Unless Sinema wigs out, that's it. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson will be joining the Supreme Court. The only question is whether Collins, Murkowski, Romney and maybe a couple of others will do the right thing. https://t.co/y1ig82BLvZ
— Dan Kennedy (@dankennedy_nu) March 25, 2022
२५ मार्च, २०२२
"Unless Sinema wigs out..."
याची सदस्यत्व घ्या:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा (Atom)
पोस्ट्स
१०१ टिप्पण्या:
I see no reason not to support her nomination. I feel the same way about almost everyone nominated by the President to the Supreme Court. Even Harriet Miers.
(This might be why I am not a Senator. One of many reasons!)
Good ol' Moderate Joe. No Democrat SCOTUS pick too radical or stupid. Meanwhile, he sat on the fence with Kavanaugh and didn't support him till AFTER he was a sure thing.
Maybe that's what is going no here. Moderate Joe giving cover to Some RINO Republican. Notice how 48 out of 50 D Senators are UNITED on almost everything. Meanwhile, the R's lose 6 Senators when impeaching Trump and 20 when they vote on a border fence.
Nothing in Sinema's background to suggest she would vote against KBJ, whom she voted to confirm to her current position.
Does anybody think Romney wouldn't vote for her?
Pedophiles in America are estatic!!! Happy day for them!!!
It still might happen that a high-school classmate will appear and will allege credibly that young Brown Jackson assaulted him at a party.
If Brown Jackson were a Roman Catholic, then Senator Feinstein would make a big deal about the allegation.
If Brown Jackson were Jewish, then Senator Feinstein would bury the allegation.
Since Brown Jackson is neither Roman Catholic nor Jewish, we still cannot be sure what Senator Feinstein would do about the allegation.
Romney voted against KBJ last time.
Just hoping no exchanges unearthed between KBJ's husband and Trump's chief of staff.
Democrats are much better at enforcing discipline among their troops than Republicans.
Republicans tend to think for themselves and that is positively Putin-like.
Someone please ask Manchin to define "woman". Because I'm sure he can.
Then ask if he's a biologist. Because I'm sure he's not.
Then ask why he's approving someone to the Supreme Court who isn't sure of her own gender. Because that sounds really stupid.
Do the right thing? You mean confirm her just because she identifies as a woman and is Black?
Listen. This Judge is very soft on crime. And she's fully invested in the woke and CRT theology. She's completely out of the mainstream.
This "woman" will go to her grave as the woman who doesn't know what a woman is. Good. 2+2=5
She raped me.
Me, too…
KBJ also called President Bush a war criminal. That's a historic first for a SCOTUS Justice.
Yah, hard bot to feel like a permanent cementing of 2020 era leftie lunacy. Lefties will move on to some new brand if lunacy but she’ll still be here…
I am not big on claiming victimhood, but I have to say that the one prejudice that is allowed on Althouse is anti-Semitism. Mike Sylvester's comments are usually condescendingly stupid and often offensive. Today's comment is both.
FYI: The Daily Wire is reporting that Justice Thomas has been released from the hospital.
The Daily Wire is reporting that Justice Thomas has been released from the hospital.
It worked! A live long and prosper sentiment, with a monetary donation to life.
Since Brown Jackson is neither Roman Catholic nor Jewish, we still cannot be sure what Senator Feinstein would do about the allegation.
Diversity [dogma], perhaps. She is a Democrat, and they bitterly cling to that dogma as a religious principle.
Bring on the Royal Coronation.
She will immediately become the new RGB. Get used to KBJ. I can almost feel the gushiness in the air.
I thought Kamala couldn't break this tie? Not that she'll have to; Jackson will likely get several Republican votes.
“Nothing in Sinema's background to suggest she would vote against KBJ, whom she voted to confirm to her current position.”
The only LGBRXYZ bisexual in the Senate voting against the woman who refuses to define what a woman is, because of demands by the LGBRXYZ lobby? Not likely.
I am certain that George Soros strongly supports KBJ (maybe he even selected her for Biden), and by extension, so does the WEF.
“ She will immediately become the new RGB. Get used to KBJ. I can almost feel the gushiness in the air.”
Except that she isn’t apparently smart enough to do nuance very well. The Republicans on the Court already make fun of Justice Sotomayor’s idiotic, nuance free, opinions. My bet is that we are about to see the AA Dumb and Dumber team. That leaves Kagan, in many cases, the only one of the left capable of framing articulate responses to Republican dominated opinions.
Two AA justices are two too many AA justices.
Herbert the Infant to 2:17 PM
... one prejudice that is allowed on Althouse is anti-Semitism. Mike Sylvester's comments ...
I've said it before, and I will say it again.
Senator Feinstein is prejudiced against Roman Catholic nominees to the US Supreme Court, because of Roman Catholic teachings about abortion. On that basis, she does whatever she can to sabotage Roman Catholic nominees.
That is a major reason why she tried to sabotage the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh -- because he is Roman Catholic.
If the nominee had been Jewish, then Feinstein would have buried the allegations about a high-school incident. Feinstein would not have subjected a fellow Jew to the abuse that Kavanaugh suffered during the hearings.
It was a foregone conclusion that any Biden Black female nominee would be confirmed.
Thus, he picked one that will "expand" the Constitution to serve the purposes of the Marxist Democrats.
Nothing to see here. Let's move along now.
Two AA justices are two too many AA justices.
What percentage of TV and internet ads feature Blacks? What percentage feature White men?
It is reparations time, folks. Learn to live with it because there is nothing you can do about it.
n.n. at 2:35 PM
She is a Democrat, and they bitterly cling to that dogma as a religious principle.
Suppose that the nominee had been a Republican (not Democrat) Jew.
Senator Feinstein would have buried the allegations against him -- because he were a Jew -- even though he were a Republican.
Feinstein promoted the allegations against Kavanaugh, because he is Roman Catholic. Feinstein does whatever she can to keep Roman Catholics off the US Supreme Court. Feingstein opposes them reflexively, because the Roman Catholic Church opposes abortion.
======
Suppose the nominee were a Republican Jew who publicly opposes abortion. In such a case, I think that Feinstein would have buried the allegations about the high-school incident -- because he were a Jew. She would not do that to a fellow Jew.
That's my opinion.
Powerful racial resentment on display here. And anger.
Mike S-
I know a few (politically) conservative Jews and a lot of liberal/leftist Jews.
The leftists treat Judaism as a hobby and their true religion is leftism.
You are correct that Feinstein would bury any negative allegations re KBJ, but it would because of their common leftism, not their common religion.
Do you think that Feinstein would bury any negative information about, say, Ben Shapiro or Dennis Prager, if they were appointed to a government position?
They would be treated the way that Sen Biden treated Judge Clarence Thomas.
Pretty sure the Bush war criminal thing has been debunked. He was sued in his official capacity in a habeas corpus petition based on alleged Geneva Convention violations against her client. In January 2009 Obama was substituted as defendant and, presto, Bush out and Obama in as the war criminal defendant.
And anti-Semitism.
It's the trifecta!
Probably better to have her on the court than a different justice who is just as much of an ideologue but actually smart. If we have to have a lefty ideologue, better one who’s not too bright. I mean she claims to be a woman but she also doesn’t even know what that means. So strange
"I know a few (politically) conservative Jews and a lot of liberal/leftist Jews."
West TX goes with a modified version of the usual canard: some of my least favorite people are liberal Jews.
Anyone notice that the hearing this week was chaired by Durbin? That's because Feinstein was pressured to step down after she was accused of being too accommodating as ranking minority member during the confirmation process for Barrett to USSC in 2020.
rehajm said...
She raped me.
Me, too…
Me Three! It's SEARED into my memory, It was So Horrible!
I don't remember the year, or the city, or the place..
But SHE RAPED ME! and it's SEARED into my memory
West TX Intermediate Crude at 3:18 PM
Do you think that Feinstein would bury any negative information about, say, Ben Shapiro or Dennis Prager
If the negative information were a dubious allegation about a high-school incident, then I indeed do think that Senator Feinstein would have buried the allegation about Shapiro, Prager or any other Jew.
Feinstein would be happy to oppose Shapiro, Prager or any other Jew on the issues, but she would not subject them to the extraordinarily scurrilous accusations that she launched against Kavanaugh, a Roman Catholic.
Mike it's well known that we Jews have dual allegiances at best. Isn't there a 19tg century pogrom you're supposed to be organizing?
Powerful racial resentment on display here. And anger.
You Lefties have no problem with racial resentment, you cultivate it on purpose. You've been doing it for hundreds of years. The only thing that has changed is know you're trying to make Black people angry instead of White people.
At least we don't burn down our neighborhoods and attack the cops.
Daniel12 said...
Powerful racial resentment on display here. And anger.
******************
You must be a kid---or are conveniently forgetting the "high tech lynching" Clarence Thomas was put through, by Democrats, including Joe Biden..
Which is it?
Daniel12 said...
Mike it's well known that we Jews have dual allegiances at best. Isn't there a 19tg century pogrom you're supposed to be organizing?
******************
Yeah, pogroms were a major feature in America ever since its founding.
What a yutz.
West TX Intermediate Crude at 3:18 PM
They [Jewish nominees] would be treated the way that Sen Biden treated Judge Clarence Thomas.
Biden can be blamed for his treatment of Thomas during the hearings, but he should not be blamed for revealing Hill's accusations against Thomas.
The Senator who revealed Hill's accusations was Senator Paul Simon of Illinois. If not for Simon, Hill's accusations against Thomas might have remained buried.
======
I paid special attention to Simon's role in that history because he was a family friend.
Paul Simon's father and my mother's father both were pastors concurrently at Grace Lutheran Church in Eugene, Oregon. As a teenage girl, my mother had a major crush on Paul Simon, who was close to her age. This ancient crush is part of our Sylwester family's lore. The family joke is that she might have become the wife of a US Senator, if she had just played her cards a bit better.
For a while, I lived near Washington DC, and when my parents came to visit me, we sometimes had dinner with Senator Paul Simon. However, all my meetings with him happened before I read about him leaking Anita Hill's identity to the press during the Thomas hearings, so I never asked him about it.
======
Anita Hill did not want to be exposed as the source of secret accusations that Thomas was a sexual harasser. Of course, Thomas never would have guessed that Hill was making such accusations against him. She refused to give her permission to be publicly exposed.
Nevertheless, Senator Simon leaked Hill's identity to a journalist -- and the rest is history!
I had a greater chance of getting a sex change operation than KBJ not getting confirmed.
Blogger Bruce Hayden said...
"The Republicans on the Court already make fun of Justice Sotomayor’s idiotic, nuance free, opinions."
Link please.
I don't know, I think on principle the Democrats should kick out Manchin and Sinema before any vote on the justice nomination for their opposition to the 3 trillion build back better bill. If they don't protect their brand name purity now then all Democrats are tainted. It always surprises me when it comes to politics how many people are unable to look, just one or two steps forward. Republicans have Susan Collins, and Democrats have Manchin. Both parties are getting probably the best they can hope for on a representative from that state. It is probably the same for Sinema. Murkowski is probably not the best Republicans could hope for, and Romney is definitely not the best Republicans could get from Utah.
Powerful racial resentment on display here. And anger.
She's the one who champions CRT, but yeah. We're the racists.
Yawn.
Do better.
At least her spouse isn't an insurrection conspirator whom she would vote to hide their treasonous texts.
Insurrection conspirator?
What's that? I guess it's OK to be a Russian collusion Maddow-Hillary lie swallower conspirator...
but don't you DARE think for a moment that the 2020 election was suspect. Biden is KING! Obey! You there - You are an Insurrectionist!
*blows whistle* *Illegal thoughts! Illegal thoughts! Guards ... Seize the Insurrectionist!
*whistle blows*
Howie makes a good loyalist Soviet.
"INSURRECTIONIST" is the collective left's word of the year.
"She's the one who champions CRT"
Link please.
She would not do that to a fellow Jew.
Diversity [dogma], perhaps. Political collusion, maybe. What's in her soul can be inferred, but not known. A religion serves as a guide, but is not determinative of character. Anyway, I don't exercise liberal license to indulge that dogma. Perhaps I would under duress, for a special and peculiar cause (e.g. mom, dad, sister, brother), or not depending on the principle under consideration.
@Howard
Is the spouse in the room with us now? What is the spouse doing? Is the spouse texting you in the 'bad' place again?
Here, show us on the doll where the spouse texts you.
RSM: touche
Howard: "At least her spouse isn't an insurrection conspirator whom she would vote to hide their treasonous texts."
LOL
I see our Russia Russia Russia Collusion Truther BlueAnon morons have been assigned their newest idiotic and transparently fake conspiracy theory by their lefty masters.
Lets see how long this one will last. My guess? Foever. Just like all the others.
Senator Feinstein is prejudiced against Roman Catholic nominees to the US Supreme Court, because of Roman Catholic teachings about abortion.
And Judaism that follows God, and denominations of Protestantism that follow Christ. Thou shalt not elect to abort for social, redistributive, clinical, and fair weather causes. Also, men and women who recognize first principles: dignity, conscience, and value. Even self-defense is a licit choice through a process of reconciliation.
What difference does it make? Anybody could be a liberal "Just Us" whose vote is utterly predicable, "qualifications" are just window dressing.
Daniel12: "Powerful racial resentment on display here. And anger."
Powerful lefty child porn enabling on display these days. And lefty pro-child sexual grooming too.
I'm pretty sure Romney is a giant asshole, but I can't say for sure.
I'm not a proctologist.
Haha. Dammit Jim, I'm a judge, not a biologist.
The Republicans are such losers. Imagine if the positions were reversed.
The Democrats would've found some person from the past who would claim the Judge had told them in confidence that 30 years ago, SHE LOVED KIDDIE PORN!!!. but of course, couldn't remember the exact day or year, or where exactly she was when the Judge told her. The D's would then demand hearings, and proclaim it a CREDIBLE ACCUSATION.
All the cucks like Romney, Collins, and Sasse would rush to the nearest TV camera and proclaim they were VERY CONCERNED and WE MUST A HEARING.
Of course, becase its the Judge is a Democrat nominee, the Republicans just tell the truth, and the Caravan moves on.
It you don't understand the play, I'll tell you. The Legal elite are VERY upset at the sentences being dealt out to people who watch sexual abuse of children. This goes with their anger over the long sentences dealt to People of color due to drug crimes and every other crime (except Rape).
The legal elite thinks too many people are in jail. And so, logically, too many people are in jail for sexual abuse of kids. The mob is demanding these punative sentences. And legal elite recoils against that. Just that recoil against using the death penalty. The Judge is just part of legal elite that feels this way.
Manchin shows his true deep state colors.
Until the Democrat Senator from New Mexico gets back, the vote is 49 - 50 until some Republicans flip
So no, she's not yet a lock. Since if some other Democrats Senator gets hospitalized or one from a State with a GOP Governor dies, they may not get to 50, ever
Or, for that matter, if Joe Biden becomes so obviously non-functional that the Dems are forced to 25th Amendment him, then the Democrats lose their time breaking vote.
Daniel12 said...
Powerful racial resentment on display here. And anger.
The only racists here are the leftists like you.
The rest of us hate her because she's a scumbag leftist, not because of the color of her skin
Maynard said...
It is reparations time, folks. Learn to live with it because there is nothing you can do about it.
Sure there is. I used to spend a couple hundred bucks a year on Gillette products. Then they did their "toxic masculinity" ad. I haven't bought a thing from them since then.
I haven't bought a Coke product since Code started doing left-wing politics and CRT last year.
I haven't watched an NFL game since they let Kaepernick piss on the US flag while at work. I haven't watched an NBA game since they went al BLM.
I've cancelled a trip we had planned for Disneyworld, and I won't ever be scheduling another one
I still spend the same amount of money, I just spend it on companies that does not try to piss me off
Is she Pro-Abortion (i.e. wicked solution)? Wrong.
Is she Pro-Diversity (e.g. affirmative discrimination, racism, sexism, ageism)? Wrong.
Is she Pro-Social Justice anywhere is injustice everywhere? Wrong.
Does she support politically congruent constructs ("=") or selective exclusion? Wrong.
Does she support normalizing the transgender spectrum disorder through medical or surgical corruption, or inculcation, of the general public, especially captive audiences? Wrong.
Does she conflate sex and gender? Sex chauvinism (e.g. femalinism)? Gender chauvinism (e.g. maculinism)? Wrong.
Does she support Obamacare and other single/central/monopolistic/shared/shifted acts
of irresponsibility? Wrong.
Does she support catastrophic anthropogenic immigration reform? Coups without cause (e.g. Spring series)? Wrong.
Does she believe in the hypothesis of [catastrophic] [anthropogenic] climate cooling... warming... change, undeniable, unfalsifiable? Wrong.
Does she support Mengele mandates, cargo cults, viable legal indemnity? Wrong.
Does she subscribe to the Pro-Choice "ethical" religion? Wrong.
Does she perceive emanations from penumbras of The Constitution? Wrong.
Mutaman said...
"She's the one who champions CRT"
Link please.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/03/22/ted-cruz-critical-race-theory-taught-at-school-where-ketanji-brown-jackson-serves-on-board/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/03/22/watch-ted-cruz-stumps-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson-on-critical-race-theory-in-sentencing/
GFY, you lying hack
Since Sinema and Kelly both warned Beiden that he better straighten out illegal immigration, I suspect she will have a highish motivation for not kicking him in the balls this time.
The Democrats would've found some person from the past who would claim the Judge had told them in confidence that 30 years ago, SHE LOVED KIDDIE PORN!!!. but of course, couldn't remember the exact day or year, or where exactly she was when the Judge told her. The D's would then demand hearings, and proclaim it a CREDIBLE ACCUSATION.
That is freaking crazy ... but quite likely.
Daniel12 said...
Powerful racial resentment on display here. And anger.
Daniel12 can't actually discuss the reasons why he supports this choice that Biden made clear was an affirmative action pick.
Daniel12 cannot make any intelligent arguments against why any decent human being would oppose this pick.
So he falls back on the only thing he can do.
Which is be a racist lying piece of shit.
Sinema is not the "Squad" she seems quite smart.
So "wig" like Marie Antoniette or is this more of a Kriss Kross wiggida wiggida whack?
Static Ping said...
So "wig" like Marie Antoniette or is this more of a Kriss Kross wiggida wiggida whack?
Could mean wig in the Maxine Waters sense, but who really knows?
Blogger Howard said...
At least her spouse isn't an insurrection conspirator whom she would vote to hide their treasonous texts.
How do you know? Do you think the FBI is interested in her, being a hardcore leftists as she is ? I would say the chance of discovering anything with her husband is about the same as exposing Hunter's laptop in 2020. Democrats (including the FBI)take care of their own.
She could be filming and distributing kiddie porn and I think you still couldn't get 50 republicans to vote against her. Not the first black female nominee.
Notice I didn't use woman. You know because of the biologist thing.
Judge KBJ:
Senator Ladybugs and Sasse the Asse, You don't want the truth because deep down in places you talk about parties; you want me on that SCOTUS, you need me on the SCOTUS! I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to Republican Senators who support open borders, criminals, trans-rights, and the global elite. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way.
Good always loses, because it is so STUPID.
"Good always loses, because it is so STUPID."
That is the explanation for all successful politicians.
Hubert the Infant said...
I am not big on claiming victimhood, but I have to say that the one prejudice that is allowed on Althouse is anti-Semitism. Mike Sylvester's comments are usually condescendingly stupid and often offensive. Today's comment is both."
Indeed. Funny thing is the Dianne Feinstein is not Jewish nor was she born Jewish. She did however marry a Jew. Unless she converted she is no more Jewish than Kamala Harris who is also married to a Jew.
"Hubert the Infant said...
I am not big on claiming victimhood, but I have to say that the one prejudice that is allowed on Althouse is anti-Semitism. Mike Sylvester's comments are usually condescendingly stupid and often offensive. Today's comment is both."
If anyone says Mike Sylvester or our Hostess is a baddie, there is nothing in support on this blog, that I have seen.
I shy away from such statements, but will not suffer lies to reign. Prove your case. Sorry to all.
Getting back somewhat to the point of this post, Manchin knows that voting for this "woman" will not change the status quo. He will say something to the effect that the President deserves to have his choice confirmed. Then, in 2026 when it's time to replace Kagan and/or the Wide Latina, and President Desantis nominates Judge Genghis Khan, he can say the same, and maybe keep his seat. If he voted against the current "woman," he would get primaried by some PO'd Dems in WV, and have to work for a living.
Hubert the Infant said...
I am not big on claiming victimhood, but I have to say that the one prejudice that is allowed on Althouse is anti-Semitism. Mike Sylvester's comments are usually condescendingly stupid and often offensive. Today's comment is both.
*********************
How is it that Mike's observation that Feinstein's differing stance on judicial nominees seems to depend on what religious faith they adhere to is .."anti-Semitism"?
.....rather than an observation that Feinstein's differing stance on judicial nominees seems to depend on what religious faith they adhere to?
What nominee's faith did she famously refer to when she said "the dogma lives loudly in you"?
Was that anti Christian, or not? Please explain.
Show your work.
@Cuban Bob
Dianne Feinstein is Jewish. Her mother and father are Jewish.
What are you talking about?
West TX Intermediate Crude said...
Getting back somewhat to the point of this post, Manchin knows that voting for this "woman" will not change the status quo. He will say something to the effect that the President deserves to have his choice confirmed. Then, in 2026 when it's time to replace Kagan and/or the Wide Latina, and President Desantis nominates Judge Genghis Khan, he can say the same, and maybe keep his seat. If he voted against the current "woman," he would get primaried by some PO'd Dems in WV, and have to work for a living.
Joe is a Democrat Party hack. With Kavanaugh, he waited to announce his vote until after Collins had pushed Kav over the top.
Murkey Abstained rather than voting no "so the Republican Senator wouldn't have to come back froths daughter's wedding."
Kav won by 2. If Turkey hadn't abstained, Kavanaugh would have won by 1, which is to say Manchin would ahve put him over the top.
Manchin wasn't willing to do that, which is why Murkey had to abstain.
He's not worried about a Dem Primary loss. If he was he'd support BBB
Ones hopes that in 2024 the WVa voters will finally get tired of him lying to them
Link please.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/03/22/ted-cruz-critical-race-theory-taught-at-school-where-ketanji-brown-jackson-serves-on-board/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/03/22/watch-ted-cruz-stumps-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson-on-critical-race-theory-in-sentencing/
Breitbart? Are you serious? Its like dealing with 5 year olds.
Greg The Class Traitor
"The rest of us hate her because she's a scumbag leftist, not because of the color of her skin"
Polly want a cracker?
"If he voted against the current "woman," he would get primaried by some PO'd Dems in WV, and have to work for a living."
Are the Democrats really stupid enough to hand over a Senate seat just to get back at him?
No One seems to be addressing The Real Question here..
If "Sinema wigs out..." what color wig would she wear?
I'm assuming, a standard electric blue punk wig, but maybe she'd prefer red goth wig ?
who knows? maybe a rainbow wig?
I have LITERALLY stayed up ALL night thinking about this (well except for the 8 hours asleep in bed)
If we're going to have another Leftist on the court--and that seems inevitable--isn't a mediocre one preferable to a wily, smart one. Her dismal showing in the hearings seems to indicate she isn't some bright shining intellect that's going change minds. She seems like a garden-variety Progressive whose decisions won't surprise or sway anyone.
Every time I see "Unless Sisema wigs out" I wonder if the term "wigs out" would be used with a male senator. I am surprised by my own response because I am not personally offended by its use and, if anything, she would probably find it funny. It just, in these hypersentitized times, I was surprised someone else didn't take offense.
Dianne Feinstein is Jewish. Her mother and father are Jewish.
===========
what is difference between 'is Jewish' and 'is Jew' ?
for example : Hindu is Hindu ; Muslim is Muslim; Christian is Christian
I have LITERALLY stayed up ALL night thinking about this (well except for the 8 hours asleep in bed)
=========
wishing you wiggy dreams
Going to be a permanent, standing, ubiquitously known joke: What is a woman? What a gift.
Mutaman, if you weren't a lazy, lying sleaze you could find virtually the same clip from the hearings anywhere.
If you ask someone for a link and then get two, stop bitching.
Blogger 0_0 said...
" Mutaman, if you weren't a lazy, lying sleaze you could find virtually the same clip from the hearings anywhere.
If you ask someone for a link and then get two, stop bitching.'
Hey Sparky.
If some liberal supported a statement with an article from The World Socialist Daily , your head would explode. So put your big boy pants on and argue like an adult and not some punk with a degree from trump university.
Blogger Richard Aubrey said...
"Going to be a permanent, standing, ubiquitously known joke: What is a woman? What a gift.'
except its not much of a joke- The know Nothings have this habit of taking something dopy and then beating it to death-"Benghazi", "Let's go Brandon",etc. lack of imagination and/or education I guess-can't do a thing about it.
Mutaman said...
Link please.
Breitbart? Are you serious? Its like dealing with 5 year olds.
Well, only a 5 year old would be dumb enough to play your game.
The fact that the tools you like don't report the facts doesn't make them any less true.
You can't argue the truth, so you whine about Breitbart and run away.
GFY, loser
Mutaman said...
Hey Sparky.
If some liberal supported a statement with an article from The World Socialist Daily , your head would explode
No, because we're not leftist morons.
We'd look at the link, and if it was BS we'd mock you for the contents.
Not whine about the fact that the source we don't like it providing the facts we hate
"We'd look at the link, and if it was BS we'd mock you for the contents."
Who's this "we" masked man? Talk about your herd mentality. MOOOOO.
Severely Ltd. has left a new comment on the post ""Unless Sinema wigs out..."":
"She seems like a garden-variety Progressive whose decisions won't surprise or sway anyone.
And we all know how Severely Ltd. is constantly being swayed by Neil Gorsuch's opinions.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा