Writes Magdalene J. Taylor in "Have More Sex, Please!" (NYT).
१३ फेब्रुवारी, २०२३
"Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness...."
"In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that 'everyone else is having sex' has never been less true.... Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so.... Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.... Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.
Many people... have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli.... As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, any capable people should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can."
Writes Magdalene J. Taylor in "Have More Sex, Please!" (NYT).
Writes Magdalene J. Taylor in "Have More Sex, Please!" (NYT).
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
२० टिप्पण्या:
One wonders why adolescents that identify as female feel pressured to have sex.
--- digital sex It’s no match for the real thing.
Another NYT scoop.
Casual sex does not create social solidarity. It didn’t for the Soviets, it didn’t for the Nazis, it didn’t for the Hippie Boomers. The only kind of sex that creates solidarity is sex within a committed relationship and it only creates solidarity within that relationship. That relationship then benefits the couple themselves, their children, extended families and the society around them since the stability of their committed relationship counterbalances nature’s chaos.
No casual or group sex ever creates that. Ever, in the history of man. No fantasy of swinger anthropologist has ever been shown to exist functionally in the real world. Leftists get EVERYTHING WRONG.
An article for the lonely, I gather. I thought NYT women had cats.
Well, I checked out what she looks like, and I believe her- she could have as much sex as she wants- quite attractive.
"They're sharing a drink they call loneliness, but it's better than drinking alone"?
Gotta say, I never knew that the survival of the species rested on getting this kind of nuanced and refined argument to win over hearts, minds and groins.
How things change!
Maybe if you stopped being a fucking asshole? The stuff you’re doing as an ‘activist’ isn’t putting anyone in the mood…
HOW, does This correlate to Professor Althouse's adage* that You should NEVER have sex..
UNLESS BOTH parties EAGERLY WANT it.. RIGHT NOW (not, a little, not in a while.. But RIGHT NOW!)
Althouse's adage* Please forgive me, if i'm misquoting the adage (or, if i'm misusing the word Adage)
"Sex" now is apparently BJs, rough anal and choking.
Whatever his little heart desires.
Calling BS!
People should be making love -- to their spouse. So get married THEN have lots of sex.
Married. Commitment. Love. Love and lots of love-making; including makin' babies.
Commitment, with your mind and will, is the difference between love and mere lust-sex.
For most women, most of the time, sex with men who don't love them is less good than just dancing without sex; less good than a movie date without sex; less good than dinner, or lunch, or coffee, & talking, without sex.
For most men, they'd often rather have love-less sex than mere masturbation, but as they get older most are looking for more than mere orgasms; tho those always feel pretty good.
My wife doesn't read this blog.
Apparently, social progress transfitness is the opiate of the masses, not limited to teen girls who are judged and labeled a "benefit".
I thought NYT women had cats.
Pussy hats... cats... sharing is caring, until you label a feline a child, then run headlong into an epiphany.
Relationship are distorted, sometimes irreconcilably, through a conflation of love, lust, and gratification. She is not a gender - an assembly of sex-correlated attributes. He is not a commodity. Choose wisely, ladies and gentlemen.
Maybe they could even pair up and get married! And have children. And grandchildren. How connected is that?! Sometimes it even involves lots of sex. But apparently people would rather be cool than happy.
Sex without passion is often a nothing-burger. James Bond has a license to kill and piddly, noiseless orgasms.
The model for best sex practices is the artist. Passion and deep feeling equals powerful orgasms.
Our society is deeply repressed about human sexuality. Our "authorities" don't know what a baby is, and now they don't know what a woman is. All they know about sex education is birth control, condoms on bananas.
Sex is beautiful, an amazing gift from the Lord.
I think churches should step up and perform marriages of young people that are outside the law.
Young people who do not have jobs should be encouraged to perform a small wedding ceremony in a chapel when they are in love and want to start making love.
There is no rule in Christianity that our marriages have to be acceptable to the state.
We should encourage young people to marry in church before virginity is lost. Intimacy and passion make sex hotter and better.
Romeo and Juliet were married by a priest.
Marriage has been corrupted by state officials and other people obsessed with money.
Sex is amazing but it's a nothing-burger if you feel nothing.
The marriage ceremony should also be preceded with frank conversations about babies and sex education. I would not trust the state with sex education, it's way too corrupt and dishonest. Our officials don't know what a baby is, and now they don't know what a woman is. Their lies and deceits are multiplying.
@Yancy Ward: "Well, I checked out what she looks like, and I believe her- she could have as much sex as she wants- quite attractive."
I totally agree. And she's very aware of it.
Too dangerous. One pissed off girl and you are facing rape charges. And you know, believe all girls.
In the Long Ago Time (before the iPhone of 2007), boys sometimes broke away from their games to get out of the house and meet people. Girls didn't carry a phone in their hip pockets and check social media every 30 seconds.
Sex is something for 'big people' who take care of teenagers and 20 somethings needs, and not something they can handle. I wonder if they watched movies from the classic "Teenage Sex Comedy" era...Grease, Animal House, Porky's, Weird Science, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Revenge of the Nerds?
I actually know the answer (no, they didn't watch), as a high school in Australia dropped its plans to remake Olivia Newtown John's career-defining movie Grease...way way too politically incorrect...
https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/arts-culture/582034-schools-cancel-grease-after-show-is-called-sexist/
The lyrics to "Greased Lightning" were so explicit that they didn't make it on the film soundtrack way back in 1978. The Harvey Weinstein's who ran Hollywood back then might have taken a cue and changed their ways...but no they couldn't stop and wanted Bill Clinton and pals Epstein and Gates to run the show...
https://www.songlyrics.com/grease/greased-lightning-lyrics/
Excerpts:
We'll get some purple fringe taillights and thirty inch fins, oh yeah
A Palomino dashboard and duel muffler twins, oh yeah
With new pistons, plugs and shocks I can get off my rocks
You know that I ain't bragging, she's a real pussy wagon
Grease lightning
(Go, go, go)
...
Go grease lightning, you're burning up the quarter mile
(Grease lightning, go grease lightning)
Go grease lightning, you're coasting through the heat lap trial
(Grease lightning, go grease lightning)
You are supreme, the chicks'll cream for grease lightning
...
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा