Wait a minute! Isn't it also better for the people who are doing the chaos and anarchy and vandalism and violence? Why are they doing it otherwise — doing it for months on end? It must be their idea of better, and they are in control of it, their own actions. But you don't talk to them. I wonder why not. It's so much easier to sit back and listen to things said by Trumpers, things that, of course, always inspire outrage... except to the extent that you can toy with edginess by saying almost admire the balls.
The quote above is from NYT columnist Thomas A. Friedman, in "For Biden to Win, Listen to Minneapolis/Not everyone is for defunding the police. Especially those in communities that would be most affected."
Friedman proceeds to do the same thing Kellyanne did: Look at the chaos and anarchy and vandalism and violence and jump right to what apparently matters most — how it affects the presidential candidate you care about.
So, Joe Biden has a real challenge on his hands. To mobilize the majority he needs to credibly assure enough voters that he takes both the violence seriously and its social, policing and economic roots seriously. His “looting is not protesting” speech in Pittsburgh on Monday was a good start....Key word: "start." Biden did the easy and obvious part, but he didn't do anything bold or courageous or difficult. He didn't demonstrate leadership. Indeed, he only read a text off a teleprompter. He won't submit to questioning. He has not had to show us one thought dredged up directly from his own head. Friedman goes on to offer some nuanced notions about practical police reform that Biden could use to progress from "good start" to something of real substance.
[Martin Luther King Jr.] decried riots as “self-defeating,” but he also pointed out that “a riot is the language of the unheard..." Economic progress and social justice, King argued, “are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention.” Which is why Biden, if he frames it right, can be the real “law and order” candidate in this election. Because he’s not for disbanding the police, but for improving them — which is how you build respect for the law from everyone — and because Biden knows that sustainable order can only come from a president who wants to build healthy and just communities, not from a president who thinks it’s “better” for him politically if they’re torn apart.Trump wants "healthy and just communities" too, and Biden wants to do what's better for him politically too. I'm so tired of that template — hating Trump and puffing up Biden. Let's see Biden step up and show some real leadership and intellectual heft. Let's see him submit serious questioning and cruelly neutral criticism. So far, he won't do it, and the media are facilitating his evasion of any real test. I'm beyond fed up with this treatment of Biden and Trump.
पोस्ट्स
८५ टिप्पण्या:
At least the Trump administration have been acknowledging the Riots and looters all along, instead of pretending they are a myth like Nadler claimed.
Foolishness
NOUN
lack of good sense or judgment; stupidity.
"Let's see Biden step up and show some really leadership and intellectual heft"
He's almost 78. If he could he would have done it by now.
Biden can't step up and lead. He's a sick old man who is being abused.
I'm beyond fed up with this treatment of Biden and Trump.
Good. You should be. Hopefully you will remember in November.
But don't act like this is something new. It's been happening literally my entire lifetime. The media protects and promotes the Democrat, while attacking and out right lying about the Republican.
Not everyone is for defunding the police.
What is it? 81% want more or the same level of funding? So "not everyone" in Democrat-land is 19% -- and falling quickly as they see the likely effects.
One thing I admire about the NYT: When they tell you the truth, they always couch it in a way least likely to trigger their snowflake readers.
now if captain pike, hadn't made the opposite pledge to cardi b, or adye barkin
Shorter NYT: Joe Biden has always been at war with Eastasia.
Friedman playing dumb. “It is better [for the re election prospects]...” is what she means and it is obviously true.
Were journalists always this dumb and/or corrupt? They seem to be getting a lot worse, both individually and as a group. Is social media to blame?
As Mollie Hemingway has pointed out, "looting is not protesting" was actually borrowed from Mike Pence. The old plagiarism problem. Has Joe ever had even one thought in his head, even when he was younger and healthier?
The biggest challenge Biden has on his hands is to prove that he can speak a paragraph-full of off the cuff remarks without stumbling, without drooling, and that make a sensical point.
We'll call that "Phase 1". He'll need to pass 3 other phases before he can be freed to go back to work.
So Friedman's agruing that when Trump advocates for law and order he's only doing it for purely political reasons but when Biden does something simlar his motivations are somehow more pure? Why exactly? That's some rich sophistry right there.
Economic progress and social justice, King argued, “are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention.”
Funny that he turned out to be completely wrong about that.
If anything it's just the opposite: thanks to the professional race hustlers, er, I meant Diversity Inclusion and Equity specialists, who want job security, the more preferences and deference that blacks get, the more whining we hear.
"...the better it is for the very clear choice..."
"Better" does not always mean better in general. What she is saying is the more rioting, the clearer the choice. It is better for drawing a clear distinction, not better for any person or group of people.
Let's see Biden step up and show some real leadership and intellectual heft. Let's see him submit serious questioning and cruelly neutral criticism. So far, he won't do it, and the media are facilitating his evasion of any real test. I'm beyond fed up with this treatment of Biden and Trump.
YA! You gotta prop up the Democrat I so desperately want to feel good about voting for instead of reluctantly voting for!!!
So, "Defunding" is not "Disbanding?" I'm sure Friedman expects the new police force to work for free. This is so transparent. The DNC memo goes out and we will see the local lefties all with the same message.
the better it is for the very clear choice
What I believe she's saying (or trying to) is that the longer the rioting goes on, and the longer that Dem state and city leadership tolerate the looting and burning and mayhem, it clarifies the elements and consequences in choosing between the candidate & party that will promote "public safety and law and order," and the candidate and party that will not.
Joe can't do old-fashioned campaigning and pressers. If he tried, his campaign would fall apart in a mental fog.
Of course, Dems have removed other candidates before elections but I don't think Harris has the stroke to get it done either.
don't act like this is something new. It's been happening literally my entire lifetime. The media protects and promotes the Democrat, while attacking and out right lying about the Republican.
This!
When I discuss current events with friends, family and coworkers this is probably one of the main points I try to make is the lack of objectivity in media.
I'm so tired of that template — hating Trump and puffing up Biden.
An Obama and Hillary voter said this.
Key word: "start." Biden did the easy and obvious part, but he didn't do anything bold or courageous or difficult.
He gave the media what it needed to fight his battles for him: a highly-publicized speech with one key, pre-approved sentence and 20 minutes of anti-Trump rhetoric to fill the required time.
The quote above is from NYT columnist Thomas A. Friedman, in "For Biden to Win, Listen to Minneapolis/Not everyone is for defunding the police. Especially those in communities that would be most affected."
THIS is why I despise, detest, and distrust the NYT (and its little dog WaPoo, too!)
The democrat media won't touch the subject of rioting/arson/looting/wholesale property destruction in these leftwing enclaves.
It's all a myth. So why would Joe need to say anything about anything?
MLK detested violence and riots. In fact he would refuse to help a Black community if they didn't promise not to participate in violence. In many cases when violence did occur he would get right back on the bus or train and leave or cancel the appearance. But then MLK wasn't a race baiter, he actually tried to find solutions.
Let's see Biden step up and show some real leadership and intellectual heft. Let's see him submit serious questioning and cruelly neutral criticism. So far, he won't do it, and the media are facilitating his evasion of any real test. I'm beyond fed up with this treatment of Biden and Trump.
Won't isn't the issue. Can't is the issue. At best, he's Max Headroom. And we all know it.
NYT columnists are either dumb as stumps or wholly disingenuous. Which doesn’t matter.
In this instance, Kellyanne, a political woman, is obviously stating a political reality. Riots by Democrat Brownshirts work in Trump’s favor politically. In Friedman’s ridiculous, irrational drive to demean Trump and supporters, he ignores that fact. The efforts of the leftmediaswine to coordinate their blather with the Biden campaign to excuse Biden’s late entry into the anti-violence conversation produces some asinine results.
Trump has been decrying the violence for months. Nothing can change that. The ability of the Democrats and their media pimps to delude the public about that as they have deluded the public about Trump successes and Democrat failures in dealing with the China virus and other matters of national importance will decide the election.
This election is a referendum on the gullibility of American voters.
Friedman can't parse a simple, declarative sentence. 'The more chaos and anarchy and vandalism and violence reigns, the better it is for the very clear choice on who’s best on public safety and law and order.' is so clearly referring to the clarity of the choice that I am forced to conclude that Mr. Friedman must have rotted his brain over the years with a mixture of drugs and alcohol and association with bad company.
Tom Friedman used to be someone who I felt had interesting thoughts, even if I disagreed with him. Now he writes drivel. Did Trump just break these people?
Let's parse. Friedman sez...
"[Martin Luther King Jr.] decried riots as “self-defeating,” but he also pointed out that “a riot is the language of the unheard..." Self-contradictory. You can make the case that protests are the voice of the unheard, but riots are theft, extortion, and intimidation.
"Economic progress and social justice, King argued, “are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention.” Maybe so, though it depends on how you define them. But economic progress won't happen under any of the plans set forth by the Democratic Party.
"Which is why Biden, if he frames it right, can be the real “law and order” candidate in this election." Non sequitur. Law and order have some effect on economic progress in that they don't work against it. But the social justice advocates have been saying all along that law and order are anathema to their movement - case in point, Madison's vote on police oversight.
"Because he’s not for disbanding the police, but for improving them — which is how you build respect for the law from everyone — and because Biden knows that sustainable order can only come from a president who wants to build healthy and just communities, Q: How do you improve the police by reducing funding? A: Struggle Sessions! Just as was tried with 'sensitivity sessions' in the FAA. "Healthy and just" = double whammy of Mediocre For All and SJW-ism. Oh my.
"...not from a president who thinks it’s “better” for him politically if they’re torn apart." It's not so much that the tearing apart is better for Trump; it's just worse for Democratic candidates in general and the Biden campaign in particular
Thomas Friedman and Jen Rubin are birds of a feather.
Everything the write is Garbage. Truly. Pravda would be proud.
I'm beyond fed up with this treatment of Biden and Trump.
It's only a problem for women. Men look at the structural policies, rules vs whim, and go for rules. Women go for whim. That's why they're called women.
For men the news is an amusement. Look at what they're giving women to watch now.
I used to play the loot.
'...the better it is for the very clear choice on who’s best on public safety and law and order.' The better it is? How could anyone be 'better' in America?
She meant to convey...
...the [clearer] it [becomes who's] the [better] choice on who’s best on public safety and law and order.
And Friedman knows it.
Kellyanne Conway was responding to *why* Biden and the Democrats want to condemn riots after ignoring them for so long. It's the same thing Don Lemon has said and the same thing most political observers have said. She was making an observation, not a proscription. It's clear as day if you watch the tape.
"Joe Biden needs to get out and condemn these riots! They are hurting him in the polls!"
"How dare Kellyanne Conway say the riots are hurting Biden and helping Trump!"
Friedman is so dishonest.
The Dems promoted, defended, encouraged the rioting in the first place because they thought it would be better for them.
"the better it is for the very clear choice..."
It is clear that she is saying it is easier for people to distinguish between who is on the side of law and order and who is not.
Friedman is supposed to be smart (he keeps telling us that he is) and yet he allows himself to look like a fool for the sake of writing a disingenuous column.
The more chaos and anarchy and vandalism and violence reigns, the better it is for the very clear choice
A choice is clearer and therefore is better.
Craig: "Were journalists always this dumb and/or corrupt?"
No. For about 80 years they were tough guys who came up from the streets and understood how things worked. They had been in wars and had lots of jobs and were strret smart and savvy. Then, starting in the 50's the "professionalisation" of journalism began where news organizations drifted further and further left and began to only hire graduates of the Ivy's and then only the most "prestigious" "journalism" schools. Thus, by the 80's the media was monolithically liberal and isolated culturally. Credentials and connections mattered more than skills.
We now know throughout the 60's Walter Cronkite was a raving lefty as he later admitted. In 1964 you had Ben Bradlee literally sitting with LBJ's staff coordinating message strategies and news coverage.
By the 2000's even that failed screenwriter and Fine Arts graduate Ben Rhodes, hired by obambi because his brother runs CBS news, openly admitted that the dems could create an echo chamber for any and all democratical narratives because all the "journalists" were 27 years old and dont know anything...and culturally to the far left.
Obviously.
Police reform at the national level is a fool's errand anyway. This is a perfect opportunity for the laboratories of democracy. Let Seattle attempt a method of their own devising, same with Chicago, NYC, Baltimore, etc. Let's see what works, and what doesn't. Any national level attempt is going to be just as much a failure as Common Core.
There is no reason to be fed up.
There is no reason to be annoyed by any individual in the media.
They are not doing this because they are especially bloody minded, or stupid, or whatever. They are professionals acting under orders. You are reacting to a machine, or to the moral equivalent of a machine, a battalion of Hessian musketeers say.
Friedman et al are just mercenaries who have taken their pay and will do as they are told.
Now, there are those who control this machine, and your beef is with them. They are pretty shadowy sorts however.
Maybe it's time to try one of Elon Musk's pig implants on old Joe.
Hell, it couldn't hurt.
Let's see Biden step up and show some real leadership and intellectual heft. Let's see him submit serious questioning and cruelly neutral criticism. So far, he won't do it, and the media are facilitating his evasion of any real test.
He doesnt have to.
He's just a placeholder.
The less he engages the better lest he screw up more
Obama was the blank slate upon which you could project what you wanted
Biden is a scribbled-on slate that his handlers are trying to clean up
The Los Angeles Times published an interesting photo this morning. It showed Biden delivering "his strong attack on Trump" in Pittsburgh. You'll recall the wire grid behind him as he spoke. I thought he was speaking from a warehouse with a locked cage behind him (or maybe around him). Yup--he was in a warehouse. The camera crews were all in properly social distanced circles painted on the floor. There were no spectators--other than the camera crew men. Let's just say it was not a "real" campaign event--it was carefully stage managed.
LA Times political reporter Doyle McManus--as reliable a hack cheerleader as any Democrat could wish--said it was time for Biden to "get off his duff and get out there". McManus said that Biden's handlers were treating him as carefully as if he were a fragile Faberge egg.
Well the Oval Office is not a place for people who need to be swathed in cotton batting.
"Let's see step up and show some really leadership and intellectual heft"
should be Easy! after all;
He Bragged about being slightly above average in law school
And then decided I wanted to stay, went back to law school and, in fact, ended up in the top half of my class.
{of course, that WAS a LIE}
Biden also claimed he "graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school."
{of course, that WAS a LIE, too}
Biden ALSO said that he "went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my class who had a full academic scholarship,"
{of course, that WAS a LIE, too}
But, Other than EVERYTHING, that he has EVER done, Jo Biden actions CONSTANTLY show some really leadership and intellectual heft... Other than EVERYTHING, that he has EVER done
Something seems to be going on. President Trump just deputized oregon State Troopers as US Marshals. Apparently the governor went along with this.
Apparently, though it's not yet clear, that means that rioters can (will?) be arrested on federal charges.
Nice move, pdjt.
Probably unrelated but in the past week US Marshals have raided, broken up, freed 6-7 groups of children held for trafficking.
Good for them, we need way more of this.
What really caught my eye was that it was Marshals doing the investigations and raids. Not the FBI.
Matt Dillon was a federal marshal, not a sheriff. Many people don't remember that.
John Henry
It can hardly be a surprise (to anyone who knows history) that the riots and looting give Trump a winning issue. That Democrats thought such things were to their advantage in the beginning is the real surprise. Now that the dead hand of history has proven them wrong, it's a little late to play "we are the law and order party".
The Friedman/Biden approach to the issue of rioting is nonsense. They're saying the solution to the violence and terrorism that is now being enacted nightly in U.S. cities is to make cities more "just" and to reform the basic manner in which the police operate throughout the U.S.? Everybody knows that those things either AREN'T going to happen, ever; or they constitute extremely long-range projects that will show no perceptible results in time to prevent the cities that are currently under siege from looking like Beirut. So even crediting Biden with good faith in his vision of a plan to address this issue, it's obvious that his plan is completely inadequate to the situation.
By contrast, Trump is proposing to take direct and immediate action to stop the violence. It may not work, but it least it CAN work. I don't see how anyone who sees what's going on and cares about it could possibly decide that the Friedman/Biden approach is the way to go.
Here's my problem with the riots. What SPECIFIC injustice are the "protesters" rioting over? What specific policy or act of racial injustice JUSTIFIES all this looting, death, and destruction?
As far as I can tell there is none. But straighten me out.
The rioters are labeled as "peaceful protesters" - but we're never told WHAT there are protesting. SPECIFICALLY. If tomorrow, Trump was to say, "OK, what do want us to do (Besides electing Biden)", what would they say?
We're all against racism. We're all against bad cops shooting people unnecessarily. We had 20 FBI agents investigating a NASCAR noose. We have civil rights laws, set asides, quotas, and affirmative action. SO what is supposed to appease the mob? Specifically? Maybe Mitt Romney can tell us.
Biden used this in his speech the other day too:
One of his closest political advisers in the White House doesn’t even bother to speak in code, just comes out and she says it. “The more chaos, violence, the better it is for Trump’s reelection.” Just think about that. This is a sitting president of the United States of America. He’s supposed to be protecting this country, but instead he’s rooting for chaos and violence.
They know what they are doing, and they are turning it into a talking point. But it's hard for them to act outraged while at the same time sending out the candidate because the violence is hurting him.
the dye is already cast.
large-scale vote-by-mail is only days away.
only a president can manage a problem this big.
it would be nice if i could get my stimulus check before the Republic falls.
i could spend it on rice and beans and fortifications.
So you are finally fed up?
Are you mad as hell? Will you not take it any more?
Welcome to my world.
" “a riot is the language of the unheard..." except when the riots are the planned, organized efforts of political groups using riots to further their ideological goals. Like Antifa, like BLM, like the Democrat Party.
Antifa wants chaos because it is the only opportunity they have to sieze power locally.
BLM is a grifting organization working to keep Blacks on the Dem plantation.
Dems want Antifa and BLM to continue the violence to somehow demonstrate that only Dems can quell the violence caused & encouraged by Dems. (I never said the ideological goals were logical.)
[Martin Luther King Jr.] decried riots as “self-defeating,” but he also pointed out that “a riot is the language of the unheard..." Economic progress and social justice, King argued, “are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention.”
Not when the rioting is carried out by a nihilistic rabble, manipulated by a cynical cabal of wreckers.
But then MLK wasn't a race baiter, he actually tried to find solutions.
King dreamed of affirmation action and racial quotas; did he have any non-racist ideas?
What’s better, Karen Friedman, if a candidate condemns the violence, offers to help stop it and notes that if it continues it will hurt his opponent and help him? Or a candidate that weakly condemns the riots, shifts blame from his own supporters and insists with no evidence that it helps his opponent?
I'd like to know if the Biden team has been in contact with the terrible mayors, DAs, and governors, and what was said, but no reporter will dare ask any party. Biden could tell them publicly to do their jobs, but then did he wait so long?
" 'a riot is the language of the unheard...' except when the riots are the planned, organized efforts of political groups using riots to further their ideological goals. Like Antifa, like BLM, like the Democrat Party."
Hahahahahaha!
No delusion is too stupid for you, eh?
Kellyanne would likely "blurt out the truth" that the "thimbles" in question (along with Trump branded "covfefe") are being carried around by Trump's conspiratorial “unnamed people in ‘dark shadows’ ... controlling Democratic nominee Joe Biden.”
why would Biden need to show leadership on a myth?
We should focus on Russian meddling, and make sure to ignore Hillary's private server and Hunter Biden's international board-sitting for mega cash.
He's just a placeholder.
Yah- I think one thing both sides can agree on is nobody is really voting for Joe Biden. It's Trump or player(s) to be named later...
"But you don't talk to them. I wonder why not."
Hmm, I wonder why I wonder why.
Anyway, a corollary to the Conway Proviso: talking to the actual left engaged in actual destruction with the actual support of actual Dems would reinforce the revulsion of many Americans and help Trump's electoral prospects.
Kellyanne always spoke truth So effectively she was Target numero uno for the Propagandist Fake News assholes.she was kryptonite to their Super Bimbo Liar powers.
And yet another repeat of the inane claim that riots have anything to do with social justice or economics or any other cause.
When a camper decides they want to toast marshmallows, starts a campfire, and the campfire sparks a forest fire, only an utter idiot tries to end the forest fire by giving the camper toasted marshmallows.
Riots happen because there's a segment of the populace (tending young and male) that will riot when the opportunity is presented. They don't care whether the opportunity is provided by a blackout (NYC 1977), a sports championship celebration (SF 2014), a jury verdict (LA 1992), or protests (current).
Justice or injustice is utterly irrelevant to riots; the only question is whether or not the rioters think they'll suffer consequences.
Cook: We know for an absolute fact that Kamala Harris funded bail to get people arrested for violent acts during the riots released and back out on the streets to continue it.
And virtually every Democrat and their lickspittles in the media in the last 3 months defended the riots as "peaceful protests", contrary to mountains of evidence of violence and destruction.
If that doesn't back up including the Democrat Party in "except when the riots are the planned, organized efforts of political groups using riots to further their ideological goals. Like Antifa, like BLM, like the Democrat Party.", what possibly in your eyes ever could?
Literally everyone understands what KellyAnne Conway meant. It’s adorable watching Thomas Friedman lie to himself and others about that.
When you've lost Ann Althouse, you've lost a lot of people.
More oxygen for us, with the canary dead, said the miner.
"Kellyanne would likely "blurt out the truth" that the "thimbles" in question (along with Trump branded "covfefe") are being carried around by Trump's conspiratorial “unnamed people in ‘dark shadows’ ... controlling Democratic nominee Joe Biden.”
WTF?
Friedman has been a horse's hind quarter for decades, and never disappoints.
Why, why, why won't the New York Times deal fairly with both major presidential candidates? Why are they propping up a mentally failed corruptocrat who made his career snuggling up to the Dixiecrat caucus and persecuting "superpredators?" Who could have seen this coming? Other than literally every single American, of course. Is it because feminism rots your brain, or because feminists literally cannot entertain a thought that the elite New York media hasn't shoveled into their skulls? A curious notion.
By the way, Robert Cook- Black Lives Matter currently redirects donations right to Joe Biden. You can say that Antifa/ BLM/ the Dems are all part of the same conspiracy, you can say that all three are perfect little angels who did nothing wrong (even Biden himself is backing off on this in public). Hell, you can even say Antifa is constantly acting in the name of BLM without being associated with them, and is infiltrated by Nazis like Huber and Grosskreutz... but in that case why do Dems let them roam the streets?
What you can't do is pretend there's some sort of distinction between Biden and his BLM terrorist allies. That ship has sailed. Jimmy Dore, Matt Taibbi, and Glenn Greenwald aren't putting themselves in the gunsights on behalf of neoliberal corruption- why on earth would you?
That was certainly my thought when Kellyanne Conway declared last week, 'The more chaos and anarchy and vandalism and violence reigns, the better it is for the very clear choice on who’s best on public safety and law and order.' The better it is? How could anyone be 'better' in America if we have more chaos, anarchy, vandalism and violence? It couldn’t be better — except for one man: Donald Trump."
If you want the current chaos, anarchy, vandalism, and violence TO END, then:
1) The American people (voters) need to understand the extent and nature of the problem. Currently, they are being misled daily by the media. I have been appalled, talking to friends, at how many of them have no idea what's going on.
2. People need to demand that their local leaders *do something* to fix the problem. This won't happen until they know there *is* a problem (and know how bad it is in some places).
I would argue we will ALL be better off when enough people have communicated to their leaders that the current state of affairs is unacceptable that they have no choice but to act.
The sad fact that this likely won't happen until things get even worse is not something Trump is responsible for. He has repeatedly called for action and drawn attention to the suffering inflicted on people who live in these cities (many of them minorities). It would help if Biden and the press would actually acknowledge the problem and get behind efforts to fix it instead of supporting violent riots and raising bail money for violent rioters. Or blaming the one guy who keeps calling attention to the destruction and offering to send help.
If this turns out to be a 'law and order' election - which it's certainly trending that way - Republicans (not just Trump) win in a landslide.
That's the way it's always been.
And you'll have no one to blame but yourselves, leftists.
"Cook: We know for an absolute fact that Kamala Harris funded bail to get people arrested for violent acts during the riots released and back out on the streets to continue it."
How do we know this? To the extent she funded or advocated funding for bail for arrested protestors, how do we know she wanted rioters and looters to be freed to go back and riot and loot some more? You may not make the distinction, but not all the protesters were rioting and looting.
"And virtually every Democrat and their lickspittles in the media in the last 3 months defended the riots as 'peaceful protests,' contrary to mountains of evidence of violence and destruction."
And much of it has been. Of course, the "lying media" will emphasize the more sensational coverage of violence and chaos. That always sells.
"If that doesn't back up including the Democrat Party in 'except when the riots are the planned, organized efforts of political groups using riots to further their ideological goals. Like Antifa, like BLM, like the Democrat Party.', what possibly in your eyes ever could?"
That's faint evidence, at best, much less proof, that the Democrats are funding or otherwise actively supporting rioting and looting. If anything, the rioting and looting helps Trump. How do we know he isn't covertly supporting it? (I'm being rhetorical.)
Birkel said...
When you've lost Ann Althouse,
------------=============
asserted without evidence -
Lloyd W. Robertson said...
As Mollie Hemingway has pointed out, "looting is not protesting" was actually borrowed from Mike Pence. The old plagiarism problem.
-----------==============
then mike pence should have tweeted about it - joe seeing the light and not shadow etc
Let's see Biden step up and show some real leadership and intellectual heft. Let's see him submit serious questioning and cruelly neutral criticism. So far, he won't do it
Well, why should he? To impress the people who hate him?
Birkel said...
When you've lost Ann Althouse, you've lost a lot of people.
More oxygen for us, with the canary dead, said the miner.
----------============
with covid protocol the canary gets mechanical ventilation - democratical generator running inside the mine and exhausting oxygen needed for miners
I'm beyond fed up with this treatment of Biden and Trump.
Quaere: if that's how you are now, how will you be if the forces of D corrupt and erode the electoral process and ultimately steal the Presidency, House and/or Senate?
Vote R. Vote straight R down the line unless you can find somebody to the right of R.
It's the only way they'll learn.
"By the way, Robert Cook- Black Lives Matter currently redirects donations right to Joe Biden. You can say that Antifa/ BLM/ the Dems are all part of the same conspiracy, you can say that all three are perfect little angels who did nothing wrong (even Biden himself is backing off on this in public). Hell, you can even say Antifa is constantly acting in the name of BLM without being associated with them, and is infiltrated by Nazis like Huber and Grosskreutz... but in that case why do Dems let them roam the streets?"
You can say any kind of thing, like the mish-mash of unsupported gibberish above. That doesn't mean much or any of it is true.
"What you can't do is pretend there's some sort of distinction between Biden and his BLM terrorist allies."
Sure I can, and do: Biden, whom I do not support, he being as Republican a Democrat as can be, (and they're almost all Republicans now, except for a rare count'em-on-one-hand few), is in no way colluding with, connected to, or an advocate of any rioters or looters. The idea is HAHAHAHAHA-able!
Sure I can, and do: Biden, whom I do not support, he being as Republican a Democrat as can be, (and they're almost all Republicans now, except for a rare count'em-on-one-hand few), is in no way colluding with, connected to, or an advocate of any rioters or looters. The idea is HAHAHAHAHA-able!
Don't ask Cook to click on the "donate" to BLM button and see where it redirects.
Cook, like most communists, is all theory.
Here is what will happen, because it always happens.
The Democrats will say whatever needs said, regardless of what they said previously, or what they really believe, or even what they really want, and definitely regardless of what they will do. Then a bunch of voters who imagine themselves to be open to both parties and who think they vote for the best candidate will vote for the Democrat because he said the magic lie they were waiting for. This is usually accompanied by an explanation for how the Republican "lost them". You can't lose what you never had, and you are not bipartisan or fair if only one side's bullshit is accepted at face value.
That's just one of many common excuses for doing the wrong thing over and over, and then asking how it got so bad until the next time when you do it again.
"Biden, whom I do not support, he being as Republican a Democrat as can be, (and they're almost all Republicans now, except for a rare count'em-on-one-hand few), is in no way colluding with, connected to, or an advocate of any rioters or looters. "
Democrats are paying to get criminal looters and rioters out of jail, and paying their legal costs. Not to mention pushing to keep charges from even being filed. These include people in the Dem Presidential campaign, and those associated with it using money supposedly for the campaign. Republicans are paying to help the victims of these violent, selfish, lawless assholes.
If you are a Democrat, you have to be senile, irresponsible, and a blatant liar to lose Althouse, but that is some kind of a standard, I guess.
Juan Williams on 'The Five' today, seemed to sincerely believe that the rioting was being done by right-wing white supremacists, encouraged by Trump. Jesse Waters and Greg Gutfeld tried to call him on it but I bet he will be back tomorrow spouting the same nonsense.
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा