooter shot from.
The Counter Sniper team was watching the shooter for minutes before he took the shots.
"Someone" cleaned the shooter's house before it was "searched."
The FBI tried to hide his Gab account which made it absolutely clear he was a Biden supporter.
"Jack Smith’s Anti-Trump Deputy Excoriated For Inappropriate Behavior At DOJ"
https://thefederalist.com/2024/07/26/jack-smiths-anti-trump-deputy-excoriated-for-inappropriate-behavior-at-doj/
Well Sean Davis, why would anyone ask that question unless they were a secret Nazi/KKK/racist/bigot?
BTW, isn't it weird how all these unelected, mysterious NGO's and "Press" organizations have so much power to censor and ride herd on everyone? ADL, Newsguard, SPLC, Rightwing watch, Media Matters, etc. Who's funding them? WHy are they so obscure yet so powerful?
And all of them are "Guarding us" and "Protecting us" from badthink. For our own good. And for the good of the Left.
Given that the POTUS for censored and cancelled for almost 2 years, and the FBI/DHS were involved in cancelling people on social media, I'm shocked more people aren't upset. But I've come to the conclusion that the Democrats and Left have given up on free speech. To them censorship is only bad when they are being censored.
I don't think is good for the USA or American values but I don't see anyway its going to change.
Given all the things the Biden administration has done over the past 3 1/2 it was not an unreasonable question to ask. They attempted to cover up Biden's mental and physical problems to the point of lying to us daily (with the cooperation of the press), why wouldn't some of us think they might also cover up his death?
JIM, Melania wasn't in public for a few days during Trump's term and there was a general media freak out.
Tom T. said...
Obviously the regime lied about Biden's cognitive ability for a long time. That doesn't make Davis credible, though. Sure, he's Just Asking Questions, but when the question is that inflammatory, it's entirely fair to then ask him whether he had any basis for asking that question or was just pulling it from thin air.
Ok, but let’s remember you wanted to go down this road. First, until Biden showed up to board Air Force One to return to the White House, no one outside his family is said to have seen him since he left a fundraiser in Las Vegas. He said at that fundraiser he was not dropping out. Biden’s own campaign and White House staff learned from X like the rest of us that Biden claimed to be dropping out. No one informed them of Biden’s status or intent. Then leaks came out that first responders were told to prepare to transport and receive POTUS at a Las Vegas hospital as he left the fundraiser, but that was changed to him returning to Air Force One with no photography of him boarding Air Force One.
All this was the situation when Davis posed his question. Before you dismiss this as unsubstantiated lies, we will remind you the claims that Harris was “Border Czar” is unsubstantiated lies has been substantiated. Claims that Trump fell down when he heard loud noises or was hit by shrapnel or couldn’t be protected because of sloped roofs have not been substantiated. This gives Davis an edge in the credibility department. If the leftist press doesn’t like it, up their game.
Again we are left with Schrodingers Biden.
Notice Davis simply asked those who may disagree whether there was evidence, not assert, as many in-the-tank “journalist” do, there is “no evidence.”
Davis's questions were perfectly valid at the time he asked him.
A President refusing his party's nomination, which he had completely wrapped up and had insisted he was going to accept only a couple of days before, via a post on X using a generic auto-signed letter that could have been written by literally anyone when no one has seen the President for days is not normal. Not normal requires questions. You know, like journalists are supposed to do.
If we are going to play the game that asking valid questions and then being wrong requires immediate disqualification, then someone please shut down the New York Times and the Washington Post with all due haste.
The wicked take the truth to be hard.
That "Norman Coordinate" comment is making me laugh. 100% perfect.
NwwsGuard = Mindguard
In groupthink theory, a mindguard is a member of a group who serves as an informational filter, providing limited information to the group and, consciously or subconsciously, utilizing a variety of strategies to control dissent and to direct the decision-making process toward a specific, limited range of possibilities - Wikipedia
Two things - you damn well know if Trump went missing for days the "news" would ask ad nauseum if Trump was alive and demand absolute proof.
We have idiots on this board demanding to know where Melania is.
Remember the old joke: "Even paranoids have real enemies"? Don't mock someone who asked "Where's Biden" when the most public person in our government hadn't been seen for several days, and yet earth-shaking announcements had been made IN HIS NAME". Haven't we all wondered and speculated for months (or years) who was actually making "Biden's" decisions?
Paraphrasing the immortal Mary McCarthy, “ Every word they utter is a lie, including “ and” and “the”.
No doubt Kumar will not try to answer that question and all the evidence we did have during that period that Biden was alive.
Unfortunately, if the answer is “not much”, there is zero chance she would then ask, “Is this a problem for our country?” Zero chance.
Question “is Biden dead?”
Answer “no”
Pretty simple, really. But then, it’s politics so ingrained into these people including the media, that they don’t care about who lives or dies.
Apart from the Mark Twain rediscovered play, is Biden Dead? Was a valid question. The Sunday Statement was NOT like Biden's writing at all. Unusual for any POTUS to do total blackout. See Ike's heart attack vs. Cleveland's oral cancer surgery.
That outfit was trying real hard to intimidate you! Oh, I believe that Biden only dimly realizes he was ousted in a coup,
I did a quick check. Many of its investors are hidden. So, likely funded, at least in part, by some well-monied Leftists. Perhaps all of its funding came that way.
And, I did notice that the seed money was in the form of a LOAN. Not that usual in the case of new businesses - the investors usually take seed money, as actual assets are few, and projections for future revenue are - well, projections (often only marginally related to reality).
What MOST investors take is a piece of the company. But, not this time. Which makes me wonder, why not?
Could it be that, although it is a private company, the possibilities of a loan's origins being unearthed is less than for a stake in the company, which would have to be in the company's reports. A laundered loan would only show the last leg on the laundering journey.
So, win-win.
Both launder foreign/criminal money, and set up a scheme to spread "truth" to the Non-Left. With everyone saying "My hands are clean" along the way.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा